
How weight-loss wonder drugs are redefining the way our bodies work
Obesity was once medicine's Cinderella subject with some questioning whether the condition should even be viewed as a biological disorder. But the arrival of a new class of appetite-suppressing drugs such as Ozempic and Wegovy has transformed obesity treatment into the most scientifically exciting and commercially lucrative area of healthcare.
These drugs lead to dramatic weight loss, are shifting perceptions and, according to a series of results announced at the European Congress on Obesity (ECO) in Málaga this week, promise health benefits that extend far beyond weight management.
'It's been an extraordinary week,' said Prof Susan Jebb, a public health nutrition scientist at the University of Oxford, who has been researching obesity treatments since the 1980s and who presented the findings at the ECO meeting.
'Obesity has been [in the background] for so long and it's been such a slog,' she added. 'These drugs have energised the field and it has happened so fast.'
First developed to help lower blood sugar levels as a diabetes treatment, it was quickly apparent that Novo Nordisk's drug semaglutide (the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy jabs) has a dramatic effect on weight. The drug works by mimicking a hormone, GLP-1, which is released in the gut when we eat and acts on receptors around the body, including the brain.
Eli Lilly's rival product, Mounjaro, contains the active ingredient tirzepatide. This emulates GLP-1 as well as a second hormone producing even more impressive results, according to the first head-to-head trial reported this week in which participants lost an average of 20% of their body weight after 72 weeks of treatment.
The benefits of being at a healthy weight are substantial, with one study published in January suggesting weight-loss jabs could reduce the risk of 42 diseases including heart disease, cancer, clotting disorders, Alzheimer's, chronic kidney disease, addiction and a range of psychiatric conditions. There is early evidence that these benefits go beyond what might be expected due to the drugs' metabolic effects.
'We absolutely know that almost every aspect of health is better if you're a healthy weight,' said Jebb. 'What we haven't really nailed is whether those effects are independent of weight. There may be weight independent effects. My reading is that the jury is still out.'
Others are already convinced. Results from a phase 3 trial of semaglutide in patients with fatty liver disease (medically known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis or MASH) found the drug could halt and even reverse the condition, which affects one in five UK adults. Most participants in the trial were obese or had diabetes, but the data revealed benefits to the liver even in those who experienced little or no weight loss.
'We were able to demonstrate that there's a weight loss contribution but that there's a contribution that's weight independent,' said Prof Philip Newsome, of King's College London, who presented the findings in Málaga this week. 'That's quite interesting and exciting.'
Another trial found weight-loss jabs could almost halve the risk of obesity-related cancers, with the effects larger than would be expected from weight loss alone. And two studies suggested that the drugs may have mental health benefits.
'Clearly if your weight improves there will be a benefit to emotional wellbeing, your self-worth, self-confidence and energy levels,' said Dr Toby Pillinger, a psychiatrist and lecturer at King's, who authored one of the studies. But given that the drugs also appear to act on the brain's reward system, more direct neurological effects are also plausible.
'They've been likened to the Swiss army knife of medicines,' Pillinger said. 'We are only starting to understand their effects around the body. None more so than in the changes in how our brain is functioning.'
Within a few years, the drugs have transformed the landscape of metabolic medicine. Pillinger sees a similar revolution on the horizon for psychiatry, suggesting that addiction, binge-eating disorders and schizophrenia are obvious targets for future trials.
The problem with diets, notoriously, is that once a person stops dieting they often regain weight. For GLP-targeting drugs, the data is patchy because pharmaceutical companies typically stop tracking people once they stop taking the medicine.
Jebb and colleagues are among the first to trace this trajectory . They found rapid weight loss was followed by a rapid rebound. When people stopped taking semaglutide they regained all the weight lost within 10 months – far quicker than for behavioural interventions. 'We've got to face up to what happens when people stop taking these drugs,' said Jebb.
Another obesity expert, Prof Alexander Miras, at Ulster University, said: 'No one has actually given us specific numbers as to how many people this happens in, but we are estimating it to be around 95%.'
Dr Martin Whyte, a consultant in diabetes at King's College Hospital NHS trust, said it was a phenomenon he cautioned patients about. 'I haven't seen a single person who got down to a weight on GLP-1 drug, stopped it, and their weight stayed exactly the same coming off the drug,' he said.
The findings do not undermine the efficacy of the drugs, experts say, but they need to be carefully considered by those paying for them and by patients considering their treatment options.
'We need to face up to the costs of lifelong treatment – and these drugs are expensive,' said Jebb. 'When we come to private prescriptions – and right now in the UK most people are doing this privately – people need to understand there are high risks of regaining the weight very fast when you stop. We've got to give people the facts.'
It is an experience familiar to Anita*, 41, who is a consultant from Cambridge. She started on Mounjaro in April 2024 and continued taking the medication until December, falling from 87kg (13.7st) to 70kg.
'Food has always been front and centre for me,' she said. 'But when I was taking Mounjaro, my appetite was absolutely different. It was almost to the point where I couldn't believe how much it had changed. I thought: 'Oh, this is what normal people must feel like when they're just not wanting to eat all the time.''
Just before Christmas 2024, Anita came off the jabs as the £225 monthly cost was proving too expensive. Three weeks into January her cravings and appetite returned. She put 7kg back on within two months.
'My appetite came back as unstoppable as before,' she said. 'I could not help eating junk. I craved chocolate and cheese, which was exactly what I felt before I started the jabs. It was like I had never been on them.'
Anita decided to go back on Mounjaro and started on the jabs six weeks ago. This time she shopped around and now pays £150 a month.
'I feel like if I can afford it I'll probably keep on it as maintenance. If you have a drug that will help you achieve what you need, has low side effects, and it works well and is safe, why not use it?' she said.
Experts say rather than being an acute treatment, as would be used for something like an infection, these weight-loss medications should be viewed as a treatment for a chronic condition – similar to the way statins are used.
'If you have somebody on a statin for their cholesterol, and you stop statin, almost inevitably the cholesterol rises,' said Whyte. 'If you have somebody on the blood pressure tablet, you stop the tablet, almost inevitably the blood pressure rises. So it's not dissimilar from that.'
Yet questions remain, including why a fraction of patients do not regain weight when they stop the medications.
'No one knows who these people are, and they don't know what makes them different,' said Miras, though he added that there were two main theories. The first was that such patients might have gained weight due to particular life events such as a pregnancy or a stressful period – meaning that when the event resolved, so too did the weight gain.
Another possibility, said Miras, was that a genetically predetermined 'set point' for body weight had a broader range for some people than others, meaning their body did not resist efforts to deviate from this weight as strongly as for other people.
Whyte said research was now looking at how to minimise weight-regain, noting that as well as maintaining muscle mass and making lifestyle changes, research suggested tapering down doses might help.
As patients are tracked for longer and in real-world settings, it is also clear that these drugs are not the solution for everyone. Some find the side-effects unpleasant, miss enjoyment of food or simply don't want to continually take medication and, while they have been found to be effective in early trials in children, some question whether this is the right approach so early in life.
With the medications known to reduce muscle mass, Whyte said an important question was whether this went beyond what would be expected from weight loss alone.
Yet with GLP-1 drugs having been used for diabetes for almost 20 years, Whyte said the data suggested overall the medications were safe.
'There was an initial concern [about], maybe it could lead to higher risk of pancreatitis or even pancreatic cancer or thyroid [cancer]. That has not been borne out in any of the follow-up data,' he said.
Critics of weight-loss drugs tend to view them as medicalising a problem that would be better solved by policies to tackle the underlying causes of the obesity crisis. But, according to Prof Naveed Sattar, of the University of Glasgow, there is no sign of high-calorie foods becoming less ubiquitous. And where successive policies have failed to make a sufficient impact, he argues the drugs themselves may provide a fresh incentive for a change in the food market.
'When Eli Lilly first reported their results, the share prices of some fast-food places dipped,' said Sattar. 'Ultimately it might reverse-engineer things towards a better food environment.'
Weight-loss drugs now dominate the conversation around obesity. But their success may also drive medical interest in alternative pathways for treatment.
'What the success of these drugs absolutely demonstrates is that obesity is a biological phenomenon,' said Jebb. 'Some people have a genetic susceptibility that makes it a struggle to manage their appetites, which is made incredibly hard in a world where food is everywhere.'
'Part of what I hope these drugs do is reframe medical attitudes around obesity. It's easier to engage doctors in talking about drug treatments but I hope it will draw them into talking about other options as well.'
Miras was also enthusiastic. 'When you don't understand the disease, it is almost automatic in medicine that we start blaming the patient because we feel uncomfortable,' he said. 'Now we have understood the disease, not completely but much better. And now, as a result, there is a revolution in the treatment of obesity and that will only get better.'
*Name has been changed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Millions of patients to be treated by GPs instead of hospitals under radical reforms to cut NHS waiting list
Patients will be treated by GPs rather than getting specialist care in hospitals under radical reforms as Keir Starmer battles to tackle the NHS crisis. Routine appointments will be dealt with in community services close to patients' homes in a move they believe could 'fix the waiting list'. The health service will also ramp-up technology meaning patients will have less in-person appointments - instead using like the NHS app and wearable devices to monitor patients remotely. NHS bosses claim half of the 135 million hospital outpatient appointments every year are 'pointless' and follow-ups and consultations could instead be done in high-street surgeries. It comes as the government is set to launch a ten-year plan to create a 'neighbourhood health service', The Times reports. 'As we deliver the transformational shifts in our 10 Year Plan, from hospital to community, analogue to digital, and sickness to prevention, it will have radical implications for services,' Health Secretary Wes Streeting told the NHS ConfedExpo in Manchester. 'Much of what's done in a hospital today, will be done on the high street, over the phone, or through the app in a decade's time.' The plans are set to link family doctors, nurses, social care services and volunteers with money being paid to NHS regions based on how effective their care is rather than how busy the hospitals are. Streeting added: 'We will use financial incentives to invest more in public health outcomes, not just in more activity that reacts to sickness.' Earlier this week, figures revealed that the number of patients waiting has fallen to its lowest point in two years - but the number of patients waiting for more than a year for hospital treatment has increased. The news comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave the NHS a cash injection worth an extra £29 billion per year. Speaking to the Commons, the Chancellor said she is making a 'record cash investment' in the NHS, worth an extra 3 per cent a year in real terms. The Chancellor insisted this would lead to 'more appointments, more doctors and more scanners' as Labour seeks to deliver on its manifesto promise to get the NHS 'back on its feet'. But the settlement received a lukewarm response from NHS bosses, who said they would need even more money if the Government is to achieve its aim of treating 92 per cent of patients within 18 weeks of a GP referral by the end of this Parliament. Matthew Taylor, of the NHS Confederation, which represents health organisations, said: 'Difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29billion won't be enough to cover increasing costs of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it. 'On its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, told the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester that the health service has done 'really well relative to other parts of the public service'. But he added: 'We all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, the day-to-day cost pressures... but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand we've got what the country can afford to give us. 'We really need to get better value for that money – it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount.' Government documents accompanying the Spending Review show that, on average, from 2023/24 to 2028/29, the NHS in England will receive 3 per cent real-terms growth in day-to-day spending, equivalent to a £29billion increase in annual budgets The Government said it will also invest up to £10 billion in NHS technology and digital transformation by 2028/29, plus £6 billion to speed up tests and treatments. Scanners, ambulances and urgent treatment centres are among things the additional cash – part of the overall £29 billion – will pay for, with the aim of providing up to 4 million more tests and procedures in the next five years. NHS England figures show 7.42 million treatments were waiting to be done at the end of March, relating to 6.25 million patients – up from 7.4 million and 6.24 million respectively at the end of February.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Disgusting' loos see pupils trying to skip school - as horrified children say they feel 'like they were stepping into a horror movie'
More than one in ten parents said their children have asked to miss school because the toilets are so disgusting, a survey has suggested. A poll, of 2,000 parents of school-aged children in the UK suggests around one in six (17 per cent) parents rated the toilets at their child's school as unclean. Nearly a third (31 per cent) of families said they have raised concerns about the toilets with school staff, according to a survey for charity Parentkind. One parent told the charity that the toilets were so dirty that their children 'felt like they were stepping into a horror movie', while another parent said their child had seen cockroaches in the school toilets. The Censuswide poll suggests that 11 per cent of parents said their child had missed school, or asked to stay at home, because of worries about the toilets at school. The charity is calling on the Government to prioritise funds to improve 'disgusting' school toilets as part of plans to improve the school estate. It comes after the Chancellor announced around £2.3 billion per year for fixing 'crumbling classrooms' and £2.4 billion per year to rebuild 500 schools. Some surveyed parents suggested their children had wet themselves at school, or suffered constipation, because of avoiding the toilets at their school. Jason Elsom, chief executive of Parentkind, called for government funds set out in the spending review to be used to make school toilets 'fit for use'. He said: 'With a million children facing humiliation because of the disgusting state of school toilets, we need to shine a light on the health and well-being of our children who are refusing to drink during the day to avoid going to the toilet and the millions of children suffering constipation because their school toilets are so dirty. 'Parents tell us that we need to set aside the cash to clean and upgrade school loos. 'Parents tell us their children have seen 'cockroaches coming out of the floors' and toilets 'covered in poo and urine'.' Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'Schools understand the vital importance of toilets being clean and in good order, work hard to ensure this is the case, and will be dismayed at the findings of this research. 'Many schools are struggling with old and outdated buildings which require a great deal of maintenance because of years of government underfunding, and this may play a role in the perceptions reflected by respondents. 'We urgently need improved investment in upgrading and modernising school buildings.'


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
I'm an NHS leader - but my mum still suffered at hands of the health service
A senior NHS leader has criticised the health service, saying his mother received a "black service, not an NHS service" as she Victor Adebowale, chair of the NHS Confederation, which represents health managers, described his mother Grace's death as "undignified".The 92-year-old died in January of suspected lung cancer, although it was not detected until after her Adebowale said his mother's missed diagnosis, combined with the sub-standard care she received when admitted to hospital for the final time, had left his family upset and searching for peer, who was also on the board of NHS England for six years, believes his mother's experience illustrates wider problems. "My mum would have wanted me to tell her story because she is not the only one who will have faced these problems."Lord Adebowale said he would not call the NHS racist, but instead believed it was riven with inequalities, particularly racial inequalities."It's the inverse care law. The people most in need of health and care are the least likely to get it - if you are black, if you are poor, if you are elderly and poor, there are inequalities in the system and people like my mum suffer."The intervention by such a figure is significant. Lord Adebowale has held senior health roles for more than two decades and also helped establish the NHS Race and Health Observatory in 2021 to try to tackle inequalities experienced by black and minority ethnic patients in England said it was working to improve access to services and tackle inequalities, which would form an "important part" of the 10-year health plan, expected to be published next month.A spokesperson added: "Everyone - no matter their background - should receive the best NHS care possible. But we know there is much more to do."A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care echoed those comments, adding: "Our deepest sympathies are with Lord Adebowale for the loss of his mother." A committed, caring nurse Lord Adebowale's mother, who had three other children, emigrated to the UK in the 1950s from Nigeria and went on to work as a nurse in hospitals, the community and mental health describes her as a caring, compassionate and intensely committed nurse. "She believed in the health service. It's people like her who help build the NHS, but, when she needed it, it wasn't there as it should have been."She had dementia and in the final five or six years was in regular contact with the health service. We cannot understand why she did not get a [cancer] diagnosis. She was in discomfort and pain – and had been for some time. "She never got any treatment for cancer – it was only after she died we learnt she had lung cancer."That was found during a post-mortem and subsequent tests have suggested that was the likely cause of her death, he Adebowale added that when his mother was taken to hospital the final time it was not easy to find her a bed. "The hospital was under intense pressure. She did not want to die in hospital in that sort of situation." Symbolic of wider problem Lord Adebowale is not naming the NHS service involved in her care, saying he does not want to apportion individual blame, as his mother's experience was symbolic of a wider problem."I just think there are too many situations where people that look like me and shades of me don't get the service they deserve. It was not the dignified death that we would have wanted for her. It wasn't the death she deserved."I think she got a black service, not an NHS service."Lord Adebowale, who for nearly 20 years was chief executive of Turning Point, a care organisation that supports people with substance misuse and mental health problems alongside those with learning disabilities, before becoming chair of the NHS Confederation in 2019, said there were multiple examples of inequalities in the health highlighted research showing younger black people waited 20 minutes longer on average in A&E than white also showed people from the poorest backgrounds were more likely to face year-long waits for routine studies have suggested people from deprived communities are 50% more likely to have cancer diagnosed after a visit to A&E – such diagnoses are more likely to be at a later stage when chances of survival are said while the promise of extra money for the health service made in this week's spending review was welcome, that alone would not tackle the inequalities."It a systematic problem – I don't want to blame any particular individual or my mum's local NHS. "What happened to her could happen anywhere. We need to address inequalities in the health service and that requires leadership – not just money."