
Obscene post about infant: Accused pleads for leniency, says won't repeat it
Ahmad Nasir Kadiri, 58, apologised for committing the offence and promised never to do it again.
Sessions judge Ahmad Fuad Othman ordered Nasir to pay a fine of RM3,000, in default six months' jail.
The accused was said to have made the obscene posting about the infant daughter of Malaysian-borh surgeon Dr Nur Amalina Che Bakri three years ago.
Dr Amalina now works in the United Kingdom but was known for holding the record of 17 A1s in her Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia examinations in 2004.
Before delivering the sentence, the judge admonished Nasir, advising him to be more cautious when making comments on social media, emphasising that every action carries consequences.
"With a phone in hand, it's easy to post all kinds of comments, even to slander or defame others. But as your case shows, every action is monitored by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission," the judge said.
According to the charge, Nasir used the Facebook account "Bro Nasir" to knowingly post and share an obscene comment with the intent to offend or hurt the feelings of others.
The link was accessed on the eighth floor of the MCMC Tower in Cyberjaya at 11.52am on Jan 3, 2023.
The charge against Nasir was framed under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, which carries a maximum penalty of a RM50,000 fine, up to a year in prison, or both.
Additionally, a daily fine of RM1,000 may be imposed for each day the offence continues after conviction.
Earlier, MCMC deputy public prosecutor Fadhli Ab Wahab urged the court to impose a deterrent sentence to serve as a lesson for the accused and a warning to the public against repeating such offences.
"The accused must be reminded that social media should not be used as a platform for making obscene remarks.
"In this case, the comment targeted a baby who couldn't even speak for herself. It was the baby's mother, Dr Amalina, who filed the complaint with the MCMC," he said.
Fadhli also urged the court to take into account current sentencing trends under Section 233, where fines for cases involving obscene comments typically range between RM7,000 and RM9,000.
Nasir, who was not represented by a lawyer, appealed for a lighter fine, citing financial difficulties and the responsibility of supporting a child who is still studying at university.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
14 minutes ago
- The Star
Crowd of supporters swells as Dr Akmal expected to be charged in Bukit Mertajam
BUKIT MERTAJAM: The crowd of supporters at the Bukit Mertajam court complex has swelled as they gather in solidarity with Umno Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh who will be charged with "public mischief". Supporters have lined Jalan Betek in Taman Bukit Kecil, where the Bukit Mertajam court is located. Earlier, Dr Muhamad Akmal turned up at 8.27am Friday (Aug 22) to cheers as he entered the courthouse to face charges under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code. He was greeted by his wife, mother, relatives and a team of lawyers representing him. Outside the court the group of over 150 supporters had to be controlled by police personnel. With the Jalur Gemilang and "Solidarity with Dr Akmal Saleh" banners in hand, the supporters have been gathering from as early as 7.15am. Those entering the courthouse have to been scanned by security personnel before being allowed into the courthouse. It was reported that the AGC had said they would charge Dr Muhamad Akmal over a Facebook post under the name "Akmal Saleh". Also to be charged are Muhammad Hilman Idham over a TikTok post under the " account, Siti Hajar Aflah Sharuddin over a statement on the "SHA_Abrienda" TikTok account and Chandrasegaran Subramaniam over a statement made on TikTok under the "cikguchandra3" account. The AGC said based on the evidence and statements obtained, charges would be filed against Dr Muhamad Akmal, Muhammad Hilman and Siti Hajar under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code. Meanwhile, it said Chandrasegaran would be charged under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1988. All charges will be filed in a Magistrate's Court. It added that the statements made by these individuals were found to have threatened public order or constituted improper use of network facilities or network services. Under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code, a person may be charged with making statements likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public. If convicted, a person can be punished with up to two years imprisonment, a fine, or both.


Malaysiakini
14 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Akmal arrives with 'fanfare' to face charge in court
Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh arrived at Bukit Mertajam Magistrate's Court to face a charge under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code for allegedly threatening public order. The charge is over an unspecified Facebook post, likely about his uproar over upside-down flags. He arrived with considerable fanfare...


The Star
38 minutes ago
- The Star
Rolls-Royce with RM54,000 road tax seized
Hot wheels: Some of the 38 luxury cars worth about RM10mil that were seized by JPJ and put on display for the press at JPJ Seberang Jaya. — ZHAFARAN NASIB/The Star BUTTERWORTH: A Rolls Royce with an annual road tax of RM54,000 was among 38 luxury cars seized by the Road Transport Department (JPJ) for being driven without valid road tax and insurance. State JPJ director Zulkifly Ismail said the crackdown, dubbed Ops Luxury, targeted business owners and VIPs, including Datuks, since it began in June. 'The Rolls Royce was confiscated for two offences – expired road tax and without valid insurance,' he told a press conference at JPJ Seberang Jaya yesterday. Other vehicles seized included BMWs and Porsches, also found to be without valid licences. Action was taken under Section 23 of the Road Transport Act for road tax offences and under Section 90 for insurance-related offences. Zulkifly said the operation aimed to prevent national revenue losses and protect other road users. 'Some owners claimed they forgot but in several cases, the documents had expired for six months, a year and even up to two years. 'So the excuse is lame and no longer valid,' he said. Zulkifly also said JPJ would continue to carry out such operations from time to time and that stern action would be taken against those flouting regulations.