Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse
Last Saturday, during a visit to the country, US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza.
But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the military offensive in Gaza and annexing parts of the shattered enclave.
The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a US-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel.
After Netanyahu met Witkoff last Thursday, a senior Israeli official said that 'an understanding was emerging between Washington and Israel,' of a need to shift from a truce to a comprehensive deal that would 'release all the hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarize the Gaza Strip,' – Israel's key conditions for ending the war.
A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Sunday that the envoy's visit was seen in Israel as 'very significant.'
But later on Sunday, the Israeli official signalled that pursuit of a deal would be pointless, threatening more force:
'An understanding is emerging that Hamas is not interested in a deal and therefore the prime minister is pushing to release the hostages while pressing for military defeat.
Israel's Channel 12 on Monday cited an official from his office as saying that Netanyahu was inclining towards expanding the offensive and seizing the entire Palestinian enclave.
What a 'military defeat' might mean, however, is up for debate within the Israeli leadership. Some Israeli officials have suggested that Israel might declare it was annexing parts of Gaza as a means to pressure the militant group.
Others, like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir want to see Israel impose military rule in Gaza before annexing it and re-establishing the Jewish settlements Israel evicted 20 years ago.
The Israeli military, which has pushed back at such ideas throughout the war, was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defence officials.
While some in the political leadership are pushing for expanding the offensive, the military is concerned that doing so will endanger the 20 hostages who are still alive, the officials said.
Israeli Army Radio reported on Monday that military chief Eyal Zamir has become increasingly frustrated with what he describes as a lack of strategic clarity by the political leadership, concerned about being dragged into a war of attrition with Hamas militants.
A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) declined to comment on the report but said that the military has plans in store.
'We have different ways to fight the terror organization, and that's what the army does,' Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani said.
On Tuesday, Qatar and Egypt endorsed a declaration by France and Saudi Arabia outlining steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which included a call on Hamas to hand over its arms to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority.
Hamas has repeatedly said it won't lay down arms. But it has told mediators it was willing to quit governance in Gaza for a non-partisan ruling body, according to three Hamas officials.
It insists that the post-war Gaza arrangement must be agreed upon among the Palestinians themselves and not dictated by foreign powers.
Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar suggested on Monday that the gaps were still too wide to bridge.
'We would like to have all our hostages back. We would like to see the end of this war. We always prefer to get there by diplomatic means, if possible. But of course, the big question is, what will be the conditions for the end of the war?' he told journalists in Jerusalem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump pledges to raise tariffs on India over Russian oil. Why this may not deter New Delhi
Donald Trump has doubled down on India purchasing oil from Russia. The US president has threatened to raise tariffs 'substantially' on goods over its continued purchase of crude. But New Delhi, it seems, will continue to source oil from Moscow read more A Russian crude oil tanker transits the Bosphorus in Istanbul. Trump has threatened to raise tariffs on India over its purchase of Russian oil. File image/Reuters To buy or not to buy… That's the question India is having to ask after US President Donald Trump has stepped up his attacks against the country for its purchase of oil from the Vladimir Putin-led nation. On Monday, the US leader threatened to 'substantially' raise tariffs on goods from India over its purchase of Russian oil. This came after Trump has already announced a 25 per cent tariff on New Delhi along with a 'penalty' for buying Russian crude. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since last week, Trump has taken aim at India along with his officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, questioning India's purchase of Russian oil. However, the question is — will Prime Minister Modi acquiesce to Trump's demands and stop buying Russian oil? The answer: it seems quite unlikely, and here's why. Trump's threats to India on Russian oil The current tension between India and the US stems from when Donald Trump first announced that he would slap tariffs of up to 100 per cent on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a peace deal with Ukraine by August 7-9. Then last week, Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's levies on US products and purchases of Russian oil and military equipment. While India was 'our friend', it had always bought most of its military equipment from Russia and was 'Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine — all things not good'! Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on July 30. This was followed up by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stating that the purchase of Russian crude was a 'point of irritation' in US-Indo ties, telling Fox News that while India was an 'ally' and 'strategic partner', Delhi's purchase of Russian oil was hampering its relationship with Washington. US President Donald Trump and some of his officials from the administration have been pressuring India to forego its oil trade with Russia in the past one week. File image/Reuters Then on Sunday (August 3), Trump's top aide accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by buying oil from Moscow. 'What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia,' said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of Trump's most influential aides, in an interview with Fox News, adding, 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD And Trump himself doubled down on the pressure on Monday (August 4) with a fresh post on Truth Social, in which he accused India of buying 'massive amounts' of oil from Russia and then 'selling it on the open market for big profits.' 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA,' he said. India's purchase of Russian oil The strain in India-US ties has also to do with oil, namely Russian oil. Earlier, India purchased most of its oil from West Asia, but this changed after Russia began selling its oil at discounted rates after the West shunned it as punishment for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In fact, an US Energy Information Administration report reveals that India increased its purchases of Russian oil more than sixfold after the conflict broke out. Moreover, the International Energy Agency notes that 70 per cent of Russian crude was exported to India in 2024. Compiling data, Bloomberg reports that India, on an average, has been buying Russian crude at about 1.7 million barrels a day so far this year. Bloomberg reports that India, on an average, has been buying Russian crude at about 1.7 million barrels a day so far this year. Representational image/Reuters India's stance on Russian oil On Monday (August 4), a little after Trump threatened additional tariffs on India, India responded to the situation, indicating that it wouldn't stop purchasing crude and even stated that 'the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable'. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal in a statement said that India has 'been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He called out the US and Europe's double standards noting that while they criticised India, they themselves were carrying out trade with Russia. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion. 'The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of €67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at €17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5 million tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. 'Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' He further noted that India began importing from Russia traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability. Other officials in the Indian administration note that despite Trump's threats, India will continue its trade with Russia for a number of reasons. Representational image/Reuters Let the Russian oil flow Other officials in the Indian administration note that despite Trump's threats, India will continue its trade with Russia for a number of reasons. Firstly, they noted that there was a growing sense within the administration that it shouldn't allow for American policymaking to shape its choices on vital energy supplies for its 1.4 billion people. Analysts and officials from the government also note that if even India suspended its oil trade with Moscow it wouldn't help the US. As Pankaj Saran, a former Indian deputy national security adviser and ambassador to Moscow, told the New York Times, 'What we also have to keep in mind is that even if India may cut to zero, China is not going to. You will have a kind of a bizarre situation where Russia will sell to China at cheap prices, and so you would have China being the ultimate beneficiary.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, Indian experts note that it was owing to its purchase of oil that helped keep global oil prices in check. Indians kept the Russian oil flowing at the capped price, helping to shrink Russia's revenue but also ensuring that global prices would remain in check. One source was quoted as telling the Mint, 'Had India not absorbed discounted Russian crude combined with OPEC production cuts of 5.86 mb/d, global oil prices could have surged well beyond the March 2022 peak of US$137/bbl, intensifying inflationary pressures worldwide.' In fact, former US ambassador to India Eric Garcetti had lauded New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil in 2024. In the now widely circulated video, Garcetti is heard saying, 'They (India) bought Russian oil because we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil at a price cap. That was not a violation or anything. It was actually the design of the policy because, as a commodity, we didn't want the oil prices going up, and they fulfilled that.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD "India brought Russian Oil, because we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil...", says US ambassador Garcetti on India buying Russian oil ; Adds,'no Price Cap violation, we did not want oil prices to go up..' — Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) May 11, 2024 Experts also noted that India's contracts are long-term and 'it's not so simple to just stop buying overnight'. Trade research body GTRI also noted, 'India's oil trade with Russia has taken place with full transparency and broad understanding with the US. One of the key reasons India stepped up Russian oil purchases was to help stabilise global oil markets after Western sanctions disrupted traditional supply chains. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'By maintaining diversified and affordable energy access, India contributed to preventing a global oil price shock. Trump's decision to raise tariffs on India citing oil trade is not only unjustified — it ignores market realities misrepresents trade data, and undermines a key strategic partnership in the Indo-Pacific.' India also has to consider the price of moving away from Russian oil. New Delhi would have to pay more if it went with sources of oil like Saudi Arabia, who sells at a higher price to Asian countries because of a policy called the 'Asian premium' maintained by the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Ospec). We will just have to wait and watch to see what happens next — will Trump drop his demand or will India give in. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Chinese engineers' ..., the 'important angle' Microsoft reportedly missed while revealing SharePoint hack
Microsoft announced last month that Chinese state-sponsored hackers exploited vulnerabilities in its SharePoint collaboration software to breach hundreds of companies and government agencies, including the National Nuclear Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security. However, the tech giant omitted a crucial detail: China-based engineers have been maintaining the very software that was compromised, as reported by ProPublica. According to screenshots viewed by ProPublica, Microsoft's internal work-tracking system showed China-based employees recently fixing bugs for SharePoint "OnPrem" — the exact version targeted in the cyberattacks. The revelation raises serious questions about potential security risks when foreign personnel maintain critical US government systems. Microsoft's China team has 'years' of SharePoint access ProPublica's investigation revealed that Microsoft's China-based engineering team has been responsible for maintaining SharePoint software for years, supervised by a US-based engineer. The company stated that work is "already underway to shift this work to another location" following the security breach. The timing proves particularly concerning given that Microsoft's analysis showed Chinese hackers were exploiting SharePoint weaknesses as early as July 7. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch on July 8, hackers successfully bypassed the initial fix, forcing the company to issue additional "more robust protections." Government systems potentially exposed to foreign oversight Cybersecurity experts warn that allowing China-based personnel to perform technical support on US government systems creates major security vulnerabilities. Chinese laws grant officials broad authority to collect data, making it difficult for citizens or companies to resist direct requests from security forces. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has identified China as the "most active and persistent cyber threat" to US government and critical infrastructure networks. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency confirmed that the SharePoint vulnerabilities enable hackers to "fully access SharePoint content" and execute malicious code. This latest revelation follows ProPublica's previous reporting that Microsoft has relied on foreign workers, including China-based engineers, to maintain Defense Department cloud systems for over a decade. In response, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth launched a review of tech companies' use of foreign-based engineers, while senators from both parties have demanded more information about Microsoft's practices.
New Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Andhra BJP chief Madhav visits quarry victims, highlights Centre's aid to Palnadu
GUNTUR: BJP State President PVN Madhav toured Palnadu district on Monday, addressing local issues, meeting party workers, and reviewing relief measures following the quarry accident in Ballikurava, and met injured workers at GBR Hospital. He urged improved safety at quarries and assured full NDA support to victims' families. Madhav highlighted Centre-backed projects, including 4,400 km highways, Rs 3,000 crore for Amaravati's ORR, and infrastructure for tobacco farmers. He said efforts are underway to strengthen BJP at the constituency level under PM Modi's leadership. As part of the 'Sarathi' outreach, he held a 'Chai Pe Charcha', joined a rally with TDP MLA Chadalavada Aravind Babu, and announced Tiranga rallies on August 15 and a public meeting for nomadic communities in Vijayawada on August 30.
