More than 100 Britons' details in leaked Afghan dataset, including spies and SAS
Defence sources have said that details of MI6 spies, SAS and special forces personnel were included in the spreadsheet, after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the UK.
The dataset, containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap), was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) became aware of the breach more than a year later, when excerpts of the spreadsheet were anonymously posted in a Facebook group in August 2023.
Other details leaked included the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members.
In a statement on Tuesday, after an unprecedented superinjunction was lifted by a High Court judge, Defence Secretary John Healey offered a 'sincere apology' on behalf of the British Government for the data breach.
He later told the Commons the spreadsheet contained 'names and contact details of applicants and, in some instances, information relating to applicants' family members, and in a small number of cases the names of members of Parliament, senior military officers and Government officials were noted as supporting the application'.
'This was a serious departmental error,' he added.
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge also apologised on behalf of the former Conservative government, which was in power when the leak happened and when it was discovered more than a year later.
Mr Cartlidge later asked Mr Healey about reports that someone other than the original person who leaked the data had been engaged in blackmail.
Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK Government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021.
Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024.
However, an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – by the previous government in April 2024.
The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million.
Millions more are expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation.
Around 4,500 people, made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members, have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route.
A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme.
Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs.
The case returned to the High Court in London on Thursday, sitting in a closed session in the morning where journalists and their lawyers were excluded.
While private hearings exclude the public and press but allow the parties in the case to remain, closed hearings require specific lawyers who can deal with sensitive issues, including national security.
During the public part of the hearing, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that while he needed to give lawyers for the Ministry of Defence an 'opportunity' to argue why a closed hearing was needed, 'I will be scrutinising very carefully any justification for holding any part of this hearing in private, let alone in closed'.
The judge later said he would not be 'kicking the ball down the road'.
He added: 'The superinjunction has now been lifted and if there are other matters that are capable of being reported in public, that needs to be able to happen straight away.'
Also on Thursday, Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) requested a number of documents used in the superinjunction proceedings be provided to it 'immediately'.
This includes intelligence assessments from the MoD and the Joint Intelligence Organisation, as well as the unredacted report of retired civil servant Paul Rimmer.
ISC chairman Lord Beamish continued that the committee had also asked for the reasons why barristers for the Government previously told the Court of Appeal that information about the breach could not be shared with the ISC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revenge of the Taliban: Ex-UK interpreter warns data leak will mean 'more executions' as warlords murder three Afghans linked to foreign forces in a week
Taliban warlords are on a vengeful killing spree against hundreds of Afghans after the British Government lost a top secret database. One man was shot by a gunman who stepped from an alley on Monday and fired four bullets at close range into his chest – one of three assassinations in the past seven days. Panic has been spreading since Tuesday when Afghans were officially informed their personal details had been lost in the UK's worst ever data blunder, putting 100,000 'at risk of death'. Thousands received 'notifications' from His Majesty's Government saying sorry, and adding: 'We understand this news may be concerning.' It is not known if the Taliban actually has the database, which includes names of Afghans who helped the UK, as well as members of the British intelligence community, it is understood. But one Afghan soldier, who fled to Britain for fear of retribution, believes his brother was gunned down in the street this week because the militant group was aware of his affiliation to the UK. He said: 'If or when the Taliban have this list, then killings will increase – and it will be Britain's fault. There will be many more executions like the one on Monday.' The Mail has seen a dossier of more than 300 murders that include those who worked with the UK and some who had applied for the UK scheme, the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP). The murdered include Colonel Shafiq Ahmad Khan, a senior Afghan intelligence officer who had worked alongside British forces. The 61-year-old grandfather was lured into a trap and shot twice in the heart on his doorstep in May 2022. Others include commando Ahjmadzai, who applied for sanctuary in the UK, and soldier Qassim, both killed in April 2023. News of the killings comes after the media, public and MPs were kept in the dark while ministers launched evacuation mission Operation Rubific. The Mail discovered the data breach in August 2023. Since then, 18,500 Afghans have been airlifted to Britain in secret, with 23,900 expected overall. Yet some 75,000 Afghans will be left to fend for themselves – and were instead offered 'advice' on how to stay safe when the UK informed them it had lost their details. Afghans now know that the missing dossier contains their names, phone numbers, their family's details and other facts which could help Taliban revenge squads hunt them down. The Mail's revelations about the data leak and the unprecedented super-injunction to cover it up – which we spent two years fighting in secret courts – has triggered political and security storms. So far, three parliamentary probes have been launched, with MPs expressing outrage that the Government kept them in the dark for so long. Last October ministers agreed to spend £7billion without any parliamentary debate. Ahjmadzai (above, left) and Qassim (above, right) were both murdered in April 2023 The missing database contains the names of 18,800 people who had applied to the ARAP scheme for loyal Afghans who had worked alongside British forces. Military interpreters saved countless British lives by being their 'eyes and ears' on the frontline. In May 2024, when the High Court initially tried to lift the super-injunction, Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'The one thing that can be said with confidence is that affected persons would be better off learning of the data breach by notification from the UK Government than from a knock on the door by the Taliban.' There has been fury this week as the deadly implications of the 'double betrayal' by Britain sunk in, with one angry former interpreter telling the Mail: 'We risked our lives for the UK standing beside them day after day. Now they are risking our lives again.' While the methods may change, Monday's assassination on a quiet dust-caked street in the capital Kabul has now become a weekly occurrence. The victim's brother was a soldier with the Afghan special forces known as the Triples who was given sanctuary in Britain. Within an hour, news of the murder had reached the brother in Britain, who is convinced his sibling was executed because the Taliban, having been unable to kill the Triple himself, sought revenge on his family instead. Elsewhere in the city, a day later, Taliban fighters dragged a woman from her home, beating her on the street and dumping her for neighbours to take to hospital. A former British military interpreter who witnessed it told the Mail: 'The woman's husband worked for the West and it was punishment for that work. He is hiding in Iran and they told her it was because he worked with "infidels".' The murder of the soldier's brother and the beating of the woman took place in the hours before the lifting of the super-injunction, and it is unknown if any of the victims featured on the lost list. The Taliban boasted this week that they had obtained the leaked data, although this could not be verified. Mohammed, a former interpreter who once translated for former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, is now in Britain. He said news of the lost database had spread like wildfire since Tuesday, striking the 'fear of god' into former interpreters like him. Mohammed, 38, who was pictured with Mr Brown in Afghanistan, said: 'This has changed everything. In the past the Taliban did not often have confirmation that an Afghan worked for the UK, or what his role was, but now we know it is on the dataset together with our family members. It is a gift that leads to death.' Last night the MoD referred the Mail to a statement made by Defence Secretary John Healy in the Commons on Tuesday. He said: 'My first concern has been to notify as many people as possible who are affected by the data incident and to provide them with further advice. 'The MoD has done that this morning. Anyone who may be concerned can head to our new dedicated website, where they will find more information about the data loss, further security advice, a self-checker tool, which will inform them whether their application has been affected, and contact steps for the detailed information services centre that the MoD has established.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Grant Shapps accused of 'rewriting history' after former defence secretary says gagging order that prevented Mail revealing Afghan data leak could have been lifted... but he was the one who kept it in place
Grant Shapps was accused of 'trying to rewrite history' yesterday when he expressed 'surprise' the super-injunction had 'lasted so long'. The former defence secretary told the BBC he thought the draconian gagging order could have been lifted last summer – but the Daily Mail can reveal he was the one keeping it going. He also appeared to suggest it was judges who decided to keep the Speaker of the House of Commons in the dark. However, the Mail has the memo showing it was Sir Grant who blocked it. The super-injunction meant Mail journalists faced jail if they revealed the Afghan data breach scandal or even told anyone there was an injunction. In May last year, High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled in secret that the 'continued stifling of public debate' was not justified and the injunction should be lifted. He said: 'Open justice is a cardinal constitutional principle', and warned that Sir Grant's unprecedented super-injunction would make people suspect 'the court's processes are being used for the purposes of censorship'. The then defence secretary responded by hiring one of Britain's most expensive KCs, Sir James Eadie, to overturn the judge's decision and prolong the super-injunction. Sir James told three Appeal Court judges in June that lifting the injunction would 'bring the house down', and they backed Sir Grant's bid to keep the public in the dark. The former defence secretary told the BBC he thought the draconian gagging order could have been lifted last summer – but the Daily Mail can reveal he was the one keeping it going as seen in a memo (above) Open justice is a cardinal constitutional principle' Mr Justice Chamberlain The secrecy went on until Tuesday this week, with the Mail and others spending two years fighting in locked courtrooms for open justice. Yesterday Sir Grant told Radio 4's Today programme he was 'surprised it's lasted quite so long', adding: 'I'd thought that it was probably going to come to an end last summer, the autumn perhaps at maximum.' Regarding whether the Speaker should be briefed, Sir Grant said: 'Who was briefed was decided by conversations with the judges', although he went on to acknowledge the judges were keen for the Speaker to be briefed. Yet an official memo dated November 16, 2023 – three months after the data blunder was discovered – records him as saying: 'I would not widen the circle by briefing others – so not agreed [to brief Speaker...].' A Whitehall source said: 'Shapps is trying to rewrite history. Everyone knows he was the one personally demanding to keep the super-injunction in place after the election was called last summer.' The database at the heart of the super-injunction scandal, seen by the Daily Mail, contains details of 18,800 Afghans Meanwhile Downing Street has defended current Defence Secretary John Healey over accusations that he misled Parliament. No 10 said his statement to the Commons on Tuesday, in which he said that 'to the best of my knowledge' no serving Armed Forces personnel were put at risk by the breach, was 'accurate'. Opposition critics have demanded he 'correct the record' after it was reported days later that MI6 spies and members of the SAS were among those named on the dataset.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Proms star Gerald Finley: Why playing psychopaths suits me
In 2018, when the Canadian bass-baritone Gerald Finley was the star soloist at the Last Night of the Proms, he unfurled a Canadian flag and a Union Jack while singing Rule, Britannia! Parading a Canadian flag at the Proms this year might be seen as a touch controversial — a riposte to President Trump's designs on Finley's homeland. So perhaps it's just as well that Finley is back for the First Night of the Proms — when no flags are displayed. Which is not to say that the concert won't carry a strong social, even political message. Finley will be the soloist in a rarely performed choral epic — Vaughan Williams's Sancta Civitas, written in the aftermath of the First World War. 'It's based on the Book of Revelation,' he says, 'yet it's a piece reflecting the destruction and slaughter that Vaughan Williams's generation had been through. And it's full of hope. People had lost so much. They must have felt that it meant something, that there must be a way of rebuilding a better world.' One imagines that many people hearing the work in 2025 will be hoping for the same thing. Finley, 65, looks the epitome of elegant charm as he sips a morning coffee in a central London watering hole — although we spend most of our conversation talking about his life of violence, cruelty, lust and malice. A catalogue of crime confined to the stage, I hasten to add. It's just a few months since he was at the Royal Opera House playing the abusive patriarch Helge in Mark-Anthony Turnage's opera Festen. In September he is back on the same stage as the monstrous police chief Scarpia in Puccini's Tosca. Add to that his celebrated portrayals of Iago in Verdi's Otello, Don Giovanni and various manifestations of Satan and he has a weighty track record of operatic evil. How does such a pleasant bloke play such horrible characters? 'When I first performed Scarpia I asked myself: 'OK, is he a psychopath?'' Finley says. 'So I looked up Jon Ronson's The Psychopath Test. It has a great line on its first page: 'Don't worry, the fact that you've picked up this book usually means you aren't'.' But did it offer useful tips? 'Yes. The whole idea is that psychopaths behave as they observe normal people behaving, even though they have these incredibly brutal, narcissistic, literally unfeeling tendencies. That's extremely useful knowledge.' Does Finley enjoy transforming himself into a thoroughly bad character? 'I was once chastised by an audience member who said my voice was much more suited to benevolent roles, such as Hans Sachs [the noble cobbler in Wagner's Die Meistersinger ]. But that's why I think it works.' In September he will perform in Tosca opposite Anna Netrebko , the soprano initially barred from many opera houses (she is still banned at the Metropolitan in New York) after she gave an ambivalent response to the invasion of Ukraine. What is Finley's attitude to working with Russian musicians who are perceived as sympathetic to Putin? 'That's more a question for the Royal Opera's casting team,' he says. 'I'm a working singer, I go where the job takes me.' After singing as a boy treble in a church in Ottawa, Finley was encouraged by his great uncle — the Westminster Abbey organist William McKie, who conducted the choir at the 1953 Coronation — to take up a choral scholarship at King's College Cambridge, where he read modern languages and then theology. 'I loved theology,' Finley says, 'because Don Cupitt [the radical Christian philosopher] was around then and he was inspirational.' • Those lectures must have come flooding back when he sang the role of the tormented Robert Oppenheimer in John Adams's 2005 opera Doctor Atomic. 'Absolutely,' Finley says. 'When Adams gets Oppenheimer to sing John Donne's sonnet [ Batter my heart, three person'd God ] he really is asking all those fundamental questions. What is the universe doing? Am I finding the answers or not? Am I about to destroy everything?' Would it be fair to say that singing in the King's choir was less formative? 'Well, David Willcocks [the King's choirmaster in the 1960s] famously said that if you make an ugly sound in King's chapel it lasts eight seconds. So there was definitely an emphasis on gentleness and blend, which isn't perhaps the best preparation for opera. It took me until I was 30 to give strength and direction to my sound and unlock the true voice within me. I had to go to the US to find a teacher — Armen Boyajian, who's a legend in New York.' The coaching must have been good because Finley excels in just about every serious vocal field. He's the go-to bass-baritone for composers writing new operas, whether it's Turnage (he was also in the premieres of The Silver Tassie and Anna Nicole), or John Adams (he has just played Antony in his Antony and Cleopatra at the New York Met) or Tobias Picker (The Fantastic Mr Fox). And he's one of a diminishing band regularly giving song recitals, most recently on an international tour with the young pianist Isata Kanneh-Mason. Is he proud of such a breadth of repertoire? He laughs. 'Some might call that indecisive. You know, Mr Variety's the Spice. But you only discover great music by trying it out.'
