logo
Japan's railgun ready to zap Chinese hypersonic missiles

Japan's railgun ready to zap Chinese hypersonic missiles

Asia Times22-04-2025

Japan's ship-mounted railgun offers a cost-effective and rapid response to potential missile saturation threats by utilizing electromagnetic energy to launch projectiles at hypersonic velocities.
This month, Naval News reported that the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) disclosed the deployment of its advanced railgun aboard the test ship JS Asuka, marking a significant milestone in electromagnetic weaponry.
Developed by Japan's Ground Systems Research Center (GSRC) under the Ministry of Defense's Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency (ATLA), railgun research began in 2016 and achieved its first shipboard firing test in October 2023.
The weapon system demonstrates enhanced muzzle velocity, reaching 2,000 meters per second, and stability for firing up to 120 rounds, overcoming challenges of rail erosion and projectile flight stability. Current research aims to transition to a complete 'gun system,' integrating continuous firing, flight stability improvements and a tailored fire control system.
Japan's railgun could bolster naval missile defenses, provide new options for land-based artillery such as counter-battery fire and coastal strikes, and theoretically contribute to intercepting specific high-speed missile threats. However, a miniaturized power supply remains pivotal for practical deployment.
Japan also collaborates with France and Germany's Research Institute of Saint-Louis to advance railgun technologies, reflecting international scientific cooperation. This breakthrough positions Japan's railgun as a cornerstone for future defense systems, promising technological and operational maturity through FY 2026.
Unlike the US Navy, which halted its railgun project in July 2021 because of significant power, overheating and rail wear challenges, Japan continues to pursue the technology to address the possible shortcomings of missile-based defense and strike capabilities.
Missiles offer powerful long-range strike options but are extremely expensive and limited by shipboard magazine capacity. US Navy destroyers and cruisers carry only 96–122 missiles in their Vertical Launch System (VLS) cells.
During operations against Houthi rebel forces from 2023 to 2025, the US expended hundreds of difficult-to-replace, multi-million-dollar missiles to down relatively cheap drones and ballistic missiles, highlighting an unsustainable cost curve and dangerously shallow magazines.
Japan faces a similar problem. In December 2022, Kyodo News reported that Japan had only 60% of the interceptor missile stockpiles deemed necessary for national defense.
Underscoring the missile threat, Newsweek reported in March 2025 that China has significantly increased the number of its missiles capable of hitting Japan.
According to the report, new bases in China's Jilin and Shandong provinces house three types of missiles—the DF-17 medium-range ballistic missile and the CJ-10 and CJ-100 ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCM), which can penetrate Japan's existing missile defenses.
Beyond limited magazine depth, the inability to reload VLS cells at sea presents another major constraint.
In a March 2024 article for the Georgetown Studies Review, Tyler Koteskey mentions that despite their effectiveness, US Mk41 VLS must be reloaded in port. Koteskey notes that early attempts to install foldable cranes on US vessels failed, given the challenges of loading heavy canisters of munitions in rough seas.
He adds that, depending on the availability of such facilities, returning to a port capable of reloading VLS can take weeks. He stresses that large-scale missile salvo attacks could rapidly deplete US VLS magazines in a high-end combat scenario.
Japan is already building large Aegis System Equipped Vessels (ASEVs) to compensate for magazine limitations. However, concentrating so much capability on a few high-value ships makes them prime targets for North Korea and China attacks.
Railguns may offer a critical solution to these missile defense bottlenecks. In a December 2011 Proceedings article, Maxwell Cooper notes that railguns can deliver many rounds at distances comparable to most missiles with the same lethality and accuracy, while at lower costs and greater quantities.
Cooper explains that railguns fire projectiles at hypersonic speeds, with the round itself using its massive kinetic energy for destructive effects—no explosive filling is required. He also suggests that rounds could be equipped with GPS units for greater accuracy and that the absence of explosive propellant frees up some magazine space.
However, while railgun rounds are smaller and cheaper than missiles, they still require substantial onboard power and projectile storage.
Further, Cooper mentions that the lack of a capable multi-mission gun has forced US Navy commanders to use expensive, limited, high-end missiles for all types of targets, creating a gap in the ability to economically engage lower-end threats such as patrol boats, undefended coastal targets and basic ballistic missiles, which would otherwise be engaged with low-cost gun rounds.
Railguns could also provide an economical means to counter saturation missile attacks. An April 2022 US Congressional Research Service (CRS) report mentions that it takes 300 seconds to detect a missile launch signature, track the projectile, and calculate a vector for defensive projectiles.
The report states that an 11-kilogram railgun projectile can disperse more than 500 three-gram tungsten impactors capable of destroying incoming missiles through sheer kinetic energy.
While railguns offer promise, Japan still faces critical questions: Can Japan integrate and scale the technology fast enough to counter China's growing missile arsenal? And, can it avoid concentrating too much capability on a few vulnerable ships?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kashmir air clash heralds rise of system-of-systems warfare
Kashmir air clash heralds rise of system-of-systems warfare

Asia Times

time19-05-2025

  • Asia Times

Kashmir air clash heralds rise of system-of-systems warfare

The April 2025 India-Pakistan air clashes were not just an air battle, but a masterclass in system-of-systems airpower—showing that in modern warfare, it's the network, not the jet, that wins, and Southeast Asia's mixed-fleet air forces should be paying close attention. At the tactical level, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Pakistan used an 'ABC system'—ground-based radars (A), fighter aircraft (B), and airborne warning systems (C)—to coordinate the detection and engagement of Indian aircraft, with J-10C fighters firing long-range missiles guided by Saab 2000 Erieye airborne early warning & control (AEW&C) planes. SCMP highlighted that this real-time data sharing among sensors, missile launchers, and battle managers marks a notable departure from traditional air combat, where individual jets managed detection and engagement separately. As to what ties this system together, Gaston Dubois mentions in an Aviacionline article that Pakistan's domestic Link-17 enabled the interconnection of combat platforms from diverse origins into a unified and coherent tactical network. Dubois says that this network-centric design enables the creation of a real-time operational overview, supports dynamic target allocation, and provides an advantage in decision-making against opponents who have disjointed information streams or inadequate system compatibility. He observes that while India has deployed over 70 aircraft, Pakistan has only 40; however, Pakistan optimized its combat effectiveness through an integrated system of sensors and data connections, allowing it to achieve informational dominance and shared situational awareness to leverage the capabilities of the PL-15E missile fully. This feat required Pakistan to execute a relatively complex kill chain, involving the detection, tracking, and engagement of targets, with evident success, says Fabian Hoffman in an article for The Spectator. Hoffman's observation highlights that Pakistan's edge in air combat came from the speed and cohesion of its decision-making network rather than just superior hardware or numbers. In an article for The China Academy, Wang Xiangsui and Charriot Zhai state that Pakistan's advantage lies in the simplification of its fighter aircraft fleet, comprising only six types and sourcing all fighter acquisitions from China since 2000. Conversely, they highlight that India operates fourteen types of fighters from five different nations, which significantly increases the complexity involved in integrating data links. Although the Indian Air Force (IAF) does not lag in the level of individual fighter designs, their Western and Russian avionics and missile technologies are incompatible. Consequently, Wang and Zhai mention that the fighters from France and Russia in India's arsenal occasionally struggle to communicate with one another and couldn't guide each other's missiles. This lack of interoperability exposes a downside of having a diverse range of platforms, which was once considered advantageous but now undermines the efficiency of networked combat. These operational lessons from the recent India-Pakistan air skirmishes reinforce the idea of operationalizing airpower as an ecosystem, rather than relying on individual platforms. In a June 2019 article for The Mitchell Forum, Peter Mattes mentions that an integrated air defense system (IADS) is composed of interdependent but diverse elements such as radars, command systems, communications networks, weapon platforms, and personnel, organized to perform surveillance, battle management, and weapons control. Mattes says that rather than acting independently, these components operate in a fused, parallel network enabled by modern communications and data fusion. He notes that fighter aircraft are not standalone assets but serve within this system to provide defensive counter-air capabilities, complementing surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and electronic warfare systems. He adds that their role is integrated alongside other elements to ensure layered, adaptive, and seamless air defense across domains. While Southeast Asian air forces have not yet operated within high-intensity system-of-systems environments, their procurement and planning decisions suggest they may be vulnerable to the same disjointed architectures that hindered India's airpower effectiveness during the Kashmir clash. In February 2025, Defense and Security Monitor (DSM) reported that Vietnam may be facing a significant challenge in replacing its Soviet-era Su-22 jets, as the Ukraine War has cast doubt on Russia's reliability as a supplier, and the performance of its aircraft leaves much to be desired. While Vietnam has reached an agreement with the US to buy 24 F-16 fighters, introducing the type into the Vietnam People's Air Force (VPAF), which is built around Soviet and Russian aircraft, will require new training, maintenance, and logistics structures. These adjustments may result in serious interoperability problems. Maria Siow mentions in an April 2025 SCMP article that Vietnam's decision to purchase US F-16s was driven by the desire to gain leverage in trade talks with the US, rather than a strategic realignment away from Russia. Siow says that prior to 2022, Russia supplied 80% of Vietnam's armaments, and that while Vietnam is working to diversify its suppliers, the Vietnamese military continues to trust Russia more than the US. She notes it is unclear whether Vietnam will receive brand-new or second-hand F-16s, the latter being of questionable combat value against China's stealth fighters. She adds that the jets' high cost, the risk of a hostile Chinese response, and the appeal of lower-profile alternatives such as C-130 cargo planes all weigh against the deal. Siow also says that Vietnam has had no difficulties in acquiring Russian spare parts, making the prospect of acquiring F-16s even less likely. India's loss of Rafale fighters may have prompted Indonesia to rethink its purchase of 42 jets of that type, in a sale worth USD 8.1 billion. That purchase would add to the hodgepodge nature of its fighter fleet, consisting of F-16s, Su-27s, and Su-30s. Defending the Indonesian government's decision to purchase Rafale jets, Dave Laksono mentioned in an SCMP article that even the most capable fighter jets can be shot down or experience technical issues, while acknowledging that Pakistan's claims to have downed an Indian Rafale provide legitimate and constructive grounds for evaluation. Further, Chappy Hakim mentions in a Jakarta Post article that Indonesia's acquisition of Rafale aircraft does not automatically confer air superiority, but also requires a complete network of reconnaissance radars, early warning sensors, tracking systems, and an integrated command-and-control structure. Without this supporting architecture, adding another fighter type may bring diminishing returns. In the case of Malaysia, Defense News reported in September 2024 that the country is struggling to keep its 18 Su-30 MKM jets flying, and that Western sanctions have affected its ability to purchase spare parts from Russia. While Olli Suorsa states in a December 2024 Fulcrum article that the country plans to acquire ex-Kuwaiti F/A-18 jets as a stopgap measure, these aircraft represent aging technology and are older than the F/A-18s Malaysia has in service. He adds that having two F/A-18s from different generations could cause incompatibility with spare parts and increase maintenance complexity. In an age where airpower is defined by systems integration, Southeast Asian countries' failure to build cohesive air combat networks could turn their fighter fleets into expensive liabilities.

Can China launch hypersonic glider from satellite? Rocket force study suggests possibility
Can China launch hypersonic glider from satellite? Rocket force study suggests possibility

South China Morning Post

time08-05-2025

  • South China Morning Post

Can China launch hypersonic glider from satellite? Rocket force study suggests possibility

China 's hypersonic weapons can travel at extreme speeds of up to Mach 20, strike global targets within half an hour and even be launched from space , according to a new study. Advertisement Researchers from the People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) summarised the capabilities and vulnerabilities of China's re-entry glide missiles , revealing they can travel up to 21,000km/h (13,000 miles per hour) in high altitudes within the atmosphere. Certain variants may even be launched from space-based platforms, making them 'capable of drastically compressing the adversary's early-warning system response time and operational scope, thereby enhancing the probability of successful penetration', researchers wrote. The analysis, published last month in China's authoritative academic journal Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, likely disclosed some details for the first time and corroborated earlier reports from the US that critics dismissed as hype. In 2021, The Financial Times cited US military intelligence claiming China tested two hypersonic weapons released from near-Earth orbit, but some military experts called the orbital bombardment tech ' science fiction '. Chinese military vehicles carrying DF-17 roll during a parade to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the founding of Communist China in Beijing in 2019. Photo: Handout

US fires hot shot in hypersonic sea race with China
US fires hot shot in hypersonic sea race with China

Asia Times

time05-05-2025

  • Asia Times

US fires hot shot in hypersonic sea race with China

The US Navy fired a major shot in the race for sea-based hypersonic dominance, aiming to turn a long-troubled stealth destroyer into tomorrow's fastest naval strike platform. This month, the US Navy successfully conducted an end-to-end flight test of a conventional hypersonic missile, marking a pivotal step toward its first sea-based hypersonic capability. The test, conducted at Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, validated the US Navy's cold-gas launch system, designed to eject missiles before ignition safely. It advances the Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) program, developed in partnership with the US Army's Rapid Capabilities Office, which had completed two prior flight tests in 2024. Vice Admiral Johnny R Wolfe Jr, head of Strategic Systems Programs, said the milestone brings the US Navy closer to deploying CPS aboard the USS Zumwalt. The hypersonic system, offering high speed, range and survivability, enhances US deterrence and strike capabilities amid growing strategic competition. Insights from the test will inform the refinement of the common All Up Round (AUR) missile, reinforcing the ability to counter high-end adversary threats. The War Zone (TWZ) reported in January 2025 that the Zumwalt-class can carry up to 12 missiles triple-packed into Advanced Payload Module (APM) canisters. TWZ says that the Intermediate-Range Conventional Prompt Strike (IRCPS) missiles to be installed aboard the ships will have an unpowered boost-glide vehicle payload capable of maneuvering unpredictably toward their targets. Delving into the tactical advantages of sea-based hypersonic weapons, Francis Mahon and Punch Moulton mention in a January 2025 article for Real Clear Defense that such weapons can be effective against time-sensitive targets, often fleeting, high-value, and high-payoff. Mahon and Punch note that such targets are often beyond the reach or responsiveness of current strike capabilities, but hypersonic weapons can change that. Illustrating that capability difference, the Atlantic Council mentions in a March 2025 report that traditional subsonic cruise missiles, such as the Tomahawk or Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), would take an hour to hit a target 800 kilometers away, while a hypersonic cruise missile could hit the mark in less than ten minutes. The report also says that a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) can cover the distance between Guam and the Taiwan Strait in less than 30 minutes. To underscore the scale of hitting time-sensitive targets, Thomas MacDonald mentions in a January 2025 article in the peer-reviewed Journal of Strategic Studies that the operators of ground-based mobile missiles could deploy multiple transporter-erector-launchers (TEL) across different locations simultaneously, ensuring a survivable capability. MacDonald says that TEL operators could choose to move their missiles if gaps exist in an adversary's remote sensing coverage. He notes that TEL operators could keep their missiles hidden if an adversary loses track of the projectiles, forcing them to keep track of them continuously and nullifying the advantages of sensor technologies that rely on stealth or have limited endurance. In addition, MacDonald states that TEL operators would likely deploy countermeasures against an adversary's tracking capabilities, which range from satellite-blinding lasers to decoys. To further illustrate the threat, the US Department of Defense's (DOD) 2024 China Military Power Report (CMPR) mentions that China's People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) has approximately 1,500 TEL units, presenting a formidable targeting challenge. The PLARF, as noted by the report, plays a critical role in China's counter-intervention strategy against Taiwan and strategic nuclear deterrence. Discussing the advantages of deploying hypersonic weapons at sea, former US Navy Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael Gilday mentions in an April 2021 USNI News article that such deployment could enable multi-vector attacks. In addition, Gilday points out that deploying hypersonic weapons at sea gives a mobility advantage, which can substantially increase survivability, given that adversaries may have access to ubiquitous satellite imagery of the Pacific. Contextualizing the possible deployment of hypersonic-armed Zumwalt-class destroyers at the operational level, such ships may play a critical role as part of a two-level force described by Thomas Mahnken in a February 2022 Proceedings article. Of that dual force, Mahnken mentions that an 'inside force' composed of mobile, dispersed ground and expeditionary forces would transform the First Island Chain spanning Okinawa, Taiwan and the Philippines into defensive bastions armed with missiles, sensors and electronic warfare systems to prevent China from projecting power beyond that region. That force, Mahnken says, would be supported by an 'outside force' primarily consisting of air and naval forces employing standoff or penetrating capabilities that could exploit gaps in China's anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) systems created by inside forces to support defensive operations with mass and conduct offensive operations, including strikes on the Chinese mainland. As a hypersonic weapon launcher, the Zumwalt class could be a critical asset in an envisioned outside force. However, rising costs and delays could once again derail the platform's relevance, echoing the cost-death spiral of its previously equipped Advanced Gun System (AGS) intended initially for naval gunfire support (NGFS). A US Congressional Research Service (CRS) report from April 2025 says that due to high costs, the US may only have a small number of hypersonic weapons. It also mentions that the US may need large numbers of such weapons to defeat high-end targets. A January 2023 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report illustrates these likely prohibitive costs, mentioning that intermediate-range hypersonic boost-glide missiles of the type to be installed in the Zumwalt class could cost up to US$41 million per unit. The effectiveness of the Zumwalt class is also in question. A US CRS report from December 2024 mentions insufficient data to determine the class's effectiveness in anti-air warfare (AAW), torpedo defense and undersea warfare. The report states that the Zumwalt-class surface strike capabilities have yet to be evaluated following the completion of live missile events in 2027. It also says that existing data is insufficient to assess the type's survivability against threat weapons. Meanwhile, as the US continues retrofitting a previously sidelined destroyer platform to accommodate hypersonic weapons, China may already have the upper hand in ship-based hypersonic firepower. In April 2022, Naval News reported that China test-fired the YJ-21 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) from one of its Type 055 cruisers. According to Naval News, launch footage may imply that the YJ-21 might be a cold-launched, two-stage missile equipped with a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV)—similar to the type of weapon the US plans to install on its Zumwalt-class destroyers. The report also points out that China has eight Type 055 cruisers in service and additional units planned, in contrast to the three-ship Zumwalt-class, with its DDG(X) successor still in development. Whether the rearmed Zumwalt class signals the dawn of a new strike era or represents a last-ditch revival of the platform, the hypersonic race at sea is accelerating and the US cannot afford complacency.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store