High-speed Airo trains are coming to Seattle
Driving the news: Construction has begun at Amtrak 's Seattle maintenance facility to help launch the company's new Airo trains, which can travel 125 miles per hour.
Why it matters: The trains — which promise faster and more comfortable rides — are set to debut first on the Amtrak Cascades route, which connects Seattle to Portland and Vancouver B.C.
The trains are slated to be in service on the route by the end of next year, according to Amtrak spokesperson W. Kyle Anderson.
State of play: In the meantime, Seattleites may notice major work happening in SoDo.
By the numbers: The $300 million maintenance facility will stretch 600 feet — almost two football fields.
That's long enough to accommodate the full Airo "trainset," which can't be separated like older railcars, Anderson told Axios.
500,000 gallons of groundwater will be pumped out daily during construction, enough to fill 15 swimming pools. (The site sits on a former tidal bed filled with early Seattle landfill.)
The facility will be anchored by steel piles driven 140 feet into the ground, which would stretch out 17 miles if lined up end to end.
The bottom line: While Seattle's Airo facility is the second to break ground, after Philadelphia, it will be the first to open, per Anderson.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
What AI means for the future of the job market
Business leaders have offered dire warnings in recent months about the turmoil artificial intelligence (AI) could unleash on the job market, predicting widespread worker displacement and mass unemployment. Experts say the picture is still unclear, with the full impact of the technology yet to be realized. Here's what to know about how AI could change the labor market: What are business leaders saying? The predictions of leading executives on the impact of AI have varied wildly since the technology first took the world by storm in late 2022, with the public release of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned in an interview with Axios in May that AI could wipe out half of entry-level white-collar jobs, resulting in unemployment rates of 10 to 20 percent within five years. In a note to employees in June, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said he anticipates that AI will reduce the e-commerce giant's corporate workforce and 'change the way our work is done.' 'We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' he said. 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has also warned of a 'painful transition' as AI pushes 'large swaths' of people out of work for extended periods. However, others are a bit more skeptical about claims of dramatic job losses and disruption. 'The hard part about this is, I think it will happen faster than previous technological changes,' OpenAI CEO Sam Atman said on The New York Times 'Hard Fork' podcast in June. 'But I think the new jobs will be better, and people will have better stuff.' 'And the take that half the jobs are going to be gone in a year or two years or five years or whatever, I think that's not how society really works,' he added. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang similarly acknowledged there would be some upheaval but painted a more optimistic picture of the labor market. 'Every job will be affected,' he said in May. 'Some jobs will be lost, some jobs will be created, but every job will be affected. You're not going to lose your job to AI. You're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.' What's happening now? For all the forecasting about AI, the impact isn't showing up in the data quite yet, experts told The Hill. 'We are still very much in the early days of AI,' said Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor. 'It does seem like every business is experimenting with AI, but there is still a lot of work to be done before it's actually fully integrated into business processes and is really realizing potential that business leaders are seeing.' A recent analysis from the Economic Innovation Group found no meaningful impacts from AI on the labor market across several different measures. The most AI-exposed workers, such as financial examiners, actuaries and budget analysts, saw a slight uptick in unemployment. However, the jobless rate of the least exposed workers rose faster, the analysis found. The data also fails to show that AI-exposed employees are less likely to retire than their peers. They have long moved jobs at a faster pace than other workers, a trend that has not shown any major uptick in recent years with the emergence of public-facing AI tools. Nor have AI-exposed workers moved into less exposed roles, according to the analysis. There's little impact registering at the firm level either, as companies with more exposed workers maintain higher rates of employment than their counterparts. And young workers and recent college graduates are seeing an uptick in unemployment across the board, no matter how exposed their jobs are to AI. 'it's just not there,' said Nathan Goldschlag, director of research at the Economic Innovation Group who co-authored the analysis. 'That's not to say it won't be right. It's just we can't, it's very hard to justify the claim that AI right now is totally, fundamentally reordering the labor market.' Martha Gimbel, executive director and co-founder of The Budget Lab at Yale University, similarly underscored that AI is simply not registering in labor data yet. 'There's no sign,' she told The Hill. 'It is a flat line until kingdom come. If you were at a hospital and you saw that line, you'd go, 'That patient is dead.'' Companies have increasingly pointed to AI as they make job cuts, although some experts are skeptical. More than 10,000 layoffs in July cited AI, according to a recent report from the employment agency Challenger, Gray & Christmas. 'I think it's really important to look in the data, right?' Gimbel said. 'That's for a couple of reasons, not least of which is there's no social returns right to saying, 'We over hired, and we need to let a lot of people go.'' 'There are greater social returns to saying, 'Oh, well, we've done all of this investment in AI, and we're incredibly productive, and so we don't need to hire as much moving forward,'' she added. 'Both things may be true, one thing may be true, but it's much better to look at what is literally happening, as opposed to relying on what people are saying about it.' What comes next? While AI isn't upending the job market quite yet, it may eventually make its presence known, especially as companies throw billions of dollars into developing the technology as rapidly as possible. 'The rate of improvement of AI has been incredible,' Zhao said. 'And so, any prediction about how it's going to impact the job market has to recognize that we don't know exactly how good AI will be two, three, four, five years from now.' 'That being said, I do think that AI has the potential to change how we work pretty fundamentally,' he added. Rather than taking full jobs, AI could take over certain tasks and reshape these roles, said Stephan Meier, chair of the management division at Columbia Business School. 'It's not as simple as robot take over jobs, but it definitely will be a shift in the kind of work people do, and as a result, it will change jobs,' he said. This change will likely depend on how AI tools progress and get integrated into production technologies, a process that may go slower than some people expect, Goldschlag noted. He pointed to the expanding role of electricity in the manufacturing sector in the early 1900s, emphasizing it took time to reorganize the factory floor to integrate the new technology effectively. 'It takes a long time for firms to ingest those things, find ways to make them productive,' he said. While Gimbel suggested the current period of technological change could happen much faster than previous periods, she emphasized that it won't be 'instantaneous.' 'If you invented super intelligence tomorrow, would every company adopt it immediately tomorrow and then fire all of their employees? No, right? It's just not the way companies in the labor market work,' she said. Other labor market forces may also counteract the impacts of AI, even as it begins to make waves. 'You've got to remember that when labor gets displaced, there's forces in the economy and prices that help reallocate that labor,' Goldschlag added. 'It's not a static problem. It's a very dynamic problem.'
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
See inside ex-NASCAR champion's $12M Lake Norman mansion
A Mooresville estate owned by NASCAR star Jamie McMurray will hit the market on Thursday, Aug. 20, for $12 million, Corcoran HM Properties listing agents Josh Tucker and Joey Adams confirmed to Axios. Why it matters: The listing underscores Mooresville's — and greater Charlotte's — surge in luxury real estate demand, especially from affluent individuals connected to NASCAR and motorsports. Catch up quick: McMurray is a Missouri native best known for winning both the Daytona 500 and the Brickyard 400 in 2010 — one of NASCAR's rarest feats. Only three drivers have pulled it off in the same season: Dale Jarrett (1996), Jimmie Johnson (2006), and McMurray (2010). McMurry has retired from racing and is now a TV analyst for Fox Sports and the CW, covering NASCAR. The intrigue: Nearby Mooresville luxury transactions include Martin Truex Jr.'s $7.5 million lakefront Euro‑style home and Ricky Stenhouse Jr.'s record‑setting $12.2 million sale earlier this year, Mooresville Now reported. Zoom in: McMurray's mansion sits on nearly 34 acres along the Brawley School Road peninsula on Lake Norman. At 9,000 square feet, it has five bedrooms, six full bathrooms and two half bathrooms. A gated driveway leads to a four-car garage — a nod to McMurray's racing past — built by Arcadia and designed by Harry Schrader in 2015. Other highlights include a turf-lined pool, pool house and private lake access from the dock. Take a look around.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
MIT study on AI profits rattles tech investors
Wall Street's biggest fear was validated by a recent MIT study indicating that 95% of organizations studied get zero return on their AI investment. Why it matters: Investors have put up with record AI spend from tech companies because they expect record returns, eventually. This study calls those returns into question, which could be an existential risk for a market that's overly tied to the AI narrative. Driving the news: MIT researchers studied 300 public AI initiatives to try and suss out the "no hype reality" of AI's impact on business, Aditya Challapally, research contributor to project NANDA at MIT, tells Axios. 95% of organizations found zero return despite enterprise investment of $30 billion to $40 billion into GenAI, the study says. Even firms that are now using AI are not seeing widespread disruption. Between the lines: Companies that bought AI tools were far more successful than those that built internal pilots, according to the study. What they're saying: " My fear is that at some point people wake up and say, alright, AI is great, but maybe all this money is not actually being spent all that wisely," says Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. Sosnick says it appears retail investors are coming in to buy dips amid the Big Tech slide, while institutions seem to be trimming exposure. Situational awareness: The study comes at a challenging moment for Wall Street. Traders are anxiously awaiting Fed chair Jerome Powell's remarks at Jackson Hole. August and September are seasonally volatile months for stocks. We're coming off a rally in markets that has felt unstoppable. That backdrop can make it easy for one thing, including a MIT study, to shake investors. What we're watching: It's difficult to suss out when Wall Street will run out of patience with AI spending. Studies like this one don't necessarily help that timeline. What we're watching: Is this study an indication that corporations will improve their AI usage overtime by adopting best practices like buying versus building? Will firms learn which corners of their businesses stand to gain the most from AI adoption? And will all of that happen in the timeline Wall Street is looking for?
