logo
Man who killed for second time not drug tested on day of attack

Man who killed for second time not drug tested on day of attack

RNZ News8 hours ago
The man's father alleged that on the day he killed for a second time, he was supposed to be drug tested.
Photo:
RNZ
A mental health patient was not drug tested on the day he committed his second killing because the staffer believed he was "acting cagey", his father alleges.
The man was subject to a compulsory treatment order at the time, which meant that drug screening occurred on a voluntary basis.
But if he failed the test, the clinician would then need to assess whether the patient should be re-called to hospital.
RNZ earlier revealed the man - who was made a special patient under the Mental Health Act after his first killing - was recently found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for a second time after killing someone he believed was possessed.
RNZ is unable to publish details regarding either killings due to an appeal against name suppression that is due to be heard by the Court of Appeal.
RNZ has obtained a copy of a letter from the man's father to the presiding judge.
Do you know more? Email
sam.sherwood@rnz.co.nz
The man's father alleged that on the day he killed for a second time, he was supposed to be drug tested.
"He turned up for the appointment but was not tested because the staff member said that he was acting cagey and she didn't want to make him feel like he was being picked on.
"This is a so-called health professional who observed unusual behaviour from a person with severe mental health issues and they didn't do anything about it. She didn't test him and basically allowed him to leave. A few hours later [he killed again]."
The man said his son told him he had to go have a drug test "so he was expecting it, but nothing came of it".
The man's second killing "could and should have been prevented," the father says.
"How can someone who has previously killed another person be able to remain free when the warning signs are right there for all to see?"
In the weeks leading up to the second killing, the man's mental health was "rapidly declining", a judge earlier said. He was admitted to a mental health facility following an altercation with a relative.
About a week later he was released. He was having relationship problems and was using cannabis.
Five days after he was released from the mental health facility, he stabbed someone to death.
In his letter, he said his son had mental health issues "for most of his life".
"I have attended countless appointments and meetings relating to [him] and his treatment, and I have full knowledge of the process, his medication and it's effectiveness, the downsides and how he has responded over the years.
"I have met his doctors and psychiatrists and have a good understanding of the mental health system, what services are provided and some of it's failings."
He discussed his son's admission to a mental health facility before the second killing when his mental health "deteriorated".
He said the staff should not have released his son.
The second killing was "predictable if anyone bothered to look at the warning signs and do something about it," he said.
"Predictable in the sense that [he] was on a downward spiral. Maybe not predictable with the exact date and time, but the warning signs were there for the health professionals to see. To use their judgement and training and to actually do something about what they saw instead of just letting it go because it gets too hard for them."
He said the health system was "not aggressive enough to make decisions".
"For more than 5 years I visited [him] every night in one of their institutions, so I know full well what goes on inside the walls. There are more questions than answers. The health system had [him] in their custody and released him. A health professional saw [him] on the day he killed [again], described him as being cagey, did not do the blood test and let him go without doing anything. How? Who is accountable? How can someone who has previously killed another person be able to remain free when the warning signs are right there for all to see?"
RNZ put the allegations regarding the drug test to both Health New Zealand and the Ministry of Health.
Health New Zealand (HNZ) said an external review of the care the patient received leading up to their alleged offending is in progress. They did not comment on the allegations.
In most situations screening for substance use occurred on a voluntary basis and could include individuals subject to detention under the Mental Health Act on Compulsory Treatment Orders, an HNZ spokesperson said.
"However, screening is very much part of an individual treatment/care plan where interventions may be put in place in the event of a positive result or refusal to be tested."
Director of Mental Health Dr John Crawshaw said in a statement that in circumstances like these an independent review is triggered to investigate the incident and make recommendations for changes to services and for those recommendations to be acted on.
A review was still underway.
"The claim of reported drug use and delays in drug testing would be most appropriately investigated by the independent review commissioned by Health New Zealand."
In relation to drug testing, a Ministry of Health spokesperson said screening for substance use occurred on a voluntary basis and can include individuals subject to detention under the Mental Health Act on Compulsory Treatment Orders.
"Screening is very much part of an individual treatment/care plan where interventions may be put in place in the event of a positive result or refusal to be tested.
"For further background, it also depends on whether the person is on an inpatient order or a community treatment order. If the testing is part of a condition of leave on an inpatient order it can result in the leave being cancelled. If the person is on a community treatment order, the responsible clinician would then need to assess whether there is enough concern to direct the patient to be treated as an inpatient. It's important to note that this applies to people under ordinary Mental Health Act orders and there is a separate process for special patients."
Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey said any serious incident, particularly one where someone was killed was a "cause of very serious concern".
"That is why it is important that reviews are triggered and recommendations for changes to services are acted on. My focus is on ensuring agencies involved are putting in place the necessary changes to help prevent these incidents occurring again.
"There is an external review underway, and it would be my expectation that this review will cover the care this person received leading up to the incident."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman accused of Christchurch church fire remanded in custody
Woman accused of Christchurch church fire remanded in custody

RNZ News

time12 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Woman accused of Christchurch church fire remanded in custody

Photo: RNZ / Adam Burns A woman accused of setting a church in Christchurch on fire will remain behind bars until at least the end of the month. The 35-year-old, who has interim name suppression, appeared in the Christchurch District Court via audio-visual link on Monday. Police charged the woman with arson after the fire at the QE2 Life Church in New Brighton on Sunday afternoon . Five fire trucks were called to the Atlantis Street church about 2.30pm after a fire alarm went off, and were able to quickly put the blaze out. The woman was remanded in custody to appear later this month. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Review after Jevon McSkimming case finds urgent need to change police internet rules
Review after Jevon McSkimming case finds urgent need to change police internet rules

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Review after Jevon McSkimming case finds urgent need to change police internet rules

Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming. Photo: Getty Images A review commissioned amid an investigation into the former deputy police commissioner has revealed weaknesses in police's internet access controls, unmanaged devices, limited monitoring and governance gaps. Police Commissioner Richard Chambers says the review made clear the current settings were "not robust enough and urgent attention is required". He has ordered the re-introduction of audits of data and internet usage on police devices and initiating an assessment of police-owned standalone devices which operated outside the police network. RNZ earlier revealed the investigation into Jevon McSkimming led to concerns that staff could bypass internal controls and "exploit vulnerabilities to access inappropriate content". The concerns prompted Chambers to order a "rapid review" of police's information security (INFOSEC) controls to ensure police had sufficiently strong controls to prevent or detect the misuse of police technology and equipment for non-work-related purposes. A summary of the review was released on Monday. The report said police managed an "extremely complex technology operating environment". "This requires a variety of different user personas to be catered for, each with different levels of security controls (and in some cases a requirement to have permissive controls)." "Additionally, the varied (and law enforcement) nature of policing may require some employees to access websites that in other corporate environments may be blocked." For several years police had been faced with a "technical debt", however steps were being taken to address this. "As with many agencies and businesses, there has been an increase of what is commonly known as Shadow IT - that is, technology purchased or used for legitimate business purposes but operated outside of the management and oversight, and often the knowledge of the ICT group." The report said police had a "wide range" of modern security technology in place which protected police information. "Most user activity is logged and monitored in accordance with good industry practice. "The review found some key issues however, which provide opportunity for improvement." The main risks were; weaknesses in technology configuration, lack of visibility over user activity and gaps in governance. The report included key findings and recommendations in relation to each of the risks. There was "inconsistent application" of internet access policies across different workgroups as well as a "lack of robust filtering mechanisms" to consistently prevent access to unauthorised websites. The review also found there was "insufficient monitoring of internet usage to detect and respond to potential security threats and inappropriate usage." Other findings included unmanaged devices being used for operational activities and inadequate monitoring of user activity and network traffic. There was an absence of centralised logging and analysis tools to detect anomalies and potential issues and "insufficient resources allocated to continuous monitoring and incident response". The review also said there was lack of "clear governance structures and accountability" for INFOSEC controls, with "inconsistent enforcement" of security policies and procedures. The report called for "improved oversight and coordination among different workgroups". Among the recommendations was that police implement consistent internet access policies across all work groups and use advanced filtering mechanisms to block unauthorised websites. It was also recommended that police enforce policies to ensure all devices were managed and monitored, and that they allocate resources to "continuous monitoring and incident response". In relation to the concerns about governance, the report recommended police established clear structures and accountability for INFOSEC controls and "ensure consistent enforcement of security policies and procedures. "Addressing these issues through the recommended actions will enhance operational security, visibility, and policy enforcement, ensuring a robust INFOSEC posture," the report said. Police Commissioner Richard Chambers says the review made clear the current settings were "not robust enough and urgent attention is required". Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Chambers said the review found that while Police had a wide range of security measures in place, there were "opportunities to strengthen and tighten controls on their use". "The review found Police has a range of modern security controls which protect Police information and systems from malicious activity. Most user activity is logged in line with good industry practice and there is clear guidance and expectations for staff around acceptable use. "However, the review also identified several areas where improvement was needed. These include more monitoring of staff internet use and stronger filtering mechanisms to guard against inappropriate or harmful content being accessed or downloaded." The review also recommended better oversight of all Police-owned devices, including those that sit outside the Police network for legitimate work purposes, Chambers said. "Police is an extremely complex workplace and different levels of security settings will always be required by some staff for lawful policing purposes. Some staff also require devices that operate outside the central Police system. "However, the review has made it very clear the current settings are not robust enough and urgent attention is required. The report includes recommendations to strengthen the settings." Chambers said he had made two decisions immediately in wake of the review. He would be re-introducing audits of data and internet usage on police devices, a process that was halted about four to five years ago, and initiating an assessment of Police-owned standalone devices which operate outside the Police network. "While there are legitimate work reasons for such devices, clarity is needed around the oversight of them. "I have requested a remediation plan to consider the review's recommendations and address key issues. I have asked this be done quickly and expect to make further decisions within the month." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Man who died while hunting on Stewart Island was shot, RNZ understands
Man who died while hunting on Stewart Island was shot, RNZ understands

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Man who died while hunting on Stewart Island was shot, RNZ understands

The man was found dead near Lords River. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon A man who died while hunting on Stewart Island area was shot, RNZ understands. Police are investigating the death, which occurred near the remote Lords River. Emergency services were first notified about midday Saturday. A search and rescue team was flown to Rakiura by helicopter and found the man dead. A police spokesperson said officers were speaking with people who were in the area at the time. However, they declined to provide any further details about the death. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store