Labor minister faces backlash for saying there are no beggars in Cuba
Cuba's Minister of Labor and Social Security, Marta Elena Feitó Cabrera, made the comments on Monday before deputies in a National Assembly committee. They went viral, prompting calls for Feitó impeachment and a wave of criticism in a country experiencing a tough economic situation in recent years.
The economic crisis in Cuba has increased social vulnerability and led to unusual scenes for the island, such as people — especially the elderly — begging or scavenging through garbage, or some cleaning windshields at corners.
'We have seen people, apparently beggars, (but) when you look at their hands, look at the clothes these people are wearing, they are disguised as beggars, they are not beggars,' Feitó said before the National Assembly committee. 'In Cuba there are no beggars.'
She added that people cleaning windshields use the money to 'drink alcohol.'
Feitó also lashed out against those who search through the garbage dumps. She said they are recovering materials 'to resell and not pay tax.'
Without mentioning her name, but referring to the meeting at the National Assembly committee where Feitó participated, President Miguel Díaz-Canel said on his X account: 'the lack of sensitivity in addressing vulnerability is highly questionable. The revolution cannot leave anyone behind; that is our motto, our militant responsibility.'
Until a few years ago, despite the poverty, there were no signs of begging or homelessness on the island thanks to benefits that have now been greatly reduced.
The pension of a retiree is about 2,000 Cuban pesos per month, roughly $5 on the informal market, and just under the cost of a carton of eggs. For those who don't receive remittances from family abroad, it means going hungry.
Self-employed Enrique Guillén believes the minister is wrong and that some people do not see the situation clearly, and hopes the government will take action.
'They are elderly people who count on a pension that does not exist. They cannot even buy a carton of eggs. It is the reality we are living in Cuba,' Guillén said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 days ago
- BBC News
Steve Rosenberg: Russia is staying quiet on Trump's nuclear move
Could this be the first time in history a social media spat triggers nuclear escalation?President Donald Trump, offended by posts by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, says he's ordered two nuclear submarines to move closer to how will Moscow respond? Are we on a path to a nuclear standoff between America and Russia? An internet-age version of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis?I doubt it, judging by initial reaction in Russia. Russian news outlets have been rather dismissive of Trump's to the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper, a military commentator concluded that Trump was "throwing a temper tantrum".A retired lieutenant-general told Kommersant that the US president's talk of submarines was "meaningless blather. It's how he gets his kicks"."I'm sure Trump didn't really give any orders [about submarines]," a Russian security expert suggested to the same also mentions that in 2017, Trump said that he'd despatched two nuclear submarines to the Korean peninsula as a warning to North not long after, Trump held a meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong bizarrely, might Donald Trump's latest submarine deployment be a precursor to a US-Russia summit?I wouldn't go that the reaction from the Russian authorities has been time of writing, there hasn't been any. Not from the Kremlin. Not from the Russian foreign ministry. Nor the defence I've seen no announcement about Russian nuclear submarines being positioned closer to suggests that either Moscow is still studying the situation and working out what to do, or that Moscow doesn't feel the need to Russian press reaction I mentioned earlier suggests it's the latter. Trump had been sparring with Medvedev on social media for several the US president had reduced his 50-day deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine to less than two weeks, Medvedev posted that Trump was "playing the ultimatum game with Russia…Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war".Trump responded: "Tell Medvedev, the failed former Russian president who thinks he is still in power, to be careful what he says. He is entering very dangerous territory."Medvedev's next post contained a reference to "Dead Hand", the automatic nuclear retaliation system developed in the Soviet that did not go down well with the White House he was Russia's president, between 2008 and 2012, Medvedev was seen as a relatively liberal figure."Freedom is better than no freedom" he was famously quoted as he has grown increasingly hawkish. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine he has gained a reputation for bombastic, anti-Western social media posts. Most of them have passed unnoticed, since he is not viewed as the voice of the he has been noticed: by the President of the United not just noticed. He's got right under Trump's one thing to dislike a social media post. We've all been to dislike it so much you deploy nuclear submarines feels like why has Trump done it?Here's Trump's own explanation from his interview with Newsmax: "Medvedev said some things that are very bad, talking about nuclear. When you mention the word nuclear my eyes light up and I say we better be careful, because it's the ultimate threat."But Medvedev has long been accused of nuclear sabre-rattling via social media. It's nothing is clear is that Trump took the recent Medvedev posts very personally, and reacted there also be a strategy at play? Unpredictability feels like a big part of Trump's way of doing things, in business and in politics; taking unexpected decisions that can put rivals and opponents off balance before talks or during a ending the war in Ukraine, for submarine deployments may well fall into that category.
Times
30-07-2025
- Times
Michel Barnier v Rachida Dati: the prize fight for Paris
When Michel Barnier stepped down as the EU's Brexit negotiator in 2021, observers assumed he was planning to retire to his country house in the wooded Sologne region south of Paris. They were wrong. He kept his main home in the capital's chic 7th arrondissement, where he has provoked an internecine war within his Republicans party by standing in a by-election against Rachida Dati, the tough-talking centre-right culture minister who dreams of becoming mayor of Paris next year. Dati is livid about what she views as his intrusion in her well-heeled backyard. Barnier does not seem to care. He has his eyes on bigger things. At the age of 74, he believes that his 'destiny' may be to unite a fractured, indebted, befuddled nation by becoming president. • Rachida Dati: why the most feared woman in Paris won't back down Barnier has pointedly refused to rule out entering the race to succeed President Macron in 2027 and, in the meantime, he is seeking to become an MP once more, 47 years after he first sat in the National Assembly. This week the Republicans named him as the candidate for an autumn by-election in a Parisian constituency considered so safe that 'you don't have to mess around handing out leaflets in markets', according to a senior member of the movement. Barnier's victory is a foregone conclusion, or at least it would be if Dati, 59, had not also decided to stand in the by-election. The confrontation between Dati, the child of north African immigrants who has fought her way up the political ladder, and Barnier, an old-school grandee who joined the movement as a teenager, has left political observers agog. On one side is Dati, who is often described as a glamorous French answer to President Trump. On the other is a painstakingly courteous, slightly antiquated politician who embodies everything Trump is not. Barnier's claim to the seat is based upon his residency in the constituency, which incorporates the 7th arrondissement, home to the Musée d'Orsay and the Eiffel Tower. Dati, however, views him as an outsider. Not only does she too have a flat in the arrondissement but she is also the district mayor. She accused Barnier of a 'lack of respect'. Republican leaders are worried that the war might not only cost them a safe seat in parliament, by splitting their vote, but also harm the party's standing in the country — just as it is starting to emerge from years in the electoral desert. Dati is convinced that Barnier wants to thwart her lifetime goal of becoming mayor of Paris in next year's council elections. Having lost to Anne Hidalgo, the socialist incumbent, six years ago, she is the pollsters' favourite. However, she remains a divisive figure who angered some in the party by joining Macron's centrist government in 2024. The announcement last week that judges are sending her for trial on corruption charges was a further blow, although she insists she is innocent. The suspicion in the Dati camp is that Barnier wants to push her aside in a show of force that would cement his presidential credentials. Some of her supporters also suspect that if the presidency proves out of reach for him, he may be tempted to stand as mayor of Paris instead. 'This [by-election] cannot be used to carry Michel Barnier's presidential ambitions,' said Dati. Suggesting that he was a pawn in a bigger game, she said he was 'being pushed by those who want to stop me winning Paris'. Barnier retorted: 'I'm too old to be manipulated.' He sought to portray himself as a unifying figure on the centre right and added that he was 'determined and humble'. Barnier said he had no intention of standing as mayor of Paris, suggesting it was the entire country and not just its capital that interested him. 'The moment is so serious that one must be on the bridge,' he said. In an interview with the TF1 television channel in June, he was asked whether he planned to run for the presidency in 2027. 'If circumstances and destiny mean that I must ask myself the question of whether to be a candidate, I will force myself to respond to three demands: am I up to it, do I have the right projects for France and can I bring people together?' he replied. He followed the interview with the publication of a book based on conversations with ordinary French people entitled Ce Que J'ai Appris de Vous (What I Learnt From You). In a country that believes its leaders need an intellectual veneer, a foray into literature is a prerequisite for high office. Barnier is the second most-popular politician in France behind Dominique de Villepin, 71, also a former centre-right prime minister, according to the Ifop polling institute. However, he remains an outsider for 2027, so much so that Ifop did not include him in its list of potential candidates when assessing voting intentions for the presidential election. His supporters are convinced that he has a chance in a wide open race. Marine Le Pen, 56, the populist-right National Rally leader, is ahead in the polls but has been barred from standing following a corruption conviction against which she is appealing. Jordan Bardella, 29, her protégé, would be well placed to replace her if she loses the appeal, according to pollsters, but is hampered by his inexperience. On the left, the centre and the centre right, there are plenty of potential runners but no clear favourites. • Embattled French PM risks public wrath by cutting two bank holidays Barnier tried to win the Republicans' nomination for the 2022 presidential election but was defeated by Valérie Pécresse, 58, the head of the Paris region council. She polled a pitiful 4.78 per cent to propel the party into the wilderness. At the time, Barnier was written off as a has-been by commentators. Three years later, however, he was appointed prime minister after Macron's ill-fated decision to call snap parliamentary elections resulted in a hung National Assembly and a political crisis. Barnier's premiership lasted a mere three months before his minority centre-right government fell in a no-confidence vote in December. The defeat was humiliating. This time, political analysts declared that his career really was over. Now he seeks to prove them wrong again.
Reuters
29-07-2025
- Reuters
For first time in decades, Cuba's private sector outweighs state
HAVANA, July 29 (Reuters) - Cuba's private sector is accounting for more retail sales by value on the Communist-run island than the state for the first time since the years following Fidel Castro's 1959 revolution, new government data shows. Preliminary figures from the National Statistics Office published last week indicate the "non-state" sector was responsible for 55% of retail sales of goods and services in 2024, up from 44% in 2023. The figures exclude public utilities. The Cuban government has gradually expanded the role of private enterprise since the 1991 collapse of its former benefactor, the Soviet Union, reversing a 1968 policy that had nationalized all private businesses. In tandem, the state-run economy has shrunk, contracting by 11% over the last five years and marked by frequent blackouts, goods shortages, and high inflation. The state still operates thousands of retail outlets offering a limited variety of goods, including food, hygiene products and clothing. But at bustling informal markets such as the 100th Street Bridge Fair in Havana, hundreds of vendors sell items often unavailable in the state stores. "There are many things that you cannot find in the state sector," said Diamela Garcia, a clothing vendor at the fair. "Many people come to look for these things here." María Karla Hernández, a 27-year-old physiotherapist in green scrubs, was shopping for work supplies. "Here you find everything, although the prices are high," she said. Cuban economist Omar Everleny cautioned that those high prices boosted the value of the private sector, and that the retail data was not a reflection of overall volume. "Prices are often subsidized in the state sector and much higher in the private sector," he said. "(But) the state has little cash to import goods ... so people have to turn to the private sector, which is more flexible." While Fidel Castro, who ruled Cuba from 1959 to 2008, called the private sector a "concession to the enemy," his younger brother and successor Raul Castro took a softer view, saying it was "strategic" and would be an integral part of the economy going forward. Current president and head of the Communist Party Miguel Diaz-Canel has maintained Raul's position, while insisting that state companies must become more efficient and remain dominant in wholesale trade. Most local analysts, including Everleny, believe there is ongoing debate within the country's leadership between those who advocate further liberalization of private business and those who oppose it. Economy Minister Joaquin Alonso told the National Assembly this month that while the country's overall imports have declined, imports by private businesses topped $1 billion, a 34% increase compared to the same period last year. Alonso said fewer state enterprises were operating in the red "mainly due to an increase in prices and not to an improvement in efficiency," according to reports in state media. He acknowledged that "non-state economic actors are advancing," adding, "we do not want to confront this sector, but rather to properly guide it." According to official figures, approximately 1.6 million people in a labor force of 4 million work in the private sector.
