Four key takeaways from Trump's White House summit on Ukraine
has
hosted leaders from across Europe
as part of a flurry of diplomacy to find a path to
peace in Ukraine.
Coming just days after a disappointing summit with Russian president
Vladimir Putin
in Alaska, the pressure was on to make headway in a years-long conflict that the US president once said he could solve in 24 hours.
Below are some key points arising from the US president's range of bilateral and multilateral talks with the leaders of Ukraine, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato.
A meeting between Zelenskiy and Putin ... could it finally happen?
A bilateral meeting between Ukrainian president
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
and Vladimir Putin is something the Russian president has always resisted, urging for a list of preconditions to be met first, but the possibility may now be nearer than ever.
READ MORE
Donald Trump said after the White House talks: 'I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy. After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself.'
According to German chancellor
Friedrich Merz
, Putin told Trump in a call during Monday's White House meeting that he was ready to meet Zelenskiy 'within the next two weeks'. For his part, Zelenskiy reiterated on Monday that he was ready for talks with Putin.
Both Merz and the Finnish president, Alexander Stubbs, offered some pointed language on the topic, saying in separate press conferences that it remained to be seen if the Russian president had the 'courage' to go ahead with the meeting. Stubbs said: 'Putin is rarely to be trusted.'
So far, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov has said only that Putin was open to the 'idea' of such direct talks.
Need for security guarantees agreed – but details unclear
Although Trump poured cold water on the importance of a ceasefire, he did offer hope on US involvement in helping guarantee Ukraine's future security.
After welcoming Zelenskiy to the White House, he said: 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help', even if European countries need to be 'a first line of defence'.
Later, Trump said in a post that these guarantees would be 'co-ordinated' with the US.
On Monday morning, Zelenskiy described security guarantees as 'a key issue, a starting point towards ending the war' and appreciated Trump's indication that the US was ready to be part of that guarantee.
Zelenskiy said those guarantees would be 'formalised in some way in the next week or 10 days', which can prove to be a long time when it comes to diplomacy involving Trump's White House.
Trump believes he is very good at solving conflicts
The US president's desire for a Nobel peace prize is well known – who can forget the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity' established as part of a peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan this month – and it seemed clearly in his mind during his Oval Office meeting with Zelenskiy.
The 'peacemaker-in-chief' said he had ended six wars since he became president, with his administration claiming to have helped settle the conflicts between Israel and Iran, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, Cambodia and Thailand, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia.
A potential boost for the US arms industry
Trump's approach to foreign crises is peppered with efforts to find a way to establish economic opportunity for US industry, and Ukraine may be no different if a deal is finalised. Zelenskiy has, after all, previously had to negotiate the US president's desire for Ukraine's critical minerals as part of his rivalry with China.
On Monday, Zelenskiy indicated the price of obtaining security guarantees from the US included a pledge to buy $90bn of US weapons, primarily aircraft and air defence systems.
He added that the US would also buy into Ukraine's drone program, an area in which it has made significant strides since Russia's full-scale invasion began. - Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Intel needs Ireland: Why US stake could help Leixlip, not harm it
The US Government's plan to take a 10% stake in Intel poses big questions for the future of the embattled chipmaker and its global operations. Having largely missed out on the recent boom in chips to power AI, the California-based giant is struggling to catch up with rivals Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which have both benefited from the soaring demand for generative AI. Intel's operational lapses are reflected in its latest earnings, with its most recent quarterly profit from the end of June of €3.5bn lagging significantly behind Nvidia's €26.7bn and TSMC's €17.6bn. The White House's potential deal aims to help Intel strengthen its US operations, serving as another means for President Donald Trump to fulfil his promise to grow domestic business and bring US companies home. The significant investment, which the Trump administration is also justifying on national security grounds, will likely carry a list of terms and conditions, if similar previous deals are anything to go by. Last year, the US government took an ownership stake in US Steel as part of a merger agreement with Japan-based Nippon Steel, enabling the controversial takeover while maintaining veto power over certain investment decisions in the interest of national security. These included strategic decisions such as plant closures, import levels and technology transfers - powers that would help the government protect US jobs and safeguard domestic production. At the outset, it seems a similar deal between the White House and struggling chipmaker Intel could have significant ramifications for Ireland, where its Leixlip hub serves as the key gateway to the European market. But should its Leixlip operations, Intel's second-largest base after the US, employing almost 5,000 people, really be worried about this potential new partnership? Since 1989, Intel has invested more than €30bn in its Irish operations, the majority of which has been injected in the last few years. In 2023, the chipmaker opened its €17bn Fab 34 facility, the largest construction project ever undertaken in Ireland, according to Intel, doubling the chipmaker's manufacturing space at its Leixlip hub. In June last year, asset management firm Apollo Global committed €10bn to Intel for a 49% stake in the Fab 34 facility, which allowed the chipmaker to retain majority ownership while gaining access to additional funding for future expansions. Leixlip's "critical role" The Leixlip campus is also poised to produce the majority of its Intel 4 technology, which includes the company's extreme ultraviolet (EUV) chips, the most advanced semiconductor manufacturing technology on the market. According to Intel, EUVs play a 'critical role' in driving the company towards its goals of delivering five nodes in four years and regaining leadership in process technology by 2025. Intel's Irish base also seems to have escaped the worst of global restructuring measures brought in by CEO Lip-Bu Tan to cut its workforce by 20%, with the expected job losses from its current round of layoffs far less than what would be considered proportionate. Intel's European operations are extremely intertwined, and the Leixlip facility is the epicentre. The Fab 34 facility in Leixlip is also part of what the company calls a 'first-of-its-kind end-to-end leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing value chain in Europe,' with the site being combined with a wafer fabrication facility in Germany and an assembly and test facility in Poland. EU chip production The company is also nicely positioned to benefit from the EU's goal to increase its global share of chip production to 20% by 2030 as the bloc seeks to enhance competitiveness on the back of the eye-opening Draghi report published last year. The EU is ready to give away billions to enable domestic semiconductor and chip manufacturing. If Intel moves its operations back to the US, it risks losing out on significant gains that it cannot afford to miss. While a government stake may help its financial woes, Intel's biggest problem is its lack of paying customers, a problem that President Trump could actually help fix by putting pressure on other US companies with large European operations to switch to Intel for their manufacturing needs. The US wants Intel to be a leader in chipmaking. For that to happen, Intel also needs to lead in Europe, for which a European hub is critical to prepare for a growing semiconductor market with ample money to spend. If it plays its cards right, Intel can simultaneously increase its customer base and benefit from the EU's push to strengthen its semiconductor industry. This will require a skilled workforce and a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility with a strong gateway to Europe. As much as Ireland needs Intel, Intel needs Ireland.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
State to levy fines on drone operators for breaches of new regulations
The State will levy fines on drone operators for regulatory breaches as part of a new framework to guide regulation of the sector published on Wednesday. The National Policy Framework for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) – commonly called drones – sets out a set of 16 actions under the new framework announced by the Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien. Mr O'Brien said the field of UAS presents 'exciting opportunities for business and the public sector to boost productivity and improve service provision' but noted that the 'rapid pace of expansion' of its usage has left communities with 'real concerns and uncertainty'. He said that the framework would be a 'living document' in order to keep pace with the evolution of the sector and had been informed by consultation with the public and the drone industry. READ MORE As part of the framework, the Department of Transport will introduce fixed charge offences for breaches of drone regulations. Responsibility for the implementation of these fines, will fall on an 'inter-agency mechanism' established between the Irish Aviation Authority, An Garda Síochána and the Data Protection Commission, which will investigate drone offences. The Irish Aviation Authority will train members of An Garda Síochána to enforce the legislation for the sector, while the Garda will publicise the conviction and enforcement actions relating to these offences where possible to act as a 'deterrent'. 'I don't think the Department of Finance have any respect for the tourism industry' Listen | 41:44 A steering group has been established to develop a national plan for the implementation of 'rules of the road' for unmanned aircraft traffic management, dubbed U-space by the sector, in Irish airspace. A working group on UAS geographical zones – restricted airspace for drones – will also be created to 'develop transparent processes and procedures' and to aide the 'integration of UAS into our airspace and the impact on society and the environment'. 'Concerns in respect of privacy, safety, security, and the environment (including noise) will need to be mitigated in order to support societal acceptance of a UAS services sector in Ireland,' the framework says, while 'public buy-in and support for UAS technology is hard won and easily lost.' The chief executive of Manna, the leading Irish drone delivery company, Bobby Healy, said the company welcomed the publication of the framework. 'This is a pivotal moment by establishing a clear, forward-looking regulatory foundation, the Government has laid the groundwork for a safe, innovative, and globally competitive drone economy,' he said. He said the policy signals that Ireland is 'ready to lead in UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) innovation, attract investment, and foster high-tech job creation – powered by responsible regulation and collective ambition.' Mr Healy said 'the Government has also signalled its intention to support the infrastructure needed for drone services to thrive.' Labour Party Dublin West councillor John Walsh said the Government had stalled the framework for three years and response was 'not only belated but inadequate' and said it focuses on promoting commercial opportunities whiling paying 'only lip service to genuine public concerns'. He described the public consultation as 'ludicrous' and suggested it was a 'box ticking exercise'. 'Every stakeholder seems to have had their say, other than members of the public who will be directly impacted by commercial drone flights.'
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jerome Powell to deliver Jackson Hole address under fire on multiple fronts
Jerome Powell's speech at the Federal Reserve's August summit in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, is always a high-stakes moment. This year, the central bank's chair takes the podium under fire – facing fierce attacks from US President Donald Trump and a growing insurgency within his own institution. Trump has engaged in a months-long assault on Powell, calling him a 'stubborn mule' and 'numbskull' for refusing to cut borrowing costs this year over concerns that the president's tariffs will inflame inflation. Now, almost six months in advance of schedule, Trump has been gifted a chance to sow more discord within the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) by picking a loyalist to fill an empty seat on the Fed's board. Stephen Miran, the economist he has chosen to replace Adriana Kugler following her abrupt departure from the central bank's policy-setting board, has endorsed Trump's calls for interest rate cuts. He has also pushed for an overhaul in Fed governance that would hand presidents the power to dismiss the likes of Powell at will. READ MORE Analysts expect something like fireworks inside the ordinarily staid central bank. 'Miran is not somebody who's going to be enveloped in and overwhelmed by the traditions inside the Fed,' said Steven Blitz, chief US economist at TS Lombard. 'He will be the agent provocateur representing Trump at the FOMC. And proudly so. He'll make no bones about it.' It would make Powell's job in Wyoming on Friday, when markets will pore over every word in his speech, more complicated than normal. [ The moment Jerome Powell stood up to Trump a reminder how few dare to contradict him Opens in new window ] 'We are in this uncomfortable equilibrium, where we don't know where things go next,' said Gennadiy Goldberg, chief rates strategist at TD Securities. 'The market wants a bit of confirmation from Powell on Friday as to whether he is open to cutting rates.' Miran is not Powell's only problem. Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, two Fed governors who both made the Treasury's 11-person longlist to succeed Powell in May, dissented and backed cuts at the central bank's July vote. [ Scott Bessent calls for inquiry into 'the entire Federal Reserve institution' Opens in new window ] Assuming Miran is confirmed by the Senate in time for the September 16-17 Fed meeting, that would leave Powell facing three dissenters from within his own seven-strong board. A schism of that magnitude last occurred in 1988 – and would be seized upon by Trump and his supporters as evidence that the chair was losing his grip. Mixed US economic data is adding to Powell's dilemma as he seeks to balance the Fed's dual mandates of maximum employment and stable prices. The Teton Range seen from the Jackson Hole valley in Wyoming. Photograph: Ryan Dorgan/The New York Times Trump's sweeping duties on trading partners have yet to produce the sort of surge in inflation seen during Joe Biden's time in the White House, but they have clouded the outlook enough to leave rate-setters wondering if they have much room to cut. Investors leapt on a relatively benign consumer price index figure last week to fully price in at least a quarter-point cut in mid-September. But insiders view the Fed's vote next month as a far closer call than markets. While a gloomy jobs report for July has raised concerns about the health of the labour market, a hot producer price index figure brought worries that tariffs were about to hit US shoppers. Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, said tariffs had created 'a stagflationary impulse' that had complicated the Fed's job 'dramatically'. [ Will Donald Trump fire Jerome Powell? 'I don't rule out anything. But it's unlikely. Unless …' Opens in new window ] Some Fed-watchers say Powell's view would depend on whether he remains focused on the unemployment rate as the prime indicator of the health of the US labour market. At 4.2 per cent, the rate remains low, suggesting the sharp slowdown in hiring this summer might be down to supply-side factors, such as a fall in immigration, which the central bank can do little to counteract. Marc Giannoni, chief US economist at Barclays, said: 'Powell warned [after the July meeting] that payrolls could be close to zero, he also said the unemployment rate may not move up much because of supply-side factors. If he repeats that, then that puts the expectations for rate cuts back closer to 50 per cent.' Bets of a September cut have edged lower in recent days, to an 85 per cent chance as of Tuesday, on the back of the PPI report and Fed officials' comments that have tempered expectations. But doves argue that, at 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent, the Fed's benchmark range remains in 'restrictive' territory, limiting growth at a time when the US labour market might be on the turn and the economy showing signs of slowing. More bad data on jobs would raise the prospect of the likes of Waller backing a jumbo 0.5 percentage point cut – in line with calls from US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent for more aggressive action. Trump's demands, meanwhile, remain extreme: he wants borrowing costs slashed to just 1 per cent, claiming this would save the government hundreds of billions of dollars on debt repayments. 'I don't think the Department of Finance have any respect for the tourism industry' Listen | 41:44 The big question for Miran is how he would keep pushing for such steep rate cuts while coming across as credible. He struggled in April to reassure investors during a market eruption after Trump launched his trade war, and previously wrote about the merits of devaluing the dollar and a so-called Mar-a-Lago accord to realign the global economy. 'He's there to try to see how far he can shift the Fed's 'Overton window',' said Derek Tang, of LH Meyer, referring to the concept that describes the range of ideas considered acceptable in public discourse. Miran, now chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, will not attend Jackson Hole, though his fellow council members Pierre Yared and Aaron Hedlund will be there. Ed Glaeser, who taught Miran microeconomics in his first semester at Harvard, expected his former pupil to echo the president's calls for rate cuts, but played down the degree to which he would be a disruptive force within the Fed. 'I suspect he would not be nominated if he did not believe that he should be cutting rates and he will certainly come into it with a pro rate-cutting view,' Glaeser said. 'But he will listen to his colleagues and do his best to be a decent member of this group.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
