B.C. First Nation builds small island, fisheries officials check for habitat damage
VICTORIA — A British Columbia First Nation has built up a small artificial island in the tidal shallows of Coles Bay off Vancouver Island, triggering an investigation by fisheries officials into whether it involved habitat destruction and if authorization should have been required.
Two yellow excavators could be seen at work last week in the bay, heaping up stones and gravel on top of an existing rock outcrop, in a project the Department of Fisheries and Ocean said was linked to a 'clam garden.'
Nearby resident Richard Smith said he watched dump trucks carry loads of rock to the shore, where the excavators hauled it into the bay, also building a temporary land bridge during the construction process.
He said the rock outcrop was previously visible at low tide, but the island is now exposed at all times after the construction, which lasted from May 26 to May 30.
The Canadian Press watched the excavators at work on May 30, then saw that they had left the scene later that day.
That afternoon, about 20 workers, some wearing outfits with the logo of the Pauquachin First Nation, were on the bay's mud flats spreading what one described as 'shell hash.' The worker declined to be identified.
Shell hash, made of finely ground sea shells, is used in some aquaculture operations to promote growth of mollusks, such as clams.
The Department of Fisheries and Ocean was asked by The Canadian Press about the construction last Friday, and on Tuesday the department said in a statement it was 'aware of work being undertaken involving excavators and dump trucks to move and stockpile rocks in Coles Bay, B.C., to facilitate construction of a clam garden,' a traditional form of aquaculture.
It said fisheries officers and biologists visited the site on Monday to evaluate the work.
'Assessment of the work will determine whether there has been any harmful alternation, disruption or destruction of fish and fish habitat that would require authorization under the Fisheries Act,' the statement said, adding that 'it would be premature to comment further at this time.'
Work above the high-water mark occurred on Pauquachin territory, maps show.
The First Nation did not respond to questions about the work.
But it had previously announced an event in August to build a 'traditional sea garden' in Coles Bay, with guests invited to help construct a 250-metre long wall on the tidal flats using 'mindfully sourced and prepared rocks' from a quarry.
'A traditionally designed sea garden will nurture clam beds, welcome the return of numerous sea life, provide food sustainability, awaken sleeping traditional teachings, harvesting practices and sharing to future generations,' a description says on a Pauquachin First Nation website.
Shellfish harvesting in Coles Bay was prohibited in 1997 on health grounds because of pollution from septic systems.
The Pauquachin First Nation of 423 people along the western shore of the Saanich Peninsula has said the prohibition represents an 'infringement' of traditional fishing rights granted under an 1852 treaty.
Chief Rebecca David said in a June 2023 letter to the provincial government that government-authorized septic systems represent the 'primary source of pollution,' calling on Ottawa and Victoria to fulfil obligations under the 1852 treaty by cleaning up the bay so shellfish harvesting can resume.
The University of Victoria's Environmental Law Centre said in a report attached to David's letter that the closure of shellfish harvesting had deprived families of a critical food source and 'failure to redress the pollution' represents 'a grievous breach of treaty rights.'
David's letter calls for the decontamination of Coles Bay to serve as a 'pilot project for developing a systemic approach to decontaminating shellfish beaches in British Columbia.'
The Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship said in a statement the province 'has supported Pauquachin's efforts to rehabilitate shellfish harvest in Coles Bay through regularly scheduled meetings and other technical support.'
It did not respond directly to questions about the construction in Coles Bay.
The lack of public information about the work has frustrated Smith, who said he is a 'big supporter of reconciliation' and supports 'anything that we can do to assist, co-operate and partner' with First Nations in almost any sphere.
'My frustration is really with the enforcement people or the people that are supposed to be governing this, who provide me with no information at all,' he said.
Smith said this uncertainty is weighing heavily on him given the environmental stakes.
'It's the ocean and we all have to protect the ocean,' he said. 'That's part of our lives … theirs (the First Nation's), everybody's, and I'm constantly out on the beach, cleaning it, pulling tires out of the water.'
North Saanich Mayor Peter Jones said on Tuesday that neither he nor the council received any notice about the work, but would have to confirm whether the First Nation contacted the municipality.
'I know for myself, I have not been contacted,' he said, adding the municipality has a 'very, very positive and very open' relationship with the First Nation.
Jones said he does not know what the First Nation is doing, but said it has been working for a long time with Victoria, Ottawa and the Capital Regional District on restoring clam beds.
'This council is very, very hopeful that the (First Nation) can, in fact, restore the clam beds to a level that would make them very, very useful to them,' he said. 'Again, I hope they are successful, and with regard to what's happening there right now, council and I have no idea.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025.
Wolfgang Depner, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Caroline Elliott: B.C. Supreme Court takes an axe to private property rights
Article content While two previous decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada recognized Aboriginal title in British Columbia (Tsilhqot'in in 2014 and Nuchatlaht in 2024), neither declared it over privately held lands as this one does. Article content Even as the B.C. government has promised to appeal the decision, it has been pursuing similar policies outside the courts. The province controversially overlaid Aboriginal title on private land with its problematic Haida Nation Recognition Act in 2024. The act was specifically referenced by the plaintiffs in the Cowichan case, and the judge agreed that it illustrated how Aboriginal title and fee simple can 'coexist.' Article content This is a questionable assertion given the numerous legal concerns. As one analysis explains, private property interests and the implementation of Aboriginal title are ultimately at odds: 'The rights in land which flow from both a fee simple interest and Aboriginal title interest … include exclusive rights to use, occupy and manage lands. The two interests are fundamentally irreconcilable over the same piece of land. Article content Article content While the government claims it adequately protected private property rights in the Haida agreement, Aboriginal title is protected under the Constitution, while private property rights are not. When these competing interests are inevitably brought before the courts, it's easy to imagine which one will prevail. Article content The fact that B.C. Premier David Eby said last year that he intended to use the Haida agreement as a ' template ' for other areas of B.C. stands in marked contrast with his sudden interest in an appeal as a means of preserving clear private property titles in the wake of this politically toxic ruling. Article content Indeed, Eby's government continues to negotiate similar agreements elsewhere, including with the shíshálh Nation on B.C.'s Sunshine Coast, even as government documents admit that Aboriginal title includes the right to 'exclusively use and occupy the land.' Article content Eby's commitment to an appeal suggests he may have learned from his costly refusal to appeal a 2021 B.C. Supreme Court decision, which found that excessive development had breached the treaty rights of the Blueberry River First Nation. Eby's government chose to pay out a $350-million settlement to avoid further litigation, a move that ultimately backfired when the two parties ended up back in court. Article content But for now, the consequences of the Cowichan decision have created considerable uncertainty for property owners, businesses and general market confidence. The judge's own words sum it up: 'The question of what remains of Aboriginal title after the granting of fee simple title to the same lands should be reversed. The proper question is: what remains of fee simple title after Aboriginal title is recognized in the same lands?' Article content If there's one positive aspect to this decision, it's that it is so extreme, it will force the Eby government's radical Indigenous policies onto the public agenda as awareness builds over what's at stake. Article content From its incessant land acknowledgements, to MLAs referring to non-Indigenous British Columbians as ' uninvited guests,' to its embrace of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its land back policies, to undemocratic land use planning processes and the overlaying of Aboriginal title on private lands, B.C. government policy has long been headed in exactly this direction. Article content Now, a reckoning is coming, and it's of the government's own creation. The broader issue will soon overtake all others in the public eye, and the premier must decide now whether he'll start walking things back, or double down on his disastrous course. Article content
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Cowichan title lands encompass multimillion-dollar mansions in Richmond, B.C.
Social Sharing The stretch of semi-rural land on No. 6 Road in Richmond, B.C., is home to blueberry farms, multimillion-dollar mansions and an 18-hole golf course. Those Metro Vancouver properties are all now encompassed by a landmark Aboriginal title claim that was successfully established by the Cowichan Nation last week. The ruling in B.C. Supreme Court confirmed Cowichan Aboriginal title and fishing rights over the stretch of land on Lulu Island next to the south arm of the Fraser River, where the nation historically had a summer village and members fished for salmon. Now it is occupied by Crown and City of Richmond holdings — as well as private properties that include a 10,600- square-foot home with 11 bathrooms and an official valuation of $7.78 million, other multimillion-dollar homes and the Country Meadows Golf Course. WATCH | UVic prof says Supreme Court needs to weigh in on case: Supreme Court needs to determine relationship between Aboriginal title and private owners: UVic prof 19 hours ago The ruling by Justice Barbara Young says the Cowichan did not seek a declaration that private titles in the area were "defective and invalid," unlike those for the land owned by the Crown and city that makes up much of the claim. But the judge ruled the province has a duty to negotiate with the nation when it comes to the private land, whose titles were granted in what she called an unjustifiable infringement of the Cowichan's Aboriginal title. Lawyer David Robbins, who represented the Cowichan in the trial that lasted more than 500 days, said Tuesday that the nation did not bring its case against private titleholders "and did not seek to invalidate their interests in this case." "It is the Crown in right of British Columbia that has the legal relationship with the holders of private fee simple interests. The Cowichan Nation has no direct relationship with those titleholders," he said. The Ministry of Attorney General said in a statement that it was "committed to protecting and upholding private property rights while advancing the critical work of reconciliation." The ministry said the number of private properties encompassed by the claim area was being assessed. Map includes mansions But a map of the Cowichan title lands that was part of the court ruling, combined with publicly available land documents, identify the mansions and other properties along Richmond's No. 6 Road, south of Blundell Road. Harry Hogler co-owns the Country Meadows Golf Course and lives across the road in a 8,900-square-foot home, featuring a fountain and a classic car in the circular driveway. Hogler declined to be interviewed but said he was aware of the ruling and was "not worried." However, B.C. Attorney General Niki Sharma said on Monday that the case could have "significant unintended consequences" for private property rights in the province, and the government would appeal the ruling. That's no surprise to Robin Junger, a lawyer with McMillan LLP focused on Indigenous and environmental law. He said if the decision stands it will have "massive implications" and "could undermine the whole system of land ownership in British Columbia." "Although the court was only asked to give a 'declaration' in relation to lands held by the City of Richmond and the Government of Canada, the reasoning of the court isn't limited to those lands," he said. Junger said he believes the decision would likely be overturned on appeal and go all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. He said if he were a property owner he would not panic. Junger said a judge only goes by what parties argue in a case, adding he believes there are "reasonable grounds to pursue" an appeal on the key question of whether B.C. extinguished Aboriginal title when it issued private fee simple land titles, and whether it had the authority to do so. "If you look very closely at the decision, you'll see that the B.C. government, and in fact the Government of Canada, did not argue that these rights were extinguished. They declined to make that argument. Only the City of Richmond made that argument," he said. "So, I think there's a lot of fertile ground to follow on an appeal, and we'll see where it lands." WATCH | B.C. government to appeal ruling: Province to appeal B.C. Supreme Court ruling in favour of Cowichan Nation's fishing and land rights 2 days ago The province has announced plans to appeal last week's B.C. Supreme Court decision that found in favour of the Cowichan Nation's bid to win back fishing rights and title for a portion of its historic lands in Richmond, B.C. Claire Palmer has more. Some other residents of No. 6 Road whose homes are within the Cowichan title lands said they were aware of the ruling, while others were not. One resident arriving at a home valued at more than $4.1 million said Tuesday that he would "fight" the ruling. He declined to be identified or to give a longer interview. Nearby, an elderly woman was selling blueberries outside a large stone home. She said in Mandarin that her son owned the home but she did not think he was aware of the ruling. At one of the most expensive homes in the neighbourhood, according to B.C. Assessment, a woman who was driving out of the property said it was owned by a friend who was in China. She said she was unaware of the court ruling.
CTV News
17 hours ago
- CTV News
Implications of bombshell B.C. land claim ruling
Implications of bombshell B.C. land claim ruling A recent court is decision pitting Indigenous land claims against property rights – prompting an appeal and a fierce debate.
