logo
Farm forestry ban too late to help: advocate

Farm forestry ban too late to help: advocate

The farm-to-forest ban passed its first reading last week but a Southland Federated Farmers executive says its too late, the damage has been done and is continuing.
Executive member and farmer Dean Rabbidge said since the ban's announcement on December 4, there has been a rush to convert arable land into forests.
"If anything, we've only seen an acceleration of it since December 4 with people knowing that this is their last chance," he said.
The sheep, beef and dairy farmer said after pulling pines out of his own property he has learned the damage the conifers do to the soil.
"It's taking a lot of work to get it back into productive land through fertiliser and seed and stuff," he said.
Pine needles themselves are quite toxic, he said, and do not let anything else grow.
He said the farms that have been converted into forestry would have had soil that was at the optimum level for animal health and pasture production.
"[The soil] has been cared for and looked after for maximum food production values, and now we're just planting it in pine trees," he said.
The ban, or Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme — Forestry Conversions) Amendment Bill, will include exemptions.
After the first reading, Minister for Agriculture Todd McClay said investors that were able to prove intent to afforest between January 2021 and December 4 would be exempt from the ban.
This exemption, which was part of the December 4 announcement, was clarified by the minister.
Mr McClay said that the combination of buying land and ordering of trees prior to December 4 would be an example of proof of a qualifying investment.
He said each of these actions alone would not.
This exemption has been a source of confusion for concerned farmers who have said the grey area of "evidence of intent" opened up a loophole that has been exploited.
Mr Rabbidge said the grey area remains and his organisation will continue to hold government ministers to account over this issue.
"There's still been some very, very questionable land purchases go on recently under the guise of, hey, we had seedlings ordered — that was their intent to plant," he said.
"We're still going to keep the pressure on the government to make sure that all the loopholes are closed."
The Wyndham farmer said the rapid conversion is visible to those living rurally, but it will take a while for urban residents to recognise the affect.
"It's far too late, but people are finally waking up to the damage that forestry, both production and carbon, is doing to the rural sector," he said.
"It's not until the urban areas feel the effects of it that it's going to be far too late."
ella.scott-fleming@alliedpress.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minister To Visit Saudi Arabia & United States For Trade Talks
Minister To Visit Saudi Arabia & United States For Trade Talks

Scoop

time12 hours ago

  • Scoop

Minister To Visit Saudi Arabia & United States For Trade Talks

Agriculture, Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay will travel to Saudi Arabia and then to the United States (US) next week to meet with his trade and agriculture counterparts. In Riyadh, Mr McClay will meet with Minister of Commerce, HE Dr Majid bin Abdullah Al-Kassabi, and Minister of Environment, Water and Agriculture, HE Eng Abdulrahman Abdulmohsen Al-Fadley, to advance bilateral trade and investment opportunities, including in food and agritech cooperation. The visit will also be an opportunity discuss how best to leverage the New Zealand-Gulf Cooperation Council Free Trade Agreement, for which negotiations concluded last year. Mr McClay will then travel on to Washington D.C. at the invitation of United States Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer. He will also meet with U.S. industry representatives, think tanks, and his agriculture counterpart, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins. 'Following the United States' 1 August decision to apply a 15 per cent, or more, tariff to ever country with a trade surplus, this visit will be an opportunity to discuss the impact of that decision and better understand the factors that may influence future U.S. tariffs,' Mr McClay says. 'New Zealand and the United States have a long-standing, well-balanced trading relationship, with periods where the US has enjoyed a surplus and times, like now, when New Zealand has a modest one. Overall, our trade is complementary and reflects the strength of a long-standing partnership. 'I will be seeking to understand the effect of any change in trade flows for example, if New Zealand's current surplus shifted to a deficit, and what that might mean for our exporters,' Mr McClay says. 'The US currently faces an average tariff of just 0.3 per cent when exporting to New Zealand, far lower than what we face into their market. 'It's important that we raise these concerns constructively, while reaffirming our commitment to the strong, cooperative relationship we have with the United States,' Mr McClay says. Meetings in Washington will cover wider bilateral trade, investment and agricultural priorities.

Trade Minister travelling to United States after to discuss 15 percent tariff
Trade Minister travelling to United States after to discuss 15 percent tariff

RNZ News

time18 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Trade Minister travelling to United States after to discuss 15 percent tariff

Todd McClay. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Agriculture, Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay will be travelling to the United States to meet with his counterparts after President Donald Trump's 15 percent tariff on New Zealand exports was announced. The United States, New Zealand's second largest export market, imposed the higher-than-expected tariff after initially signalling a 10 percent rate. "Following the United States' 1 August decision to apply a 15 percent, or more, tariff to ever country with a trade surplus, this visit will be an opportunity to discuss the impact of that decision and better understand the factors that may influence future US tariffs," McClay said. "New Zealand and the United States have a long-standing, well-balanced trading relationship, with periods where the US has enjoyed a surplus and times, like now, when New Zealand has a modest one. Overall, our trade is complementary and reflects the strength of a long-standing partnership. "I will be seeking to understand the effect of any change in trade flows for example, if New Zealand's current surplus shifted to a deficit, and what that might mean for our exporters. "The US currently faces an average tariff of just 0.3 percent when exporting to New Zealand, far lower than what we face into their market. "It's important that we raise these concerns constructively, while reaffirming our commitment to the strong, cooperative relationship we have with the United States." McClay will stop in Saudi Arabia first, to advance bilateral trade and investment opportunities, and to discuss how best to leverage the New Zealand-Gulf Cooperation Council Free Trade Agreement, for which negotiations concluded last year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact
Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact

, Climate Change Correspondent Three of the country's biggest greenhouse gas emitters no longer have to reveal how much planet-heating gas they produce. For the first time, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)'s company-level emissions data doesn't include agriculture, after the government ended compulsory reporting for the farming sector. The change means companies responsible for around half the countries' greenhouse gases no longer have to supply information to the EPA every year giving a rough total of their methane emissions, unless they happen to be captured by other disclosure rules (for example climate disclosure rules covering stockmarket-listed companies). Meat processors Affco and Alliance no longer have to supply emissions data. Nor does Open Country Dairy, the country's second biggest milk exporter after Fonterra. All three were previously among the country's top ten emitters. RNZ asked Affco, Alliance and Open Country Dairy for their totals, but none had responded by deadline. The two biggest greenhouse gas producers in the farming sector - Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms - still disclose their emissions tallies in their own annual reports, as well as listing measures to reduce their impact. "It's critical that everyday people are able to find out who is responsible for New Zealand's climate pollution," said climate advocate Alex Johnston, of the Don't Subsidize Pollution campaign. "To not have big corporate from agriculture, the sector responsible for more than half of the country's emissions, required to report their emissions footprint is not responsible governing. "It's like closing the door on your kid's bedroom when they've left the heater on and then wondering why the power bill is so high." The change came about because the government removed farmers from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Agriculture was previously included in the scheme as a backstop in case voluntary discussions between farmers and government didn't result in an agreement to price methane. The backstop provision was removed and voluntary pricing talks were scrapped and re-started after the last election. Farming companies never had to pay for their methane emissions under the ETS the way petrol importers, coal miners and gas producers pay for their carbon dioxide emissions. However, until this year, they had to submit annual totals giving a rough estimate of their climate impact. ETS emissions reports were the only public information available for comparing individual companies, because some companies choose not to voluntarily disclose emissions. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told Newsroom last year that officials had prepared an option to keep compulsory reporting while otherwise removing farming form the ETS. The government decided not to take it. He said the government was pursuing farm-level reporting instead. The change means reported emissions in the report have halved compared with last year, down from 65.7 million tonnes to 32.5 million tonnes. The difference is almost entirely because of the removal of the 33 million tonnes previously reported by the agriculture sector. When Fonterra is included, top 10 emitters collectively produce more than half the country's emissions, with Fonterra in the top spot followed by big petrol companies Z Energy, BP and Mobil. Farming companies - or their fossil fuel suppliers - still have to report and pay for any coal, gas or other fossil fuel they use in New Zealand under the ETS, for example coal used to dry milk or process meat. Affco reports its energy related emissions on its website, but not the larger total that comes from methane produced by farming the meat it processes. Alliance's website also discusses progress at reducing coal at its processing plants and said it completed a full lifecycle assessment of all its emissions last year, however doesn't appear to list the total. Open Country's website also discusses successful conversion of coal boilers to clean heat and said it is committed to reducing emissions from agriculture through the He Waka Eke Noa programme. He Waka Eke Noa was the programme scrapped by the coalition government after the election and replaced by direct engagement with farming groups through the government's Pastoral Sector Group. The new group is yet to announce a pricing plan or targets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store