logo
ActionSA-ANC Joburg partnership on the rocks after speaker Nobuhle Mthembu removed

ActionSA-ANC Joburg partnership on the rocks after speaker Nobuhle Mthembu removed

Daily Maverick5 hours ago

The ANC and its coalition partners in the City of Johannesburg voted to remove the ActionSA speaker, raising questions about their relationship in Tshwane and Gauteng.
In July 2024, ActionSA announced it would vote with the ANC in Johannesburg and Gauteng on an 'issue-by-issue' basis. Party leader Herman Mashaba, who had previously said he'd never work with the ANC, justified the move as necessary to halt Johannesburg's 'downward spiral'.
ActionSA's Nobuhle Mthembu was elected City of Johannesburg speaker in August 2024. The party later took the mayoral chains in Tshwane in a coalition with the ANC and also helped the ANC pass a version of this year's national Budget when the DA opposed its Government of National Unity (GNU) partner.
In Johannesburg, that partnership appears to have collapsed after the ANC supported a no-confidence motion against Mthembu, leading to her removal on Wednesday, 25 June. Mthembu lost the no-confidence vote 212 to 48.
On the same day, Mayor Dada Morero, from the ANC, survived a no-confidence vote, with 144 councillors opposing his removal and 75 supporting the motion in the 250-seat council. Chief whip Sthembiso Zungu also survived a vote for his removal. ActionSA abstained.
The Al Jama-ah party put forward the motion against Mthembu. The ANC-led coalition still has a majority without the support of ActionSA.
'The outcome of this process resulted in the retention of the Executive Mayor, Sello 'Dada' Morero and Councillor Sthembiso Zungu as the chief whip,' said the city in a statement.
'This victory is a clear indication that [the] majority of parties as representative[s] of the residents were voting for stability, continuity and service delivery in Johannesburg.'
The city's statement said Joburg 'has serious challenges' but was 'moving us in the right direction'. The statement did not mention Mthembu.
Speaking to the media on Wednesday, Mthembu said: 'I can never say anything ill about my organisation. I cannot say that ActionSA let me down.'
ActionSA vs DA
On Wednesday morning, ActionSA announced it would not support Morero in the no-confidence vote.
'This decision was taken with full knowledge that ActionSA's refusal will likely result in the ANC retaliating against the ActionSA speaker in the motion tabled against her,' said the party's Gauteng chairperson, Funzi Ngobeni.
Before the vote, Ngobeni was critical of the DA, which had brought the motion against Morero, claiming the party had not consulted with it about what would happen if the mayor was removed. He referred to previous disagreements when the DA's Mpho Phalatsi was mayor.
After Mthembu was removed, Ngobeni continued to criticise the DA. He said the party had 'collapsed a government that was working under Mpho Phalatse' by refusing a new deal with the Patriotic Alliance to keep her in power.
DA caucus leader Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku hadn't responded to a Daily Maverick request for comment at the time of publication, but in a statement, she criticised ActionSA's position on Morero.
'Their abstention in today's vote, which is just as good as a vote to keep Morero, is a cheap tool to keep the door for renegotiations open,' she said.
Budget fallout
ActionSA's relationship with the ANC and its coalition partners in Joburg has been rocky for months.
The party voted against the city's budget in March, largely due to the retention of the R230 prepaid electricity surcharge fee. When ActionSA partnered with the ANC in 2024, among its key priorities was to scrap the fee. However, the surcharge was passed in the budget with the coalition's majority despite ActionSA's opposition.
Following the passing of the city budget, ActionSA's chief whip in the Johannesburg council, Zark Lebatlang, said, 'The ANC has simply refused to commit to any of our proposals.'
At the time, the ANC's Zungu said, 'We have no confidence in them any more. We are not happy with them and after this council, we are going to sit down and … reconsider our relationship with ActionSA.'
In May, News24 reported that ActionSA's Ngobeni said he was aware various parties in the Joburg coalition weren't happy when his party voted against the budget. He said they 'intend to engage them further'.
It's unclear whether ActionSA met the ANC and its coalition partners. It's also unclear how Mthembu's removal will affect ActionSA's relationship with the ANC in Tshwane, where Mayor Nasiphi Moya leads the coalition through the support of the ANC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reflecting on 70 years of the Freedom Charter: a journey towards equality
Reflecting on 70 years of the Freedom Charter: a journey towards equality

IOL News

time34 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Reflecting on 70 years of the Freedom Charter: a journey towards equality

A copy of The Freedom Charter, signed in 1960 by, among others, Chief Albert Luthuli. Image: Cara Viereckl/African News Agency(ANA) SEVENTY years ago, on June 26, 1955, the Freedom Charter was adopted at the Congress of the People in Kliptown. It followed Professor ZK Matthews' suggestion in 1953 to hold a "national convention" to formulate "a Freedom Charter for the democratic South Africa of the future". While not produced by the ANC, it was closely associated with the ANC. People from different walks of life were asked what kind of South Africa they wished to live in, as an alternative to the horrors of apartheid. Their responses were stitched together to create the Freedom Charter. After 1960, with the banning of the African National Congress (ANC) and other political movements and the suppression of protest, the Freedom Charter went out of view. It reappeared when resistance to apartheid began to grow again. In 1980, the Sunday Post published the Freedom Charter and an article on its history. The 1981 Anti-Republic Day movement that protested the racist white republic promoted the Freedom Charter as the basis for a democratic people's republic. The preamble of the Freedom Charter written on the holding cell that the Rivonia Trialists were kept at the Palace of Justice. Image: Masi Losi/African News Agency (ANA) Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading On its 30th anniversary in 1985, it was widely promoted. Many anti-apartheid organisations adopted the Freedom Charter as their manifesto. The Freedom Charter responded to white minority rule, segregation, and the white monopoly of the land, mines and economy, of professional and well-paying jobs and of educational opportunities. It stated that South Africa belonged "to all who live in it, black and white", based "on the will of all the people". It declared that "the people shall govern", that "all national groups shall have equal rights" and all were to "enjoy equal human rights" and "be equal before the law". It called for everyone to "share in the country's wealth", for "the land (to) be shared among those who work it" and for all to have "work and security" and be treated equitably. There was a pledge to ensure "houses, security and comfort" and provide food security and health care. Recognising the importance of education and knowledge, there was a commitment to open "the doors of learning and of culture", ensure "free, compulsory, universal and equal" education for all and sport and recreation opportunities for everyone. Instead of apartheid's militarism, hostility to neighbouring countries and pariah status, the Freedom Charter sought "peace and friendship", "self-determination for all" and peaceful relations with other countries. Seventy years after the Freedom Charter was born and 30 years into democracy, South Africa is a very different and better society, especially for black and women South Africans. Unfortunately, despite strong support and the opportunity to fundamentally remake our country and achieve the Freedom Charter's goals, the ANC squandered the opportunity. Rather than the people governing, popular participation and a grassroots democracy, we have rule by elites focused on their interests and aloof from the people. ANC policies have done little to eliminate inequality and poverty, redistribute land, create decent jobs and ensure effective social services. We are a long way from everyone sharing in South Africa's wealth, the land being shared equitably and 'work and security' for all. Our "wealthiest 10% owns 85% of all household wealth"; the "wealthiest 0.1% own 25% of it". The "wealthiest 3 500 people own more than the most impoverished 32 million. Nowhere else do so few own so much. And there are few other places where that privilege is protected so fiercely to the detriment of the impoverished". Despite considerable investment in education, the children of the impoverished largely end up in the same position as their parents. There are probably less opportunities in black communities and for black youth to play sport today than under the non-racial sports movement of the 1980s. Chauvinists use identity politics to define who is a South African, African, and black in ever more narrow terms. By freezing identities along racial lines, they compromise building a non-racial society in which "race" eventually does not matter. In the international arena, South Africa has won admiration for its stand on the Israeli genocide in Palestine. But commitment to self-determination for all and "peace and friendship" has been inconsistent. We allow coal exports to Israel and are muted on some issues because of material interests. The Freedom Charter is a radical national-democratic manifesto. Neither a liberal reformist nor a socialist programme, it was a positive response to racial and national oppression. Its goal was a non-racial democracy and a unitary national democratic state. For some, the Freedom Charter represents their goals in full. If there has been some progress towards achieving those goal, there is some way to go to achieve what the ANC calls the "national democratic revolution". For others, the Freedom Charter represents their minimum goals. They seek to extend and deepen those goals to build a socialist South Africa that ends the rule by the wealthy and ensures greater equality. Manifestos are important but guarantee nothing. It is struggles waged by mass organisations, the conditions under which they occur, the nature of leadership, and whether there is working class leadership that determines the outcomes of freedom struggles. South Africa in 2025 is a shamefully unequal, unjust and unstable society. The impoverished grind out an existence, while the rich and middle classes flaunt their wealth and fortify themselves behind electric-fences and ubiquitous security companies. It cries out for a social movement with an ethical and capable leadership that is committed to sustainable economic development, eliminating inequality and impoverishment, ensuring fair and just treatment for all and promoting greater participation and democracy. Professor Saleem Badat Image: Supplied Saleem Badat is Research Professor in the Department of History at the University of Free State and the former vice-chancellor of the university currently called Rhodes. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. THE POST

Blame ActionSA for Dada Morero staying
Blame ActionSA for Dada Morero staying

The Citizen

time38 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Blame ActionSA for Dada Morero staying

Morero survived a motion of no confidence on Wednesday, and remains Joburg's mayor. If that old saying that 'you get the government you deserve' is true, then the long-suffering residents and ratepayers of the City of Gold must be a truly awful lot, given the way the municipality has been run for decades. Johannesburg's claim to be a 'world-class African city' is a slogan which continues to haunt those who came up with it, so bad is the decay in the richest metro in South Africa. As the City of Joburg today announces painful increases in its charges for the services it mostly doesn't deliver, many homeowners are without power – through City Power incompetence or simply through having fallen victim to its capricious and cruel, but inefficient billing system. Others will queue to replace tyres and rims damaged by the potholes which mushroom daily and still other households will have to walk to a city-supplied water tanker because they having nothing coming out of their taps. Sitting atop this cesspool of failure is the mayor, Dada Morero, who has just survived a motion of no confidence in council. ALSO READ: Joburg mayor Dada Morero survives motion of no confidence In and of himself, he seems quite inoffensive and has tried to go on a charm offensive by halting some increases in charges. But he has done little to save the city. Not that he could, anyway, because there is far too much left in the trough and the comrades have got to feed. Yet, he is the symbol of failure and, as such, his head should have rolled yesterday. The fact that it didn't is down to the expected support from his ANC colleagues, but also to the fact that ActionSA – the ANC's new best friend – abstained from voting. Its excuse was laughable: it would not defend him, it claimed. By abstaining, they allowed him to stay… therefore they did defend him. Politics – 1; Service delivery – Nil. NOW READ: Joburg speaker removed in vote of no confidence

DA disappointed as Joburg mayor Dada Morero survives no-confidence motion
DA disappointed as Joburg mayor Dada Morero survives no-confidence motion

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

DA disappointed as Joburg mayor Dada Morero survives no-confidence motion

Following a failed motion of no confidence in Johannesburg mayor Dada Morero, the Democratic Alliance (DA) says it is clear who is on the side of service delivery and who is on the side of positions. The DA tabled a motion of confidence in Morero just ten months into his term, citing incompetence and lack of service delivery among other issues. On Wednesday, 25 July, a total of 144 councillors from the ANC-led coalition voted against the motion, while 75 voted in favour, and 43 ActionSA councillors abstained. In addition, council speaker Nobuhle Mthembu from Action SA was ousted in an Al Jama-ah-sponsored no-confidence motion. DA Johannesburg caucus leader Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku said while parties in council chose positions over principles, the DA can proudly say that it brought forward a motion to dismiss the man presiding over Johannesburg's decay. Kayser-Echeozonjoku said no amount of spin by a failing executive can conceal Johannesburg's rot and decay – but the residents of Johannesburg will not forget. 'While the order of the day has been political posturing, the DA can reveal that ActionSA's abstention on the vote against Executive Mayor Dada Morero only came about because of their inability to convince the corrupt to give them more positions in the executive. Their abstention in today's vote, which is just as good as a vote to keep Morero, is a cheap tool to keep the door for renegotiations open,' she said. Reacting to the failed motion, Dada Morero said it is worrying that the DA failed to present quite convincing arguments. 'One had expected them to present strong arguments, but they did not prepare adequately, that's what I noticed. This gives the impression that there are challenges of capacity within the caucus leadership because their statements were quite very low [sic].' Morero accused the DA of electioneering and said that he knew the motion would not succeed even before councillors voted. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store