Court Sentences Two Men to Life Imprisonment in 2015 Murder Case
New Delhi: A Delhi court has sentenced two men to life imprisonment for a murder in 2015, calling the crime "heinous" and acknowledging the emotional trauma suffered by the victim's family.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In an order dated May 13, additional sessions judge Virender Kumar Kharta stated that showing undue leniency in sentencing would undermine public confidence in the justice system. Citing a 2005 Supreme Court judgment, the court noted, "Undue sympathy to impose an inadequate sentence would do more harm to the justice system and erode public confidence in the efficacy of law. It is, therefore, the duty of every court to award a proper sentence.
"
The court was hearing the sentencing arguments in the case of
and Sheesh Ram, who had earlier been convicted under Section 302 (murder) of IPC.
"The family members of deceased, Manish, have suffered mental trauma, inconvenience, hardship, disappointment and frustration. Adequate compensation must be provided to them," the judge said, directing the matter to Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DLSA) to determine and award suitable compensation to the victim's legal heirs.
Additional public prosecutor Pankaj Kumar Ranga argued for the death penalty, asserting that the two convicts, acting with common intent, had committed a brutal and deliberate murder.
However, the court, while acknowledging the gravity of the crime and noting that aggravating factors outweighed mitigating ones, observed that the case did not meet the criteria for the "rarest of the rare" category required for capital punishment. It also took into account that both convicts were first-time offenders.
"In sentencing, a balance must be maintained between the rights of the convict, the rights of the victim and the purpose of the law. Poverty alone is not a significant mitigating factor," the court said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Rape accused was a repeat offender; scooter gifted by sister
The man who raped a toddler and was gunned down in a police encounter in the early hours of Friday was booked in criminal cases registered at two police stations in the city. Charges for rioting, criminal intimidation and others were booked against him in these cases. According to police, Deepak Verma, 24, was the youngest of the four siblings. 'His elder brother, Vishnu Verma, earns his living working as a labourer and fruit vendor. His elder sister lives in Surat, and his younger sister lives in Lucknow. Two years ago, the sister in Surat had gifted Vishnu a scooter, which Deepak forcibly took and used to commit crimes,' said Subhash Chand, the Alamabh station house officer (SHO), adding he often stayed out late. In a CCTV footage, Deepak was seen fleeing with the two-year-old child on a white scooter. The police said Deepak usually left home at 6 pm and returned by 5 am. A police investigation also revealed his prior involvement in a similar crime, leading to his imprisonment along with two of his accomplices. 'The accused has two criminal cases, one registered in Para in 2024 and another at Hazratganj police station in 2021,' read details shared by the police. While the case at Para police station was booked under sections 504 (intentional insult) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, IPC sections 147 (rioting), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504, and 506 were invoked in the other. 'Sold water in trains, organised jagrata' According to police, Deepak would, at times, help his brother-in-law in the latter's fruit business. 'He also sold water in trains. He organised ritualistic jagrata events for which he made tableaus as well,' said DCP (Central) Ashish Srivastava. In a picture widely shared on social media, the accused can be seen posing in front of a statue of Lord Shiva, which he had made as part of a tableau for a jagrata event. Police added Deepak would often dress himself as a member of the 'aghori' sect, which is known for its ascetic practices. 'Several photos recovered by the police show him in aghori attire,' said an official. Pic cap: In a picture widely shared on social media, the accused can be seen posing in front of a statue of Lord Shiva, which he had made as part of a tableau for a jagrata event.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
'If there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished,' asks Jagdeep Dhankhar on Justice Yashwant Varma issue
Is a parliamentary motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma the answer, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar asked a gathering of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, in Chandigarh on Friday (June 6, 2025) adding that 'if there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished?' Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) said the government would bring out a resolution in Parliament in the monsoon session for impeachment motion against Justice Varma. Justice Varma was subject of a probe by a Supreme Court-appointed panel after a fire incident at his Delhi residence led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of cash at the outhouse. Mr. Dhankhar said the government of the day was handicapped because of a three-decade-old judicial order that did not allow it to register a First Information Report (FIR) without permission from the judiciary. The Vice-President said, 'So I pose a question to myself, in deep pain, worried, concerned, in anguish — why was that permission not given? That was the minimum that could have been done on the earliest occasion.' He also questioned why even after the Supreme Court probe, Justice Varma has not been punished. 'I have raised the issue. Ultimately, if a motion is brought to remove a judge, is that the answer? If there has been a crime, a culpable act shaking the foundations of democracy — the rule of law, why wasn't it punished? We have lost more than three months, and the investigation has not even been initiated. Whenever you go to court, they ask why the FIR was delayed.' The permission should have been granted soon after the cash was discovered and if not then it should have come up at least when the Supreme Court-appointed panel filed its report considering the 'compulsive, expedient situation'. The cash haul, Mr. Dhankhar said, was 'obviously tainted, unaccounted, illegal and unexplained' and the system must move to find out 'whose money it is.' He further asked, 'Has the money influenced the judiciary in judicial work? All these issues are agitating not only the minds of lawyers but also people on the street. But let the lid be blown off the can of worms. Let these skeletons in the cupboards come out. Why was there no FIR? Why has there been no investigation at all?' The gap between 'may be true' and 'must be true', the Vice-President said, is very thin. 'But this thin distance has to be negotiated by evidence of unimpeachable veracity. So, I put innocence at a very high level. I am not aware of who is guilty. But one thing is for sure — a crime of great enormity, shaking the foundations of the judiciary and democracy, has taken place. I hope it will be addressed,' he said.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Hyderabad man duped of ₹1.4 lakh in ‘digital arrest' scam
A 57-year-old private employee from Hyderabad was conned out of ₹1.4 lakh in a 'digital arrest' scam with fraudsters posing as government officials and threatening him with arrest in a fictitious money laundering case. The case unfolded on May 12, when the victim received a phone call claiming that a bank account had been fraudulently opened using his Aadhaar details, and that a money laundering case had been registered against him in Bengaluru. The caller warned the man that unless he cooperated, he would be arrested and jailed. In an attempt to make the ploy convincing, the fraudster initiated a two-hour video call over WhatsApp, posing as an investigator. The victim, rattled by the threats, was asked to pay ₹50,000 as a 'processing fee'. Trusting the caller, he transferred the amount to a bank account provided during the call. The scam escalated when the victim was told that his case was being forwarded to a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officer. He was asked to disclose sensitive information, including the bank balances of both himself and his wife. The fraudster cautioned that the entire matter was confidential and insisted that any disclosure would endanger his family. The victim was warned of a possible prison sentence of 2-3 years and told he might need to appear before the Supreme Court. In the days that followed, the victim was kept under sustained psychological pressure, with the fraudster continuing video calls lasting 2-3 hours each day. He was made to report every 30 minutes, share his residential address, and comply with the caller's instructions. Gradually, he ended up paying a total of ₹1,40,000. To further convince him, the fraudsters sent forged documents, including a fake acknowledgement letter from the 'Income Tax Department' for the ₹50,000 payment, a counterfeit letter purportedly from the Supreme Court bearing the forged signature of T. Rabi Sankar, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, and a second 'tax department' letter confirming receipt of funds. The victim was told that the Supreme Court would soon approve a refund of the entire amount to his bank account. Realising he had been duped, the victim lodged a complaint with the Cybercrime Wing of the Hyderabad Police. Further investigation into the case is underway.
