SC junks plea against Telangana rule mandating proficiency in Telugu for civil judge post
A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih told the petitioner's counsel, "It only says you need to know Telugu."
The petitioner, a practising advocate, applied for the post of civil judge pursuant to a April 2024 notification.
Before the high court, he challenged the constitutionality of Rules 5.3 and 7 of the Telangana State Judicial Rules, 2023 over the requirement of the language.
The petitioner also sought a direction to provide the option of being proficient either in Telugu or Urdu as a qualification for being a civil judge aside from providing the option of translating from English to Telugu or Urdu and vice versa in written examination conducted under the 2023 Rules.
Before the top court bench, the petitioner's counsel said 15 per cent population in Telangana was Urdu speaking.
The counsel said his client cleared the qualifying examination.
The bench, however, refused to examine the plea and dismissed it.
In the Telangana High Court, the petitioner's counsel argued since Urdu was given the status of second official language in the state, it was arbitrary and unjust that an option of being conversant with Urdu or Telugu in the rules for recruitment for civil judges was not provided.
"This is trite that it is in the province of the employer to decide about the conditions of service, eligibility and qualification etc. Employer is the best judge to decide about these aspects. The scope of judicial review on these aspects is very limited," the high court said in its order of November last year.
It cannot be said that the provision of recruitment rules called in question were arbitrary, discriminatory or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, the high court added.
While dismissing the plea, the high court said since the decision of the authorities was in the province of "policy decision" for betterment of judicial administration, it couldn't be struck down only because another view was possible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays operation of UP govt's Banke Bihari temple ordinance, forms panel led by ex-HC judge
The Supreme Court has stayed the operation of Uttar Pradesh government's Banke Bihari temple trust ordinance, which rests administrative control of the shrine with the state, till the high court decides its validity. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly.(HT Photo) A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi refused to entertain the challenges made to the Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, and said the affected parties can approach the high court. "At this stage, we are reminded of the fact that the petitioners' challenge to the Ordinance will doubtlessly take some time in proper adjudication. We, therefore, deem it fit to stay operation of the Ordinance's provisions in the interregnum, only to the extent they grant the state powers to constitute a Trust for managing the temple's affairs," the bench directed. The top court said consequently, the constitution of the Shree Bankey Bihar Ji Temple Trust, as defined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and its composition, as contained in Section 5, shall be kept in abeyance till the question of validity of the Ordinance (or any Act in relation thereto subsequently passed by the state legislature), is finally resolved by the high court. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly, but such an exercise will be subject to the outcome of the proceedings for which the affected persons and the petitioners have been relegated to the high court. The top court in its detailed order uploaded on Saturday also constituted a 12-member high-powered committee headed by retired Allahabad High Court judge Ashok Kumar to look after the day-to-day affairs of the iconic temple. It said, "We are equally mindful that the sum of our directions shall effectively leave the management of the subject temple in limbo yet again, since the ad-hoc arrangement of temple management has been wholly ineffective and inefficient in discharging its duties over the years. "We are pained to observe that the previous administerial deadlock(s) and in-fighting have only worsened the problems plaguing the temple, causing much distress to the pilgrims – who are left without any amenities or redress." The bench said the material on record indicates that despite the substantial donations received by the temple running into hundreds of crores, no tangible steps appear to have been taken by the successive managements for providing essential facilities to the scores of devotees visiting the temple, and the Goswami Shebaits remain divided into factions and continue to litigate before the civil courts, further contributing to administrative inaction. "We are, therefore, satisfied that a high-powered managing committee headed by an impartial person with considerable experience and ability is required to be constituted to run the day-to-day affairs of the temple, apart from undertaking some of the initiatives, which we are illustratively mentioning in the latter part of this order. "There is no gainsaying that the sanctity of safe religious pilgrimage shall never be unjustly denied to all the citizens of this country," the top court said. It also lauded the state government for taking a "fair stand" over the constitution of the committee for the management of the affairs of the temple, and said the panel may deal with a variety of issues for the proper functioning of the temple, including the provision of essential amenities for the devotees. The top court also modified its May 15 order, which gave the go-ahead to the state's scheme to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor at Vrindavan in Mathura, and allowed the government to use temple fund to acquire five acres of land for developing it as a holding area for the devotees. "It seems to us that the order passed by a coordinate bench requires certain modifications/clarifications. That order purportedly directs for the redevelopment of the temple's vicinity through the employment of temple funds. "However, we find that such directions suffer from a foundational procedural infirmity -- the principal affected parties, including the Shebait Goswamis, who have been administering the temple, were not heard prior to the passing of the said order," it said. The bench further said to allow substantive directions on a matter of such significance to be issued in collateral proceedings, especially in absentia of the necessary stakeholders, may not be in conformity with procedural fairness and judicial best-practices. "That apart, we note that the high court, vide its judgment dated November 8, 2023, had expressly declined the state's prayer to utilise temple funds for land acquisition as part of the proposed redevelopment plan. "That judgment has attained finality, having never been assailed by the state in any appropriate appellate proceedings. In these circumstances, this court could not have, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, effectively set aside the high court's judgment without any formal appeal or challenge being placed before it," the top court said. While directing for modification of the May 15 order, the bench ordered for restoring the legal position to status quo ante.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Constitution has always embodied principles of secularism & socialism: Justice Chelameswar
Kochi: Former judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Jasti Chelameswar, stated on Saturday that the Indian Constitution and its structure have embodied the principles of secularism and socialism from the very day it was enacted, even before the terms were inserted into the Preamble. Justice Chelameswar was inaugurating a law lecture series conducted by the Ernakulam Govt Law College Old Students' Association (ELCOSA) as part of the sesquicentennial celebrations of legal education in Kerala and Govt Law College, Ernakulam. Speaking on the topic 'Clamour for Removal of Secularism and Socialism: Whether Justified', Justice Chelameswar discussed various aspects of the principles of secularism and socialism, including their historical evolution. "The Constitution is a continuous process; it is not something that falls from heaven overnight but comes from the experience of life. Don't read the Constitution as a document written on paper with ink. Please read it as a document written in the blood of martyrs in Jallianwala Bagh. Then you understand what the Constitution exactly conveys," he said. Justice Chelameswar further noted that while it is legally permissible to amend the Preamble of the Constitution to change the terms 'secularism' and 'socialism,' the real question is what necessity there is to change them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 3–6 BHK luxury residences at Address by GS S3 Raymond Realty Learn More Undo "We human beings make the nation. It is for us, collectively, to determine whether we should live in a truly secular society, one in which we are willing to see all human beings simply as human beings and not define them by their cultural practices. The ultimate question is, would you like to live in a country where you have no freedom of conscience and no liberty," he observed. Justice K M Joseph, former Supreme Court judge, in his presidential address, said that any attempt to remove the word 'secularism' from the Preamble would be an act of mischief. The problems arise not from religions but from the practice of politicians using religion to gain power, he added. Minister for law and industries P Rajeeve, was the special guest at the event. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab land pooling policy appears to have been notified in haste: HC
Chandigarh, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that Punjab's land pooling policy appears to have been notified in haste and concerns including social impact assessment and environment impact assessment should have been addressed before its notification. Punjab land pooling policy appears to have been notified in haste: HC A division bench of justices Anupinder Singh Grewal and Deepak Manchanda on Thursday had ordered an interim stay on the operation of the A government's land pooling policy for four weeks. The direction had come on a petition filed by Gurdeep Singh Gill, challenging the Punjab government's land pooling policy 2025. The court has fixed September 10 as the next date of hearing. In the detailed order, which was released on Saturday, the court noted that the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 bars the acquisition of multi-cropped land and such acquisition is permissible only in exceptional circumstances. "We may hasten to add that the land which is sought to be acquired is amongst the most fertile land in the State of Punjab and it is possible that it may impact the social milieu," said the division bench. Ludhiana-based petitioner Gill sought directions to quash the state government notification dated June 24 along with the land pooling policy 2025, being ultra vires and an act of "colourable legislation", violating fundamental rights. "We are prima facie also of the view that the policy appears to have been notified in haste and all concerns including social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, timelines and redressal grievance mechanism should have been addressed at the very outset in the policy, before its notification. At this stage learned advocate general and senior counsel appearing for the state of Punjab submit that all concerns of the court shall be addressed by the next date of hearing and want some time in this regard. As an interim measure, lest any rights are created, the impugned Land Pooling Policy, 2025, notified on May 14 and June 6 and subsequently amended on July 25 shall remain stayed," read the court order. The order stated, "after hearing submissions of all parties, this court is of the opinion that the state proposes to take over tens of thousands of acres of fertile land in the entire state of Punjab for carrying out its proposed development work, without carrying out any social impact assessment or environmental impact assessment study, although a stand is taken that the assessment would be carried out later when they have definite information about the number of land owners who have opted for the scheme." The court said it has been held by the Supreme Court in several cases that before permitting urban development, the State ought to carry out an environmental impact assessment. The bench said it is also apparent that no timelines have been prescribed nor any mechanism has been provided that will address the grievances of the affected persons. "Payment of subsistence allowance has been provided to the land owners, but there is no provision for rehabilitation of those landless labourers, artisans and others who are dependent on the land." It has also been submitted before this court that the State's statutory bodies shall themselves develop the land but no budgetary provisions appear to have been made nor anything has been put forth before this court to indicate that the State has adequate resources to finance the development project under the policy, said the order. Referring to the submissions of the amicus curiae, the court said it has come across several instances wherein the owners have surrendered their land to the state development authority under the earlier land pooling policy, but the developed plots have not been allotted even after 10 years. In response to the court's query regarding any provision for rehabilitation of landless labourers, artisans, MGNREGA workers and those carrying out other occupations in the villages, the counsel appearing for the state of Punjab submitted that whatever concerns need to be addressed, shall be looked into at an appropriate stage by the government. No private builder would be allocated the land for any developmental activities and the development would be carried out by the state's statutory bodies, the counsel submitted. The amicus curiae informed the court that the costs for such development project will be in the vicinity of ₹1.25 crore per acre, and considering that land measuring about 7,806 acres is to be taken over by the state government in Ludhiana district alone, a budget of about ₹10,000 crore would have to be allocated for the development in one district alone. After the court asked about any budgetary allocation made for the proposed development project to be undertaken as per the said policy, the senior counsel submitted that he has no instructions. The petition, filed through counsels Gurjeet Singh, Manan Kheterpal and Manat Kaur, stated that since the land pooling policy was purported to be under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 but there was no such provision empowering the state to frame such a policy as the provisions of Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act 1995 was the only Act under which this policy could be framed. "That no such social impact assessment report was either prepared or published, as per the provisions of law, moreover, none of the Gram Panchayats or Gram Sabha were approached or consulted by the respondents before bringing the Land Pooling Policy 2025, which is clear disregard to the provisions mandated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013," said the petition. The A government has been facing flak from the opposition parties and various farmer bodies, which dubbed its land pooling policy a "looting" scheme to "rob" the farmers of their fertile land. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
