logo
Native American radio stations at risk as Congress looks to cut $1B in public broadcasting funding

Native American radio stations at risk as Congress looks to cut $1B in public broadcasting funding

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Dozens of Native American radio stations across the country vital to tribal communities will be at risk of going off the air if Congress cuts more than $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, according to industry leaders.
The U.S. Senate is set to vote this week on whether to approve the Department of Government Efficiency's plan to rescind previously approved public broadcasting funding for 2026 and 2027. Fear is growing that most of the 59 tribal radio stations that receive the funding will go dark, depriving isolated populations of news, local events and critical weather alerts. The House already approved the cuts last month.
'For Indian Country in general, 80% of the communities are rural, and their only access to national news, native story sharing, community news, whatever it is, is through PBS stations or public radio,' said Francene Blythe-Lewis, CEO of the Lincoln, Nebraska-based Native American video programming producer Vision Maker Media. 'If the claw back happens, I would say a good 90% of those stations will cease to exist.'
Native American communities rely on local radio stations
Local radio plays an outsized role in the lives of many who live in Indigenous communities, where cable television and broadband internet access are spotty, at best, and nonexistent for many. That leaves over-the-air TV stations — usually a PBS station — and more often local radio to provide local news, community event details and music by Indigenous artists. Sometimes the news is delivered in Indigenous languages.
'It means we're not going to hear our language on the radio,' Blythe-Lewis said.
Flagstaff, Arizona-based Native Public Media, which supports the network of 59 radio stations and three television stations serving tribal nations across the country, said about three dozen of those radio stations that rely heavily on Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding will be the first to go dark if funding is cut for the coming fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.
Loris Taylor, CEO of Native Public Media, said in an op-ed that the tribal stations reach more than 1.5 million people and 'may be the only source of locally relevant news, emergency alerts, public safety announcements, language preservation, health information and election coverage.'
Republicans face pressure to pass the cuts
GOP senators are under pressure from President Donald Trump, who promised last week on his Truth Social platform that any Republican who votes against the cuts 'will not have my support or Endorsement.'
Many Republicans say the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Republican from Missouri, recently defended the cuts as necessary to hack away at the nearly $37 trillion national debt, adding, 'It is critical in restoring trust in government.'
But some Republicans have pushed back, such as Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who questioned the proposed cuts last month during a Senate committee hearing. She said that while some of the federal money is assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, most of it goes to locally owned public radio and television stations.
Tribal stations provide lifesaving alerts
Jaclyn Sallee is president and CEO of Koahnic Broadcast Corporation and KNBA, its radio station in Anchorage, Alaska. Koahnic produces National Native News, a five-minute daily newscast that features headline news from across Indian Country, and Native America Calling, a daily hourlong call-in program, for about 190 stations across the nation. It also produces Indigefi, a music program in Indigenous languages.
KNBA is on Native Public Media's list of those stations that would be most affected by the federal funding cuts — a concern Sallee confirmed, as 40% of the station's funding comes from CPB.
'What we're really worried about are the rural stations in Alaska where they may be the only station in the community,' she said. 'The people that live there depend on the station for vital weather alerts, emergency alerts; it's the local hub of the community where people share information. So that is very troublesome because people's lives are at risk without this service.'
It's currently fishing season in Alaska, she said, 'which means getting out in the ocean or in rivers and going long distances to subsist, and so they really rely on weather reports.'
Having the news reported in a tribe's language isn't just about preserving that language, she said. Sallee spent summers in Nome with her mother's family. Her grandmother, she said, spoke only Inupiaq.
Loss of small stations could hurt the larger system
New Mexico PBS's signal reaches all but one of the more than 20 tribes and pueblos in the state. It also has signed an agreement with the Navajo Nation, which has the largest reservation of any tribe in the U.S., that allows the tribe to carry the PBS signal and programming on the Navajo Nation Television network, New Mexico PBS general manger Franz Joachim said.
'It's no question in my mind that, you know, immediately some stations will pretty much go dark,' Joachim said.
When those first stations fail, it won't take long for others to follow, Joachim said. And as they do, it will mean fewer and fewer stations left to pay membership dues that also help fund all of the stations.
'So now the whole system starts to fracture,' he said. 'So for me, the federal funding is really about the system as a whole that keeps us in place.'
That funding also helps produce national content that groups like Vision Maker Media produce. Those include Native American documentaries shown on PBS like 'Mankiller,' the story of Wilma Mankiller who became the first woman elected principal chief of the Cherokee Nation.
Blythe-Lewis compared the potential loss of tribal stations to the country's past attempts to erase Native American cultures, such as through federal boarding schools where Indigenous children were sent for generations to assimilate them into white society and where systemic abuse of Indigenous children was carried out.
'We're erased from public media and therefore invisible and therefore become unknown and unheard of,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California sues Trump administration over loss of high-speed rail funding
California sues Trump administration over loss of high-speed rail funding

Los Angeles Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

California sues Trump administration over loss of high-speed rail funding

California's high-speed rail authority sued the Trump administration Thursday over its cancellation of billions of dollars in federal funding. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California by state Attorney General Rob Bonta, comes one day after the Federal Railroad Administration's pulled $4 billion from the project that was intended for construction in the Central Valley. The suit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and challenges the legality of the decision. The lawsuit calls the administration's actions 'arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and contrary to law, and threatens to wreak significant economic damage on the Central Valley, the State, and the Nation.' It names Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and acting FRA administration Drew Feeley as defendants and details President Trump's 'personal animus' towards the project and longstanding criticism of it. Trump previously pulled funding from the train during his first term. The suit calls the president's past statements over the project's budget as untrue. The project is about $100 billion over budget from its original proposal of $33 billion. Trump previously said it was 'hundreds of billions of dollars' more. 'Trump's termination of federal grants for California high-speed rail reeks of politics.' Governor Gavin Newsom said in a statement Thursday. 'It's yet another political stunt to punish California. In reality, this is just a heartless attack on the Central Valley that will put real jobs and livelihoods on the line. We're suing to stop Trump from derailing America's only high-speed rail actively under construction.' The fast train to connect San Francisco to Los Angeles was originally expected to be completed in 2020. But while the entire route was environmentally cleared last year, no portion of the line has been finished and construction has only been underway in the Central Valley. The Trump administration initiated a compliance review in February after Republican lawmakers called for an investigation into the project and demanded that it be defunded. The 310-page review found significant failures in the project, citing budget shortfalls and missed deadlines in its assessment, and found 'no viable path' forward. In two letters rebutting the findings, the project's chief executive Ian Choudri said the review was filled with inaccuracies that misrepresented the project's progress. In early July, Choudri asked that the Railroad Administration delay its decision and requested another meeting. Less than two weeks later, the Trump administration canceled the funds instead.

House panel tees up vote on Jeffrey Epstein resolution
House panel tees up vote on Jeffrey Epstein resolution

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House panel tees up vote on Jeffrey Epstein resolution

The House Rules Committee late Thursday night advanced a resolution calling for — but not legally requiring — the DOJ to release of some information related to Jeffrey Epstein, as a number of Republicans express anger at the Trump administration's handling of the saga. The panel voted 9-4 along party lines to send the measure to the House floor, with Democrats objecting to the resolution being non-binding. It is unclear when leadership plans to stage a floor vote on the Epstein measure. House Rules Committee Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) said that House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) would make that announcement. The measure reads: 'Providing for the public release of certain documents, records, and communications related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.' It directs the Attorney General to make public 'all credible' documents, communications, and metadata related to the investigations into and prosecutions against Epstein and his convicted former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell — providing considerable exceptions for information that could identify or depict victims, violate the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or is 'demonstrably false or unauthenticated.' The measure is a House resolution, and not a bill — meaning it will not go to the Senate and does not have the legal weight to force the Trump administration to comply. Pressed on that by Democrats in the committee, Foxx did not directly answer, saying it is a 'sound, good-faith resolution' and noting that Democrats, when they offered an Epstein-related measure several days ago, also did so in the form of a resolution rather than a bill. Rules committee member Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) said if the information was not released, the panel would urge all relevant House committees to initiate an investigation into any obstruction, suppression, or delay in the release of the files. Ranking member Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) dismissed the resolution as a 'cover vote' without teeth that the panel's members advanced because they are taking heat over their vote earlier in the week against a Democratic-led amendment calling for the release of Epstein-related documents. He offered an amendment that would tee up a more forceful bill from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to require the DOJ to disclose Epstein documents, which Republicans promptly dismissed. If and when the measure comes to the floor, the procedural rule resolution that typically tees up debate and a final vote on legislation will instead 'deem' the measure passed — meaning members would vote only once on the resolution. As the panel prepared to advance the resolution, President Trump — who for over a week has called the Epstein matter a 'hoax' and fumed at his prominent supporters objecting to a DOJ decision to not release any more information on the sex offender — relented by saying on his website Truth Social he would direct Attorney General Pam Bondi 'to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval.' The vote by the panel is the latest development in the Epstein saga, which has infiltrated Capitol Hill and fractured the Republican Party. The GOP is grappling with a push by the MAGA base to release the documents and an effort by Trump to end discussion on the issue. It also puts to bed a days-long saga that delayed action in the House on a package clawing back federal funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting. Republicans on the House Rules Committee huddled with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Scalise for nearly two hours on Thursday to discuss a path forward on the thorny matter that is the Epstein controversy. On Monday, Democrats on the House Rules Committee forced a vote on whether the full chamber should vote on an amendment compelling the release of the Epstein files. That effort failed 4-8 with only one Republican — Rep. Ralph Norman (S.C.) — voting in favor. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), another Republican on the panel, did not vote on the measure. Republicans on the panel who voted against the effort have since received blowback for their vote, in-part prompting Thursday night's vote. On Tuesday, Democrats made another attempt at forcing a vote on releasing the Epstein documents by urging the chamber to oppose a routine procedural vote which, if it failed, would have triggered a vote on publishing the files. All House Republicans voted together to defeat that effort.

How ‘$300 million just went poof'
How ‘$300 million just went poof'

Politico

time33 minutes ago

  • Politico

How ‘$300 million just went poof'

With help from Alex Nieves, Seb Starcevic, Josh Siegel and Zack Colman LCFS STRIKES AGAIN: Gov. Gavin Newsom has been fighting for more than a year with Republicans and members of his own party about whether the low-carbon fuel standard amendments will raise gas prices for Californians. Turns out, they already have. But no one noticed. According to two industry sources granted anonymity to discuss proprietary market data, refiners started incorporating the new rules into their prices in January. As a result, California's gas prices have been roughly 5-8 cents per gallon higher at the pump since then, despite the underlying regulations not taking effect until this month. And drivers are out roughly $300 million that they shouldn't have been charged, according to their calculations. The episode illustrates the degree to which rhetoric and reality are almost entirely divorced in California's interminable gas-price wars — and the difficulty of puncturing the curtain that separates the two. At the same time that Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones launched his petition to repeal the '65-cent gas price hike,' GOP gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton was holding a press conference at a gas station in San Jose to call for rolling the LCFS back and replacing the California Air Resources Board, and Senate Democrats were introducing a bill to freeze LCFS credit prices, the thing they were trying to prevent had already happened. 'It was priced in on Jan. 1, and no one really knew about it,' said Will Faulkner, a carbon market analyst. How did this happen? It goes back to when the California Air Resources Board approved the amendments in November and then submitted them to the Office of Administrative Law a month later — too late for them to be approved to take effect Jan. 1 as intended. Then, OAL rejected them, pushing the timeline back further. But OPIS, the third-party energy price reporting service that converts carbon prices into cents-per-gallon prices for fuel trading purposes, started factoring in the amendments in January, on the assumption they would be retroactive once OAL approved them. CARB announced in May that wouldn't happen, so OPIS reverted back to the pre-amendment rules until the amendments kicked in July 1. CARB confirmed the snafu Wednesday, the same day it sent a memo to board members detailing the findings — and said it shows the program is ultimately working as intended, price-wise. 'It does sort of validate the points that we were making over time,' said CARB Chair Liane Randolph. 'The pricing has played out in pretty much the way we anticipated.' But given all the scrutiny this program has received — and how many estimates there've been of its impact on gas prices — it's fairly stunning that no one pointed out that it was already priced in at the pump starting in January. That's not even accounting for the fact that since it wasn't in effect, refiners kept the extra money that they would have spent on buying credits. At an average of 7 cents per gallon over 4.3 billion gallons of gas sold, they collected roughly $300 million before the rules actually kicked in. And that estimate doesn't include diesel, just gasoline. 'No one's paying attention,' Faulkner said. 'The No. 1 thing in Sacramento is affordability, and $300 million just went poof.' Read the rest of Debra's column here. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! HIGH-SPEED CLAWBACK: The Trump administration has officially nixed $4 billion in federal grants earmarked for California's high-speed rail project. President Donald Trump announced the news in a post on Truth Social, writing that not a 'SINGLE penny' in federal dollars will go towards 'this Newscum SCAM ever again.' The announcement Wednesday night came after the U.S. Transportation Department issued a scathing report last month slamming the ambitious development for 'missed deadlines, budget shortfalls, and overrepresentation of projected ridership,' POLITICO's Seb Starcevic reports. Newsom immediately hit back, promising to fight the decision and billed the move as a 'gift to China,' which has made rapid advancements in clean transportation. High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri has defended the project, estimated to cost nearly four times its original $33 billion price tag, writing in a letter earlier this month that the outcome of DOT's investigation was predetermined, and that the administration appeared to ignore thousands of pages of documentation provided by the project. Attorney General Rob Bonta filed suit Thursday. Trump attempted to revoke $1 billion in federal funds for the project during his first term, but lost in court. — AN GUMMING UP THE WORKS: The Trump administration is making things more complicated for clean energy projects on federal land. Solar and wind projects must now get Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's personal sign-off to receive permits, according to an internal memo obtained by POLITICO. That level of heightened scrutiny could potentially slow approvals and construction across vast swaths of some of the most sun- and wind-rich portions of the country, POLITICO's Josh Siegel and Zack Colman report. The move comes as the administration attempts to go beyond the Republican 'megabill' to clamp down on solar and wind subsidies. Hard-line House conservatives said earlier this month that they'd received assurances from Trump that he would weaken renewable energy tax credits, despite Senate Republicans' attempts to preserve them. The megabill requires energy projects to start construction by July 4, 2026, or begin service by the end of 2027 to qualify for federal subsidies. — AN CHARGING FOR WHOM?: Low-income and people of color nationwide are far less likely to have access to public electric vehicle charging stations, a new study from researchers at UCLA and University of Southern California finds. The research, which analyzed more than 470,000 user reviews for charging stations alongside charger location data from the U.S. Department of Energy, found that disadvantaged communities had 64 percent fewer public charging stations per capita within a 3-mile radius than more affluent areas. Renters in multifamily housing had access to 73 percent fewer chargers per capita relative to those in wealthier neighborhoods. These groups of people are also more likely to encounter faulty and broken charging equipment. 'EV chargers aren't just missing in disadvantaged communities — they're also more likely to be broken,' said Yifang Zhu, a UCLA environmental health professor and a study author. 'That's a double barrier for people who can't charge at home.' That's a problem in California, where state officials are trying to increase EV adoption among a wider group of drivers, as market growth has stagnated over the last year. EVs accounted for 23.6 percent of all new car sales between January and March, according to data from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. That represents a more than 1 percent drop compared to the same period last year. — AN — Los Angeles Times' Sammy Roth writes in his latest column that California should embrace a regional energy market, or risk closing itself off to the rest of the world. — The Steve Miller Band canceled its U.S. tour, saying it's concerned about extreme weather risks for fans and crew. — New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy is exempting a $1 billion Netflix studio from new coastal-flooding zoning rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store