A retired woman living month-to-month on disability says one of her biggest financial regrets was being too generous
At one point, she had over $100,000 in medical debt. She said she'd paid most of it off, but doing so drained most of her savings.
"Right now, I live totally on what I receive from disability," Swanagan said at the time of her interview with Business Insider in late 2024, adding, "I wouldn't consider myself financially stable."
Are you an older American comfortable sharing your retirement outlook with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form. We are especially interested in hearing from people 80 and older.
Swanagan said that one of her financial regrets is giving too much money to friends in need when she was younger and not saving more for herself.
"It's OK to care about people," she said, adding, "However, you have to look at what it is costing you mentally and financially. You only have so many years to prepare for retirement."
Swanagan is one of many in the US whose retirement was derailed by a medical crisis. Dozens of people between 48 and 96 who have emailed reporters or responded to surveys about their biggest life regrets told BI their stories about not factoring medical expenses into retirement planning or prioritizing routine medical appointments.
She regrets not asking for more money
After getting divorced, Swanagan raised her three children on a single salary as a solo parent, but never took government assistance before retirement. She believed being financially self-resilient set the right example for her children to become productive members of society.
However, that meant she constantly worked long hours and juggled multiple jobs to support her family. She spent 15 years as a correctional officer in Texas, Kansas, Washington, and Illinois. She also worked in hospitals, worked side gigs on farms, and provided in-home care for Alzheimer's patients.
Looking back, she regrets some of her decisions. "There were times I worked for less than I was worth," she said, adding, "I never demanded more money or moved on to where I was appreciated. My salary hovered around $50,000."
She wishes she'd saved more for the future
Despite tight finances, Swanagan said she always helped coworkers and friends who were going through hard times. It was "never more than a couple hundred dollars," she said, "but it adds up."
She said helping people is important, but your future self is someone worth helping, too. If she could go back in time, she said she would tell her younger self not to be so generous because the future is unknown.
"There's no such thing as a perfect retirement plan," she said. "Circumstances change, and you can never be fully prepared."
Later in life, Swanagan was diagnosed with a rare, aggressive hormonal disorder called acromegaly, which she said caused her brain tumor and was a contributing factor to her diabetes and high blood pressure. It also caused some of her bones, including those in her jaw, to expand, which led her to lose all of her teeth and her joints to ache constantly.
"There's nothing they can really do about it to take the pain away, so I'm always in some degree of pain, stiffness. I have trouble walking," she said.
Unable to work, Swanagan lives on inherited farmland in Illinois that has been in her family since 1856. At the time of her interview with BI, she was staying in her SUV, which she converted into a camper while she waited for the tiny home she ordered to arrive.
"I have people around me that are family that are willing to pitch in and help me put my home together," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
7 minutes ago
- Forbes
Nearshoring Is A Strategic Advantage U.S. Companies Shouldn't Ignore
Luis Peralta is CEO of ParallelStaff, helping U.S. companies scale with elite nearshore tech talent across Latin America. When the Trump administration launched a wide-reaching tariff campaign in 2025, the intention was to protect American manufacturing and rebalance trade relationships. But beyond the immediate impact on goods, the ripple effects of those policies prompted U.S. businesses to reassess how they source services and talent globally—particularly in technology, where speed, adaptability and innovation are essential. In response, some companies began moving away from traditional offshoring hubs, exploring alternatives like nearshoring—especially in Latin America. While not a universal solution, nearshoring has emerged as a viable option for organizations looking to address long-standing challenges in offshore engagements, such as time zone misalignment, communication lags and geopolitical uncertainty. The Tariff Wars Reshaped More Than Just Goods During its peak, the U.S.-China trade conflict imposed over $360 billion in tariffs, increasing costs on everything from electronics to machinery. While much of the spotlight remained on physical supply chains, the downstream effects also impacted digital services. IT leaders began to scrutinize: • How reliant are we on teams in countries vulnerable to policy swings? • Are we sacrificing speed and collaboration in exchange for marginal cost savings? • How quickly can we pivot if geopolitical or logistical variables change? The answers were rarely comforting. Companies that once defaulted to offshore staff augmentation in distant regions like Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe began facing performance issues, not just due to distance and time zones, but also regulatory uncertainty and communication lags. The search for a more resilient, time-sensitive solution pointed south. Nearshoring: A Growing Option, Not A Cure-All Enter nearshore software development: a model built not only on cost-efficiency, but on strategic alignment. By tapping into the talent pool of countries like Mexico, Colombia, Brazil and Argentina, U.S. companies have discovered a workforce that is technically skilled, culturally aligned, and geographically proximate. Nearshoring is no longer about saving money but gaining speed, clarity and control. Here's why it's flourishing: Time Zones That Actually Work: Unlike far-shore outsourcing, nearshore partners operate in U.S.-friendly time zones. Daily standups, sprint reviews and real-time collaboration can occur during shared business hours. The result? Faster development cycles and fewer miscommunications. Cultural And Business Alignment: Latin American professionals are known for their strong English skills and familiarity with U.S. work culture. That cultural overlap leads to smoother onboarding, better teamwork and fewer project delays. High-Caliber Engineering Talent: The Latin American tech ecosystem has exploded. Governments and private sectors alike have invested heavily in STEM education and digital infrastructure. Today's LATAM developers are fluent in English and Java, Python, .NET and DevOps. Agility in a Volatile Economy: The global economic landscape is turbulent—rising interest rates, inflationary pressures and labor shortages have made long-term hiring risky. This is where IT staff augmentation through nearshoring becomes a game-changer. Staff Augmentation: A Scalable Safety Net The traditional hiring model—full-time, on-site, with a six-month ramp-up—simply doesn't work in today's tech economy. Projects shift. Roadmaps pivot. Budgets get slashed. Companies need a way to scale teams without locking into fixed costs. That's precisely what nearshore staff augmentation offers: access to vetted software engineers who can plug into your internal teams quickly, work in your time zone and align with your culture, without the overhead of full-time hiring or the lag of offshoring. It's not just about filling seats; it's about enhancing velocity. The Risks Behind The Rewards: A Balanced Look At Nearshore Outsourcing Nearshoring isn't a magic bullet—it's a strategy. And like any strategy, it comes with trade-offs. Here are the common pitfalls leaders should be aware of: Oversight Still Matters: Nearshore teams may be easier to integrate, but they still require structured onboarding, daily engagement and strong documentation practices. Skimping on these can lead to misalignment or missed deadlines. Talent Turnover Can Hurt: Latin America's tech talent is in high demand—meaning your star developers could be poached by competitors if not engaged long term. Continuity isn't guaranteed unless you invest in team loyalty and relationship-building. Communication Gaps Aren't Gone—Just Smaller: While cultural alignment is stronger than with offshore teams, subtle communication issues can still arise. Assumptions around feedback, conflict resolution or even deadlines can vary slightly across borders. Quality Isn't Universal: The LATAM region is home to world-class engineers—but not every firm or freelancer is created equal. Without a rigorous vetting process, companies risk hiring underqualified talent or teams that overpromise and underdeliver. In short, nearshoring offers a smarter, faster alternative to traditional outsourcing—but it still demands strategic execution. Success depends on choosing the right partner, setting clear expectations and treating remote contributors like core team members—not contractors. Looking Ahead As businesses navigate an increasingly complex global landscape—shaped by economic pressures, shifting regulations and evolving workforce expectations—talent strategies need to be both resilient and adaptive. Nearshoring won't replace all forms of global outsourcing, nor will it be the right fit for every company. But for organizations seeking closer collaboration, faster execution and more predictable operations, it offers a pragmatic alternative worth considering—provided it's approached with clear goals and realistic expectations. Rather than ask whether nearshoring is better than offshoring, the better question might be: What mix of talent models will make us most responsive, most competitive and most resilient in the years ahead? Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
'Revenge saving' picks up as consumers brace for economic uncertainty
Americans are tightening their belts, as concerns about tariffs, inflation, job security and market volatility have prompted many consumers to pare back their spending and increase their savings, financial experts say. The U.S. personal saving rate — the percentage of disposable income that U.S. households save, after they pay taxes and spend money — has risen sharply this year, reaching 4.5% in May, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis data released Friday. That is slightly down from 4.9% in April, but up significantly from 3.5% in December. Some consumers may be changing their financial habits from so-called "revenge spending" — the trend of splurging after the pandemic — to "revenge saving," as they focus more on building savings and spending less. "No buy" challenges are going viral on social media platforms like TikTok and Reddit, as consumers vow to limit their discretionary spending, cut back on subscriptions and travel, and rebuild their savings. A recent Vanguard survey found 71% of Americans polled plan to shift their savings approach this summer to prioritize emergency savings and flexibility. Financial advisors typically recommend consumers aim to set aside three to six months' worth of living expenses as a cash cushion. But you might benefit from having more in some circumstances; for example, if you're a one-income household or your pay is variable, experts say. Having ample cash reserves improves overall financial wellbeing, according to Vanguard researchers. "American workers are spending, on average, nearly seven hours each and every week thinking about their finances," said Dina Caggiula, head of participant experience at Vanguard. "But if you have sufficient emergency savings, we can cut that number nearly in half." Several factors are prompting consumers to be cautious and cut back, including fluid tariff negotiations, the prospect of higher inflation and interest rates lingering at higher levels longer than some expected, financial advisors and researchers say. Many Americans are also concerned about geopolitics and social unrest. Some of the "revenge savings" trend is consumers wanting to amass cash to help shield themselves from unexpected cost increases in the future. "This may be a lot of just defensive behavior or anticipatory behavior. I may not need the money today, but I'm going to get access to that money in case I need it a few months down the road," said Charlie Wise, senior vice president and head of global research and consulting at TransUnion. Workers are also increasing the share of pay they contribute to retirement savings plans, which has boosted the 401(k) savings rate to a record high. A recent report from Fidelity, the nation's largest 401(k) provider, found 401(k) savings rates hit a record high in the first quarter of 2025, with a contribution rate of 9.5%. When you add matching contributions from employers, the savings rate for those plans rises to 14.3%, edging closer to Fidelity's recommended retirement savings rate of 15% a year. Meanwhile, another report from Vanguard shows the average savings rate for employee deferrals was 7.7% in 2024, matching record-high levels from the previous year. More retirement plans are making it easier for workers to enroll and contribute through automatic enrollment and automatic escalation features. "If you get money automatically out of people's paychecks, kind of the same way taxes come out of people's paychecks, if we can do that, most people end up saving a very high percentage of their income," said Jeff Schneble, CEO of Human Interest, a New York-based firm that helps small companies set up 401(k) services.
Forbes
14 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Summer Fridays Are Disappearing In The Hybrid Work Era
As hybrid work becomes the norm, the tradition of Summer Fridays is quietly slipping away. Summer Fridays were once the ultimate symbol of progressive office culture, a sign that a company valued work-life balance. Now, this much-loved perk is fading from the American workplace. According to a recent Monster survey, 84% of workers receive no summer-specific benefits. This shift is happening even as flexibility becomes more important than ever for employees. In Cisco's global survey of over 21,000 workers, 63% said they would accept a pay cut in exchange for remote work options. The disappearance of Summer Fridays signals a deeper change in what employees value and what companies are willing to provide. Let's explore how hybrid work has altered the role of workplace perks, what employees want and who really benefits from the new era of flexibility. How Has Hybrid Work Changed Summer Perks? The shift to hybrid and remote work has changed how, when and where work happens. As a result, Summer Fridays have largely lost their impact. INRIX's 2024 Global Traffic Scorecard reveals that fewer people commute on Fridays. Most office attendance is now clustered earlier in the week, according to Cisco's research, which also found that 72% of organizations have some type of return-to-office mandate. Still, Friday is the least popular day to be in the office. Hybrid work allows employees to manage their own time by skipping Friday commutes or adjusting their hours as needed. The "long weekend" spirit of Summer Fridays has been replaced by the year-round flexibility that hybrid work allows. What Do Employees Value And What's Missing? Even as flexibility increases, many employees still crave structured summer perks. Monster's survey found that among those who receive summer benefits, Summer Fridays remain the most valued, ahead of flexible hours and flextime. Over half of workers say these perks improve productivity. However, the majority of employees are not getting any summer-specific perks. Hybrid work often means more general flexibility but less of the collective, company-wide downtime that defined Summer Fridays. The result is a gap between what workers say they want and what companies are offering. This gap matters for retention. Robert Half reports that 76% of workers say flexibility in when and where they work influences their decision to stay with their employer. Nearly half of job seekers prefer hybrid roles, and more than a quarter want fully remote jobs. Flexibility is no longer a bonus. It is a basic expectation and a deciding factor for many when considering job offers. Who Actually Gets Flexibility? Hybrid work isn't distributed equally. Robert Half's analysis shows apparent gaps by industry, geography and seniority. In tech, finance and professional services, more than 30% of new roles in some markets offer hybrid options. In contrast, retail, healthcare and manufacturing often have fewer flexible opportunities. Geographically, states such as Massachusetts, Minnesota and New York lead the way, with 31%, 30% and 29% of new jobs offering hybrid arrangements. Metro areas such as Sacramento, San Francisco and Boston are at the top for hybrid job availability. Seniority matters, too. Senior-level professionals with at least five years of experience see 31% of roles as hybrid and 15% as remote. For entry-level employees, those numbers drop to 18% hybrid and 10% remote. For some, hybrid work has replaced Summer Fridays with more consistent year-round flexibility. For others, especially those early in their careers or in less flexible fields, the loss of a company-wide perk is noticeable. What Are The Costs of Losing Summer Fridays? Hybrid work brings clear benefits, but eliminating summer perks has downsides. Company-wide downtime, like Summer Fridays, offered a communal pause that helped teams recharge. According to Exos, a wellness company that works with employers such as JetBlue and Adobe, employee burnout decreases when organizations offer more flexible Fridays. Their "You Do You Fridays" program led to measurable improvements in well-being. Traditional Summer Fridays also addressed seasonal stress. Monster's research shows that the biggest summer challenges are vacation conflicts, childcare and covering for co-workers. General hybrid work policies don't fully address these issues. Support also matters. Monster's survey found that 42% of workers feel unsupported by their managers when it comes to handling summer scheduling. Hybrid work may provide autonomy, but it does not always address the unique pressures that arise during the summer. Why Is Retention At Risk? Removing Summer Fridays increases the risk that employees will leave for companies that provide more flexibility or better support. Robert Half found that 29% of professionals are looking or planning to look for a new job in the first half of 2025, with flexibility as the top motivator. Many workers are already finding their own ways to manage work-life balance, with or without official perks. Monster reports that 64% of employees feel confident they can maintain a balance during the summer, yet much of this confidence stems from individual effort rather than company policy. Employers who remove Summer Fridays without offering equally robust flexibility are likely to lose out in the competition for talent. How Can You Enjoy Year-Round Flexibility at Work? What should workers focus on as Summer Fridays become a thing of the past? When evaluating job offers, look for year-round flexibility, clear hybrid work policies and supportive management, especially during high-pressure periods. Consider industries and locations where flexible work is the norm. When interviewing, ask about how the company handles seasonal schedules and coverage gaps. Employers should recognize that flexibility is no longer a seasonal perk. If Summer Fridays are disappearing, they must be replaced with policies that offer consistent and meaningful autonomy. Companies that invest in real, structured flexibility will be better positioned to recruit and retain top talent.
