Beyoncé wins first Emmy, for ‘Beyoncé Bowl' halftime show
The award was among a handful of so-called juried Emmys announced Tuesday that are determined outside the regular voting process and given out by committees, with no official nominees. They are usually highly technical — several involve individual elements of the animation process — and rarely go to famous names. They are announced in advance and handed out at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards ceremony next month.
Advertisement
Beyoncé is also nominated for best variety special as a producer of 'Beyoncé Bowl' and for best direction of a variety special. Her husband, Jay-Z, is competing against her as an executive producer of Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl halftime show.
Beyoncé wearing custom Thom Solo thigh-high boots.
Parkwood Entertainment
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hypebeast
an hour ago
- Hypebeast
Beyoncé Is Officially an Emmy Winner
Summary Beyoncéhas officially secured her firstEmmy Award, winning for her work as a costume designer on theNetflixspecial,Beyoncé Bowl. The juried award, announced by the Television Academy, honors her in the category of Outstanding Costumes for Variety, Nonfiction, or Reality Programming. She wins the Emmy alongside fellow costume Shiona Turini as well as assistant costume designers Erica Rice and Molly Peters, costume supervisor Chelsea Staebell and head of workroom Timothy White. The special, which aired as aChristmas Day NFL halftime show on Netflix, has been dubbed theBeyoncé Bowland featured the live debut of songs from her critically acclaimed album,Cowboy Carter. The performance was praised for its stunning Western-themed outfits and intricate design, which paid homage to Black Southern and rodeo culture. Beyoncé's Emmy win is shared with her talented costume design team. This win marks a significant milestone for the 35-time Grammy winner, as it brings her halfway to achieving EGOT status. It is her first Emmy victory after more than 10 nominations over her career. The special has also garnered two other nominations for a variety special and directing, in which she will be up against her husband, JAY-Z. The award ceremony for these categories will be presented at the Creative Arts Emmys in September.
Business of Fashion
2 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
Exclusive: The Story Behind E.l.f.'s Controversial Matt Rife Campaign
E.l.f. Cosmetics' ads usually make a splash. The affordable cosmetics maker has decried the lack of gender parity in the boardroom with a sketch campaign called 'So Many Dicks', tapped the actress Jennifer Coolidge at the peak of her 'White Lotus' fame for its first superbowl commercial, and even sent the astronaut Amanda Nguyen into space with its products in April. Its most recent campaign, launched on Monday, a parody of the once ubiquitous ads run by the Buffalo, New York law firm Cellino & Barnes, starred the drag queen Heidi N Closet and the comedian Matt Rife as attorneys defending clients against overpriced beauty products. It leaned into the brand's usual humorous, entertainment-based approach, and because its recent 'Sunhinged' comedy special — which featured a series of comedians 'roasting' the sun to support SPF use — was such a success, the brand decided to work with a comedian once again. They picked Rife specifically, according to Kory Marchisotto, E.l.f. Beauty's global chief marketing officer, because of his significant overlap with the brand's target female Gen-Z audience. His TikTok base, she told The Business of Beauty, is 80 percent female, and 75 percent under the age of 34 — 'so right in the sweet spot.' But the campaign failed to land with some members of that audience. Almost immediately, commenters on the video, and stitches on TikTok, fixated on jokes Rife had made about domestic violence in a 2024 Netflix special. Many demanded to know why a brand that has long devoted itself to uplifting women would partner with someone who makes light of a serious issue impacting some of its core customer base. ADVERTISEMENT E.l.f. never saw it coming. 'Obviously we're very surprised,' said Marchisotto. 'There is a big gap between our intention and how this missed the mark for some people … We always aim to deliver positivity, and this one didn't. So we find ourselves in a position where, quite honestly, that doesn't feel good for us.' The brand's public statement, released on Wednesday, told a parallel story: 'You know us, we're always listening and we've heard you. This campaign aimed to humorously spotlight beauty injustice. We understand we missed the mark with people we care about in our e.l.f. community. While & schmarnes closes today, we'll continue to make the case against overpriced beauty.' E.l.f. Beauty's online statement following the backlash to its campaign. (E.l.f. Beauty) Online vs. IRL Rather than focusing on Rife's past content, the team — which releases around 20 rapid-fire campaigns per year — dove into his community engagement, which had 80 percent positive sentiment at the time of the campaign's development, according to Marchisotto. 'We [are] very much known for operating in real time, that's what it means to be in the cultural zeitgeist,' she said. 'So we're not looking in the rear view mirror when we're operating the real-time marketing machine.' E.l.f. is not the only brand to cause upset among its customers as of late. American Eagle recently sparked outrage among some social media commenters around the wordplay in its latest campaign, 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The brand's response to the backlash on Instagram, similarly to E.l.f.'s, claimed that the campaign 'is and was always about her jeans,' rather than being designed to make a broader statement. Until sales numbers are impacted, though, it's hard to tell whether a poorly executed campaign truly stops customers from shopping a brand. And while 'it's always important to have thoughtful consideration and rigor and discipline behind your talent choices,' said Marchisotto, social media can significantly amplify just how upset onlookers get. The in-person event the brand hosted at New York's Oculus in conjunction with the campaign on Wednesday, for instance, told a different story than what was happening online. The pop-up, which was designed to look like the inside of a courthouse to mirror the ad, had more than 1,100 visitors queuing up to receive $96,000 worth of E.l.f. products and, in some cases, cash back, in exchange for beauty products they had overspent on, the brand reported. ADVERTISEMENT 'Social media is a magnet for people being outraged,' said Allen Adamson, co-founder of marketing agency Metaforce. 'Whether that outrage stops them from double-clicking on E.l.f. Cosmetics or going to buy American Eagle jeans, there's not always a direct link. People love to stand on their soap boxes on social media … They're still likely wearing American Eagle.' For E.l.f., while this campaign did not reach customers in the way it hoped it would, it has no plans of straying from its entertaining ethos. 'All of the signals tell us to keep being humorous, to keep pushing the envelope, to keep leaning into entertainment,' said Marchisotto. 'That's what our community loves.' And while out-of-the-box campaigns may run a natural risk of sparking conversations online — even when brands may not be looking to upset their core demographic — brands like E.l.f. and American Eagle should reconsider the values they share with their core demographic. 'Try to test it against your core users,' Adamson advised. 'You're never going to keep everyone happy … It can ruffle 10 percent of your brand, but if it ruffles 50 percent of your brand core users, then you hit the third rail and you get off.' E.l.f.'s 'So Many Dicks' campaign is a prime example of standing out within the realm of what a brand values. In the case of Rife, though, Adamson said, any publicity is good publicity:'If you play it too safe, you're invisible … Most marketing leaders probably would rather be noticed, and apologise or dig out of it later than be invisible,' he said.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will the Oscars Leave ABC? Why the Hulu-Disney+ Merger Could Prevent a Split and Benefit Both Sides
Disney's planned 2026 integration of Hulu into Disney+ could represent more than streaming consolidation — it creates unprecedented opportunities for both Disney and the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences to reshape awards broadcasting for the streaming era. As the Academy's current ABC deal approaches its 2028 expiration, Disney's unified platform offers global reach while the Academy Awards provides Disney with a big launch platform and the prestige of hosting one of the year's biggest events in entertainment. More from Variety Rachel Bloom and Husband Dan Gregor Set Rom-Com Pilot 'Do You Want Kids?' at ABC Oscars Set Launch Date for First FYC Screeners: 'KPop Demon Hunters,' 'Becoming Led Zeppelin' and More (EXCLUSIVE) Czech Oscar Submission Controversy Heats Up as Abuse Drama 'Broken Voices' Accused of 'Fundamental Ethical Failure' and 'Misleading Claims' Disney's recent acquisition of Comcast's last remaining equity interest in Hulu paves the way for Disney and the Academy to come up with creative ways to showcase the Oscars via streaming. The last deal between the sides was set in 2016 — well before the launch of Disney+ and the rest of the streaming explosion. 'If the Oscars stay at ABC, it represents the best of both worlds,' a veteran awards strategist tells Variety. 'Disney aligns with cinema's most prestigious institution, while the Academy gains wider streaming reach.' The March 2025 dual-platform experiment — broadcast on ABC, streamed on Hulu — delivered promising results. The Oscars attracted 19.7 million viewers, a rare 1% increase that bucked years of audience decline. The experiment gave Disney valuable live-streaming data while the Academy reached expanded its reach beyond linear to streaming viewers who want more flexibility in options for watching even a live awards show event. The Academy's broader initiatives — education, philanthropy and the Academy Museum — align with Disney's content ecosystem spanning ABC Signature, 20th Television, FX and streaming services. This also opens doors to year-round Academy programming such as documentaries, behind-the-scenes features and Disney+ exclusive educational content. A long-term and wide-ranging agreement could create yield experimentation opportunities such as interactive Oscar experiences, international filmmaker showcases and member-exclusive content. However, the $100 million question remains: How are talks progressing between the two parties? Both sides have remained tight-lipped. Sources with direct knowledge tell Variety negotiations are 'going well and moving along.' Early speculation indicated that Disney chief Bob Iger wanted to wait on the deal until the Mouse House has set his successor as CEO, which is expected to come early next year. But Academy leaders don't want to wait that long. Both ABC and the Academy declined to comment. Industry insiders predict clarity on ABC and the Oscars' future by year's end. Newly appointed AMPAS President Lynette Howell Taylor, an Oscar-nominated producer for Bradley Cooper's directorial debut 'A Star is Born,' brings deep industry ties from producing the 92nd Academy Awards — the 'Parasite' year. Although she can only serve a one-year term due to board term limits, she would be allowed to return after a two-year hiatus. She would be a valuable asset to bring this over the finish line. Disney's technological infrastructure offers capabilities beyond traditional broadcasters — second-screen experiences, real-time engagement and global distribution. For the Academy, the priority remains reaching younger, more diverse audiences critical for long-term relevance. But sources caution that other media platforms have expressed strong interest to AMPAS in having discussions about Oscars. Despite its long relationship with AMPAS, Disney will have to make them a compelling offer or risk being out-bid by a rival. As negotiations advance, the potential for a continued partnership for the Oscars and Disney — or if a new player will jump into the mix — will be one of the most pressing questions for filmdom insiders in the coming months. Which partner will help define how global audiences engage with prestige movies while preserving the artistic excellence both institutions represent? Only time will tell. Variety Awards Circuit: Oscars Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
