Elon Musk renews criticism of Trump's big bill as it faces key Senate vote
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Elon Musk on Saturday doubled down on his distaste for US President Donald Trump 's sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries."The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country," Musk wrote on X on Saturday as the Senate was scheduled to call a vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill."It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future."The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, whose birthday is also Saturday, later posted that the bill would be "political suicide for the Republican Party".The criticisms reopen a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency and the administration he recently left.They also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July deadline.Musk previously made his opinions about Trump's "big, beautiful bill" clear.Days after he left the federal government last month with a laudatory celebration in the Oval Office, he blasted the bill as "pork-filled" and a "disgusting abomination"."Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he wrote on X earlier this month.In another post, the wealthy GOP donor who recently forecasted that he'd step back from political donations threatened to fire lawmakers who "betrayed the American people".When Trump clapped back to say he was disappointed with Musk, back-and-forth fighting erupted and quickly escalated. Musk suggested without evidence that Trump, who spent the first part of the year as one of his closest allies, was mentioned in files related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein.Musk ultimately tried to make nice with the administration, saying he regretted some of his posts that "went too far".Trump responded in kind in an interview with The New York Post, saying, "Things like that happen. I don't blame him for anything."It's unclear how Musk's latest broadsides will influence the fragile peace he and the president had enjoyed in recent weeks. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.Musk has spent recent weeks focused on his businesses, and his political influence has waned since he left the administration.Still, the wealthy businessman poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's campaign in 2024, demonstrating the impact his money can have if he's passionate enough about an issue or candidate to restart his political spending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Did everyone underestimate Trump? Top economist admits President may have outfoxed critics on the economy
Live Events FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on the USA's trading countries have so far evoked sharp reactions. However, a top economist has claimed that the President and his administration may have 'outsmarted' the economists. Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Sløk has also detailed about a scenario which would benefit the world as well as churn out annual revenue worth $400 billion for taxpayers in the US. Sløk's note published ahead of Donald Trump's announcement on Sunday that the President was not planning to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set would expire, and his administration will notify countries that the trade penalties will take effect unless there are deals with the United a detailed post titled "Has Trump Outsmarted Everyone on Tariffs?", Sløk noted that the Trump administration's strategy is maybe to maintain 30 per cent tariffs on China and 10 per cent tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower non-tariff barriers and open up their economies to noted that extending the deadline one year would give countries and US domestic businesses time to adjust to the new world with permanently higher tariffs, and it would also result in an immediate decline in would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers. Trade partners will be happy with only 10 per cent tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us, the Apollo Chief Economist President Trump on Sunday said Letters will start going out 'pretty soon" before the approaching deadline. Those letters, he said, would state, "Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25% tariff, or a 35% or a 50% or 10%."Trump told these to Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures" during a wide-ranging interview taped Friday and broadcast July 8, "Liberation Day" tariffs to take effect following the 90-day suspension period, potentially affecting imports from multiple countries. July 9 is the deadline for United States and the European Union to negotiate a deal to avert 50 per cent tariff duty on all EU far, the twists and turns in the US President Donald Trump's tariff policies have not only rattled global financial markets but have also taken investors on a roller-coaster ride. Companies are counting the cost of the trade war that is now being estimated at more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher expenses, a Reuters analysis had played down the deadline at a White House news conference Friday by noting how difficult it would be to work out separate deals with each nation. The administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 continue, but 'there's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them,' he said in the interview.A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. On July 8, "Liberation Day" tariffs to take effect following the 90-day suspension period, potentially affecting imports from multiple countries. July 9 is the deadline for United States and the European Union to negotiate a deal to avert 50 per cent tariff duty on all EU imports.
Economic Times
36 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Flipping farm land for cash? ITAT's ruling may close India's oldest black money trick
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Mumbai: The old trick of flipping farm land to white-wash cash is in the crosshairs of the agricultural land way below the market value in a predominantly cash deal, and subsequently selling the land at the actual value in an official transaction has been used for decades by babus, businessmen, politicians, and cine stars to legitimise undisclosed a recent tax tribunal ruling threatens to throw a spanner in this well-oiled machine. While the views of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) pertain to an otherwise innocuous case of alleged tax evasion and are not linked to any dodgy deals, its observations strike at the heart of this laundering machine that thrives on buy-sell of farm lands. ITAT is a quasi-judicial authority and hears disputes before matters are challenged before the High this: a person with unexplained cash cuts a deal with an agriculturist to purchase land, having a market value of ₹10 the official land value in the sale deed is quoted as ₹2 crore while the balance ₹8 crore is paid in cash. The seller, probably a farmer who pays no tax and is not tracked by the I-T department, has no qualms in accepting cash. Besides, he may have genuine use of the cash for paying labourers, buying seeds, fertiliser etc. A few years later, the buyer of the land sells the land for ₹10 crore (its true value) receiving the entire money as cheque or bank transfer, with the registration documents recording the sale at the fair market two transactions-first buying the land and later selling it-enables the original buyer of the land to convert cash or 'black money' of ₹8 crore (the difference between ₹10 crore and ₹2 crore) into 'white'.How? By virtue of the asset being agricultural land, no tax is paid for purchasing the land at a price much lower than the ready reckoner value-unlike a transaction involving any non-farm, urban land where the buyer must pay tax on the difference between the market price and transaction price. Again, no 'capital gains tax' is paid by the seller when the land is later sold at the full value of ₹10 crore because agricultural land is excluded from the definition of 'capital asset'.While the Ahmedabad bench of ITAT has endorsed the exemption of capital gains tax on sale of farm land, it has questioned the non-payment of tax on the first leg of the transaction (where a ₹10 crore worth asset is bought for ₹2 crore).Under Section 56(2)(x) of the I-T Act, full income tax is levied on the difference between the market value and transaction price of such "immovable property" (among other assets). The ITAT in its May 27 ruling said, "The term 'immovable assets' has not been defined in section 56(2)(x) or in any other section in the I-T Act. This renders the word to be used in general parlance. In general understanding of the term, the word 'immovable asset' means an asset which cannot be removed without destroying or altering it. Therefore, going by the general definition, 'immovable property would, in our view, include any rural agricultural land, in absence of any specific exclusion in section 56(2)(x)."If this view is upheld by the High Court, buying-selling farm land to launder bribes and cash payments would run into a serious hurdle.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did everyone underestimate Trump? Top economist admits President may have outfoxed critics on the economy
Tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on the USA's trading countries have so far evoked sharp reactions. However, a top economist has claimed that the President and his administration may have 'outsmarted' the economists. Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Sløk has also detailed about a scenario which would benefit the world as well as churn out annual revenue worth $400 billion for taxpayers in the US. Sløk's note published ahead of Donald Trump's announcement on Sunday that the President was not planning to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set would expire, and his administration will notify countries that the trade penalties will take effect unless there are deals with the United States. In a detailed post titled "Has Trump Outsmarted Everyone on Tariffs?", Sløk noted that the Trump administration's strategy is maybe to maintain 30 per cent tariffs on China and 10 per cent tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower non-tariff barriers and open up their economies to trade. Trump Tariffs - A Victory For USA? Sløk noted that extending the deadline one year would give countries and US domestic businesses time to adjust to the new world with permanently higher tariffs, and it would also result in an immediate decline in uncertainty. This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers. Trade partners will be happy with only 10 per cent tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us, the Apollo Chief Economist noted. Live Events Tariff Deadline Nears Meanwhile, President Trump on Sunday said Letters will start going out 'pretty soon" before the approaching deadline. Those letters, he said, would state, "Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25% tariff, or a 35% or a 50% or 10%." Trump told these to Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures" during a wide-ranging interview taped Friday and broadcast Sunday. On July 8, "Liberation Day" tariffs to take effect following the 90-day suspension period, potentially affecting imports from multiple countries. July 9 is the deadline for United States and the European Union to negotiate a deal to avert 50 per cent tariff duty on all EU imports. So far, the twists and turns in the US President Donald Trump's tariff policies have not only rattled global financial markets but have also taken investors on a roller-coaster ride. Companies are counting the cost of the trade war that is now being estimated at more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher expenses, a Reuters analysis showed. Trump had played down the deadline at a White House news conference Friday by noting how difficult it would be to work out separate deals with each nation. The administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Negotiations continue, but 'there's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them,' he said in the interview. FAQs Q1. Who is President of USA? A1. President of USA is Donald Trump. Q2. When is Tariff deadline? A2. On July 8, "Liberation Day" tariffs to take effect following the 90-day suspension period, potentially affecting imports from multiple countries. July 9 is the deadline for United States and the European Union to negotiate a deal to avert 50 per cent tariff duty on all EU imports. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
