How the coronavirus sparked an epidemic of intellectual malpractice
This is unsparingly documented by two Princeton social scientists, Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee, in 'In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us.' The most comprehensive and aggressive mobilization of emergency powers in U.S. history, wielded with scant regard for collateral consequences, exacerbated inequalities, included 'extraordinary restrictions on free speech' and constituted a 'stress test' that 'the central truth-seeking departments of liberal democracy: journalism, science, and universities' frequently flunked. Macedo and Lee say the 'moralization of disagreements' stifled dissent, employing censorship and shaming.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Decades of Socialist Rule at Stake as Bolivia Vote Count Starts
(Bloomberg) -- The vote count is underway in Bolivia's presidential and congressional elections that may end years of socialist rule and herald warmer relations with Washington. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds The election took place amid unrest, shortages and the steepest inflation in more than three decades. The economic crisis has undermined support for the ruling MAS party, which has held power almost without interruption since 2006. Two pro-business candidates are battling for the upper hand in a field of eight presidential aspirants. Preliminary results are expected on Sunday evening. Samuel Doria Medina made a fortune in cement, then invested in fast food chains such as Burger King and Subway. Jorge Tuto Quiroga served as president in 2001-2002 when President Hugo Bánzer Suárez stepped down due to ill health. Both candidates say they would cut spending and seek international loans to inject capital into the economy. Both also would seek foreign investment in oil and gas exploration and in lithium production — Bolivia is home to the world's largest deposits of the metal. The highest-profile leftist candidate is Andrónico Rodríguez, a socialist senator who has distanced himself from both the current president, Luis Arce, and former President Evo Morales, whose feud split the ruling party. Arce opted not to run for a second term. Morales called on supporters to spoil their votes. The election is the first since 2005 when neither Morales nor a hand-picked successor were on the ballot. Under Bolivian election rules, a candidate can win in the first round with just 40% of the vote, provided there's a margin of more than ten percentage points over the runner-up. If no one wins in the first round, there'll be a runoff on Oct. 19. The new president will be sworn in on Nov. 8. The economy has been struggling for a decade amid declining natural gas production and dwindling central bank dollar reserves. Bolivia's dollar bonds have been among the top performers in emerging markets this year, on optimism that the election will herald a government able to unlock international loans and implement economic reforms. Under Morales and Arce, Bolivia had close links with Venezuela, Nicaragua, Russia and China but often had sour relations with Washington. What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Solar Shares Rise as Trump Hit to Tax Credits Softer Than Feared
(Bloomberg) -- Clean energy stocks soared after the Trump administration released new guidance on eligibility requirements for tax credits that weren't as punitive as the industry had feared. Residential solar systems still will be able to qualify under prior guidance and the new rules won't be applied retroactively. For larger projects, they will have to meet a physical construction standard but will still have four years to complete their developments. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds 'This is much better than expected,' said Phil Shen, a clean energy analyst with Roth Capital Partners, who added the changes were minimal overall. Sunrun Inc., the nation's biggest residential solar installer, jumped as much as 42%, and home solar equipment provider SolarEdge Technologies Inc. rose as much as 28%. NextEra Energy Inc., the biggest large-scale solar and wind developer, climbed as much as 5%. NexTracker Inc., a solar equipment provider, jumped nearly 13%. The moves, which follow an executive order by President Donald Trump ordering the Treasury Department to place new limits on the tax credits, adds to an escalating campaign against wind and solar power. The crackdown, which has a series of new permitting reviews for the projects at the Interior Department and the cancellation of a massive planned wind farm in Idaho, comes at a critical time in the US as it confronts a potential shortage of power supplies to meet rising demand from data centers running artificial intelligence. Under Trump's massive tax-and-spending bill signed into law July 4, solar and wind developments are eligible for tax credits if they begin construction within 12 months. Until now, projects were considered eligible for the credits if developers had spent at least 5% of the planned projects cost. The new rule eliminates the 5% for large scale projects, instead requiring developers prove 'physical work of a significant nature' has been taking place on an ongoing basis. However, small solar facilities not greater than 1.5 megawatts can still use the 5% of planned project expense standard to qualify. 'There was some expectation that the rulemaking would make it very onerous to safe harbor tax credits, but this seems pretty straight forward,' said Robert Barnett, a clean energy analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. 'This is particularly favorable news to the residential and small commercial solar companies,' More than 2,500 announced wind and solar projects — with a combined generating capacity equivalent to roughly 383 nuclear reactors — that have yet to begin construction could be affected by the decision, according to data from BloombergNEF. 'It's not the worst thing in the world,' said Rhone Resch, chief executive officer of Advanced Energy Advisors, a risk management consulting firm for renewable energy development. 'What it is going to do is reward sophisticated companies that have projects that are further along in their development. The companies that are going to suffer are the smaller medium sized developers that aren't going to be able to meet this time frame.' Large renewable energy developers have expressed confidence they can withstand the policy change. Executives with NextEra Energy said recently they have started construction on enough projects before the passage of Trump's bill that they can meet their development plan through 2029. AES Corp. said most of its backlog of projects won't be subject to the new guidance. Still, the stricter requirements will add another hurdle to an industry already reeling from the Trump administration's attacks aimed at blocking solar and wind development on both federal and private lands. 'This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, chief executive officer of the Solar Energy Industries Association. US annual clean energy installations are projected to plunge 41% after 2027, due to the rapid phase out of wind and solar tax credits, according to an analysis from BloombergNEF published before the latest Treasury tax guidance. (Updates with details throughout.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
4 days ago
- The Hill
School choice may be the fix to DC's crime crisis
Washington, D.C., faces a serious crime crisis, with violence and homicide rates dangerously high. Even government officials have been targeted. While the Trump administration's plan to increase federal involvement may help temporarily, relying on permanent federal intervention is unsustainable. The long-term solution requires tackling root causes — especially chronic disengagement from education, which is widespread in D.C.'s traditional public schools and contributes significantly to youth crime. In the 2023–2024 school year, more than half of all high school students in Washington, D.C., were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10 percent or more of the school year. This absenteeism represents a failure to keep students connected to constructive environments and opportunities for success. When young people are not in school, evidence overwhelmingly shows they are at much higher risk of engaging in criminal behavior. The academic outcomes for D.C. public school students further illustrate the crisis. On recent standardized tests, only about 32 percent of students in grades 3–5 met or exceeded expectations in English Language Arts, a slight improvement from the previous year but still alarmingly low. Just 11 percent of high school students met or exceeded math standards. These outcomes are a direct reflection of an education system unable to provide the foundation students need for success, making disengagement and subsequent criminal activity more likely. Charter schools offer a proven, evidence-based alternative that can disrupt this cycle. Unlike traditional public schools in D.C., charter schools provide students with 30 to 50 percent more instructional time, effectively giving students up to four additional months of schooling each year. This extra time in the classroom correlates with improved academic performance and stronger student engagement. A landmark study conducted by Harvard and Princeton researchers demonstrated that winning a lottery to attend a New York City charter school almost completely eliminated the chance of incarceration for male students in the study sample. The same study also found a 59 percent reduction in teen pregnancy rates for female students who attended charter schools through the lottery. Another study, published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, found that winning a lottery to attend a school of choice in Charlotte, N.C., halved the rate of criminal activity among high-risk male students. And research on Milwaukee's voucher program found that students attending charter schools were significantly less likely to commit crimes by their mid-twenties compared to matched peers in public schools. Despite delivering compelling results, D.C.'s charter schools face significant funding disparities compared to traditional public schools. Though only a few studies have examined the precise funding differences between charter schools and public schools, one found that charter schools in D.C. receive approximately 41 percent less funding per pupil than public schools, averaging $17,525 per student compared to $29,808 per student — a gap of $12,283. This significant disparity limits charter schools' ability to expand facilities, attract qualified staff and improve programs. Meanwhile, demand for charter school seats far exceeds supply, with 17,047 students on waiting lists during the 2021–2022 school year, reflecting strong parental preference for alternatives to the struggling traditional system. Despite this funding disparity, evidence shows that public charter schools in Washington, D.C., specifically, continue to outperform traditional public schools. The success of charter schools in other cities demonstrates what could be achieved if D.C. removed these barriers and increased support. New York City's Success Academy, whose student population is 98 percent non-white and predominantly low-income, achieved remarkable academic results: 96 percent of students passed state math exams and 83 percent passed English Language Arts exams. This starkly contrasts with New York City's overall public school proficiency rate of around 49 percent, illustrating that well-supported charter schools can deliver superior outcomes even among disadvantaged populations. Washington, D.C. must view charter school expansion and equitable funding as integral parts of its strategy to reduce crime. Increasing access to quality education through charter schools addresses the root causes of criminal behavior by keeping youth engaged in structured, rigorous environments that foster academic achievement and discourage delinquency. Ultimately, no city can arrest or incarcerate its way out of a crime crisis. Long-term, sustainable solutions demand investments in education and opportunity. The District of Columbia has a proven tool in charter schools to disrupt the cycle of violence and provide at-risk youth with a pathway out of crime and into success. It is time for policymakers to remove funding disparities, lift arbitrary caps, and prioritize school choice as a core component of public safety reform in the nation's capital.
