
‘Bizarre and wrong': Danish zoo sparks debate with plea for pets to use as food
But beyond the battleground playing out on social media – where some protested against the idea of using pets as prey and others praised the zoo's efforts to drum up a practical food supply – some were swift to point out that the zoo was simply laying bare the reality of keeping carnivores in captivity.
'If you accept the fact that you have carnivores in human care, either as a pet or as a zoo, you will agree to the fact that you feed them animal matter. Basically there is no other choice,' said Marcus Clauss, the co-director of the Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife at the University of Zurich, pointing to vegan dog food as one of the few exceptions to this. 'And then the logical next step is the question, where do you source that animal product from?'
As the zoo's plea made headlines around the world, Aalborg zoo closed comments on its post, citing 'hateful and malicious rhetoric'. The zoo said it was simply aiming to mimic the natural food chain by urging those with chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs that need to be put down to instead hand them over to the zoo. 'That way, nothing goes to waste – and we ensure the natural behaviour, nutrition and wellbeing of our predators.'
Few would question the alternative, even though it came with the risk that zoo animals could end up being fed meat from animals raised in relatively poor conditions, said Clauss. 'As long as it's beef from the slaughterhouse, nobody sees it and nobody needs to think about it,' he said. 'As soon as it's an animal that is being killed at the zoo, it's in everybody's face.'
Some of the backlash was likely down to the wording of the appeal, said Dan Ashe of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, which counts more than 200 accredited facilities spanning from the US to the UAE. 'I think the thing that people maybe see as potentially shocking is the use of the word pet,' he said.
He chalked it up to cultural differences. 'Professionally, I would not expect anything like that to happen at one of our accredited zoos, certainly not here in the US. But our accreditation policies wouldn't necessarily prohibit it.'
The plea, however, spoke to a common understanding among zoos around the world: the importance, both nutritionally and behaviourally, of mimicking nature by feeding carnivores the entire carcass of animals. 'Carcass-feeding is a regular feature of what our members do when they are available, some of our members accept donations of road-killed deer or animals,' said Ashe.
Some zoos had actively sought to spotlight this, he said, citing a recent event at Denver zoo where the public was invited – and warned appropriately beforehand – to watch as lions were fed pig carcasses. 'The lions seemed to benefit, and certainly the guests who chose to watch it – it was packed,' he said.
Others, however, found little redeeming in the Danish appeal. 'To me this was so far beyond the pale,' said Clifford Warwick, a UK-based consultant biologist and medical scientist. 'The entire thing is bizarre and wrong.'
As the zoo did not specify how the donated pets would be euthanised, Warwick worried it would be impossible to do so in a way that was both humane and ensured that the animals remained safe to be eaten by predators such as the European lynx.
'And there's no validity to their claim of needing to give animals a natural diet this way,' he said. 'Lynx don't eat guinea pigs. Where do they get guinea pigs from? Lynx would eat almost any small mammal, sure, but they can't turn around and say that's a natural behaviour.'
Aalborg zoo did not reply to a request for an interview.
At a time when animal shelters around the world are grappling with overcrowding, Warwick also bristled at what he saw as the wider implications of the zoo's message. 'It further devalues the lives of pets … It's a horrendous devaluation of animal life,' he said. 'Are you really happy saying: 'OK, well Rex or Bruno, the time has come, there's a hungry lion at the local zoo. Bye, off you go.''
The wide range of reactions hints at the many factors that play into the broader question of how to keep carnivores fed at zoos, said Alessandro Di Marzio, the science lead at Riga zoo.
'Zoos are spread across a wide range of areas, so you'll find places where certain techniques are considered acceptable and more or less normal for society, while in other areas they're not,' he said, with local laws, economic resources and culture also helping to shape these tactics. 'It depends on all these circumstances.'
The resulting clash of cultures has at times been glaring; earlier this year, Germany's Nuremberg zoo sparked protests after it confirmed it had killed six of its 12 Guinea baboons due to overcrowding and had fed the primates to lions, tigers, maned wolves and marbled polecats.
In Denmark, Copenhagen zoo was the focus of global protests in 2014 after it put down an 18-month-old giraffe, citing the risk of inbreeding, and fed some of the meat to the zoo's lions.
For Clauss, the heated debate unleashed this week recalled one of the emails sent to Copenhagen zoo after the euthanasia of the giraffe. 'It said: 'Why do you have to kill animals to feed your carnivores? Can't you just buy meat?''
While he did not think the view was representative in any way, he marvelled at how the Danish appeal had served to kickstart a global conversation. 'The amazing thing is that we learn about these things because of zoos,' he said. 'And not because of what we do at the supermarket.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
A-level results in England expected to return to near pre-pandemic levels
Students in England are expected to receive A-level grades that are closer to normal for the first time since the Covid pandemic triggered school closures and exam cancellations. The grades will more closely resemble those given out in 2019, before the pandemic, with the proportion of A* to E grades linked to national results from the GCSE exams taken by the same pupils two years ago. While most of the students who sat A-levels this spring were affected by pandemic disruption during their early years at secondary school, they will be the first group to have gone through their exam years without major turbulence. It comes as the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, pledged to make a priority of tackling British white working-class young people falling behind their peers in the year ahead. The government will set out its plans for the challenge in a schools white paper in the autumn, she added. Prof Alan Smithers, of Buckingham University's centre for education and employment research, said that 2024's A-level grades were unexpectedly high in England, which could have echoes in this year's outcomes. 'A-level grades have a chance to settle down this year after the volatility of Covid and its aftermath. They are likely to be close to last year's, where top grades were a percentage point or two above pre-Covid levels. This may not sound very much but, in fact, was an extra 14,200 A*s and 21,300 A*-As,' Smithers said. 'But there is huge variation in grades between subjects, a changing pattern in entries, and movement in the subject distribution of the sexes, which could also influence the outcome.' The proportion of top A* and As awarded soared after grades were set by school assessment in 2020 and 2021, and remained at higher levels when exams returned in 2022. But last year 9.3% of A-level entries in England gained A* grades, above pre-pandemic levels, leaving experts struggling to explain why. Analysts at FFT Datalab research unit said there were fewer students taking A-levels this year after record numbers in 2024, as entry patterns stabilised after the bumper post-pandemic crop of students who received better GCSE grades, enabling more of them to enrol on A-level courses. This year, career-related subjects such as business studies and economics will overtake traditional academic subjects such as history, while the sciences and maths continue to rise in popularity despite the fall in the numbers taking A-levels overall. Just 40,900 students entered to take history, compared with 41,900 taking economics and 43,000 for physics. Maths remains the most popular A-level with 105,000 entries this year, up by more than 4% compared with 2024. English literature entries fell by 5% to below 35,000, while the numbers taking French and German continued to decline. About 250,000 sixth-formers in England will receive their A-level results on Thursday, with others choosing to take BTecs or other standalone or vocational qualifications such as T-levels. Students in Wales and Northern Ireland will receive their A-level results on the same day but their grades are administered separately from those in England. Scotland published the results for its Higher and Advanced Higher qualifications last week, showing a record number receiving grades A to C in Highers. School leavers in England hoping to go to university have received higher numbers of offers as institutions have aggressively sought to fill places after a downturn in international applications. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Universities usually offer places on undergraduate courses that are conditional on reaching certain A-level grades. But Mike Nicholson, director of recruitment, admissions and participation at the University of Cambridge, said many universities would probably be 'looking very carefully' at accepting applicants who narrowly failed to achieve the required grades. Nicholson said: 'If the student, for instance, needed three As [and] gets AAB, as long as the B is not in something that's absolutely crucial for the course, I think there's a very strong possibility the student would find they'd be getting a place. 'If universities have the capacity to take near-miss students I think they'll be very keen to take them this year because those students are already in the system, they've already committed, they've possibly already even applied for accommodation. Phillipson said it was a 'national disgrace' that so many young people were 'written off' and did not get what they needed in the education system to achieve and thrive after leaving school. She added her focus would be turning around the 'stark' attainment gap and outcomes between white working-class children and their peers. Fewer than a fifth (18.6%) of white British pupils eligible for free school meals achieved at least a grade 5 – which is considered a 'strong pass' – in their English and maths GCSEs in 2023-24, compared with 45.9% of all state school pupils in England, according to Department for Education (DfE) data. Phillipson said: 'They're not well-positioned to carry on with studies, to get an apprenticeship, to go on to university. That is why the schools white paper we will be publishing in the autumn will set out an ambitious vision for how we can tackle this generational challenge of what many young people experience. '(It) is a national disgrace that so many young people are written off and don't get what they need to achieve and thrive.'


Times
7 hours ago
- Times
Even I see the point of prenups these days
As summer weddings roll by, does the thought of prenuptial contracts reassure or disgust you? It may depend on your generation, but their rising popularity certainly reflects a change in the idea of marriage. Even 20 years ago most of us associated 'prenups' with American billionaires, Hollywood stars with chronically unsettled emotions or George Clooney getting gloriously suckered in the Coen brothers' Intolerable Cruelty. But ideals erode: four years ago the Marriage Foundation estimated that one in five couples in the UK sign prenups, and a YouGov survey finds more than 60 per cent liking the idea. Inquiries to law firms reflect the change and so, cautiously, does the law itself: since a 2009 Supreme Court ruling, a contract between a couple ring-fencing their separate assets can be taken into consideration during divorce proceedings. • Why are couples who meet online more likely to fall out of love? And last year Sir Robert Buckland KC wrote here that it's already time to make prenups fully enforceable. As Boris Johnson's lord chancellor he knows the turf, having introduced no-fault divorce. He calls prenups a 'wise and practical choice'. It's worth discussing, though traditional spirits may wince. Ancient vows echo down the centuries: 'For richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, forsaking all others, till death us do part.' The bride's promise to obey, of course, got shuffled out of the service in the 1920s, though Princess Elizabeth endearingly opted to say it to Philip Mountbatten in 1947. But even harder to find in use is one magnificent 16th-century promise that bridegrooms made: 'With all my worldly goods, I thee endow.' Women never said it, since it was pretty much implied for centuries that we'd hand everything over, unless protected by some upper-crust web of trusts or entails. But now, even in church weddings, that majestic phrase is nearly gone, enduring only if you choose the 1559 Book of Common Prayer. Otherwise it's Alternative Services: Series One (as used by the Prince of Wales) which more cautiously says: 'All my worldly goods with thee I share.' Still more commonly in our age of self-analysis and identity-pride, each just says: 'All that I am I give to you.' In the Catholic service there's no mention of money-sharing. Yet there is an ancient, haunting bravery about that lordly promise to 'endow' every penny of your wealth on the beloved. The word suggests permanent, irrecoverable; an almost monastic plunge of dedication. It certainly contrasts with the fashion for writing your own florid vows, like 'You are my sunrise and sunset, the dream I have dreamt all my life'; 'I promise to never lose our spark' or — apparently quite popular — the Backstreet Boys-style 'You are my fire, my one desire'. None of these specifically implies endowing any assets. • Inside Picasso's studios: the secrets of the places where he lived and loved Tracking the phrase, I hit upon Mumsnet. Here, in a very modern take, is a young woman worriedly unsure whether, during her register office wedding, she somehow accidentally 'endowed' her chap with a right to half the £10,000 she got by selling a possession from her single days. Was it, she asks, written in law? Because if so, 'I'm just uncomfortable with the idea of not having control of my stuff!'. Someone else asks if selling her clothes on eBay entitles him to half the dibs. The discussion continues sensibly enough, with talk of fairness and joint accounts and pensions in divorce. But the uncomfortable lack of clarity, and frequent depressing stories of rough divorces, began to change my mind about prenups. And, as one commenter sapiently observed, by marrying in the UK you're sort of signing one anyway: it's just that if you do separate it'll be the courts, not you, deciding who gets what. And — aside from the obvious need for child support — who wants strange lawyers running your life? It is easy to mock prenup absurdities, American or domestic. One law firm, conceivably tongue in cheek, suggests terms that couples might include. Like at what age you can each retire, the frequency of family visits, restricted screen time, sexual action or stipulations on future weight (one comedian jokes that there are two stone of her man which she certainly never married). Another suggested stipulation was to dictate 'how long either party is expected to wait before dating somebody else if they separate'. • Alison Steadman: 'My secret? A few gins and tonic in the evening' Most of these are enough to make any onlooker turn down the wedding invitation and bin the gift list; few firms would even draft them and no court admits their validity. But it could be that if they became fully enforceable, as Buckland suggests, only rational and financial ones would be written. And money does matter when more than four out of ten marriages break up. We have an inexcusably wide wealth gap; a twistedly absurd housing market makes it worse. Prenups are very tempting if one party has built up assets: it's middle-aged couples who still inquire most about prenups because implicitly 'endowing' half a business or property feels risky. Our intergenerational wealth gap is an even bigger driver of worry. Homeowner parents who donated a deposit on a first flat or might leave a small fortune within a decade or so may flinch and murmur about a prenup if their child's whirlwind romance looks like a gambler, drinker or reckless investor. Some might make paying for the wedding conditional on such a precaution, since only the wealthiest can afford the complexity of setting up trusts. It's all fuel for sad long-term rifts. But maybe if prenups do become the norm, like insurance or fire extinguishers, and were known to be fully enforceable, it might all feel less creepy. Maybe it's time. But, sigh! It's not romantic …


Times
7 hours ago
- Times
How to erase the misery of student loneliness
T here are many implausible things about the Netflix campus romance My Oxford Year — an American visits the dreaming spires and falls for her handsome, castle-dwelling, cancer-stricken tutor — but perhaps the most unlikely part is the way new students confidently start chatting on first meeting. In my experience, they are more likely to stare intently at their shoes or phones in awkward silence, especially the boys. The real story is that many feel deeply lonely during their degrees, as several polls and studies confirm. A bit of future loneliness may not seem like a big deal to parents facing the ordeal of A-level results day this week, more concerned about whether their offspring will get to university at all. They probably assume things haven't much changed since their own time spent propping up the student bar; that eventually all but the most antisocial are bound to make friends. But in fact, quite a lot has changed — even leaving aside the negative effects of smartphones or lockdowns on burgeoning social skills.