
Access To Abortion Pill Mifepristone Could Be Threatened, Again
In this photo illustration, packages of mifepristone tablets are displayed at a family planning ... More clinic. Mifepristone is part of a two-drug regimen to induce an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy in combination with the drug misoprostol. (Photo illustration by)
The abortion pill mifepristone is in the crosshairs of politics again, as plaintiffs in several high-profile court cases together with Republican lawmakers push for restrictions. More importantly perhaps, the Food and Drug Administration is reviewing the regulation and labeling of mifepristone, a drug with a well-established safety and effectiveness record.
In an unusual move, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., issued a statement last month to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee directing the FDA to 'do a complete review' of its regulations on mifepristone, a medication used in conjunction with misoprostol in two-thirds of abortions in the United States– which has been used by more than eight million people since its approval more than two decades ago.
The FDA approved mifepristone in 2000 for medication abortion. Mifepristone is a drug that blocks progesterone, which is needed for a pregnancy to continue. When taken in conjunction with misoprostol, mifepristone ends early pregnancies (up to ten weeks following conception).
Mifepristone can be safely administered at home when prescribed by a provider, The FDA has allowed people to take the medication outside of a clinic setting since 2021. And that same year, the FDA further eased several conditions with respect to the prescribing and sale of mifepristone. Specifically, the regulatory authority allowed for prescriptions to be issued through telemedicine visits in addition to shipments of the product by mail, as MedPage Today reported.
It appears that rising numbers of abortions using prescription drugs in the past four years may be linked to the changes instituted by the FDA. In addition, the use of medication to end pregnancies could have also been triggered by the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022, as a Journal of the American Medical Association study describes.
But it appears that besides wanting to subject mifepristone to a new FDA review, Kennedy also wishes to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement, which would mean women must go to a clinic to obtain mifepristone.
The Supreme Court preserved convenient access to mifepristone last year, throwing out a lawsuit that sought to reinstate the previous requirements. The justices' argument, however, largely hinged on questioning the physician plaintiffs' right to sue the FDA to restore conditions rather than the substance of the case.
But then, earlier this year, The Hill reported that a Texas federal judge, Matthew Kacsmaryk, is allowing three Republican-led states to move forward with a lawsuit to restrict access to mifepristone. It's noteworthy that in 2023, Kacsmaryk temporarily halted FDA's approval of mifepristone altogether.
In brief, it's unclear what will happen to access as cases move through the court system and findings from the review which Kennedy ordered are revealed.
Mifepristone has been in use in Europe for nearly three decades with a minimal number of reported adverse events. And the drug has had a similar safety record in the U.S since its approval in 2000. Between September 2000 and December 2018, only 24 of the more than 3.7 million women who had undergone medicated abortions have died, according to the FDA. Overall, the adverse events rate is less than 1% and the drug is considered safer than, say, over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anti-histamines.
At least 100 studies from around the world have examined the effectiveness and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol. All peer-reviewed studies concluded that the pills are a safe method for terminating a pregnancy. Yet there seems to be a non-peer-reviewed study that's at the center of a request for the FDA to assess mifepristone. It's from the conservative think tank, the Ethics and Public Policy Center. This particular study makes claims about what it views as a high rate of serious adverse events following medication abortions. Yet, the evidence from the U.S. and around the globe suggests a highly safe and effective medication.
The FDA's mandate is to review the safety and efficacy of drugs based on clinical evidence. As such, the FDA is the federal authority for all pharmaceuticals distributed throughout the U.S., including mifepristone and misoprostol. And so, a series of court cases and Secretary Kennedy's request for another look at mifepristone set a potentially unsettling precedent in which the FDA's regulatory authority from past decisions is undermined. And it's not just mifepristone that's currently under renewed scrutiny. Consider, for example, that HHS is revisiting debunked theories of links between the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and autism. The department has also spearheaded changes in COVID-19 vaccine recommendations that are not necessarily evidence-based, and inconsistent with prior and even current guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fresenius Medical starts US commercialisation of haemodiafiltration system
Fresenius Medical Care (FME) has commenced the US commercialisation of its high-volume haemodiafiltration (HVHDF) kidney replacement therapy, 5008X CAREsystem. The full-scale commercial launch is anticipated by the company in 2026. FME secured the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) 510(k) clearance last week for the updated HDF-capable system. In February 2024, FME first obtained the clearance for the 5008X CAREsystem, enabling focused testing and clinical assessments. The latest clearance approves additional features, including the Fresenius Clinical Data Exchange (CDX), which facilitates ONE-TOUCH access to medical information systems, eliminating the need for extra computer stations. The CDX claims to optimise clinic workflows, mitigate cross-contamination risks, and reduce citations under the CMS V-tag by streamlining data access and freeing up the clinic area by minimising the cabling clutter. Over the coming months, FMS' Care Delivery patient care business segment will start providing HDF dialysis therapy in chosen first wave clinics within its US Fresenius Kidney Care dialysis clinics network. This gradual rollout will continue throughout the year. The 5008X CAREsystem, paired with the FDA-approved FX CorAL dialyser, represents a leap in medical device innovation by Fresenius. It not only enables HVHDF but also introduces enhancements in workflow and therapy. The CONVINCE study, funded by the EU and conducted across eight European countries, found that subjects undergoing HVHDF had a significant 23% reduction in death rates against those receiving high-flux haemodialysis. FME CEO Helen Giza said: 'Last week's FDA clearance of our updated 5008X CAREsystem with additional features was a critical milestone in our work to improve the lives of people living with kidney disease by bringing industry-leading, HVHDF dialysis therapy to the US. 'Haemodiafiltration is already the treatment standard across much of Europe, Latin America, and Asia, and we are very well experienced with it. Our great familiarity with this treatment, combined with the outcome and promising results of the external CONVINCE research study, reiterated the significant patient health and well-being benefits available with HVHDF.' "Fresenius Medical starts US commercialisation of haemodiafiltration system" was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données


CNET
34 minutes ago
- CNET
I Forgot John Mulaney Was in This Movie in This Week's Netflix Top 10
Every week, Netflix unveils its Top 10 lists for the week before, ranking TV shows and movies by viewership. As someone who covers streaming content (and also just watches a lot of TV), I keep an eye on the titles that come and go, and am always curious what hits and what doesn't. Last week, John Mulaney's Netflix animated series Big Mouth premiered a new season, and his Netflix talk show Everybody's Live with John Mulaney aired its season finale, so I was curious if either would crack the Netflix Top 10. Neither did, but ironically, a third Mulaney-involved title — Puss In Boots: The Last Wish — was in the No. 5 spot on the Netflix movie chart to my surprise, mostly because I forgot that he was even in it. (Sure, Puss In Boots: The Last Wish also stars Antonio Banderas, Salma Hayek, Harvey Guillen and Florence Pugh, but for the sake of argument, today it's a John Mulaney film.) Mulaney has been incredibly busy for the past few years, and it feels like the past two months reached peak Mulaney saturation: the eighth and final season of Big Mouth premiered on May 23, while his talk show Everybody's Live with John Mulaney aired its season finale on May 28 after running for 12 truly weird and unpredictable weeks. (For weeks, the show teased that the finale would feature Mulaney brawling with three 14-year-old boys. And yes, that fight did happen, rest assured no children were harmed.) Between both of his Netflix shows and recent appearances on Peacock's Poker Face and SNL 50, I think that his ubiquity is why I had forgotten all about his role as Jack Horner, the main villain in Puss In Boots: The Last Wish. It's certainly not because the role wasn't memorable, he actually stole every scene he was in as the narcissistic nursery rhyme character with an inferiority complex. Puss In Boots: The Last Wish, which debuted in theaters in 2022, is not actually available on Netflix in the U.S., which makes it even more impressive that it's dominating the Global Top 10 based on its popularity in Central and South America, where it peaked at No. 1 and has remained in the Top 10 film in dozens of countries for five weeks. DreamWorks Once I remembered Mulaney's pivotal role in the movie, I started to wonder, is this guy secretly Netflix's biggest star? He seems to have been given creative carte blanche on his talk shows and stand-up specials and, while his comedy can be niche, he also stars in projects with global appeal, so he very well could be. The streamer has deals with bigger names like Adam Sandler, Tyler Perry and Millie Bobby Brown, but I think Mulaney may be their ringer. He also starred in Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, which was only just removed from Netflix in April, he has seven comedy specials on the platform, and he pops up in everything from Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee to this month's Conan O'Brien's Mark Twain Prize for American Humor special. He's in so many things that somehow they managed to overshadow The Last Wish in my mind. But the film, which has made almost $500 million globally, is hardly under the radar. Maybe while it remains in the Top 10, it will give him a chance to take a well-deserved break from Netflix and just chill. At least for a little while, before he starts plotting who to grapple on season 2 of Everybody's Live.


Medscape
34 minutes ago
- Medscape
Walking Speed Test Predicts Heart Risk Pre–Kidney Transplant
A simple test of walking speed before kidney transplant could predict the risk for mortality and cardiovascular events, enabling clinicians to quickly activate patients with good cardiovascular fitness and target further screening or prehabilitation to those who need it. METHODOLOGY: Researchers retrospectively studied 995 patients (median age, 56 years; 36% women) assessed for kidney transplant at the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust from June 2014 to August 2022 to determine whether a simple walking speed test could predict the likelihood of abnormal cardiac stress test results and posttransplant outcomes. Walking speed was assessed by timing patients as they walked 130 m along a hospital corridor — walking to the end, touching the wall at the end of the corridor, and returning to the start point — as fast as they could; participants were then stratified into four quartiles based on the walking speed from fastest (> 1.83 m/sec) to slowest (< 1.35 m/sec). Pretransplant cardiovascular testing included stress echocardiography or myocardial perfusion scanning, with cardiovascular events defined as non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events. The mean follow-up duration was 54.2 months. TAKEAWAY: The mean time to complete the walking test was 86.9 seconds; 89 patients were unable to complete the test. Patients in the fastest walking quartile had significantly lower rates of cardiac events (1.62% vs 10.6%) and mortality (5.3% vs 27.9%) and a higher rate of activation for transplant (90.6% vs 55.3%) than those in the slowest walking quartile ( P < .001 for all). < .001 for all). Patients in the fastest walking quartile also had a lower rate of abnormal cardiac stress test results and a reduced need for coronary angiography, with none requiring coronary intervention prior to activation. Walking time was a significant predictor of cardiac events ( P = .048) with a high negative predictive value (86.2%) for stress test outcomes. IN PRACTICE: "Our study would suggest that a simple and low cost evaluation of walking speed may predict outcomes in patients being evaluated for kidney transplant and provide a good screening test to avoid significant cardiac work up in fitter patients, thus allowing greater scrutiny, with or without attempts to improve cardiovascular reserve, in patients with poorer exercise capacity," the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Pranav Satish of the Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, England. It was published online on May 29, 2025, in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation . LIMITATIONS: T he study's retrospective design and a single assessment of walking speed at the initial evaluation, rather than repeated measures, may have limited the interpretation of the findings. This study did not account for possible changes in walking speed before or after the assessment, which may have affected the reliability of the results. Although the 130-m timed corridor walk test provided a rapid assessment of the cardiorespiratory reserve, it is not internationally standardised. DISCLOSURES: This study received no financial support . The authors declared no conflicts of interest.