Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on redrawn House map backed by Trump
The dramatic move could expose Democrats to fines and other penalties — with the state's attorney general having previously threatened to arrest them if they took such an action. Refusing to attend legislative session is a civil violation, however, so Democrats legally could not be jailed and it's unclear who has the power to carry out the warrants.
Democrats have cast the decision to leave the state as a last-ditch effort to stop Republicans who hold full control of the Texas government from pushing through a rare mid-decade redrawing of the congressional map at the direction of U.S. President Donald Trump.
'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' said Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement.
To conduct official business, at least 100 members of the 150-member Texas House must be present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber. At least 51 Democratic members are leaving the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus.
'Apathy is complicity, and we will not be complicit in the silencing of hard-working communities who have spent decades fighting for the power that Trump wants to steal,' he said.
The move marks the second time in four years that Texas Democrats have fled the state to block a vote. In 2021, a 38-day standoff took place when Democrats left for Washington, D.C. in opposition to new voting restrictions.
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature that started last month to take up the redistricting effort, as well as to respond to flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people in July. Trump has urged Texas Republicans to redraw the map to help the party net a handful of seats in the midterms next year.
'For weeks, we've been warning that if Republicans in Texas want a showdown — if they want to delay flood relief to cravenly protect Donald Trump from an inevitable midterm meltdown — then we'd give them that showdown," Democratic Party Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. 'That's exactly what Texas Democrats did today: blowing up Republicans' sham special session that's virtually ignored the plight of flood victims in Kerr County.'
Attorney General Ken Paxton on X said the state should 'use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law.'
'Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately,' he wrote.
Abbott's office and House Speaker Dustin Burrows did not immediately respond to requests for comment Sunday afternoon.
Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats.
By leaving the state, Democrats are looking to block Republicans from the needed quorum to hold votes on the map set for Monday. The Texas House has rules to fine lawmakers $500 each day they break a quorum. GOP Attorney General Ken Paxton has said previously that if Democrats break quorum, 'they should be found and arrested no matter where they go.'
'My office stands ready to assist local, state, and federal authorities in hunting down and compelling the attendance of anyone who abandons their office and their constituents for cheap political theater,' Paxton said on the social media platform X on July 15.
A large chunk of the Texas Democrats are heading to Illinois, where Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker had been in quiet talks with them for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term.
Last week, Pritzker hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort. California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state.
Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Now, with Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the Trump-backed congressional map, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and the president.
Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them.
Joey Cappelletti And Andrew Demillo, The Associated Press
Associated Press writer Nadia Lathan in Austin contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
18 minutes ago
- CBC
Texas Democrats refuse to go back to the state as they face threats of arrest and expulsion
Vikki Goodwin says she's not worried about the bribery allegations, daily fines and arrest warrants being levelled against her and her fellow Texas Democrats who have fled the state. Goodwin is one of dozens of House Democrats who have hunkered down in liberal states to deny Texas Republicans the quorum they need to vote on a new redistricting plan, championed by President Donald Trump, with the goal of bolstering Republican control of the legislature. But even as Gov. Greg Abbott is doing everything he can to compel the Democrats to return, Goodwin says she and her colleagues are gaining public support every day for their self-imposed exile. "As people are learning why we are doing this, they, too, are becoming outraged that we could have our governor bowing down to the president of the United States," Goodwin, who is in Illinois, told As It Happens guest host Rebecca Zandbergen. "The idea that we're drawing lines in order to pick more Republican representation, I think that just goes against everybody's idea of what a true democracy is." Trump demands 5 more seats Abbott has convened a special session to vote on the redistricting bill, which is expected to give the Republicans five extra seats and protect their narrow majority in next year's congressional midterm elections. But he can't pass a bill in the 150-member House without two-thirds of members present. Democrats hold 62 seats in the majority-Republican chamber, and at least 51 left the state, according to a Democratic aide. The lawmakers have mostly fled to the Democrat-led states of Illinois, New York and Massachusett. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the U.S. Census Bureau, but the current Texas map was passed just four years ago. Goodwin says the process to push through a new map mid-cycle has been rushed and undemocratic. "It's simply because Trump asked for it, and Abbott is willing to do whatever Trump asks," she said. Trump, himself, has made no secret of his desire to bolster Republican dominance in Texas. "We are entitled to five more seats," he told CNBC on Tuesday. In that same interview, Trump said gerrymandering goes both ways, and accused Democrat-led legislatures of drawing electoral maps in their own favour. "They go to Illinois for safety. But that's all gerrymandered. California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress," he said. A White House official told Reuters that Trump wants Abbott to do "whatever is necessary" to get the new map passed. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said the plan is more than a power grab; it's "turbocharged racism" that will further dilute the voting power of racial minorities in the state. The new lines likely would make it harder for four Hispanic incumbents and two Black incumbents to retain their seats in 2026, according to The Associated Press. Texas Republicans dispute Wu's claims, noting the new map would create four new racially diverse districts, and increase the number of Hispanic-majority districts by one. 'There will be consequences' Abbott has called the Democrats who left the state "un-Texan" and is pulling out all the stops to force them back. He has threatened to remove them from their seats for absconding their duty — something legal experts say would be a lengthy process, not guaranteed to work, and would require new elections to fill vacant seats. The House has also issued civil arrest warrants for absent Democrats, and Abbott ordered state troopers to find and arrest them — something they are legally unable to do outside state boundaries. Under House rules, each representative faces a $500 US fine for every day they're absent. Abbott has said that any lawmaker who solicits funds to cover those costs could face bribery charges, and vowed to extradite any "potential out-of-state felons." "If you continue to go down this road, there will be consequences," House Speaker Rep. Dustin Burrows, a Republican, threatened from the chamber floor Monday. Asked about the bribery charge threats, Goodwin said: "Personally, I have not taken any money that has driven me to the decision to leave the state. This is purely out of the need to protect our democracy, the need to push back against Trump." As for the fines, she said: "We will find a way to cover those costs." Democrat-led states vow to fight fire with fire The state standoff has quickly become a national one. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul — all Democrats — have each threatened to re-draw their own congressional district maps if Texas moves forward with its plan. Goodwin says the tactic of waiting out Abbott's special session can only work for so long. When this one ends on Aug. 19, she says, he's likely to call a new one. But her hope, she says, is that she and her colleagues will continue to gain public support from Texans of all stripes, and Abbott will be forced to abandon the bill in order to avoid jeopardizing his re-election. "That would be my ultimate goal," she said. "Stranger things have happened."
CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation
The Federal Emergency Management Agency headquarters is shown in Washington on May 5, 2025. (Gene J. Puskar / AP Photo) BOSTON — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from reallocating US$4 billion meant to help communities protect against natural disasters. U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns in Boston granted a preliminary injunction sought by 20 Democrat-led states while their lawsuit over the funding moves ahead. A spokesperson for the Federal Emergency Management Agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The states argued FEMA lacked the authority to end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program and redirect more than $4 billion of its funding. The program aims to harden infrastructure around the country against potential storm damage. FEMA initially announced it was ending the program, but later said in a court filing that it was evaluating it. Noting money for the program was allocated by Congress, the states' lawsuit says any attempt to redirect it would run afoul of the Constitution. A lawyer for the government, Nicole O'Connor, argued at a hearing in July that the funds can be used both for disaster recovery and disaster prevention and that FEMA should have discretion to use the money how it sees fit. In his ruling, Stearns said he was not convinced Congress had given FEMA any discretion to redirect the funds. The states had also shown that the 'balance of hardship and public interest' was in their favor. 'There is an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law, and the potential hardship accruing to the States from the funds being repurposed is great,' Stearns wrote. 'The BRIC program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives.' The program has provided grants for a range of disaster management projects, including strengthening electrical grids, constructing levees for flood protection and relocating vulnerable water treatment facilities. Many of the projects are in rural communities. FEMA said in a news release in April that it was 'ending' the program, but the agency's acting chief, David Richardson, later said in a court filing that FEMA was merely evaluating whether to end or revise it. Stearns said it appeared FEMA had decided to end the program and was 'inching towards a fait accompli,' noting it had cancelled new funding opportunities and told stakeholders they shouldn't expect any unobligated funding. The states, including California, New York and Washington, argued that the threat of losing the funding alone had put numerous projects at risk of being cancelled, delayed or downsized. And they warned ending the program would be highly imprudent. 'By proactively fortifying our communities against disasters before they strike, rather than just responding afterward, we will reduce injuries, save lives, protect property, and, ultimately, save money that would otherwise be spent on post-disaster costs,' they wrote in the suit filed in July. FEMA said in a court filing that an injunction on its use of the funds could hamper its ability to respond to major disasters. But Stearns said the administration could come back to him to release funding should a disaster of 'unprecedented proportions' occur. Jack Brook and Michael Casey, The Associated Press
CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Audrey Strauss, acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, points to a photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell during a news conference in New York on July 2, 2020. (John Minchillo / AP Photo) NEW YORK — Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, wants to keep grand jury records secret in the sex trafficking case that sent her to prison, her lawyers said Tuesday as prosecutors continued urging a court to release some of those records in the criminal case-turned-political fireball. Maxwell hasn't seen the material herself, her attorneys said — the grand jury process is conducted behind closed doors. But she opposes unsealing what her lawyers described as potentially 'hearsay-laden' transcripts of grand jury testimony, which was given in secret and without her lawyers there to challenge it. 'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain,' attorneys David O. Markus and Melissa Madrigal wrote. Prosecutors declined to comment. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamour for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The transcript faceoff comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted of grooming underage girls to participate in sex acts with him. The British socialite denied the allegations and has appealed her conviction, so far unsuccessfully. Some of President Donald Trump 's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for not moving on, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case. A top Justice Department official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, interviewed Maxwell late last month, at the government's request. Last week, she was moved from a federal prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas to continue serving her 20-year sentence. Officials didn't explain why. Trump said Tuesday that he didn't know ahead of time about Maxwell's prison transfer and hadn't spoken to Blanche about his conversation with her. 'I think he probably wants to make sure that people should not be involved, or aren't involved, are not hurt by something that would be very, very unfortunate, very unfair to a lot of people,' Trump said in a news conference Tuesday. The Epstein uproar also has reached Congress, where the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files in the case. The committee also issued subpoenas to conduct sworn questioning of former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials. Bill Clinton, a Democrat, was among a number of Epstein's famous former friends; so was Trump, a Republican. Both men have said they knew nothing of Epstein's crimes until he was charged, and Epstein's accusers have not alleged any wrongdoing by Trump or Clinton. ____________ Associated Press writer Will Weissert in Washington contributed reporting. Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press
