
'One week' to safeguard jobs at Vivergo biofuel plant, boss warns
Bosses at the UK's largest bioethanol plant say they will be forced to begin consulting on redundancies within the next week unless the government steps in.Associated British Foods (ABF) said it was in talks with the government to help save its Vivergo Fuels site at Saltend, near Hull, after the removal of a 19% tariff on imports of ethanol from the US.ABF Sugar chief executive Paul Kenward said it meant that the government had "given away the entre UK market for bioethanol". A government spokesperson said it was working closely with the industry to find a way forward.
Speaking to BBC Radio Four, Mr Kenward said there was "a lot at stake".He said the industry was not asking for a "permanent subsidy", but needed "some bridging support from government until some simple common sense changes to regulation can be made".Mr Kenward said representatives from the industry had met with government officials, including Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds."Unfortunately, we gave a deadline which was the 15th [June]."They asked us to wait for another week – we gave them two – but if we don't hear back from them by 25 June we will have to start a consultation process, which may lead to redundancies," he added.Mr Kenward's comments follow a similar announcement earlier this week by bosses at Ensus's Redcar bioethanol plant.Ensus chairman Grant Pearson said the government needed to come up with a "urgent" solution to save skilled jobs in the region.
In response, a government spokesperson said: "The deal agreed with the US will save thousands of jobs in the UK, and we will always act in the national interest."A meeting took place last week with representatives from the bioethanol industry "to discuss their concerns", the spokesperson added.The Saltend plant produces bioethanol which is used in E10 petrol.E10 was introduced in 2021 to help cut carbon emissions and contains up to 10% bioethanol.Vivergo also produces animal feed, which is a by-product of the bioethanol production process.
Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Terraced house goes on the market for just £1,000 but there's a VERY big catch
One lucky buyer could be in with the chance of snapping up a terraced house for as little as £1,000. But the shockingly low starting price for the property in Sheffield, South Yorkshire, comes with a major catch. Photos show that behind the boarded up door there is practically nothing there. The inside has been left exposed to the elements with crumbling bricks and a hole where the window should be. Debris has also been left on the ground and there are currently no walls or floors. The property, which has been put up for auction, has been described as a 'shell' on its listing. One home hunter joked: 'The only house I could ever afford.' Another person said: 'Plot of land for a grand is not bad.' A third added: 'Could make a sick spot.' Someone else quipped: 'As someone who is from Sheffield, you'd have to pay me to live around here.' Another person said: 'If the one grand includes permission from council and neighbours to demolish, build and renovate, it's a considerable one. 'Without permissions, £100 is more than the potential.' A sixth person added: 'People talking about the area. 'Even if it cost £30,000 done up, you could get £500 a month rent. 'Where else are you going to get that return?' Someone else joked: 'Very spacious and the natural light really accentuates the features.' The property in Sheffield is being put up for auction by Auction House, Luxury Property News has reported. It is also on Rightmove. The listing states: 'This property is in shell condition but provides an excellent opportunity with a range of development potentials, subject to relevant planning. 'Hinde Street is conveniently located in Sheffield a stones throw from Meadowhall, Northern General Hospital, various retail parks, and great transport links including easy access to M1.'


Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Britain, under pressure on immigration, urges reform of European human rights framework
LONDON, June 18 (Reuters) - Britain called on Wednesday for reform of the European Convention on Human Rights, amid growing domestic criticism that it allows a foreign-based court to meddle in sensitive areas of policy such as immigration and deportation rulings. The convention, which dates back more than 70 years and aims to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe, must "evolve" to reflect changing political realities, justice minister Shabana Mahmood said. Britain's Labour government has criticised the way the convention is interpreted in immigration cases, where its provisions have been used to try to prevent the deportation of migrants - some of whom have been convicted of serious crimes. "It damages the public perception of human rights altogether," Mahmood told a meeting of the Committee of Ministers, the decision-making arm of the Council of Europe, which oversees implementation of the convention. The convention applies to the 46 member states of the Council of Europe and can be enforced by binding rulings from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), based in the French city of Strasbourg. While Britain has left the European Union, it remains a member of the Council of Europe and of the ECHR. Labour has already promised to clarify how the convention should be interpreted by domestic judges, but Mahmood used her speech to urge wider reform of the human rights framework. "The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved. Now, it must do so again," she said. The Council of Europe did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mahmood's remarks. Britain is not alone in seeking reform. Nine European countries, spearheaded by Italy and Denmark, urged the Council last month to ease the process of expelling foreign criminals. Secretary General Alain Berset, the head of the Council, criticised that initiative, saying on May 24: "The court must not be weaponised — neither against governments, nor by them." Britain's nearly one-year-old Labour government has seen its popularity slide partly due to public concerns over immigration and needs to show it can deport foreign criminals and migrants who have arrived illegally. Labour is committed to remaining in the convention but Nigel Farage's Reform UK, a right-wing party now topping national opinion polls, has said it would immediately withdraw if it won power. The Conservative Party, the biggest opposition party in parliament, has said it is reviewing its policy on Britain's continued membership.


The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dartford Crossing fee rises are ‘revenue raiser', motoring groups claim
Motoring groups have criticised the decision to increase Dartford Crossing charges by 40%. Transport minister Lilian Greenwood announced fees for the crossing, which features a bridge and two tunnels connecting Thurrock in Essex with Dartford in Kent, will rise from September 1 to 'manage traffic'. Examples of increases for one-off payments in from £2.50 to £3.50 for cars, from £3 to £4.20 for coaches and vans, and from £6 to £8.40 for lorries. It is the first time prices have gone up since 2013. With up to 180,000 vehicles using the crossing on the busiest days, Ms Greenwood described the traffic levels as 'well in excess of the crossing's design capacity, causing delays for drivers using the crossing, congestion and journey disruption to drivers on the M25 and a range of knock-on impacts for local communities'. Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: 'The claim that this 40% increase in the charge is all about managing traffic will raise more than a few eyebrows given that those making the crossing have little alternative but to do so. 'Most people will, understandably, and probably rightly, see this move as nothing else but a revenue raiser.' Edmund King, AA president, said: 'Long-distance travellers from the UK and Europe, freight, business and regional users have all been sold down the river by successive governments through the unnecessary perpetuation of tolls and lack of future capacity at Dartford. 'Tolling was supposed to pay for the Dartford Bridge and then end, which would have been in 2003. 'However, it became a nice little earner which raised tens of millions of pounds every year. 'Ramping up the tolls by an extra pound, when the majority of users have no alternative about the time and place they cross the Thames, is simply road charging and a bridge too far.' James Barwise, Road Haulage Association (RHA) policy lead, said: 'Dartford remains the only practical Thames crossing for HGVs and coaches in the South East. 'It's therefore regrettable that the charge increase has been so significant. 'This adds to running costs at an already financially challenging time for many businesses in our sector (HGVs, coaches and vans) and ultimately pushes up prices for consumers.' The Government has given the go ahead for the Lower Thames Crossing, which it hopes will reducing congestion on the Dartford Crossing The new crossing will connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel. Work on the project has been ongoing since 2009, and more than £800 million of taxpayers' money has been spent on planning.