logo
Era of American Pope begins: Will the ‘American' issues be finally resolved?

Era of American Pope begins: Will the ‘American' issues be finally resolved?

Time of India10-05-2025

The duration of 'Conclave' might be roughly 120 minutes. But historically, it has taken years to elect a cardinal to lead the Catholic church. The longest period of a conclave lasted for almost 3 years, after which, Pope Gregory X emerged as the pontiff.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
However, despite the longest duration in the history of conclaves, the 1268-71 papal conclave is known as the first example of a papal election by "compromise."
Thankfully, in 2025 – keeping up with the tradition of the last five papal elections – the conclave lasted only for two days. As the white smoke emerged from the Sistine Chapel Thursday afternoon, after a short two-day period,
emerged as the newly elected pontiff.
Pope Leo XIV walked across the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica in a white cassock.
The first American Pope :
Pope Leo XIV, who used to be Cardinal Robert Prevost, is a US-born pontiff from Chicago, making him the first American Pope.
Does that make him a tad bit more relevant to the issues the United States of America is currently grappling with?
Most probably, yes.
At least, that's what the Catholics of the US would presume.
After all, who would they seek out in times of conflict and dilemma – if not 'their own'?
But where does the American Pope stand on those issues? In particular, the issue of gender and immigration?
Let's take a look.
Who is Pope Leo XIV?
From what we know so far, Pope Leo XIV – who used to be Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost before he was elected as pontiff – is an Illinois-native, who has dual citizenship from the US and Peru and is a leader with global experience.
He is a Mathematics graduate from Villanova University in Pennsylvania, has engaged in philosophical studies that would later inform his theological perspective, and holds a doctorate in canon law from the Pontifical University of St.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Thomas Aquinas.
Pope Leo XIV is also multilingual and is fluent in English, Spanish, Italian, French, and Portuguese, and also reads Latin and German.
During his first address as a Pope, he spoke Italian and Spanish to the public, and emphasized peace – which made him come across as inclusive as it could get.
The question arises, is he really… 'as inclusive as it gets'?
Pope Leo XIV, who represents a 'dignified middle of the road', is to serve about 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide (nearly 20% of them are Americans)—many of whom come from the global south—during a period marked by decreases in Catholic Church attendance and great political conflict.
Among American Catholics, there is a rising issue regarding gender and immigration, especially under the current administration of Donald Trump.
Here's what we know so far about the new Pope's stances on key issues:
The LGBTQ+ Catholic Community:
The Catholic Church has historically maintained a firm stance against homosexuality, labeling it as a sin and prohibiting the marriage of same-sex couples within its sacred rituals. However, in a notable shift, a letter from
that surfaced in October 2023 advocated for the blessings of same-sex unions on a case-by-case basis.
In this epistle addressed to conservative cardinals, Francis emphasized the necessity of compassion and discernment: 'We cannot be judges who only deny, push back, and exclude,' he wrote. 'Pastoral prudence must adequately discern whether there are forms of blessing requested by individuals that do not convey a misunderstanding of matrimony.
When one seeks a blessing, one is requesting help from God.'
Now, the late Pope Francis' concern for the poor was noted in his critiques of capitalism, his quite visible support of refugees and migrants, and his outreach to liberationist, anarchist, communist, socialist, and liberal movements in Latin America that were under a cloud during the papacy of John Paul II.
In contrast, the centrist Pope Leo XIV stands out as more of a centrist.
The new Pope has taken a different approach regarding LGBTQ+ Catholics, as highlighted in a report from the College of Cardinals. In October 2024, Cardinal Prevost, a significant figure within the Church, articulated the importance of ongoing dialogues among episcopal conferences around the world to explore the potential for blessing same-sex couples.
He underscored that cultural contexts vary significantly across regions, particularly noting that in parts of Africa, cultural norms diverge starkly from those in the West.
Prevost explained, 'The bishops in the episcopal conferences of Africa were basically saying, that here in Africa, our whole cultural reality is very different… it wasn't rejecting the teaching authority of Rome; it was saying that our cultural situation is such that the application of this document is just not going to work.'
He drew attention to the grave consequences faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in certain African countries, where laws could punish homosexuality with the death penalty. 'So, we're in very different worlds,' Prevost stated.
Reflecting on his previous stance towards queer couples, the New York Times cited a significant statement from Leo in 2012, where he expressed disappointment at how media and pop culture appeared to empathize with beliefs and practices contrary to Christian teachings.
In contrast, Francis had been vocal against laws criminalizing LGBTQ+ identities, deeming them 'unjust' and striving to foster an environment of inclusion within the Church.
Now, the President of the United States of America, Donald Trump – as soon as he took office for the Trump 2.0 administration – rolled back orders from the previous Joe Biden administration, calling them "unpopular, inflationary, illegal, and radical practices within every agency and office of the Federal Government".
Two of the orders he revoked included a Biden directive aimed at preventing discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation.
Trump also signed an order recognising two sexes only - male and female – and declaring that they cannot be changed.
The order stated, "These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality," adding, "'Sex' is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of 'gender identity'."
In fact, in his inaugural address, Trump even used different phraseology, saying: "As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female."
Now that an American Pope has become the Vicar of Christ, succeeding a pontiff who held a much more inclusive approach towards the LGBTQ community, will Pope Leo XIV build his legacy on that principle of empathy? The world (especially the marginalized communities) awaits to see.
The Migrant Matter:
Unlike the issue of the LGBTQ community, Pope Leo's perspective on migration aligns closely with that of his predecessor, the late Pope Francis.
Jesus Leon Angeles, a coordinator of a Catholic group in Peru with personal ties to Prevost, remarked on the new pope's genuine concern for Venezuelan migrants seeking refuge in Peru amid severe economic turmoil. Currently, over 1.5 million Venezuelans have relocated to Peru, fleeing their homeland's crisis.
Pope Francis has been a staunch advocate for migrants, demonstrating his solidarity through various communications, including a poignant letter to U.S. bishops amidst a politically charged environment under President Donald Trump's second term. This period was marked by proposals for mass deportation and other harsh immigration policies that targeted undocumented individuals. Francis wrote to the bishops, emphasizing, 'Your work in defending migrants is deeply rooted in the mission of Christ and the history of the Church.
' He further stressed that while regulating migration is necessary, it must never compromise the inherent dignity of every individual.
In fact, an old tweet from a verified account on X (formerly, Twitter) carrying the name Robert Prevost resurfaced after the election, where the account user wrote, 'JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others.'
The post was made back in February, where the X account posted an article titled 'JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others'.
The story by National Catholic Reporter slammed Vance for talking about the 'Christian concept' of love.
Over a week later, the same account posted another article about VP Vance. This time, the story was titled: 'Pope Francis' letter, JD Vance's 'ordo amoris', and what the Gospel asks of all of us on immigration'.
Coincidence much? Seems unlikely.
But that's not all. The American pontiff does have to address one major controversy as well.
It's the issue of sexual abuse.
When the late Pope Francis assumed the role of the pontiff, the media attention on the systematic cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church was at its height, with many instances coming to light under his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.
Although in the first years of his papacy, the late Pope was criticized for his failure to act against sexual abuse in the church, he attempted to reform his policies in later years.
He was even quoted as telling Chilean victims of clerical sexual abuse that he himself 'was part of the problem' and apologized for dismissing accusations of a cover-up by Catholic bishops.
Moreover, in 2019, Francis publicly acknowledged the problem of the sexual abuse of nuns by priests and bishops and also warned against psychological and spiritual abuses of sisters.
In case of the new Pope, before he became the pontiff – the advocacy group Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests accused Prevost of covering up sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church while he was leading the Diocese of Chiclayo.
Now, the Catholic community's contentious history with sexual abuse—and its coordinated efforts to cover these instances up—remains an ongoing issue. As the American Pope takes over the entire religious community and dons the Fisherman's Ring – the Catholics, as well as the whole world, will be a spectator to what steps Pope Leo XIV takes to 'use his authority to enact fundamental, institutional changes to end the systematic practice of sexual abuse and its concealment.
'
What else has he got on his plate?
Women's role in the Church:
Pope Leo has taken a resolute stance against the ordination of women, mirroring the traditional view of Francis. During the Synod on Synodality in October 2023, he articulated that 'ordaining women—and there's been some women that have said this, interestingly enough—'clericalizing women' doesn't necessarily solve a problem; it might create new ones.' Nevertheless, he acknowledged the noteworthy progress made during Francis's papacy, citing the appointment of women to leadership roles as proof that their contributions are invaluable to the Church's mission.
Throughout his twelve-year tenure, Francis demonstrated a commitment to empowering women, granting them voting rights during synodal gatherings and progressively appointing them to senior roles, although he still maintained the position that women could not serve as priests. A landmark moment occurred in 2024 when Francis washed the feet of female inmates from a Roman prison, marking an unprecedented gesture as the first pope to perform this act solely for women.
Addressing climate change:
As an advocate for environmental stewardship, it is expected that Pope Leo will continue the legacy of Francis in addressing climate change. In previous remarks, he has urged the Church to assume a proactive role in combating environmental degradation. 'Dominion over nature' should not translate to a 'tyrannical' exploitation of the Earth, Prevost articulated during a seminar in November, advocating instead for a symbiotic relationship with creation.
This seminar had its origins in a call from Pope Francis, who urged the Church to respond with 'compassion' to the crisis of climate change, labeling environmental harm as a 'structural sin.' The late pontiff intricately linked climate change to its disproportionately severe repercussions on the developing world, stating, 'We are faced not with two separate crises, one environmental and the other social, but rather one complex crisis that is both social and environmental.
'
To summarize…
Although Pope Leo XIV's roots lie in Illinois, Chicago, inside the Vatican, he is known as the 'least American' of the American cardinals.
Prevost's brother, John Prevost, has high hopes for him, as he said his brother would make a good pope because he has 'a deep feeling for the disenfranchised, for the poor, for those who were not listened to.' John told CNN affiliate WBBM, 'I think the very fact that in his heart, in his very soul, he wanted to be a missionary.
He didn't want the bishop. He didn't want the cardinal, but that's what he's asked to do, so that's what he did.
'
Not just that, John holds the new Pope to the highest expectations, as he thinks his brother 'will be a second Pope Francis,' and 'will follow right in his footsteps working for the underprivileged.'
John might not be wrong to expect that, as Pope Leo XIV was reportedly well regarded by the late Pope Francis himself. As CNN's Vatican correspondent Christopher Lamb quoted, the late pontiff 'respected him and thought of him very highly,' saying, 'Clearly Pope Francis saw in him something – he saw him as a capable leader.'
Did the late Pope measure him right?
Here's to waiting for the answer to unfold.
St. Peter's Bells Toll As Pope Francis' Final Procession Begins | Vatican Mourns The Loss

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cornered and battered, Pakistan banks on Trump to ‘arrange' talks with India post-Op Sindoor
Cornered and battered, Pakistan banks on Trump to ‘arrange' talks with India post-Op Sindoor

First Post

time21 minutes ago

  • First Post

Cornered and battered, Pakistan banks on Trump to ‘arrange' talks with India post-Op Sindoor

After Donald Trump falsely claimed brokering a ceasefire, Pakistani leaders from Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to Bilawal Bhutto are wooing the US president to arrange talks with India. read more Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Army chief General Asim Munir attend the funeral of a person killed in an Indian airstrike on a terrorist facility conducted on May 7, 2025, under Operation Sindoor. (Photo: Pakistan ISPR) After suffering a beating in Operation Sindoor, Pakistan has sought US President Donald Trump's help in arranging talks with India. After Trump falsely claimed credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Pakistani leaders have launched a full-scale drive to appease the US president. While Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif made appeals at the US Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari amplified the appeal in Washington DC. In addition to appeals to Trump, Pakistani leaders have also continued their disinformation campaign about the Pahalgam attack, with Shehbaz saying at the US Embassy event that the attack was a false-flag operation by India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In response to the Pahalgam attack on April 22, India on the night of May 6 launched 'Operation Sindoor' under which it struck terrorist sites in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK). After Pakistan attacked Indian cities and military bases, India began striking Pakistani military sites, including more than a dozen airbases, radar sites, and air defence units. After four days of beating, Pakistan requested a ceasefire on May 10 and India granted the request. Bilawal, a coalition partner of Shehbaz and a former foreign minister, is currently on a visit to the United States where he is a leading a high-level delegation as part of an outreach in the wake of the last month's conflict. It comes after India dispatched all-party delegations to various countries to convey India's message about terrorism, the Pahalgam attack, and Operation Sindoor. Trump should arrange 'comprehensive dialogue' with India, says Bilawal In an interaction with journalists in Washington DC, Bilawal said that Pakistan wants Trump to arrange 'comprehensive dialogue' with India. 'On 10 different occasions, he [Trump] has taken credit for facilitating the ceasefire between India and Pakistan — and rightly so. He deserves that credit, because it was his efforts that helped make the ceasefire possible. So, if the US is willing to help Pakistan in maintaining this ceasefire, it is reasonable to expect that an American role in arranging a comprehensive dialogue would also be beneficial for us,' said Bilawal, according to Dawn. Mocking India's centrality in the Indian Ocean Region and role in the Indo-Pacific region, where India looks at itself as a net security provider, Bilawal said that India was not even a 'paperweight' and should not at all be considered a counterweight to China. On his part, Shehbaz said that Trump is 'a man for peace'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'President Trump is a man against escalation and a man against cold and hot war,' Shehbaz further said. Separately, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said that dialogue should India be on all issues and not just on terrorism as India maintains. Dar said that dialogue should cover issues like terrorism, the Indus Waters Treaty, and broader bilateral issues, according to Dawn. 'Whenever they [Indians] want a dialogue, at any level, they will find us ready, but we are not desperate,' said Dar.

Shehbaz Sharif Seeks Trump's Facilitation As Tharoor-led Delegation Exposes Pakistan In US
Shehbaz Sharif Seeks Trump's Facilitation As Tharoor-led Delegation Exposes Pakistan In US

News18

time30 minutes ago

  • News18

Shehbaz Sharif Seeks Trump's Facilitation As Tharoor-led Delegation Exposes Pakistan In US

Last Updated: Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif praised Trump for his role in helping de-escalate the situation with India and urged Washington to facilitate a dialogue between the two nations. Amid Indian delegations' global outreach against terrorism, Pakistan is making an all-out effort to seek the help of US President Donald Trump to try and achieve peace with India. Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif praised Trump for his role in helping de-escalate the situation with India and urged Washington to facilitate a comprehensive dialogue between the two nuclear neighbours. Addressing an event at the US Embassy in Islamabad, the Pakistan PM echoed former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, who stated that Trump 'deserves credit" for helping facilitate the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. 'On 10 different occasions, he has taken credit for facilitating the ceasefire between India and Pakistan — and rightly so. He deserves that credit because it was his efforts that helped make the ceasefire possible. So, if the US is willing to help Pakistan in maintaining this ceasefire, it is reasonable to expect that an American role in arranging a comprehensive dialogue would also be beneficial for us," Bhutto said. Meanwhile, India publicly denied role of US President Trump in achieving the ceasefire agreement with Pakistan. New Delhi has consistently rejected third-party mediation on bilateral issues. 'I think the US has understood for some time now that India has a very clear position that there will be no talks with a gun pointed at our head… The problem is that we will not deal with people who are pointing a gun at our heads. I mean frankly, if your neighbour unleashes his Rottweilers* to bite your children and in fact to do worse to your children, and then says, let's talk," said Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who is leading the all-party delegation to the United States. 'You think he's going to talk to him until he either unleashes those Rottweilers* or locks them up in a kennel or puts them to sleep. It's as simple as that. You're not going to talk to people who are pointing guns at your temples. It's not going to happen," he added. The Indian delegation also slammed the Pakistani side for claiming that it was as much a victim of terrorism as India was. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said, 'This (Pakistan) delegation is going around saying we are also victims of terrorism, we have lost more lives to terrorism than India has. We turn around and say- Whose fault is that? As Hillary Clinton famously said 10 years ago. You can't breed vipers in your backyard and expect them to bite only your neighbours…That's why they (Pakistan) are now getting terrorists attacked by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, but who created the Taliban from which the Tehrik-i-Taliban broke off? We all know the answer to that, so let Pakistan look inside it and let it do some serious interior reflection before it goes around pleading innocence and deniability and everything else." (With agency inputs) First Published: June 05, 2025, 13:35 IST

Iranians' World Cup dream crushed by US travel ban
Iranians' World Cup dream crushed by US travel ban

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Iranians' World Cup dream crushed by US travel ban

A year out from kick-off, Iranian football fans are watching their World Cup dream slip away after a US travel ban barred them from entering the land of "Great Satan" to cheer on their team. The 2026 tournament will be co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, but most matches, including the final, are scheduled to be played on American soil. Many in Iran had clung to hopes of cheering from the stands until Wednesday when US President Donald Trump rolled out a new travel ban on 12 countries including Iran, which will take effect from Monday. "My friends and I have been waiting for years to watch Team Melli play in a World Cup on US soil, and when they qualified, it felt like a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity," Sohrab Naderi, a real estate agent in Tehran, told AFP. "Now with the new travel ban, that dream is shattered because of politics that we don't care about and have no control over," said the 46-year-old who attended the 2022 World Cup in Qatar which saw the US side defeat Iran 1-0 in the group stage. The prospect of Iran competing in a US-hosted tournament comes against the backdrop of a decades-long enmity, with diplomatic ties broken since the 1979 Islamic revolution. The two sides are currently engaged in high-stakes talks over Iran's nuclear programme, with the United States threatening military action if no deal can be reached. Trump said the new travel ban was prompted by a makeshift flamethrower attack on a Jewish protest in Colorado that US authorities blamed on a man they said was in the country illegally. The ban will not apply to athletes competing in either the 2026 World Cup or the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, the order said. Nonetheless, supporters who had dreamed of crossing the Atlantic to cheer on their team will no longer be able to make the trip. "Every Iranian has the right to support their team, just as much as any other country, whether the game is in America or in any other country," said Hasti Teymourpour, a 16-year-old football fan. Since his return to office in January, Trump has reinstated his "maximum pressure" policy of sanctions against Iran and vowed that "something bad" would happen unless the Iranians "move quickly" towards a nuclear deal. Naderi, who called the ban "inhumane" and "degrading to all Iranians", still hopes the Iran-US nuclear talks will yield a deal that might persuade Trump to reconsider. The outcome of the US-Iran talks that began in April remains unclear, and many fans worry that even if they result in a deal, it may be too late for them. Some Iranians have refused to give up hope, however, seeing in the World Cup an opportunity to thaw relations. "Sports diplomacy can act as a strong catalyst and bring the efforts of political diplomats to fruition sooner," said political commentator Mohammad Reza Manafi. It could be "a great opportunity to help advance diplomacy between the two countries". In a memorable 1998 World Cup clash, Iranian players handed flowers to their American adversaries and posed together for photos a rare public gesture of goodwill between the nations. Iran won 2-1, a victory celebrated in Tehran as a source of both sporting and political pride. With the 2026 draw expected in December, it remains unclear whether Iran and the United States will face off again, but anticipation is building. "The two countries are not hostile to each other, this political discussion is for the governments," said 44-year-old day labourer Siamak Kalantari. Another fan, Mahdieh Olfati, said: "If we face the US again, we'll definitely win." "Ours are real players," the 18-year-old added. Manafi, the commentator, said a friendly before the tournament, possibly hosted by a third country, could help ease tensions. Such a game, he said, could help "achieve what politicians from both sides have not managed to do for years". pdm/mz/ser THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store