Two B.C. artists win $10,000 Black Canadian music award
The two B.C. musicians are joined by Ontario's Nia Nadurata and Kalisway and Nova Scotia's Obediya Jones-Darrell as winners at the fourth-annual awards. The prize is valued at $10,000.
The Black Canadian Music Awards were established through a joint partnership by SiriusXM Canada and the SOCAN Foundation in 2020 to recognize and promote the contributions across all music genres by Black music creators across Canada.
Candidates must by Canadian citizens, identify as Black, and be the original creators of the musical submissions to apply for the awards, which are judged by a jury of Black Canadian artists and industry professionals. The first five winners all receive a $10,000 award.
An additional five artists selected in the Ones to Watch category receive awards valued at $1,000. This year's Ones to Watch are Seago, AfrotroniX, Kwazii, Laurie Torres and iamamSaam.
Submissions for the awards are received at socanfoundation.com.
• Nigerian-Canadian artist Bukola was born in Vancouver and is currently based in Coquitlam.
Her latest EP, titled the Confessions of an Antisocial Butterly, was produced by Baca & Brandn and recorded in Los Angeles. The artist describes the mix of R&B vocals, jazz guitar and heartfelt lyrics as 'a retelling of the classic coming-of-age story through the eyes of a twentysomething Nigerian Canadian girl in the suburbs.'
Inspired by artists such as India Arie, Amy Winehouse and Corinne Bailey Rae, Bukola's performance credits include venues such as Toronto's El Mocambo and B.C. Place. Her music has appeared in streaming series such as Netflix's Ginny & Georgia and Disney+'s The Princess.
• Burnaby-born, Vancouver-based Ethiopian-Canadian multi-instrumentalist singer-songwriter Haleluya Hailu was first featured in the pages of The Vancouver Sun and Province while still attending Burnaby North Secondary, when her debut EP, titled Greetings & Salutations, hit the No. 1 spot on Simon Fraser University radio station CJSF, and No. 2 on the University of Victoria's CFUV station.
Following music studies at Selkirk College in Nelson, Hailu returned to making music, inking a deal with 604 Records, the label co-founded by Nickelback frontman Chad Kroeger and Vancouver lawyer Jonathan Simkin.
Her debut EP, Eternally Yours, included the singles Useless, Pinball and Manic Pixie Pacifist.
sderdeyn@postmedia.com
Q&A: Haleluya Hailu talks about putting together Greetings and Salutations EP with fellow teenagers
Q+A: Haleluya Hailu unleashes her Manic Pixie Pacifist on eternally, yours
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
First-of-its-kind role to advance accessibility in Canadian screen industry
The Disability Screen Office and the National Screen Institute are launching a program in which professionals will work with film and TV productions to ensure accessibility on set. The Production Accessibility Role Initiative will train creatives with disabilities to help identify and remove barriers for staff, cast and crew. Alethea Bakogeorge, the Disability Screen Office's director of programs, says the organization is working with unions, guilds and industry associations to ensure the role fits smoothly within Canadian film and TV productions and gets broad support. While the role won't be mandatory, she says her office hopes it will eventually become an industry standard. In early 2026, a small group will be hired for in-depth training in accessibility, production management, budgeting and HR, preparing them to work as Production Accessibility professionals. Training will be funded by the Canada Media Fund, Ontario Creates and the City of Toronto. Productions would pay for the integration of this role into their projects. The Disability Screen Office is a non-profit launched in 2022 with the goal of eliminating accessibility barriers in the Canadian screen industry. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 21, 2025. Alex Nino Gheciu, The Canadian Press
Cosmopolitan
34 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
‘Love Island USA's Chelley and Olandria Respond to Racist Mean Girl Comments
As Chelley Bissainthe and Olandria Carthen gear up for the Love Island USA season 7 reunion, the reality TV personalities are still defending themselves against 'mean girl' comments that took over social media feeds this summer. The duo got candid about everything that went down in Fiji during an interview with Teen Vogue and even opened up about the responsibility of representing Black women on reality TV. 'It was confusing and so weird because we knew who we were in that villa,' Chelley told the outlet. 'We know how much we showed up for every single person on that island, how well everyone spoke of us. So for us to come out of the villa and see that we're mean girls, we're like, 'Mean girls where?'' While they were still coupled up in the villa with no access to social media or the outside world, other islanders who were booted off the show reportedly fueled the negative comments about Chelley and Olandria. Olandria admitted that she felt betrayed by it, saying, 'To see our fellow islanders playing into that narrative was hard. It's like, you knew us, why would you get out and let America, let social media get to your head? A lot of them played into that mean girl, bully narrative. I'm like, 'Okay, this is not fair.'' The comments initially came after they called out their castmate, Huda Mustafa, in an unfiltered challenge for allegedly going too far with Chelley's partner, Ace Greene, during the infamous heart rate challenge. Other islanders, like Cierra Ortega and Iris Kendall, didn't receive backlash for speaking out against it. 'It goes back to the whole, you have to act a certain type of way [as a Black woman] because the moment you act 'out of character' you're done,' Chelley told Teen Vogue. 'We didn't call anyone names, we didn't sit here and run up and down the villa yelling, screaming. We just spoke our truth and held people accountable for their actions.' Olandria piped in, adding, 'The world always tries to label us as 'angry Black women.' They use a moment of weakness and make that one specific time our whole character...I wanted to be unapologetically me, but it's like this world doesn't allow Black women to do that.' This isn't the first time the season 7 fan-favorites have addressed comments that go against their characters. During an appearance on the Baby, This Is Keke Palmer podcast, Olandria revealed that she would try to 'tone down' her reactions in the villa to avoid the audience's villainization of Black women. 'It's very exhausting to say the least,' she said at the time. 'I truly feel like me and Chelley have to tone down a lot to not cross over that boundary. Because a person that looks the opposite of us, as soon as they get emotional, it's like, 'Oh, we're going to cater to this person.' Like, bro, what about us?' Chelley doubled down on those comments during her Teen Vogue interview and revealed how she actively attempted to block out the noise. 'I still know myself, I know my truth, so I can't take how you guys feel about me with so much weight. You sit here and try to paint me to be whoever you want me to be in your mind because of five minutes of one episode, I think that says more about a person than even myself,' Chelley said. She continued, 'This world could be crazy sometimes and this is what it comes with when putting yourself in these type of spaces and places, which ultimately I'm just so grateful and so thankful because again, the woman that Olandria is, the woman that I am, we represent so many Black women and even women in general, and I think they see that in us.'
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Prevent Scandals And Lost Customers: Lessons From E.L.F. And Swatch
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 09: Steven Bertoni interviews Matt Rife at the Forbes Top 50 Creators Celebration at Forbes on Fifth on November 09, 2023 in New York City. (Photo by) Getty Images There have been a number of brand missteps lately that has droves of consumers and even governing organizations weighing in. And while brands are not perfect, these unforced errors are all avoidable. Recently, consumers of cosmetics brand E.L.F. Cosmetics were upset because the brand posted an ad featuring comedian Matt Rife. In his Netflix special a few years ago, Rife made a joke about domestic violence that many women found distasteful. For consumers, seeing Rife in an ad with a brand they love and use – and one that is often touted for its commitment to inclusion felt like it was a betrayal of their brand values. People had a lot of thoughts about the ad on social media. Some on Instagram responded, 'And that's me not buying elf again.' Another shared, 'This is not it, poor choices. Lost another customer, and I hope you will think about your actions and pick better ones.' Another customer on LinkedIn wrote, 'I'm looking for a new liquid eyeliner recommendation.' E.L.F. made a statement acknowledging consumers outrage, but did not remove the ad from circulation (this angered consumers even more). As a result of the misstep, many consumers vowed to find another beauty brand to buy their makeup from. Watchmaker Swatch came under fire when it posted a series of photos to promote its Swatch ESSENTIALS collection, that included an image of a male Asian model pulling the edges of his eyelids back. Consumers, especially in China were outraged, as they felt the image showcased harmful imagery that has been used for a long time to denigrate Asian people. Consumers on social media in China were clear about their disdain for the ad. One person wrote, 'I am tossing out all my swatch watches and anything under your brand. Disgusted.' Another wrote, 'Unforgiveable and disrespectful.' And another said, 'Sack the entire marketing team and bar the ad company for making such an obviously taunting advertisement.' Swatch has since made a statement about consumer feedback and removed that image from the circulation. And an ad for Sanex body gel just got banned in the U.K. by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). The ad, reminiscent of a Dove ad that received a lot of backlash a few years back, featured two Black models that the voiceover described as having skin that makes them want to 'scratch day and night,' as well as, 'to those whose skin will feel dried out even by water.' One of these models appears to have dried mud caked on their skin. A white model then appears, with no visable skin concerns, along with the voiceover that says 'relief could be as simple as a shower.' The ASA explained why they ruled that the ad should no longer be shown in the current format, 'The ad was therefore structured in such a way that it was the black skin, depicted in association with itchy and dry skin, which was shown to be problematic and uncomfortable, whereas the white skin, depicted as smoother and clean after using the product, was shown successfully changed and resolved.' ASA acknowledged that they don't believe Sanex, whose parent company is Colgate-Palmolive, intended any harm with the ad. However, intention and impact are two separate things, and ASA felt the message the ad communicated, 'could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin.' There is the obvious recommendations that you'll hear, such as having diverse team members who are representative of the people you are trying to serve. While building high-performing teams with diverse lived experiences helps brands produce better work, that is often a longer-term solution. One of the ways I recommend brands avoid these types of land mines is by testing campaigns with consumers before it goes live. Brands are often investing a ton of resources in these campaigns. Investing a little more to get a pulse of what the consumers you are trying to reach actually think about what you've produced goes a long way. China is an important market for Swatch. If they had just tested the campaign with even a few people in the Chinese market, they very likely would have gotten feedback about that image that wouldn't have cost them customers and turned into a PR nightmare. The key to doing to being effective with this type of testing includes two things that are often forgotten. First, brands should be sure to include consumers in the testing who are not only part of their ideal customer group, but who share the identities of people who are showcased or spoken about in your campaign. In addition, consumers participating in research will often answer the questions asked of them. If you don't ask them specific questions related to their identity and how they respond or feel about the campaign, you might not get the type of input you are looking for. I've found that very often marketers and uncomfortable bringing up specific areas of identity, such as race, and as a result, they miss the opportunity to get the meaningful and relevant feedback needed, that can prevent them from making an impact that isn't what was intended. Also, brands can't make culturally competent and intelligent campaigns and communications, if the teams doing and approving the work do not have cultural competence or intelligence. The team at Sanex said that they intentionally used models of different races in their ads to showcase diversity. Representation matters, but not all representation is good representation. A degree of cultural competence should have flagged problem areas of what the imagery could be interpreted as being portrayed. But if no one has that competency, ads like these will slip through over and over again. The solution for brands to deliver campaigns and communications that helps them acquire more of the people they want to serve, rather than pushing them away, comes down to upgrading the skills and practices of marketing teams, to align with the needs of the consumer of today. We are not in the same marketing environment we were in ten, five, or even three years ago. Today's consumer has evolved, and brands need to evolve their skills and practices according to win and keep those customers.
