logo
Federal judge bars Arkansas public schools from displaying the Ten Commandments

Federal judge bars Arkansas public schools from displaying the Ten Commandments

USA Today5 days ago
The federal judge called the law 'obviously unconstitutional' and said passing it was likely part of a coordinated strategy to inject Christian religious doctrine into public schools.
A federal judge on Aug. 4 barred several Arkansas school districts from implementing what he described as a 'plainly unconstitutional' state law requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in their classrooms and libraries.
The preliminary injunction, a temporary measure that maintains the status quo until a court hears the merits of the case, was issued a day before Arkansas Act 573 was set to go into effect.
U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Brooks wrote that the Protestant displays would unconstitutionally violate the right to free exercise of religion as well as the Establishment Clause, a provision of the First Amendment that prohibits the government from favoring religion over non-religion.
He noted that the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a 'nearly identical' law in Kentucky in 1980.
'Why would Arkansas pass an obviously unconstitutional law?' he wrote. 'Most likely because the State is part of a coordinated strategy among several states to inject Christian religious doctrine into public-school classrooms.'
He went on to say that such states, including Louisiana and Texas, may be taking such measures in light of the Supreme Court's recent rulings in favor of religious expression and accommodation in public spaces.
Several civil liberties groups – Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, the ACLU and the Freedom From Religion Foundation – and the New York-based law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP are representing the plaintiffs, a group of multifaith families with children in Arkansas public schools.
The Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville and Siloam Springs school districts are defendants in the case. The state of Arkansas, on behalf of Attorney General Tim Griffin, is listed as an intervenor in the case – a third party who's not part of the original lawsuit but requests to get involved.
Following Brooks' order, Griffin told Axios he was 'reviewing the court's order and assessing our legal options.'
Republican Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders also disagreed with the order.
'In Arkansas, we do in fact believe that murder is wrong and stealing is bad,' Sanders told Axios. 'It is entirely appropriate to display the Ten Commandments – the basis of all Western law and morality – as a reminder to students, state employees and every Arkansan who enters a government building.'
BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@usatoday.com.
USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-Kentucky clerk Kim Davis asks Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage ruling: ‘Legal fiction'
Ex-Kentucky clerk Kim Davis asks Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage ruling: ‘Legal fiction'

New York Post

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ex-Kentucky clerk Kim Davis asks Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage ruling: ‘Legal fiction'

Kim Davis, the former Kentucky clerk who violated the rights of a gay couple, has petitioned the Supreme Court to revisit its landmark decision on same-sex marriage – slamming the ruling as a 'legal fiction.' Davis, 59, served five days in jail in 2015 after she refused to issue a marriage license to gay couple David Ermold and David Moore shortly after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in the Obergefell v. Hodges case. The former Rowan County, Ky., clerk was subsequently ordered to pay a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages and $260,000 in attorneys' fees to the married couple. Advertisement She asked the high court – in a 90-page filing last month – to review a lower court's 2022 finding that she violated Ermold and Moore's constitutional right to marry and revisit its decision in the same-sex marriage case. 3 Davis claims her First Amendment rights were violated when she was jailed and ordered to pay damages to the gay couple she refused to grant a marriage license to. AP 'If ever a case deserved review, the first individual who was thrown in jail post-Obergefell for seeking accommodation for her religious beliefs should be it,' Liberty Counsel, the nonprofit law firm representing Davis, wrote in the petition. Advertisement 'Davis was jailed, haled before a jury, and now faces crippling monetary damages based on nothing more than purported emotional distress,' the filing continued, arguing that Davis was protected by her First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion in denying the marriage licences. The petition also asks the justices to consider 'whether Obergefell v. Hodges … and the legal fiction of substantive due process, should be overturned.' 3 The Supreme Court previously turned down a chance to review Davis' case in 2020. REUTERS 'Kim Davis' case underscores why the US Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman,' Mat Staver, the founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, said in a statement. Advertisement 'Obergefell cannot just push the First Amendment aside to punish individuals for their beliefs about marriage,' Staver added. 'The First Amendment precludes making the choice between your faith and your livelihood.' 'The High Court now has the opportunity to finally overturn this egregious opinion from 2015.' 3 The Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in 2015. REUTERS William Powell, an attorney for Ermold and Moore, told The Post that he is 'confident' the Supreme Court won't take up Davis' case. Advertisement 'We are confident the Supreme Court, like the court of appeals, will conclude that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention,' Powell, who serves as senior counsel at Georgetown University's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, said in a statement. 'Marriage equality is settled law,' he added. The Supreme Court previously denied a 2020 petition from Davis to consider her appeal.

Laura Loomer Fires Back at Marjorie Taylor Greene: 'Low Life Degenerate'
Laura Loomer Fires Back at Marjorie Taylor Greene: 'Low Life Degenerate'

Newsweek

time35 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Laura Loomer Fires Back at Marjorie Taylor Greene: 'Low Life Degenerate'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Far-right influencer Laura Loomer lashed out at Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia on Monday after Greene suggested Loomer is "bankrolled" by Israeli intelligence. The feud between the two—both of whom are staunch allies of President Donald Trump—stems from their disagreements about the Trump administration's policy toward Israel and continued U.S. support for Israel's devastating military assault on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Loomer and Greene's attacks quickly became personal, culminating in Loomer calling the Georgia congresswoman a "low life degenerate," questioning her Christian faith, hurling misogynistic insults at her and criticizing her physical appearance. Newsweek reached out to Greene's office for comment via email on Monday. Why It Matters Greene and Loomer are among the loudest voices in the pro-Trump political and media sphere. But they've locked horns over U.S. policy vis-à-vis Israel, with Loomer advocating for continued U.S. backing of the Israeli government, while Greene embraces a more anti-interventionist stance on Israel-Hamas as well as hotbeds of conflict like the Russia-Ukraine war. Greene has publicly broken with the Trump administration over Israel multiple times in the last few weeks and recently became the first Republican lawmaker to refer to the Israeli government's actions in Gaza as a "genocide." Loomer, on the other hand, has called for the Trump administration to crack down on pro-Palestinian protests and equated criticism of the Israeli government with antisemitism. What To Know The fight between Loomer and Greene played out on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, after Loomer attacked Florent Groberg, a decorated soldier and Medal of Honor recipient, who backed Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign. Loomer said Groberg did not deserve to be celebrated because he spoke at the 2016 Democratic National Convention as a private citizen and was not "US born." Greene posted a screenshot to X showing that Loomer had blocked her and wrote, "What a coward." She then told Loomer to "shut up" about Groberg, saying that the far-right commentator has "ZERO respect or reverence for even the most heroic people in America." Loomer "is not MAGA, she is MIGA," Greene said. The Georgia congresswoman was referring to the slogan "Make Israel Great Again," which some on the right have coined to criticize America's steadfast support of Israel as it carries out its military campaign in Gaza. She added: "Many people are asking who or what government or what intelligence agency has bankrolled, the twice failed Congressional candidate, Laura Loomer all these years?" Loomer went scorched earth in response to Greene's comments and the fight quickly turned personal. The conservative podcaster called Greene a "whore" and resurfaced allegations that the Georgia congresswoman cheated on her husband, prompting him to file for divorce in 2022. The far-right conspiracy theorist also said Greene's father is "rolling over in his grave about what a lying, low life degenerate his daughter has become," adding: "You have always been a compulsive liar and people finally have woken up to how disingenuous you are." She went on to say she was filing an ethics complaint against Greene for "falsely accusing me of being funded by an intelligence agency." "That is an abuse of your power. Just because you are consumed by your rage and jealousy doesn't mean you get to go around lying accusing private citizens of being intelligence agents," Loomer wrote. She continued her lengthy screed, saying of Greene: "You call yourself a Christian while you wreck your marriage like a whore and lie out of bloated horse face which has permanent damage from your years of alleged steroid use. Which is why you look like a Neanderthal." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Trump says Washington needs National Guard protection. Police data says crime is down.
Trump says Washington needs National Guard protection. Police data says crime is down.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump says Washington needs National Guard protection. Police data says crime is down.

President Donald Trump has declared plans to send National Guard troops to Washington, DC, to help reduce crime in the nation's capital. Trump said the federal government would take control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department. "I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse," Trump said. About 800 troops will be deployed. Crime statistics from the FBI and the Washington Metro Police Department, however, indicate crime has been declining in the capital. The Justice Department noted that overall violent crime in Washington has decreased 35% from 2023 and is at a 30-year low. Here's what law enforcement statistics say is happening in Washington. Violent crime in Washington has fallen Homicides have also declined Washington's homicides in 2024, mapped Can't see our graphics? Click here to reload the page. How have crime rates changed in Washington? How violent crimes have dropped in Washington Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel say crime and violence are increasing in Washington. But the Justice Department said in January that compared with 2023, overall violent crime is down, including: The president also wants homeless people removed from the district. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital," Trump posted on Truth Social. Trump is considering expanding the federal crackdown on crime to other cities, including New York City, Baltimore, Chicago and Oakland, California, USA TODAY reported. He did not elaborate. CONTRIBUTING Joey Garrison, Zac Anderson, Tom Vanden Brook, Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Josh Meyer, Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy and Sudiksha Kochi SOURCE USA TODAY Network reporting and research; Reuters; CrimeData DC; FBI Crime Data Explorer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store