Greg Abbott Launches $20 Billion Texas Water Plan
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed two major bills into law on June 18, launching a landmark $20 billion investment aimed at tackling Texas' growing water shortages. Final funding approval for part of the plan will require voter consent in a November statewide ballot.
Newsweek contacted Abbott for comment on Thursday via email outside regular office hours.
Why It Matters
Texas faces mounting water challenges driven by rapid population growth, frequent droughts and rising demands from agriculture and industry. Leaking infrastructure and dwindling supplies threaten quality of life and economic growth. Abbott's plan aims to secure the state's water future while addressing ongoing environmental concerns.
Texas suffered from severe drought in the summer of 2023, with only 11 percent of the Lone Star State drought free, according to the U.S. Drought Map, though more rainfall improved the situation in 2024.
In September 2024, Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said the state loses "about a farm a week" because of water shortages.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott takes a question from a reporter outside the West Wing after meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House on February 5, 2025, in Washington.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott takes a question from a reporter outside the West Wing after meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House on February 5, 2025, in Washington.
Andrew Harnik/GETTY
What To Know
Details of the Water Investment
The bills signed by Abbott—Senate Bill 7 (SB 7) and House Joint Resolution 7 (HJR 7)—target repairing aging water systems and investing in new supply sources. Half of the $20 billion allocation is earmarked for infrastructure upgrades and the other half will support projects such as pipelines and desalination.
Voter Approval and Immediate Funding
The plan requires voter approval of HJR 7 in November to dedicate $1 billion a year from state sales tax revenue, beginning in 2027. However, the $2.5 billion allocation for the Texas Water Fund is secured regardless of the November ballot result. The Texas Water Development Board will oversee project selection and funding distribution as the state shifts to a coordinated, regional strategy for water management.
Texas Water Context
Water scarcity is a recurring crisis in Texas. Years of drought, persistent population increases and intensified industrial use have stretched existing systems, forcing some cities to consider restricting development. The state also faces a backlog of expensive infrastructure repairs, with Houston alone reporting a $4.93 billion need because of leaking pipes according to city officials.
What People Are Saying
Texas Governor Greg Abbott: "We lose about 88 billion gallons of water a year because of broken, busted, and aged pipes."
State Senator Charles Perry: The new law represents "a cultural shift from the way we do water in Texas" and moved the focus to coordinated regional strategies.
What Happens Next
Texas voters will decide on final funding through a constitutional amendment in November. If passed, the initiative will set aside $1 billion annually for water projects, beginning in 2027, with immediate funds supporting urgent infrastructure needs across the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
Texas Republicans set to resume push for redrawn US House maps
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Republicans on Monday aimed to resume pushing through redrawn U.S. House district maps that would carve out a bigger GOP advantage in the 2026 midterm elections after state Democrats indicated they were ready to end a two-week walkout. In response, California Democrats are also moving ahead with their own reshaping of congressional districts to counteract Texas, putting in motion a potentially widening and unusually timed redistricting battle nationwide. The redrawing began in Texas but has been stalled since dozens of Democrats, who are the minority in each chamber, left the state on Aug. 3, with most of them going to Illinois. The absent lawmakers had signaled they were ready return to Austin after Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ended a first special session and California moved forward with its own plan. The Texas House was scheduled to try convening a quorum again Monday. Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow U.S. House majority to avoid losing control of the chamber, and with it, prospects for Trump's conservative agenda in the later part of his term. It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions with the task. The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of the resulting battle, which has reached into multiple courtrooms and statehouses controlled by both parties. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Texas' maps would aim to give the GOP five more winnable seats there. California Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — on Friday unveiled a proposal that could give Democrats there an additional five U.S. House seats. But any changes would first need the approval of state lawmakers and voters. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Defends Putin Summit Against Media 'Major Defeat' Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump dismissed criticism of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska as "fake news" Sunday night on Truth Social, saying the war in Ukraine could be ended "almost immediately" but critics were making it harder to do so. Trump also appeared to rule out any return of the Russian-occupied Crimea region or NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) membership for Ukraine. Why It Matters Critics have slammed Trump for providing Putin with red-carpet treatment in Alaska on Friday in exchange for seemingly little in the way of concessions. The meeting ended without any agreement on a ceasefire or peace deal, but Trump officials have talked up possible concessions made by the Russians, although details have yet to surface. Trump's comments come as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due to travel to Washington, D.C. on Monday to discuss with Trump a possible settlement of the war, which Putin launched in February 2022. Several European leaders are due to participate in the meeting. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. Andrew Harnik What To Know Trump rejected any suggestion that holding the summit on U.S. soil represented a defeat. "The Fake News has been saying for 3 days that I suffered a "major defeat" by allowing President Vladimir Putin of Russia to have a major Summit in the United States. Actually, he would have loved doing the meeting anywhere else but the U.S., and the Fake News knows this. It was a major point of contention!" the president said in a post on his Truth Social platform. "If we had the Summit elsewhere, the Democrat run and controlled media would have said what a terrible thing THAT was. These people are sick!" he said. The decision to hold the summit at Anchorage's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson surprised many observers as previous suggestions indicated a third country, such as the United Arab Emirates, would host the two leaders' first meeting in six years. Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, did not hold back on his assessment of the Trump-Putin summit, saying in a Sunday appearance on NBC News' Meet the Press that the meeting was a "disaster" that gave Russian Putin "everything he wanted." "The very unattractive (both inside and out!) Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, said "Putin got everything that he wanted." Actually, "nobody got anything," too soon, but getting close," Trump fired back in another Sunday Truth Social post. "Murphy is a lightweight who thinks it made the Russian President look good in coming to America. Actually, it was very hard for President Putin to do so. This war can be ended, NOW, but stupid people like Chris Murphy, John Bolton, and others, make it much harder to do so." In advance of his talks with Zelensky and his European allies, Trump appeared to rule out any chance that the Ukrainian leader would succeed in his long-held aims of getting back Crimea, which Russian forces occupied in 2014, or of membership of NATO. "No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" Trump said. Kyiv has repeatedly said it is against the country's constitution to give land away to Moscow. One of Putin's fears is that Ukraine would become a member of NATO, expanding the U.S. and European footprint even more along the border of Russia. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Sunday said the Russians had agreed to a "game-changing" concession, which would allow the U.S. to establish security guarantees modeled after NATO's Article 5 protections, which states that an attack against any member of NATO is an attack against all members of NATO—also known as the collective defense clause. Looking ahead to Monday's talks, Trump said: "Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!" What People Are Saying In a post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump said: "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight." Senator Chris Murphy told NBC News: "It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted…He was invited to the United States: War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America." What Happens Next? Zelensky and several European leaders are due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Bolivia Heads to First-Ever Presidential Runoff as Centrist Leads
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Bolivian voters have triggered the country's first-ever presidential runoff after no candidate secured the required majority in Sunday's election. With over 91 percent of ballots counted, centrist Senator Rodrigo Paz Pereira leads with 32.8 percent of the vote, followed by right-wing former President Jorge "Tuto" Quiroga at 26.4 percent. The runoff is scheduled for October 19, marking an unprecedented moment in Bolivia's electoral history since adopting its current constitution in 2009. Why It Matters This election could end nearly two decades of leftist rule in Bolivia, potentially reshaping the political landscape of South America's most Indigenous nation. The result reflects deep economic frustration among Bolivia's 12 million citizens, who face annual inflation exceeding 16 percent and widespread fuel shortages. A right-wing victory would likely trigger significant geopolitical realignment for a country currently allied with Venezuela, China, Russia, and Iran. What To Know Bolivia's electoral system requires candidates to win either 50 percent of the vote or 40 percent with a 10-point lead to avoid a runoff—thresholds neither leading candidate achieved. The fragmentation of Bolivia's once-dominant Movement Toward Socialism (MAS) party, founded by former President Evo Morales, created an opening for opposition candidates. Morales, barred from running due to term limits and facing an arrest warrant on statutory rape charges, urged supporters to cast null ballots in protest. The economic crisis has dominated voter concerns, with the country's natural gas industry collapsing and currency reserves dwindling. Both leading candidates, Quiroga and businessman Samuel Doria Medina, have pledged painful austerity measures including eliminating fuel and food subsidies—policies that risk sparking social unrest in a country where Indigenous and rural communities depend heavily on government support. What To Know Senator Rodrigo Paz Pereira posted this message on X on August 11: "This August 17 we will win. Grateful to all the people, brothers, sisters, who joined us at our campaign closing in the city of #ElAlto #Bolivia #elecciones2025 #cierredecampaña #pdc #victoria #rodrigopaz" Former President Jorge "Tuto" Quiroga said on X on Sunday: "The day has arrived, #17Ago, let's all go vote. #BoliviaVota" Eileen Mirabal, 30-year-old psychologist and voter, told the Associated Press: "The economy is a disaster right now, so all I could bring myself to do was vote for change." Ronaldo Olorio, a former Morales supporter, told the AP: "People were waiting for a new, popular candidate, and in this, the opposition failed us. My vote is one of anger, of discontent." An Indigenous man casts his vote at a polling station during the presidential election at the Kentupata community in Laja, La Paz department, Bolivia on August 17, 2025. An Indigenous man casts his vote at a polling station during the presidential election at the Kentupata community in Laja, La Paz department, Bolivia on August 17, 2025. AIZAR RALDES/AFP via Getty Images What Happens Next? The October 19 runoff will likely pit Paz against Quiroga, though final results remain pending. Both candidates have promised to restore diplomatic ties with the United States, ruptured in 2008 when Morales expelled the American ambassador. They've also pledged to attract foreign investment to develop Bolivia's vast lithium reserves—crucial for global battery production. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
