BRYAN DEAN WRIGHT: John Brennan was my boss at the CIA. He belongs in prison
Here's why.
The CIA released fresh details yesterday about the creation nearly 10 years ago of the agency's Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) of Russia's influence campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. It found that Russian President Vladimir Putin "aspired" to help then-candidate Donald Trump win the election. That assessment – ordered by then-President Barack Obama and executed by Brennan – ignited the Trump-Russia hoax that would haunt Trump's presidency for four years.
We're now learning five key details Brennan used to cook the books to ensure maximum damage to Trump.
He told The Wall Street Journal in January of 2017 he never read it and gave it no particular credence.
He was lying.
As his former staffers now admit, Brennan specifically pushed for the inclusion of the dossier in the ICA despite explicit warnings from his top operational and analytical management that the dossier "didn't meet the most basic [of] tradecraft standards."
Brennan said he didn't care.
As we're now learning, he said he wanted it included because it "fit narrative consistency" — aka Trump Russia collusion — and that then-FBI Director James Comey was demanding the same.
That's shocking, because both Comey and Brennan's agencies had investigated its allegations in the fall of 2016 and found them not to be credible.
But both Comey and Brennan still wanted it in, simply and clearly to destroy President Trump.
As we're now learning, Brennan demanded that his agency take the lead in drafting the ICA, intentionally blocking out other intel agencies and the National Intelligence Council.
As the new report confirms, that decision "depart[ed] significantly from standard procedures for formal IC assessments."
But why would Brennan do that?
As a former CIA officer, I know why: He wanted to control the authors (his employees), their assessment, any dissent, and their careers if they crossed him.
As the new report confirms, "Direct engagement in the ICA's development [by agency head Brennan] was highly unusual in both scope and intensity. This exceptional level of senior involvement likely influenced participants, altered normal review processes, and ultimately compromised analytic rigor."
In other words, Brennan knew he could make or break the careers of his analysts. And so he did — ensuring that he got the exact ICA he wanted, which included the junk dossier and a single-source intel report on fabricated "Trump-Russia Collusion."
As we're now learning, CIA analysts felt "jammed" by Brennan's timeline to produce the ICA by late December 2016 — despite the fact that "the election had concluded, and the ICA was essentially a post-mortem analysis."
The highly compressed timeline was "atypical" for an ICA, which "ordinarily can take months to prepare, especially for assessments of such length, complexity, and political sensitivity."
But Brennan didn't care. He wanted this ICA done by the time Trump got into office.
The new report confirms that Brennan and Comey shared the ICA with "more than 200 U.S. officials. This is unusually high for such a highly compartmented product…"
In other words, they briefed it to leak it — to destroy Trump.
In fact, that's what The New York Times suspected, too. As they asked their readers in January of 2017, why would Brennan and Comey have briefed and shared the discredited dossier "to multiple people in Congress and the executive branch, virtually assuring it would be leaked?"
The answer: Brennan and Comey spread the ICA (and dossier) far and wide to ensure it all leaked and hobbled Donald Trump — and destroyed his presidency.
Bottom line: John Brennan, James Comey, and their fellow anti-Trumpers in the U.S. intel community intentionally tried to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump — with a tightly controlled, scripted, rushed, and poorly sourced ICA (and dossier).
In doing so, they tried to destroy not just President Trump, but also the Republic itself. And that's why this still matters.
These men thought they knew what was best for America, and they didn't give a damn what voters like you thought. It was their country – not yours – and they were willing to act with their profound powers to destroy a politician they didn't like.
That's why these men deserve to rot in prison, along with anyone in the Obama White House or Clinton campaign who colluded with them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Proposes UFC Event in Wild Location
Trump Proposes UFC Event in Wild Location originally appeared on Athlon Sports. President Donald Trump's relationship with the UFC is well-documented. He has attended multiple events, and fighters like Conor McGregor have visited him at the White House, reinforcing the alliance between the MMA promotion and his political brand. The UFC's massive popularity, especially among younger male demographics, makes it a centerpiece for Trump and his supporters, who include the UFC's CEO and President, Dana White. Advertisement Now, Trump has floated a bold and unconventional idea to celebrate America's upcoming 250th anniversary: a UFC championship fight on the White House grounds. Donald Trump and Dana WhiteEd Mulholland-GettyImages During a speech at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, Trump revealed his desire for a large-scale event featuring a UFC fight with up to 25,000 spectators as part of the "America250" festivities. 'Does anybody watch UFC? The great Dana White? We're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there,' Trump said. While the announcement energized Trump's supporters, the feasibility and appropriateness of hosting a violent combat sport on White House property were clearly not in the president's consideration. The White House has never before been used as a venue for a pay-per-view sporting event, let alone a sport with a fan base as rowdy as MMA. Advertisement Overlooked in his proclamation were the logistical hurdles, including Secret Service approvals and crowd control, that could make the plan more aspirational than practical. The UFC's involvement adds another layer of controversy. While the organization has grown into a mainstream sports powerhouse, it has also faced criticism over fighter pay, benefits, and overall dwindling quality. As of now, the proposal lacks concrete details, and the idea is likely nothing more than mere political theater. Given Trump's history of controversy, however, the possibility cannot be entirely ruled out. Related: The UFC Could Be On The Verge Of A Huge Partnership Related: Dana White & Mark Zuckerberg Announce UFC-Meta Partnership: Enhanced Fan Experience, But at What Cost to Fighters? This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 4, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Star Lawyer Who Defended Trump's Family Issues Stark Warning About Presidency
The super-lawyer who kept Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump out of legal jeopardy during Robert Mueller's Russian investigation now fears Donald Trump will demolish the very institutions that protected them. 'I have never been as concerned as to whether our system can withstand the pressure it is being put to,' Abbe Lowell told the Financial Times, warning that the White House is 'pushing the tree to the point that it could break,' noting that during Trump's first term, critics of the president said democracy was 'tested but didn't break.' The legal eagle has defended several high-profile Democrat figures—including Bill Clinton and Joe Biden's son, Hunter. But he is perhaps best known for his high-stakes work for Trump's daughter and son-in-law. In June 2017, the Daily Beast reported that Kushner, 44, who is married to Ivanka, 43, had hired Lowell to join his defense team as Robert Mueller's Russia probe heated up. The following month, Ivanka followed suit, tasking the prominent lawyer to provide 'legal and ethical advice' as investigators examined possible campaign ties to Moscow, bringing both Trump family members under the same high-powered counsel. Now, Lowell says, Ivanka father's behavior in his second term threatens to smash the constitutional 'wall' separating courts from executive muscle. 'The crack you put in the wall today becomes the gash tomorrow,' Lowell had told Congress in 1998. That was 'not a bad prophecy', Lowell told the FT, saying that the structure is 'more than cracked, not yet crumbled.' In an attempt to fight back, Lowell, 73, has launched Lowell & Associates to combat what he calls government 'over-reach.' Nine law firms, he says, have already 'buckled' under Trump-era intimidation—agreeing to nearly $1 billion in work that advances the president's agenda while muzzling internal critics. Several defectors from those firms have signed up to Lowell's boutique organization, Lowell said, with many more showing interest. Clients include New York Attorney General Letitia James—now under federal investigation after winning a massive civil-fraud judgment against Trump—and former DHS official Miles Taylor, whose security clearance vanished after he blasted the president. Both hope Lowell's aggressive strategy can blunt a barrage of executive orders targeting universities, NGOs and even courthouses. 'I don't know the administration has the ability, breadth, depth and expertise to handle all' the resulting lawsuits, Lowell said. Yet the veteran litigator is under no illusion every legal action will stick. With a Supreme Court that 'believes in an executive branch with broad power,' reports the FT, Lowell says challengers must craft cases on First Amendment grounds rather than on presidential authority. Because if Trump diminishes the authority of the country's courts, Lowell warns, 'there will just be rubble from that wall.' The Daily Beast has approached the White House for comment.
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
Police in one Colorado city work with community partners, repurpose stolen bikes for those in need
Bike thefts are a bigger problem than you might think. Nearly 150,000 bikes were reportedly stolen across the country last year, and it's rare that an owner gets their bike back. A law enforcement department in the Denver metro area has started a program that hopes to solve an issue that has resulted from all of that theft. CBS The Wheat Ridge Police Department is not necessarily a very large police department, and when they come across bikes -- be they part of an investigation for evidence, whether it's because they are stolen or whether they're just found in unclaimed property -- they find themselves with too many bikes and nowhere to put them. In an attempt to fix that issue, they've partnered up with a couple of community organizations that are taking those bikes and giving them back to the community. Steve Selly works for the city of Wheat Ridge and is part of the group that loads up the bikes and gets them to the community groups. "It seems like there have been more and more bikes available over the course of the last, I'd say, two to three years," he said. CBS Kelly Blinn is part of one those community groups, and said the bikes sometimes go to students. "This can help us connect high school students or, you know, people who can't afford a bike without access to transportation," Blinn said. Wheat Ridge police spokesman Alex Rose said bikes are becoming a more common item picked up by police departments across the Denver metro area, and there's a question of what to do with them. "This is the best thing that we can do with these bikes and this property in general, to put it to good use," he said. "You collect a lot of evidence through the course of all of these hundreds and thousands of investigations that happen throughout the course of the year," said Rose. Rose said he's proud of the program that gets bikes back into the community and out of police storage. "We need to find homes for them, and so the more relationships that we have with folks in the community that are interested in transportation and interested in giving these bikes some TLC and giving them to families who really need them, or sending them to places where they could go to good use, that's a win win for everybody," he said. Rose says there are some things bike owners can do in the unfortunate case that a bike were to get stolen. "Write down that serial number, because if your bike gets lost or it gets stolen, that is a key to report that to your local law enforcement agency," Rose said. When the serial number of a stolen bike is shared with police, if it ends up in another Colorado municipality, there's a chance that serial number is going to pop up on another jurisdiction's database. That means there's a better chance a stolen bike might be found, even if it's not in the town or city it was stolen from.
