Lupus Drug Withdrawal: Immunosuppressants or Steroids First?
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers conducted a randomized noninferiority trial at a tertiary hospital in India (between May 2021 and December 2023) to compare the outcomes of immunosuppressant withdrawal with those of glucocorticoid withdrawal in adult patients with SLE in remission.
They included 117 patients with SLE who had received treatment for at least 3 years, had been in remission for at least 1 year, and were receiving glucocorticoids (≤ 7.5 mg/d of prednisolone) along with one maintenance immunosuppressant.
Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: One tapered off prednisolone over 3 months while continuing immunosuppressants (n = 58; median age, 35 years; 98.3% women) and the other tapered off immunosuppressants while maintaining low-dose prednisolone (n = 59; median age, 36 years; 93.2% women). All patients continued receiving hydroxychloroquine.
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a flare, as defined by the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index, at any time up to 52 weeks, with follow-up extending up to and beyond 104 weeks.
Noninferiority of immunosuppressant over glucocorticoid withdrawal was confirmed if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the between-group difference in the proportion of patients who experienced a flare was < 10%.
TAKEAWAY:
At 52 weeks and at maximum follow-up, the proportion of patients who experienced a flare did not differ significantly between the immunosuppressant and glucocorticoid withdrawal groups, with the risk difference between the groups indicating the noninferiority of immunosuppressant withdrawal.
At the maximum follow-up, 55.2% of patients in the glucocorticoid withdrawal group and 67.8% of those in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group did not experience a flare. Among those who did, mild to moderate flares were most common.
Damage accrual did not differ significantly between the two groups at maximum follow-up.
Low baseline complement C3 levels were identified as a predictor of flares at both 52 weeks (hazard ratio [HR], 3.698; P = .012) and at maximum follow-up (HR, 3.785; P = .001).
IN PRACTICE:
'Our results suggest that low-dose GCs [glucocorticoids], combined with HCQ [hydroxychloroquine], may be a viable long-term maintenance option for managing SLE patients in sustained remission,' the authors wrote. 'Based on our findings, it is evident that a one-size-fits-all approach to IS [immunosuppressant] or GC withdrawal may not be ideal. Instead, a personalized tapering approach considering patient risk profile, prior damage, and steroid exposure may help mitigate adverse events while maintaining disease control,' they added.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Aishwarya Gopal, MD, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. It was published online on March 24, 2025, in Rheumatology .
LIMITATIONS:
This study had an open-label design and lacked a control arm that continued all medications. Adrenal insufficiency upon flares was not tested in patients who underwent steroid withdrawal. Remote access to glucocorticoids could not be ruled out.
DISCLOSURES:
This study received funding from Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mental health urgent care now available to all in Clermont County
Almost everyone has been to an urgent care before for a medical problem. However, not many know about mental health urgent cares. We visited one location right in Clermont County. Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Virginia Tech study shows dogs can detect invasive lanternfly
BLACKSBURG, Virgina – Researchers at Virginia Tech say man's best friend may also be one of nature's best defenses against an invasive pest. For the first time, a study shows that pet dogs could help stop the rapid spread of the spotted lanternfly. Spotted lanternflies feed on different plants and excrete a sugary substance called honeydew, which promotes mold growth. They are considered so destructive that some states have launched campaigns urging residents to stomp them on sight. Experts say the real solution is to wipe out their egg masses, but those can be hard to find because they often resemble dried mud and can blend in with their surroundings. That's where the dogs can come in to help with their strong sense of smell. "Dogs have one dominant sense. It's their nose. We use our eyes. Dogs use their nose like their eyes," said study participant, Katie Thomas. Thomas and her nine-year-old pitbull mix, Finch, participated in the study, hoping to put their years of recreational scent work to good use. They went through indoor and outdoor tests, sniffing out egg masses, and receiving an award when Finch was right on the money. "To be able to do things that we already do, that we are having a lot of fun with… Train our dogs to sniff stuff, being able to apply that to something like a real problem that affects our community is really fulfilling," said Thomas. The spotted lanternfly is native to Asia and was first detected in the United States in Pennsylvania over ten years ago. Since then, it has spread to 19 states, according to the USDA. "They are everywhere, and we need to search out the eggs. The problem is it's too late once we have the lanternfly," said study participant, Carolyn Shelburne. Carolyn and her 9-year-old border collie, Hermes, was one of the first five K9 and handler teams to pass their field tests. Ultimately, 182 volunteer teams across the U.S. took part in the study. For indoor tests, dogs identified the lanternfly scent correctly more than 80% of the time. For more real-world outdoor tests, dogs identified the scent correctly more than 60% of the time. That's still better than most human searches. "Hopefully, more people will see that you can train any dog to do this, and it gives you something fun to do with your dog," said Shelburne. Researchers are hoping this is just the beginning for dogs to protect local environments. Even in areas where spotted laternflies aren't a problem, dogs could be trained to sniff out other invasive species.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Not All Ultra-Processed Foods Are Bad for You—These 8 Are Actually Healthy
New research from the American Heart Association suggests these foods have some benefits. Key Takeaways Ultra-processed foods dominate the U.S. diet and raise heart disease risk, but some—like whole-grain cereals or plain yogurt—can still be healthy. Good picks include frozen produce, low-sodium beans, nuts, and high-fiber cereals, while processed meats, sugary drinks, and refined breads are best limited. Swaps like plain yogurt with fruit or sparkling water, plus smart use of frozen or canned basics, can cut harmful UPFs without losing convenience. If you've noticed a lot of headlines around ultra-processed foods lately, you're not imagining it. There have been several recent studies linking ultra-processed foods (UPFs)—which contain ingredients and chemicals that aren't generally available to a home cook—to a variety of health issues, from cardiovascular disease to risk of premature death. "High UPF intake is widespread and detrimental," says Grace Derocha, RDN, CDCES,spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "Nearly 60% of U.S. calories come from UPFs—and adolescents fare worst, correlating with poorer heart health scores." But before you clean out your pantry, there is some nuance when it comes to processed foods, according to new research from the American Heart Association. And in fact, some can actually be beneficial to your health. Meet Our Expert Grace Derocha, RDN, CDCES,spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics What the Research Shows Regarding Ultra-Processed Foods The American Health Association found that processed foods that contain additives and chemicals often have other not-so-great ingredients that put you at risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic diseases, and death, including unhealthy fats and added sugars and salts. And processed food takes up more than 70% of what's available at your local grocery store, so it can be harder than you'd expect to avoid them. The American Heart Association recommends limiting your UPF intake and focusing your diet on vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, nuts, seeds, healthy oils, and lean proteins. But in this new research, they've taken a stab at defining which UPFs are the most dangerous to your health—and which ones aren't. "Not all UPFs are equally harmful: Items like whole-grain cereals or yogurt may carry lower or even inverse cardiovascular disease risk compared with sugary beverages or processed meats," Derocha says. "The science recognizes the complexity—UPF is a broad category, and context matters. We should differentiate between 'unhealthy UPFs' and more wholesome packaged items." Related: The Difference Between Processed Food and Ultra-Processed Food—and Why It Matters for Health How to Choose Healthier Processed Foods You don't have to give up the convenience of processed foods entirely in order to reduce your risk of negative health effects. Just follow these tips—based on the new research—to help you create a shopping list that'll focus on your health. Opt for "Green-Flag" Processed Foods One of the reasons that ultra-processed foods have proliferated? They make it much simpler to get dinner on the table—just heat and eat. But you don't have to rely on heavily processed foods to simplify your food prep. "Convenience doesn't equal compromise," Derocha says. "Smart choices like frozen produce, canned staples, and wisely selected UPFs can make healthy eating accessible." Among the "green-flagged" processed foods that are considered healthier: Lightly salted and flavored nuts, seeds, and legumes Low-sodium canned beans and legumes Low-sodium canned tuna, salmon, or chicken, packed in water Unsweetened dried fruit Low-sodium whole grain breads and crackers High fiber cereal with minimal sweeteners Plant-based meat and dairy alternatives like soy milk and tofu Frozen produce There are also a few "caution" items that are considered moderately healthy, such as canned fruit in light syrup or juice, hard cheeses, and low-sodium and/or low-fat canned soups or canned beans that contain salt. Minimize "Red-Flag" Foods The American Heart Association chart reviews both processed and unprocessed foods for their potential impacts on cardiovascular health—which includes a list of red-flagged foods that could put your health at risk. "Identifying high-risk UPF subgroups is essential to balancing nutritional goals with the need for accessible and appealing food options," according to the study. "Most UPFs overlap with foods high in saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium, which are already targets for cardiometabolic risk reduction." Processed meats like bacon, chicken nuggets, sausage, and hot dogs, and sugar-sweetened beverages are high on the list of red-flag foods, but you probably won't be surprised by what is on the list: Processed meats, like chicken nuggets, sausage, hot dogs Sugar-sweetened beverages Sweets like cookies, candies, and fruit snacks Cheese products White bread, tortillas, and rolls Ice cream and other dairy-based desserts Frozen meals that contain things on this list (like pizza or instant noodles) Canned fruit in syrup Tortilla or potato-based chips But the paper also called out some minimally processed foods that could be harmful to your health. That list includes: Meat and dairy products, including red meat, pork, butter, beef tallow, and sour cream Natural sweeteners, like sugar, honey, and maple syrup Sweetened dried or canned fruit and brined vegetables French fries Crackers 100% fruit juice Tropical oils, like palm and coconut oil Some of these foods are often on lists of healthier options, and Derocha notes that they may be more of a "sometimes" food, rather than a wholesale ban. "While honey is minimally processed, it's still a concentrated source of sugar—making it less heart-friendly than, say, whole-grain bread or canned beans that offer fiber and nutrients. It's less about processing level and more about overall contributions to cardiovascular health." Make Healthier Swaps If you're looking to reduce your ultra-processed food intake, there are some easy swaps that are just as delicious—and won't raise your health risks. "Try sparkling water flavored with fruit instead of soda; make yogurt parfaits with plain yogurt and fruit instead of pre-sweetened cartons," Derocha suggests. And check the ingredient list. "Look for UPFs that include whole grains, legumes, yogurt, or nuts—not just isolated additives," Derocha says. "Cereals, yogurts, and whole-grain products are among UPFs associated with lower cardiovascular risk." You'll also want to limit or avoid foods that have a huge list of chemicals among their ingredients. "Favor foods with fewer, recognizable ingredients—avoid long lists of additives, emulsifiers, sweeteners," Derocha says. Find Other Ways to Speed Up Meal Prep Choosing minimally processed building blocks like frozen fruits and veggies, canned beans, and frozen whole grains can help you get your meal on the plate faster, Derocha says. "You can also meal prep simple components," she suggests. "Roast a batch of chicken or bake vegetables ahead, then mix and match throughout the week." You can also consider batch cooking, in which you make a larger batch of a favorite dish and freeze the leftovers for a busy weeknight. "Cook once, and eat twice," Derocha says. "Allowing the freezer to be your friend is a great way to be in the driver's seat of what you are consuming." Related: 9 Superfoods That Will Help You Live Longer, According to Dietitians Read the original article on Real Simple
