Why India is boosting arms sales to Armenia amid Pakistan, Turkey tensions
India is reportedly accelerating arms sales to Armenia in what analysts view as part of a broader effort to counter the growing strategic alignment between Turkey Azerbaijan and Pakistan – a trilateral partnership that has challenged New Delhi's regional interests and openly backed Islamabad in the wake of their recent cross-border flare-up.
Defence ties between Delhi and Armenia's government in Yerevan have grown steadily since 2020, fuelled by shared strategic interests and the West Asian nation's gradual pivot away from
Russia , its traditional arms supplier. Indian analysts say the shift highlights a deeper geopolitical rivalry emerging across Eurasia, where alliances are increasingly being redrawn in the wake of the
Ukraine war and other regional conflicts.
'India's relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan are not great,' said Rajan Kochar, a senior adviser at Indic Researchers Forum, a Delhi-based security think tank. 'Therefore, any arms sales to Armenia are unlikely to affect our relations with them, especially so when both nations have openly sided and abetted Pakistan against India in the recent Operation Sindoor.'
An Armenian soldier fires artillery on the front line amid fighting between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020. Photo: AFP
India is planning to deliver a second batch of Akash-1S surface-to-air missile systems to Armenia under a 2022 treaty, along with a broader range of weapons including howitzer guns and Pinaka multiple launch rocket systems, according to media reports. The first batch of missiles was sent in November last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
5 hours ago
- Asia Times
India-EU deal holds key to a new world trade era
The European Union and India have reached consensus on almost half of the topics to be covered by a trade deal they hope to seal this year, according to a report. The India-EU trade deal isn't just about tariffs or trade quotas—it's a cultural cage match between India's vibrant, improvisational spirit and Europe's love for order. And if resolved in a win-win deal, it could rewrite the rules of global trade. This trade pact is more than a deal on goods; it's a daring experiment in fusing two wildly different worldviews: India's adaptive, sometimes chaotic economic approach—rooted in jugaad , the art of making do with what's at hand—with Europe's rigid, regulation-heavy ethos. This tension isn't necessarily a flaw; it's the deal's potential secret sauce. By forcing both sides to confront their blind spots, this agreement could birth a new trade model that values flexibility over cookie-cutter uniformity, giving India a chance to tilt the global economic balance more toward the Global South. Trade deals sound like dusty policy papers, but they're the arteries of the global economy, pumping goods, ideas, and power across borders. With world trade fracturing under US tariff threats and China's constrictive supply chain grip, India and the EU are racing to secure their economic futures. India, with its 1.4 billion people and roaring growth, is no longer a bit player. The EU, a trade giant, needs new partners as old alliances wobble. Recent reports peg the deal's deadline for late 2025, but the real story is how this pact could redefine who sets the terms in a world where emerging powers are flexing their muscles. To understand why this deal matters, consider the broader picture. Global trade is no longer just about who makes the cheapest widgets. It's about who controls the flow of ideas, technology and resources. India's tech sector, for instance, is a powerhouse, with companies like Infosys and TCS already competing globally. The EU wants a slice of that expertise, especially as it pushes for digital transformation. But India's negotiators are savvy—they know their tech and pharmaceutical industries are bargaining chips. By leveraging these strengths, India could secure better terms for its smaller industries, like textiles, which employ millions but struggle against global competition. India's negotiators are playing a bold hand, and it's not just about lowering tariffs on cars or whisky, though those matter (Europe wants India's 100% duties on autos slashed; India wants access for its textiles and pharmaceuticals). The heart of the deal lies in cultural friction. India's refusal to open its dairy and small-farm sectors—vital to millions of livelihoods—challenges the EU's free-market ideals. Indian farmers, often working tiny plots, aren't just economic units; they're the backbone of a rural culture that resists the EU's vision of efficient, large-scale agriculture. This isn't just about milk or mangoes; it's about whether global trade can respect local realities. In India, trade isn't just numbers—it's lives. The dairy sector alone supports over 80 million farmers, many of whom rely on small-scale operations. Opening it up to European competition could devastate rural communities. India's negotiators know this, which is why they're digging in their heels. For the EU, this feels like protectionism, but for India, it's about survival. This push-and-pull isn't just a hurdle; it's a chance to redefine what fairness in trade looks like. Can a deal respect both India's small farmers and Europe's efficient markets? That's the question both sides are wrestling with. Europe, meanwhile, is grappling with its own dogma. Its obsession with predictability—think carbon taxes and strict labor standards—clashes with India's improvisational resilience. Indian businesses, accustomed to navigating red tape and power cuts, see the EU's rules like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (set to hit Indian steel and cement exports in 2026) as a fancy tax on their hustle. Yet, this friction is productive. India's pushback forces the EU to rethink its one-size-fits-all approach, while Europe's insistence on transparency nudges India toward clearer rules. Moreover, the deal could shift power toward the Global South. India, projected to be the world's third-largest economy by 2030, isn't just negotiating for itself. It's setting a precedent. If India can protect its farmers while securing market access for its tech and textiles, other developing nations—say, Brazil or South Africa—might demand similar treatment at the negotiating table. The EU-India trade corridor, already worth 184 billion euros in 2023, could become a blueprint for deals that balance growth with cultural identity. Unlike the UK-India deal, which focuses heavily on whisky and cars, this pact dives deeper, tackling investment protection and geographical indications. The stakes go beyond economics. This deal is a test of whether two vastly different systems can find common ground. For India, it's a chance to prove it can negotiate as an equal, not a junior partner. For the EU, it's about staying relevant in a world where Asia's giants are rising and the US is withdrawing behind protectionist walls. Success here could inspire other trade blocs to rethink their approaches, prioritizing nuance over rigid templates. Failure, though, risks entrenching old power dynamics, where the Global North sets the rules and the Global South scrambles to comply. The India-EU trade deal is a high-stakes drama where two worlds collide—one thriving on chaos, the other craving order. As they hammer out the final chapters, they're not just trading goods; they're trading ideas about how the new world order should work. If they pull it off, the pact could inspire a new kind of global trade—one where the Global South doesn't just follow rules but helps write them. Brabim Karki is an author and businessman and the owner of Mero Tribune media. Follow him on X at @brabim7
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Russia moves again to join with China and India despite trust issues from border disputes
Russia's fresh bid to revive a strategic triangle with China and India as a counterbalance to the Western-led international order faces headwinds given the deep-seated distrust between the two Asian powers, according to observers. Advertisement However, United States President Donald Trump and his aggressive and unpredictable policies could be the catalyst to bring the three together, one analyst says. The assessment was made as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov objected to what he described as Nato's attempt to draw India into 'anti-China' efforts, and reaffirmed Moscow's hope for India and China to restore a three-way mechanism that has been in limbo since the deadly 2020 China-India border dispute 04:07 Xi Jinping says China, Russia have 'special responsibility' to stand up to power politics Xi Jinping says China, Russia have 'special responsibility' to stand up to power politics 'Now that India and the People's Republic of China are reaching an understanding on de-escalating tensions along their shared border, the moment has arrived to revitalise RIC,' Russia's top diplomat said at a Eurasian security forum in the Russian city of Perm last week, referring to the Russia-India-China framework. It is not the first time since violence broke out at the China-India border in May 2020 that Russia has tried to push for a resumption of the trilateral mechanism. The border dispute largely froze bilateral ties until a disengagement agreement was reached in October last year in a bid to de-escalate tensions between the world's two most populous nations and normalise the relationship. Russia brokered two high-level meetings between senior defence and foreign policy officials of China and India months after their countries' border conflict broke out in 2020, a move that highlighted Moscow's influence within the RIC mechanism. Advertisement Russian President Vladimir Putin also tried to push for a leaders' summit of the two countries when he had separate talks with his Chinese and Indian counterparts in December 2021, before his country invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
India projected to accelerate solar power generation as storage costs fall
India 's transition towards a clean energy -based digital economy may have received a boost from a new study showing that the costs of solar power and its storage are now lower than coal-generated electricity used by businesses in the country. Advertisement Solar and its battery storage costs have fallen to 6 Indian rupees (7 US cents) per kilowatt hour and is likely to remain stable for the next 25 years, according to a report by the India Energy and Climate Centre of the University of California, Berkeley released on May 28. In comparison, India's industrial tariffs for electricity, which is mostly powered by coal, have climbed steadily to an average of 8 rupees per kilowatt hour this year. Nikit Abhyankar, an author of the study and a faculty member at UC Berkeley, told This Week in Asia: 'Solar plus storage in India is now cheaper than industrial electricity tariffs in most states, and these prices would be locked in for decades.' Emilia Chojkiewicz, the report's lead author, said energy-intensive data centres supporting high-end computing, such as artificial intelligence, required clean power to minimise environmental impact. Insulating these facilities from future price shocks could offer India a strategic advantage, she added. Advertisement Battery storage costs had halved in the past 18 months, allowing solar energy to supply continuous electricity at rates lower than coal-based power in India, the report said.
