Only 16% of Italians would fight for their country, survey shows
The survey by the Centre for Social Investment Studies (CENSIS) showed 39% of Italians aged between 18 and 45 would declare themselves as pacifist conscientious objectors, 19% would try to evade conscription another way, and 26% would prefer Italy to hire foreign mercenaries.
After years of escalating geopolitical tensions and two ongoing nearby wars, in Ukraine and the Middle East, Italy has joined other NATO nations in pledging to ramp up national defence spending.
However, most Italians remain sceptical of rearmament. Just 26% believe that military deterrence is a good way to ensure peace, while only 25% support increased military budgets even if it means cutting welfare. A mere 11% would like the country to have nuclear weapons.
Despite a 46% rise in defence spending over the past decade, per capita expenditure in Italy remains comparatively low at 586 dollars, the survey said. That compares with 686 dollars in Greece and over 2,000 dollars in countries such as the United States or Norway.
To ensure Italy's security, 49% of all Italians are in favour of strengthening NATO, while 58% would like to see an integrated European Union defence system, with a single army, under a unified command and joint weapons procurement.
Another poll published last month by the European Council of Foreign Relations, opens new tab showed that only 17% of Italians support increasing defence spending, the lowest proportion among 12 European countries surveyed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
AI-cloned voice of 999 call handler used in Russian disinformation operation
The voice of a British 999 call handler was cloned using artificial intelligence. This AI-cloned voice was subsequently used in a Russian online disinformation campaign. The campaign aimed to spread fear ahead of Poland 's presidential election in May. The call handler, Aaron, expressed shock, noting the convincing nature of the fake voice, which was sourced from a North West Ambulance Service video. Watch the video in full above.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sport England to meet RFL over concerns with rugby league funding at stake
Sport England will meet the Rugby Football League in the coming weeks to air their concerns over developments at the governing body in a move which could have an impact on the sport's financial outlook. Rugby league is one of several sports in receipt of millions of pounds worth of funding from Sport England every year. That funding is critical to the ongoing existence of the sport, and is particularly important for the RFL, with continued adherence to the code for sports governance essential to maintain it. The RFL has been under scrutiny in recent months with its former chief executive, Nigel Wood, returning to the organisation initially as its interim chair following the resignation of his predecessor, Simon Johnson, in March. Wood was appointed by clubs to lead a strategic review of the professional game which recommended Super League expanding to 14 teams as early as 2026. That was approved by clubs at a meeting in Leeds on Monday, two weeks on from Wood's interim position as chair being made permanent. That code details that all key leadership appointments – such as chair of the governing body – have to follow recruitment processes that are deemed 'open and transparent' by Sport England. The Guardian has now had confirmation that meetings are planned in the coming weeks in light of Wood's installation as permanent chair. A Sport England spokesperson told the Guardian: 'All organisations in receipt of significant funding from Sport England must reach the standards of the Code for Sports Governance. This includes major leadership appointments following open and transparent recruitment processes. 'Following recent developments, we will meet with the leadership of the RFL in the coming weeks to address our concerns.' Tony Sutton, the RFL's CEO, said: 'The RFL is working with Sport England on a Governance Action Plan, following the resignations from the Board earlier in the year. The new board at the RFL remain totally committed to working towards full compliance with Sport England's Code for Sports Governance.' Wood's return was seen by many of his critics as controversial. Clubs elected to remove him as chief executive in 2018 and he was paid a severance package of over £300,000. He has since held the role of chair at Bradford Bulls, a role he relinquished in order to return to the RFL, though he remains a shareholder of the Championship club. However, those same clubs now feel he is the best individual to deliver an overhaul of the professional game, led by an expansion of Super League to 14 teams. The Guardian revealed earlier this week how Sky Sports were seeking answers from Super League on the decision to extend the competition. The RFL have been approached for comment.
BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
What went wrong with NATS' air traffic control system?
A radar problem used within the UK's air traffic control system caused chaos at airports in the UK and beyond on fault lasted a mere 20 minutes, but was enough to ground planes across the country, causing 150 flight cancellations and delays that have continued into what went wrong with this vital piece of air traffic technology? NATS, which is partly owned by the government, manages all of the UK's airspace for flights arriving and departing the country's has not provided lots of detail on Wednesday's outage other than saying there was "radar-related issue which was resolved by quickly switching to the back-up system".It said it reduced traffic during the outage for safety reasons and added that "there is no evidence" that it was caused by any cyber Secretary Heidi Alexander has said NATS told her it was "an isolated event and there is no evidence of malign activity".To understand how such a brief radar failure could cause such much havoc, Graham Lake, a former director general of the Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation (CANSO), said people should imagine the NATS air traffic network as "national infrastructure"."Think of the network as motorways in the sky," he told the BBC."When you lose something like surveillance radar coverage for whatever reason, the capability of your network degrades to a country lane."That's why the systems slow down when there's a technical failure." Is NATS to blame for the outage? Airlines have been vocal in their criticism of NATS, noting that this is the second time its system has failed since August 2023, more than 700,000 passengers were affected when some 500 flights were cancelled at the UK's busiest airports due to a major airline, Ryanair, has called for NATS chief executive Martin Rolfe to resign, arguing "no lessons" have been learned from the previous has called the outage "extremely disappointing".However, Mr Lake told the BBC's Today programme he did not believe it was fair to call for Mr Rolfe to lose his job, arguing that technical failures are "inevitable" and that "the recovery was quick".Even with the issues in 2023, NATS has been performing well "if you look at the minutes of outage over a period of years", he said. Are the UK's skies just too busy? Mr Lake said that the NATS performs well when compared with other countries - which also suffer from air traffic glitches - and that Wednesday's issue was a case of bad luck."The UK airspace is very busy, certainly among the busiest in the world. We are at the busiest time of year and the failure yesterday was at the busiest time of day, so it's not an ideal situation."Because of the congestion in the UK's skies, Heathrow Airlines Operators Committee, which represents airlines that fly from the airport, has called for more runways in the south east of England to increase group's chief executive Nigel Wicking said "the NATS operational teams do a phenomenal job" but that the system is "running hot" and "when things go wrong and we lose the system for even an hour the impact is major".The UK government has said it backs the expansion of Heathrow, Gatwick, and Luton airports, but critics argue the plans would increase emissions and air pollution.
