logo
Trump Administration Live Updates: Bessent Defends Approach to Tariffs as ‘Strategic Uncertainty'

Trump Administration Live Updates: Bessent Defends Approach to Tariffs as ‘Strategic Uncertainty'

New York Times27-04-2025
media memo
Usually, the White House Correspondents' Association dinner features Hollywood stars, a zinger-filled comedy set and a public display of comity between the White House and the press corps that covers it.
On Saturday, the dinner had no comedian and no president. Among the smattering of celebrities on hand was Michael Chiklis, whose best-known television role, in 'The Shield,' concluded in 2008.
'It's just us,' Eugene Daniels, the association's president and an MSNBC host, told his fellow journalists at the start of the night.
The reporters who spoke from the dais emphasized the importance of the First Amendment, garnering repeated ovations from the black-tie crowd. Levity came in the form of clips from past years, when presidents still turned up and cracked wise about the press and themselves.
Hand-wringing about the dinner, once the apex of the capital's social calendar, is as much a Washington tradition as the corporate-sponsored parties that surround it. But as media institutions grapple with an onslaught from President Trump — who has sued and threatened television networks, barred The Associated Press from presidential events and upended the day-to-day workings of the White House press corps — the notion of a booze-soaked celebration felt particularly jarring.
'The mood and reality sucks,' said Jim VandeHei, the journalist and news executive who helped create Politico and then Axios, two stalwarts of the Beltway media.
'No president attending, no comedian to make fun of all of us, TV networks buckling under government pressure, a top producer quitting over corporate interference and the public sour on the media and government,' Mr. VandeHei said. 'Enjoy the weekend!'
It is true that, in the last several days alone, the head of '60 Minutes' resigned as CBS's owner considered a multimillion-dollar payment to settle a lawsuit brought by President Trump, and the Committee to Protect Journalists, a nonprofit that aids reporters living under autocrats, issued a safety advisory for journalists planning to visit the United States. And on Friday afternoon, hours before the first wave of weekend parties, the Justice Department announced that it would subpoena reporters' phone records and compel their testimony in leak investigations.
Maybe journalists could use a moment or two to relax.
'Our clients work so hard covering today's nonstop news cycle, and once a year we throw a big weekend of parties to honor them for their work,' said Rachel Adler, the head of news at Creative Artists Agency, who represents television journalists like Andrea Mitchell and Audie Cornish and was the co-host of a jampacked soiree on Friday at a private Georgetown club. 'Why would this year be any different?'
Tammy Haddad, a Washington impresario whose annual Saturday garden party went ahead unabated and well-attended, said that for all the tensions over press access and independence, the weekend was still a chance for community. 'Some chose to stay away, but there are opportunities to make new connections and find some common ground,' she said. (Her guests included the editor Tina Brown, the chef Bobby Flay and Dr. Mehmet Oz, the celebrity doctor recently sworn in to lead Medicare and Medicaid.)
Still, the correspondents' dinner itself carried a more serious tenor than in years past. Some of the loudest applause came for journalists at The A.P., which has been embroiled in a legal fight with the administration after Mr. Trump sought to restrict access to its reporters for using the term 'Gulf of Mexico' in its coverage.
Mr. Daniels pledged support to The A.P. and also to Voice of America, another outlet that has been the target of Mr. Trump's scorn. With no entertainer for the evening, Mr. Daniels served as the keynote speaker, calling for journalistic solidarity.
'What we are not is the opposition,' he said. 'What we are not is the enemy of the people. And what we are not is the enemy of the state.' He called journalists 'competitive and pushy,' but also 'human,' noting the effort that reporters make to ensure accurate information reaches the public.
Image
Eugene Daniels, the association's president and an MSNBC host, at the dinner on Saturday.
Credit...
Jose Luis Magana/Associated Press
In interviews, top journalists at multiple news outlets said that it had been nearly impossible to convince celebrities and lawmakers to attend as guests. One reporter said that the list of people who had rejected invitations to join the publication's table was in the 'dozens.'
This is a dinner that once attracted the likes of George Clooney and Steven Spielberg. On Saturday, it seemed as if the most au courant actor in town was Jason Isaacs, the Englishman who played the dad on the latest edition of 'The White Lotus,' and whose character spent the season fantasizing about a murder-suicide.
Mark Leibovich, a correspondent for The Atlantic, said he found it refreshing to have an evening more focused on the act of reporting than a comedian's speech.
Still, he added, 'I wish we could have used the time we gained from that to all leave an hour earlier.'
The correspondents' association represents hundreds of journalists who regularly cover the workings of the White House. Its autonomy has been undermined repeatedly by the Trump administration, which broke precedent by handpicking which outlets are granted access to the 'pool' that covers smaller presidential events and has signaled plans to shake up the seating chart in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room. (For decades, the correspondents' association has overseen the pool and the seating chart.)
In February, the group announced that a comedian, Amber Ruffin, the actress and talk-show host, would be the dinner's featured entertainer. Last month, Ms. Ruffin's appearance was canceled. She had appeared on a podcast where she referred to the Trump administration as 'kind of a bunch of murderers.'
Mr. Daniels said he wanted 'to ensure the focus is not on the politics of division.'
Ms. Ruffin has since mocked the group for canceling her set, quipping: 'We have a free press so that we can be nice to Republicans at fancy dinners — that's what it says in the First Amendment.'
In previous years — including in 2018, during Mr. Trump's first term — the White House press secretary attended the dinner and sat on the dais. Karoline Leavitt, Mr. Trump's current press secretary, said she had turned down an invitation.
On Friday, during an interview with the Axios reporter Mike Allen, Ms. Leavitt was asked to describe the news media in one word.
'Exhausted,' she said, with a smile.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll: Nearly 70% of Americans — including a majority of Republicans — think the government is hiding something about Jeffrey Epstein
Poll: Nearly 70% of Americans — including a majority of Republicans — think the government is hiding something about Jeffrey Epstein

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: Nearly 70% of Americans — including a majority of Republicans — think the government is hiding something about Jeffrey Epstein

About a quarter believe the well-connected sex offender committed suicide. Twice as many think he was murdered. Bipartisanship is rare in U.S. politics these days. But according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll, there's now at least one thing that more than two-thirds of Americans seem to agree on: that the government is 'hiding' information about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 24 to 28, shows that a clear consensus has formed across party lines about how the government has handled the questions surrounding Epstein's life and death. When respondents are told that President Trump's Justice Department has 'concluded that Epstein did not have a 'client list' of famous associates who engaged in wrongdoing with him,' 69% of them still say the government is 'hiding information about Epstein's client list.' That group includes a majority of Republicans (55%). Just 8% of Americans, meanwhile, say the government isn't concealing information about a client list. About a quarter of U.S. adults (23%) believe the Justice Department's conclusion that Epstein died by suicide after hanging himself in jail. The rest think Epstein was murdered (47%) or say they're not sure what happened (30%). Nearly as many Republicans (42%) as Democrats (51%) believe Epstein was killed. As a result, nearly seven in 10 Americans (67%) say the government is hiding information about Epstein's death. Again, that group includes a majority of Republicans (52%). What do people think is going on? About half of Americans (48%) — including 81% of Democrats and 53% of independents — think the government is hiding information about Epstein's client list 'because it would implicate Trump.' Even among Republicans, 13% say the same and 16% say they're unsure. The new Yahoo/YouGov poll comes amid ongoing right-wing backlash over how the administration has handled its investigation into Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial for allegedly paying dozens of teenage girls, some as young as 14, to perform sex acts. The disgraced financier has long been the focus of conspiracy theories that claim he was murdered to conceal the names of powerful people on a secret 'client list.' During the 2024 campaign, Trump said he would consider releasing additional government files on Epstein. Then, after returning to the White House, he directed the Justice Department to conduct an exhaustive review of any evidence it had collected. Earlier this month, the DOJ and FBI released a two-page joint memo concluding that Epstein had 'committed suicide in his cell" and compiled no such 'client list' — echoing previous findings by the Biden administration. The move enraged some Trump loyalists, who accused the president and his administration of breaking their promise to release all of the Epstein files. It also put the spotlight back on Trump's own relationship with Epstein. Speaking to reporters Monday in Scotland, Trump said he never visited Epstein's notorious private island, even when given the chance. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn him down,' Trump said. 'But a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.' Low marks for the administration's approach For the president, the Epstein controversy now seems to be creating a credibility gap with the public — including some of his own supporters. Just 21% of Americans approve of the way the president is handling the investigation, his lowest rating this year on any individual issue; nearly three times as many (61%) disapprove. Meanwhile, 44% of Republicans — roughly half the number who applaud his approach to immigration — approve of how Trump has dealt with the investigation. A majority of Americans (55%) say the president has 'not gone far enough' in his efforts to 'get to the bottom' of the Epstein case; combined, less than a quarter say that his approach has been about right (16%) or that it has gone too far (7%). A third of Republicans (33%) say Trump has not gone far enough. Attorney General Pam Bondi — the face of the administration's Epstein efforts — is now deeply unpopular: 26% of Americans say they have a favorable opinion of her. And while confidence in the Justice Department wasn't high the last time Yahoo and YouGov asked about it, in August 2022 — back then, 44% said they had 'a lot' of confidence or 'some' confidence in the DOJ; 56% said they had 'a little' or 'none' — today those numbers are even worse: 39% and 61%, respectively. Why the Epstein story has broken through The new Yahoo/YouGov poll suggests three potential explanations. First, ubiquity: Nearly all respondents (91%) have heard either a lot (50%) or a little (41%) about the story. That's the fourth highest 'heard a lot' score recorded in any Yahoo/YouGov poll since 2020; only the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022 (70%), Will Smith slapping Chris Rock at the Academy Awards that same year (66%) and Trump getting indicted in 2023 (57%) have topped it. Meanwhile, a full 84% of Americans say they think Epstein was guilty — including 91% of Democrats, 90% of independents and 77% of Republicans. Second, Epstein's bipartisan circle. In the poll, respondents were reminded that Epstein 'had a wide circle of influential friends and acquaintances, including former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump.' Then they were asked if either president 'engaged in crimes' with the financier — and nearly half of Americans said yes for Clinton (47%) and Trump (48%). In contrast, the share who said the two presidents did not engage in crimes with Epstein —12% for Clinton, 26% for Trump — was much lower. Conspiracy theories may be more attractive when they have the power to hurt the other side as well. Third, conspiracy theories in general seem to have become more mainstream recently. For example, a majority of Democrats (51%) believe "many top politicians are involved in child sex-trafficking rings.' A majority of Republicans (51%) believe that "regardless of who is officially in charge of the government and other organizations, there is a single group of people who secretly control events and rule the world together.' A majority of Democrats (57%) believe 'the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pa. was staged in order to help him win the 2024 election.' A majority of Republicans (58%) believe 'Trump's would-be assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks, didn't act alone.' And a majority of Republicans (63%) also believe that former President Barack Obama 'committed treason to try to sabotage Donald Trump in the 2016 election' — as Trump has been claiming lately, without proof. What's next? Americans are clear about what they want: More than eight in 10 (84%) say they would approve of the government 'releasing all of the information it has on Jeffrey Epstein.' Just 5% would disapprove. Conversely, more than two-thirds of Americans (69%) disapprove of the decision last week by Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican, to send "the U.S. House of Representatives home early for the summer to avoid having to vote on releasing the Epstein files.' Only 10% approve. Previously, Johnson had said that Congress 'should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' With Dylan Stableford __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Clock Ticks Down Toward Higher Tariffs With Little Clarity
Clock Ticks Down Toward Higher Tariffs With Little Clarity

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Clock Ticks Down Toward Higher Tariffs With Little Clarity

President Trump on Thursday granted Mexico a 90-day delay on higher tariffs and said the two countries would try to negotiate a trade deal. But much of the rest of the world remained in limbo as countries waited to see if the spiraling tariffs the president has threatened to put in place as of midnight would go into effect and, if so, how much the United States would charge on imports. Steep tariffs on dozens of countries are set to snap into effect at 12:01 a.m. Friday, as the president realizes his vision for remaking a global trading system he has long criticized as unfair. But although the administration has disclosed some tariff rates for countries on the president's social media account or in fact sheets, the specific rates that importers and exporters will need pay to move certain goods across U.S. borders remained unclear, with just hours to go before the deadline. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said Thursday that the administration's trade team was discussing tariff rates, and that president would be signing an executive order establishing the import taxes later this afternoon or evening. She said the United States had struck deals with many major trading partners, and sent out another 17 letters to countries informing them of the tariff rates they would face. 'The rest of those countries that either do not have a deal or have a letter, they will be hearing from this administration by the midnight deadline tonight,' Ms. Leavitt said. She said more trade agreements could be announced before the deadline tonight. The Trump administration has now announced preliminary trade deals with a handful of trading partners, including Britain, Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan and the European Union. Those partners have promised to purchase vast amounts of American energy and airplanes, make investments in U.S. factories and lower their barriers to U.S. exports of farm and industrial good. Top U.S. officials also met with their Chinese counterparts in Stockholm this week to discuss extending a trade truce that expires Aug. 12. While Chinese officials said they had secured a 90-day extension, U.S. officials said the decision was ultimately up to Mr. Trump. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on CNBC on Thursday that an extension was likely. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us.
Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us.

USA Today

time29 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us.

Jerry Seinfeld says he stands with Israel. Ms. Rachel won't work with anyone not speaking out about Gaza. The crisis is drawing out different voices. Tell us what you think about US actions. As the images of hunger and desperation keep coming at us, we're hearing more and more people weigh in on Gaza, with news coverage picking up on voices ranging from heads of government to internet celebrities. But what do you think? Those recently criticizing Israel include people like popular children's content creator "Ms. Rachel," who said she'll no longer work with anyone not speaking out about Gaza, as well as right-wing congressional member Marjorie Taylor Greene, who called the situation "genocide." They point to children perishing in the Palestinian enclave where the death toll, made up mostly of civilians, now exceeds 60,000. Greene's Republican Party has historically stood with Israel, but continued reports of starvation and civilian suffering are peeling away supporters, such as the United Kingdom, which announced it would recognize Palestine as a country if Israel doesn't improve conditions for noncombatants. But outspoken allies of Israel, from the president to the creator of a culture-defining comedy, say we should remember the horrific surprise attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, that kicked off the war and killed 1,200 Israelis, a majority of them civilians. Of the 251 hostages taken on that day, there are 50 still in captivity. Actor and comedian Jerry Seinfeld has made a statement about living briefly in the Jewish state and the heartbreak he felt over the Oct. 7 atrocities, saying, "I will stand with Israel." President Donald Trump, meanwhile, recently said recognizing Palestine as a nation and similar pressure on Israel amount to "rewarding Hamas." 'Every ounce of food': Trump presses Israel on starvation in Gaza; 'children look very hungry' What is the US doing in Israel, Gaza? In terms of actions to stop the humanitarian crisis, the United States pressured Israel to allow aid after it cut off deliveries in March by the United Nations and other groups for 11 weeks because Israeli officials said Hamas was seizing food. The U.N. said those renewed deliveries were a "drop in the ocean" of what was urgently needed. Now $30 million in U.S. aid is to be delivered through a controversial private, for-profit U.S. and Israel-backed contractor, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Critics say GHF is not getting enough food to people, who are being killed as they try to get help from the aid sites. People are starving in Gaza. Why are we so comfortable just letting that happen? | Opinion Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, is set to travel to Israel on July 31, Thursday, to address the humanitarian crisis. Witkoff called off the most recent efforts to broker a ceasefire deal on July 24, saying Hamas showed "a lack of desire.' Should the US do more to help Palestinians? Should celebrities be weighing in? Now we're asking you, our readers, if you think the U.S. government is taking the right actions in terms of Israel and Gaza. And who do you think should be weighing in on the argument? Fill out our form below or send us an email to forum@ with the subject line "Forum Gaza." We'll pick a collection of responses to share in a follow-up post. Here are some questions to help you respond: Joel Burgess is a Voices editor for the USA TODAY Network. Do you want to take part in our next Forum? Join the conversation by emailing forum@ You can also follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and sign up for our Opinion newsletter to stay updated on future Forum posts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store