Kremlin expects 'difficult' talks with Ukraine in Istanbul
Both delegations have arrived in Istanbul and are expected to meet later in the evening, according to Russian state media and Ukrainian officials.
The two sides previously met in the Turkish city in May and June, but managed to agree only on exchanges of prisoners and soldiers' bodies.
US President Donald Trump last week gave Russia "50 days" to end the war or face sanctions, but the Kremlin has not indicated it is willing to compromise on its demands.
"No one expects an easy road," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters when asked about his expectations for the talks.
"It will be very difficult," he added.
Ukraine said it hoped the two countries would discuss the release of prisoners and lay the ground for a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
"Everything will depend on whether Russia stops speaking in ultimatums and takes a constructive position," a source in the Ukrainian delegation told AFP.
"This will determine whether results can be achieved at this meeting," the source added.
But Moscow has said that a lot of work is needed before even discussions can take place about possible talks between Putin and Zelensky, who last met in 2019.
- Radically different positions -
The two sides have radically different positions for ending the conflict.
Russia has called on Ukraine to effectively retreat from the four Ukrainian regions Moscow claims to have annexed in September 2022, a demand Kyiv has called unacceptable.
Ukraine has ruled out any negotiations on territory until after a ceasefire and says it will never recognise Russia's claims over occupied territory -- including Crimea, which Moscow annexed in 2014.
Russia's full-scale invasion, launched in February 2022, has ravaged swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine, killing tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians.
Ukraine said former defence minister Rustem Umerov, who currently serves as security council secretary, would head its delegation.
The Kremlin said it would send political scientist Vladimir Medinsky to lead its negotiating team.
Medinsky, who led the Russian delegation in the two previous rounds of negotiation, is not seen as a powerful decision maker. He has been described by Ukraine as a puppet.
At the last talks on May 16 and June 2, the two sides agreed to large-scale prisoner exchanges.
They also exchanged their draft terms for ending the conflict, which the Kremlin said were "diametrically opposed".
- Russia claims advances -
Wednesday's talks come as the White House steps up pressure on Russia to agree a compromise.
Trump announced last week he was giving Russia until September to strike a peace deal with Ukraine or face bruising sanctions.
The US leader has been trying to broker an end to the war since his inauguration in January, but has failed to extract any concessions from the Kremlin, despite repeated phone calls with Putin.
Russia has meanwhile intensified its bombardment of Ukrainian towns and cities, while advancing across several different areas of the front line.
Between late Tuesday and early Wednesday, Russia fired 71 drones at four different regions of Ukraine, said the Ukrainian air force.
The Russian defence ministry said Wednesday it had captured the village of Varachyne in Ukraine's northern Sumy region, where Moscow has been advancing for weeks.
A Russian drone attack on the Sumy region cut power to more than 220,000 people earlier Wednesday, Zelensky said.
Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan last month called on both sides not to "shut the door" on dialogue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
31 minutes ago
- ABC News
Federal politics live: Albanese and Macron speak about Gaza and agree to meet at UN summit
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has discussed the war in Gaza with French President Emmanuel Macron during a phone call overnight. The pair have agreed to meet again on the sidelines of a UN summit in New York, which France intends to use to recognise Palestinian statehood. Follow our live blog.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Netanyahu reportedly considers full takeover of Gaza
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has met with senior security officials to finalise a new strategy for the war in Gaza, with Israeli media reporting he is leaning towards a complete military takeover of the strip.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Legal stoush between Russia and Australia over embassy site near Parliament House reaches the High Court
There may be a touch of the Cold War in the air in Canberra today as Russia and Australia go into battle in the High Court over a new embassy. The dispute is over a law passed in 2023 which cancelled Russia's lease on the block, which is only 300 metres from Parliament House. At the time, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the law was needed on national security grounds. But a Russian spokesperson characterised it as a hostile action, showing "Russophobic hysteria". Now, the fight has arrived at the High Court of Australia. It all began nicely enough in 2008 when the Australian government granted the lease on the site to Russia to build a new embassy. The site is in the so-called "dress circle" around Parliament House in Canberra's leafy Yarralumla, near the Canadian, British and Chinese diplomatic missions. The new embassy was to replace Russia's low-profile building in Griffith, and would have included residential buildings as well as a large pool. But after what Russia says was a dispute with a builder, and then COVID-19 delays, the main embassy buildings had still not materialised. That triggered moves by the National Capital Authority to revoke the lease, creating a sticky legal and diplomatic situation, especially after Russia won a case in the Federal Court. Parliament stepped in in 2023, passing the law in a bid to head off the dispute, after advice from security agencies. Professor of International Law at the Australian National University, Don Rothwell, said nothing like this had happened in Canberra before. He said advances in technology may have been a factor in the decision to make the law. "The way in which embassies can eavesdrop on various activities of government, including Parliament House, has ... enhanced in recent years," Professor Rothwell said. Russia has fought the case all the way. A Russian diplomat even occupied the site for a time, refusing to leave so Australia could take control of the block. Today lawyers for Russia will tell the High Court the law is not valid because under the constitution, the parliament doesn't have the power to make such legislation. Russia has taken particular aim at the claim the law was necessary on national security grounds. "There is no evidence that the plaintiff was planning an internal attack such that termination of the lease was for the purpose of protecting Australia from an internal attack," the Russian submissions to the High Court say. But the Commonwealth submissions rely on the fact that "specific advice" was received about the nature of the construction that was planned and the capacity the location of the site would provide the Russian mission. "Parliament's power is at its zenith when it legislates to protect its own security, because if parliament cannot ensure the security of the very place where it meets then it cannot ensure a practical precondition to the exercise of Commonwealth legislative power," the Commonwealth submissions to the High Court said. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation advice on which the legislation was based has not been revealed to the High Court, because it is protected by public interest immunity. The Russians have told the High Court if they should lose on the first argument, and the law is found to be valid, they are entitled to "just terms" for the loss of the site. The Commonwealth said in its submissions the termination of the lease is far removed from the usual acquisition of property which attracts such compensation. "The constitutional conception of 'just terms' does not extend to requiring a foreign state to be compensated for actions … in order to address the risk of that foreign state interfering with Australia's democratic institutions," the submissions said. Professor Rothwell said that "the key question here is whether or not the termination of the lease is actually an acquisition of property for those purposes". He said Russia's pursuit of the case was probably a matter of principle. "Ultimately a good outcome for Russia could be that the Commonwealth is ordered to pay them certain compensation with respect to the question of the acquisition of this property." In the meantime Professor Rothwell said the current case had put other diplomatic missions on notice. "They are also aware of the fact that when they occupy an embassy — or in this case, they're seeking to build a new embassy — [that] they very much have to work with the Australian government and their principal interlocutor as the Department of Foreign Affairs," Professor Rothwell said. For the moment, the site remains vacant. It may be a prime position, but finding the right tenant is a whole other exercise.
