logo
Key hacking now behind three in five car thefts - here's how to protect your motor

Key hacking now behind three in five car thefts - here's how to protect your motor

Daily Mail​12-05-2025

Car key hacking is now behind the majority of thefts, new figures show.
Three in five vehicles stolen are now broken into this way, analysis of Office of National Statistics data by RTA Law has found.
The percentage of vehicles thefts caused by someone manipulating the signal from a remote locking device has rocketed from 13 per cent between April 2018 and March 2019 to 58 per cent between April 2023 and March 2024.
Car key hacking is achieved by intercepting, copying, amplifying or replacing wireless signals sent between a vehicle's remote key and its security system.
Usually, criminals will use devices designed to capture or boost the key's transmitted, allowing them to unlock or even start the vehicle without physical access to the original key.
Rod Mitchell from RTA Law said the quadrupling of car key hacking cases is shocking.
He said: 'The change in entry mirrors the advancement in technology in the motor industry. As technology changes, so does the way criminals pry on people and their possessions.
'It really shows that we always need to be thinking one step ahead when technological advances take place to keep ourselves and our belongings safe.'
It comes after it was announced in February that anyone caught with sophisticated electronic gadgets used in car thefts face up to five years in prison under a new law to crackdown on hi-tech vehicle crime.
Before people could only be prosecuted if there is proof that they have used them to commit a crime.
The Crime and Policing Bill introduced to Parliament a ban on the possession, sale and distribution of gadgets such as signal jammers and relay devices, which are deployed by organised gangs of motor thieves to target high-value vehicles.
These are behind the recent surge in car thefts, with criminals able to use technology to steal motors without needing the key or raising the alarm to the owner.
Signal jammers are used predominantly in car parks to prevent drivers from being able to lock their vehicles to provide clear access for thieves.
Relay devices have become an even greater problem for motorists and police, with gangs able to use them to extend the signal of a car key inside someone's home so the vehicle car be unlocked and driven away without detection.
One car was pinched every eight and a half minutes last year in Britain, so the aim is that the new laws will stop these devices getting into the hands of criminals.
Anyone caught with a wireless jammer like this and is suspected of using it to steal vehicles could face up to five years in prison under the new laws introduced in February
The most common methods of car key hacking
Criminals manipulating the signal from a locking device was the most common method of entry.
The second most common method of entry was 'using a key or electric fob' – 18 per cent of cases.
But this has dropped significantly from April 2018 to March 2019 when it made up 33 per cent of cases.
An 'offender forcing a car's lock' was the third most common method, amounting to 13 per cent of cases in April 2023 to March 2024.
The 'door not being locked', and 'other' came fourth, both at 5 per cent, followed by 'offender broke window / tried to' at 4 per cent.
The 'window being left open', and 'offender forced / broke / bent / prised door', came last, with very few cases.
How can you keep your car safe from key hacking?
1. Signal block your keys
Rod Mitchell says the first step is to signal-block your devices.
'Use a signal-blocking pouch or container. Investing in a quality signal-blocking pouch, commonly known as a Faraday pouch, is an excellent first line of defence.
'These pouches block electromagnetic signals between your keys and potential criminals, preventing relay attacks where thieves amplify and mimic your key's signal.
'Simply placing your keys inside the pouch when not in use significantly reduces the risk of unauthorised access to your vehicle'.
The same advice applies to your spare keys.
2. Keep keys away from windows
The second is to store keys away from doors and windows.
'Keep your car keys in a secure location, ideally away from entry points like front doors or windows.
'Criminals often attempt to intercept key signals from outside your home, so placing your keys deeper inside your property creates an additional barrier.
'It also decreases the likelihood of thieves detecting your keys' signals, significantly enhancing your vehicle's security.'
3. Disable keyless entry when parked overnight
The third and last tip is to disable or secure keyless entry features when possible.
'If your vehicle has keyless entry, consider temporarily disabling this function, especially when parked overnight or in vulnerable areas.
'Many vehicles allow you to switch off keyless entry through the vehicle's onboard settings.
'If this isn't an option, consider adding a physical security layer, such as a steering wheel lock or immobiliser, to act as an effective deterrent even if the signal is compromised.'
The best anti-car key theft devices to buy
You can buy a Faraday pouch online for as little as £5, or from a retailer like Halfords.
Metal tins and boxes will also provide similar protective levels.
A simple steering wheel lock or wheel clamp might look ugly but are a great tool to deter even the hardiest criminals with the most tech.
They will act as a visual deterrent for thieves who will likely avoid them.
Steering wheel locks can range from around £25 to up to £200, but even the most basic version of a Stoplock will go a long way.
Installing a tracker system in your vehicle, such as a Thatcham approved device, offers an extra layer of security.
Many new cars come with this level of security.
A tracking device won't stop your vehicle being stolen, but it significantly increases the chances of the police recovering and returning it to you.
They cost from between £250 and £800 and the most secure use military-grade tech to locate the whereabouts of cars.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bolton: Ironman event visitors warned of QR code parking scam
Bolton: Ironman event visitors warned of QR code parking scam

BBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Bolton: Ironman event visitors warned of QR code parking scam

Drivers visiting a town for a triathlon event are being warned to beware of bogus QR codes when Council said the fake codes had been found on pay-and-display machines around Bolton town centre and urged visitors to be authority said council-run car parks only took payment by cash or through the RingGo fake QR codes have directed motorists to fraudulent websites to take payment. Hundreds of people are expected to come to the town to watch or compete in the Bolton Ironman triathlon event, which takes place later. A council spokesman said: "Our civil enforcement officers and machine engineers will continue to respond quickly when alerted to these fake stickers, and they have all been removed as far as we know."They said the warning about ways to pay for parking only applied to car parking payment machines managed by Bolton Council "as some privately-managed car parks within the town may have other payment methods in use".Greater Manchester Police previously warned there had been a "steep rise" in the use of the barcodes, which offer mobile phone users a quick way of accessing a website, since the coronavirus force said criminals were using them as a "new way to defraud people". Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Joanna Dennehy's twisted henchmen: Female serial killer had two 'nodding dog' devoted followers plan murders, dump bodies and hide her in their homes… but where are they now?
Joanna Dennehy's twisted henchmen: Female serial killer had two 'nodding dog' devoted followers plan murders, dump bodies and hide her in their homes… but where are they now?

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Joanna Dennehy's twisted henchmen: Female serial killer had two 'nodding dog' devoted followers plan murders, dump bodies and hide her in their homes… but where are they now?

A tall but overweight man wearing scruffy clothes lifts up his shirt provocatively and stares gormlessly into the camera as he poses on the balcony of a suburban council block. At a glance it looks like a cringeworthy picture posted on social media - but the truth is chilling. The man in this grainy photo is Gary Stretch, a 'nodding dog' follower to one of Britain's most notorious female serial killers - Joanna Dennehy. Dennehy took the picture in 2013 while she was on the run from the police after butchering three men and just hours before she set off to stab two more innocent victims. Stretch, formerly known as Gary Richards, was Dennehy's key accomplice and called himself her 'Hubby 4 Lifey' in jail-house love letters. But he was not the only acolyte under the killer's spell. Leslie Layton was also one of Dennehy's henchmen and helped her dispose of the bodies of two of her victims. Like Stretch, he was said to be under the 'psychological' control of the killer, though was described as 'willing' by a judge. Dennehy was handed a whole life tariff after her trial heard she had a 'fetish' and 'taste' for murder. But far from reformed, last week it was revealed she had chopped off the finger of a prison guard in an audacious, but failed, attempt to escape from Britain's high security female prison, HMP Bronzefield. While Dennehy will die behind bars for her heinous crimes - MailOnline reveals what has become of the men that fell under her spell. Mother-of-two Dennehy, from Peterborough, had bragged to her friends while on the run that herself and Stretch - also a father to three children - were a modern day 'Bonnie and Clyde'. The 59-year-old had helped her hide the bodies of her three victims, 31-year-old lover Lukasz Slaboszewski, housemate John Chapman, and landlord and lover Kevin Lee. The pair then drove 140 miles west in a Vauxhall Astra registered under the false company name Undertaker and Sons to Hereford where he aided her in randomly picking out two dog-walkers to attack. But while Dennehy viewed the 7ft3 'giant' as her partner in crime, his defence claimed at trial that he had been 'manipulated' and 'bent' by Dennehy to act as she wished. Stretch's defence lawyer, Karim Khalil QC, had likened Dennehy to a 'Shakesperean' or 'Jacobean' villain, and said she surrounded herself with people she 'knew to be weak' and could 'bend to her will'. He described Stretch, 59, as her 'nodding dog', even addressing the subject of Stretch's size stating: 'Fear is a terrible thing. It crushes the human spirit. Fear makes a mockery of size.' Dennehy - who psychiatrist Dr Frank Farnham found had the condition paraphilia sadomasochism, a disorder of preference for sexual activity involving the infliction of pain or humiliation or bondage - is believed to have met Stretch several years before the killing spree. In a letter to ex-partner Julie Gibbons after trial, Stretch told of how he had met Dennehy after a spell in prison and had been staying on a sofa at her home. Speaking to The Mirror back in 2014, Ms Gibbons had told of how she feared her family could have been Dennehy's next target after Stretch suggested he had only helped her to 'keep her away from his family'. Ms Gibbons, who described Stretch as a 'gentle giant', had said Dennehy must have had him under her 'spell' and that he had 'fallen in love with her'. In twisted letters written to Dennehy from his cell while they both awaited sentencing, Stretch had written that she was his 'devil in the flesh' and described sex with her as 'a dream never to come true'. He had also praised her 'bloodthirsty' leanings and 'dirty and dark mind' and even signed off the letters with 'Your biggest supporter!' 'Undertaker' and 'Hubby 4 Lifey'. Despite attempts by the defence to argue Stretch had been under Dennehy's influence, he was sentenced to life with a minimum of 19 years after being found guilty of three counts of preventing the lawful burial of a body and one of attempted murder at Cambridge Crown Court. Now, over ten years later, it is understood Stretch is still serving his sentence at HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes. The infatuated accomplice of the serial killer had launched two appeals against his life sentence, both of which were rejected by an Appeal Court judge in 2014. At the Court of Appeal hearing in October 2014, Lord Justice Pitchford said the life sentence handed out to Stretch was appropriate to his crimes. 'The applicant, knowing that Dennehy was a serial killer and for that reason likely to kill again, assisted her to evade justice by concealing the bodies of her three victims. 'We agree with the judge first that the applicant presented a most serious danger to the public and second, that the sentence for the attempted murders must be condemnatory,' he said. He added: 'We conclude that it is not arguable that any part of the sentence imposed was inappropriate and for this reason the renewed application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' Dennehy's crimes were so inhumane that she is one of only four women in the UK to have ever been handed a whole life order. The twisted serial killer told police officers and psychiatrists of how she found killing 'moreish' and 'fun', and had tried it to see if she was 'as cold' as she thought. She went from killing her first victim Lukasz Slaboszewski with a single stab wound to the heart, to launching a frenzied attack of more than 30 stab wounds on her final victim John Rogers - who miraculously survived. Dennehy had met her first victim Slaboszewski just days before the murder. She had befriended him and he had messaged a friend to the effect that 'life was beautiful' now he had Dennehy as his 'girlfriend'. She then lured him to her home in Rolleston Garth, Peterborough, and stabbed him through the heart. She had then dumped the body in a wheelie bin and even brought over a 14-year-old girl she had befriended to view the body. Dennehy and Stretch then using money borrowed from landlord Lee - who later became her third victim - dumped Slaboszewski's body in a ditch. It was during her second murder that her second accomplice Layton became involved. While a judge acknowledged Layton had 'played a subordinate role to Gary Stretch', he still found he was a 'willing' participant. He was said to be another 'nodding dog' of Dennehy's, helping to hide the bodies of two of her victims and cover their tracks. Cambridge Crown Court had heard how he and Stretch had acted out of fear that they could be her next victims. Layton, who had left home and cut ties with his family as a teenager, had been living in a flat above Dennehy. The judge described how he had become 'caught up in the excitement and fascination of the appalling murders'. Dennehy's second victim, John Chapman, a 56-year-old man who was 'kindly and harmless' and had served in the Royal Navy but fallen to alcoholism, was a housemate to Layton. Stretch and Layton had met and drank with Chapman just days before Dennehy murdered him by stabbing him in his own bed sitting room. In a horrifying discovery, a photograph of Chapman's dead body was found on Layton's mobile phone. The judge found that Layton's reaction to finding Chapman's dead body was not to call for help but to photograph the body for his 'own purposes as a morbid souvenir.' Dennehy's third victim Lee, her landlord and lover, was lured to her flat and stabbed five times in the chest. Layton was found to have been involved in getting rid of the bodies and setting fire to Lee's Mondeo car. Lee's body was dressed in a black sequined dress when dumped as a final act of humiliation. Layton was sentenced to 14 years after he was found guilty of preventing the lawful and decent burial of two men and perverting the course of justice. He is understood to have been released on licence after seven years, and is believed to be living in Lincoln. Speaking to Layton's mum outside her home in Peterborough, Susan Layton, 72, told of how she did not recognise her son when she saw him in court. While she had not been in contact with her son for almost two decades, the news of the trial still came as a huge shock to her, prompting her to attend court. She said: 'My son was involved but I don't know what went on. I was shocked. I was literally shocked. 'Me and my youngest daughter, we went to court. 'It wasn't my son. It didn't look like him if you know what I mean. 'I couldn't even recognise him. 'In his teens when he was like 17 he said 'oh I can go and get a place of my own, £7 a week', I said 'go and do it', so he went and after that nothing. 'He doesn't speak to any of the family.' Representing Layton during trial, Christopher Morgan said: 'The only person who glorifies in death and who trades on it and gets satisfaction from thinking about it and doing it is Joanna Dennehy. 'Leslie Layton has nothing to do with those exceptional circumstances, he's now caught up in it.' Layton supposedly now lives in Lincoln, having built a new life and finding a partner. Layton's mother told MailOnline: 'I know that he lives in Lincoln somewhere but where I don't know. 'He didn't even speak to me before and he won't even speak to me now. 'I haven't tried reaching out because I mean it probably would be disheartening for him and for me. 'But he's got his life now and I've got mine. And I think he's got a girlfriend apparently. 'I know he got 14 years but when he came out I do not know. He's got seven years to do and I think he's got a tag on. 'Apparently, according to what I got told, he [Stretch] is going to go for him [Leslie] when he's out. 'Because apparently he thought it was him that turned and split on them two, that it was him that turned and informed the police. 'Because he got less than what them two got. 'But she [Dennehy] is still inside. And she'll stay until the rest of her life.' While Stretch could one day have hopes of being released, Dennehy will spend her entire life behind bars. As MailOnline visited one of the flats Dennehy had lived in when she carried out the murders, a neighbour who had lived in the block at the time shouted: 'Sod her! 'She can rot in jail!'

Megan Newborough's parents waiting for review years after her death
Megan Newborough's parents waiting for review years after her death

BBC News

time42 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Megan Newborough's parents waiting for review years after her death

The parents of a woman who was murdered by her boyfriend in 2021 are still waiting for a review into her death, which should have been completed in six McCullam was jailed for a minimum of 23 years after killing Megan Newborough, 23, at his home in Coalville, analysis has now found just 1% of reviews into domestic abuse-related deaths in England and Wales are being completed in the recommended time of six Newborough, Megan's mother, says "nothing is changing" and the delayed review "prolongs the grieving period as well". Every domestic killing or suicide involving people aged 16 and over in England and Wales is subject to a domestic homicide review (DHR).According to Home Office guidance, DHRs make recommendations to prevent others from being killed by partners or family analysis found most are taking years and that none of the 21 reviews undertaken in the East Midlands had been completed within six months. The body of Megan, from Nuneaton in Warwickshire, was dumped in the Leicestershire countryside after she was admitted manslaughter but denied murder and was given a life sentence. He was told he would serve at least 23 2023, her family founded the Megan Newborough Foundation to raise money for charities supporting women who suffer mother paid tribute to her daughter, saying she had "a wicked sense of humour" and "would light up the room when she walked in".Anthony Newborough, Megan's father, said: "The grief comes in waves."You think you can deal with it, but then all of a sudden a big wave comes over you and seems to drown you again. So it's been very difficult."Mrs Newborough added: "We were hoping that Megan's voice would be part of this process. There's been meetings that we haven't been party to."They wouldn't include our advocate on the panel meetings. They wouldn't let her attend meetings. And it's just been a very painful process."Nothing is changing. It's stressful. It's incredibly stressful. And it prolongs the grieving period as well, because every time you're going back, you're reliving the same feelings over and over again."Four or five years for a review, how many more people are dying?" 'Devastating tragedy' Jess Phillips, minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, said: "Every death related to domestic abuse is a devastating tragedy and should not be overlooked."DHRs offer a really important opportunity for agencies on a local and national level to consider each individual victim, improve their safeguarding practices and ultimately prevent these deaths from happening in the first place."But we know that more needs to be done to ensure these reviews are effective and timely, which is why we are cracking on with action to improve the way they are undertaken."This includes creating a new oversight board with publicly-appointed members to make the process for reviewing reports faster."If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this story, support and advice is available via the BBC Action Line website.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store