Family's battle for justice has impacted victims' rights
Harriet and Mike Salarno were getting ready for bed when the phone rang at their San Francisco home. Mike answered it. His tone signaled the news.
Harriet Salarno: I said … "what's wrong?" … he says, Catina has been shot and she's in the emergency room.
The Salarnos' two younger daughters, Regina and Nina, rushed to their side. Then the phone rang again.
Harriet Salarno: And they said, "your daughter passed away."
Nina Salarno: I don't think it can be described in words, what it's like to watch your mom collapse, crying. My dad, very, very strong man, but you could tell he was shaken to the core.
Regina Salarno-Novello: And life just stopped. … I literally … life stopped, completely stopped.'
"48 Hours" first met the Salarno family in 1990. Harriet and Mike were making their weekly visit to Catina's resting place.
MIKE SALARNO (1990): I think coming out here and being able to talk to Catina gives me a peace of mind. Also that I can still communicate with my daughter, that it isn't, um, the final end.
At the time, Catina had been gone for 10 years, and her family was just embarking on a decades-long journey to keep her killer behind bars.
MIKE SALARNO (to reporters outside 1990 parole hearing): It's the first skirmish in a long, long battle that this we started today.
It was not a journey they had ever expected to make.
Erin Moriarty: Harriet, did you and Michael really have kind of a — the perfect life as parents, three kids?
Harriet Salarno: Yes. To answer you, yes. We were so blessed.
Both Mike and Harriet were juvenile commissioners assigned by the city of San Francisco to mentor boys and girls. Their arms and home were always open, says Nina, the youngest daughter.
Nina Salarno: I think the best way to describe it is it typified a middle-class American family that valued their faith, valued family, valued community as well.
They spent blissful summer days at the cabin in the mountains. Three carefree sisters with Catina leading the pack, says Regina, younger by 18 months.
Regina Salarno-Novello: She was the heart and soul of the family. … She had such a good heart. She loved being the older sister.
Nina Salarno: [I] think the best way to describe Catina is she is that person every person should meet in their life. She just brought an air of kindness.
CATINA SALARNO MEETS THE BOY ACROSS THE STREET
When Catina was 14, a new family, the Burns, moved in across the street in San Francisco. There were four children: a girl and three boys – all about the same age as the Salarno sisters.
Regina Salarno-Novello: And we were spying on them. So … we all made a big batch of cookies, giggled all the way across the street, knocked on the door, introduced ourselves, and gave 'em a batch of homemade cookies.
Soon, the friendship between the oldest Salarno sister and the second oldest Burns brother blossomed into a young love. Catina and Steven Burns started dating in the tenth grade.
Erin Moriarty: How would you describe Steven Burns?
Regina Salarno-Novello: Well, he was the big brother I never had, you know. And for me it was like, God, I have a big brother. And I was — I just thought he was great because we got to go to the football games.
Burns, who went to an all-boys Catholic school, was a star athlete and captain of the football team. He and Nina, a basketball and volleyball player, bonded over their shared love of sports.
Nina Salarno: I loved Steve. I idolized him. … He was a great athlete. He coached my teams … He would help me with my shot, and he took the time to do that.
Mike took Burns, who had a difficult relationship with his own dad, under his wing. He not only mentored him, but he also gave him a job at his TV store delivering TVs.
Regina Salarno-Novello: And my dad …who embraces everybody, brought him in and treated him as a son.
Mike trusted him completely says Regina. They all did.
Erin Moriarty: Did you ever see anything that between Steve and Catina that worried you?
Harriet Salarno: I have to tell you, I've given hours and hours of thought of that. Why didn't I see this? What was it?
Nina Salarno: You sometimes are close to people, you don't always see little signs or you ignore them.
But with hindsight, the sisters say, there were signs. In her senior year, Catina who'd been accepted to the University of the Pacific, wanted to break up with Steve. But he wasn't having it, says Regina. He started threatening her.
Regina Salarno-Novello: She said that Steve said that if I broke up with him, he would kill me …
But at the time, neither sister took him seriously.
Erin Moriarty: Neither one of you told your parents.
Regina Salarno-Novello: We just figured he was just saying it. And because of what our relationship was over the years, why would we believe that? … He enjoyed being part of the family. Why would he destroy a family that he loved?
Mike and Harriet never heard about that incident; never imagined the life they knew would come to an end.
Harriet Salarno: We thought we were doing good and everything would be fine and never thought the boy across the street would murder our daughter.
ONE LAST ENCOUNTER
When Catina Salarno arrived at the University of the Pacific in September 1979, she thought she had left Steven Burns behind for good. He said he was going to Santa Clara University and she was going to begin pursuing her longtime goal.
Regina Salarno-Novello: She knew she was gonna become a dentist. … She knew exactly what she was gonna do. It was planned for her. That was her goal, her dream.
But Catina's excitement was cut short soon after the Salarnos got to campus.
Regina Salarno-Novello: We were staying overnight and we went to the hotel lobby, and then all of a sudden there's Steve and his sister and family. And we were like, "what are you doing here?" And he says, well, I'm going to UOP.
Nina Salarno: That's really, the first time I heard a lot of panic in her voice, uh, because that just caught her off guard.
For the first time, Catina turned to her father for help.
Regina Salarno-Novello: My dad walked up to him and said, OK, Steve. … Leave Catina alone. She has told you that. You guys move on to your own ways, be friends, and know that I will always be here for you.
The Salarnos headed back to San Francisco and Catina and Burns each moved into their respective dorm rooms on opposite sides of the campus.
Burns' new roommate, Les Serpa, remembers walking in the room and seeing Catina's picture everywhere.
Les Serpa: He said his girlfriend, uh, was at Pacific as well … there were pictures of her and him together … more pictures than I'd ever seen before, but they were everywhere on his desk.
Erin Moriarty: He didn't mention that she had wanted to break up?
Les Serpa: Not at all. It was all very positive. Everything was great.
Across campus, Catina was settling in with her new roommate, Joanne Marks. Then came a knock on the door. It was Steve Burns.
Joanne Marks: After he left, uh, Catina told me that he wanted to meet with her later in the evening for the last time.
Joanne Marks: She was not looking forward to meeting with him, but she was looking forward to it being the last time. She believed that he would stop bothering her.
Marks says Burns came by to pick up Catina about 7:45 that evening.
Joanne Marks: I said something like, you know, have a good evening, and he just grunted.
Catina told Joanne she would see her later; but that later never came.
A freshman out for a walk named Kevin Arlin would be the one to discover why. It was around 9:45 p.m. when he saw something on the sidewalk. Arlin, unnerved by what he saw, rushed back to his dorm and got a resident advisor. They both ran back to the scene.
Kevin Arlin: And … we got up to — to her and it was … a young lady that, uh, was laying on the ground and she was still alive … she was unconscious, but there was a big pool of blood around her head.
Arlin would later find out it was 18-year-old Catina Rose Salarno. She had been shot in the back of the head.
Kevin Arlin: Her arms … were twisted in a way that I never thought the human body could twist.
Erin Moriarty: Do you remember her face?
Kevin Arlin: I — I — I just remember the blood.
Erin Moriarty: That had to be heartbreaking.
Kevin Arlin: Yeah. I knew it was tragic or I knew it was, uh, it was very serious, a very serious injury.
While the two men waited for the ambulance to arrive, Steven Burns returned to his dorm room, where his roommate Les was watching "Monday Night Football."
Les Serpa: He went and laid on the bed, propped up a pillow and started watching the game.
Erin Moriarty: Did he seem nervous at all?
Les Serpa: He was not nervous at all.
The ambulance arrived around 10 p.m. and rushed Catina to St. Joseph's Hospital. She was still alive, barely.
Years later, her family would learn she was not alone. Randy Haight – at the time a young patrol officer who was at the crime scene — met his partner at the hospital.
Randy Haight: I said, where's the family? And he says, she's a student at UOP from out of town. …They're not here. I said, Is anybody with her? He says, haven't seen anybody. It's just us.
Catina Rose was pronounced dead at 9 minutes after midnight.
Randy Haight: We made the decision to sit with Catina until the Coroners came. … even though she had passed, I just didn't feel right leaving her alone … I prayed. I said a prayer for her.
By then, homicide detectives were at Catina's dorm talking to Marks.
Joanne Marks: I told the police that, uh, Catina had been picked up by Steve Burns and I told them which dorm he was from.
Serpa and Burns were in their room when there was a knock at the door.
Les Serpa: I opened the door and, uh, I — you know, there's like five guys out there in suits. … And so I stepped out a little bit say hello, and I could see at the end of each hall was full of police officers. … And then they asked to search our room. … they went through everything, every bag, every drawer — everything.
Erin Moriarty: What were they looking for?
Les Serpa: I didn't know at the time … but later I learned they were looking … for a weapon, for a gun.
Steven Burns was pulled from the room and taken to the Stockton police station, where he was fingerprinted and photographed. Officer Haight recalls seeing him there.
Randy Haight: He did not appear to be upset in any way. …
Burns told the police he didn't meet Catina on campus that night, and that he spent the evening in his dorm room watching "Monday Night Football."
Without the gun – it was never found – the police didn't have enough evidence to hold him. Steven Burns was released. His father took him back to San Francisco.
The police didn't publicly name a suspect. But Harriet Salarno didn't need a name. She already knew it.
Harriet Salarno: I just said to Mike," it's Steve, Mike, it's Steve." I — I — I don't know why … I just had that feeling.
After talking to the family, the police learned that Steven had threatened to kill Catina if she broke up with him. Two days after the murder of Catina Rose Salarno, Steven Burns was arrested at his home just across the street from where Catina grew up.
Nina Salarno: I remember … sitting up in the window, watching them walk him out in handcuffs and putting him in the patrol car. My whole world got taken from me, and really, in the flash of a gun. I mean, everything was gone.
A MURDER AND A BETRAYAL
Learning to live without their daughter has been a lifelong journey for Catina's parents — one crippled by what ifs. Mike Salarno never stopped blaming himself.
Harriet Salarno: He felt that as a father, he let her down.
For decades, Catina's sisters have also grappled with regret, wishing they had told their parents about Steven Burns threatening to kill Catina.
Regina Salarno-Novello: What if I had said something? What if we told them about the threat?
Erin Moriarty: You're living with guilt, too.
Regina Salarno-Novello: And it doesn't change after 40 years. … it's the hole in my heart from missing my sister and what we could have had together.
In the wake of the murder, each member of the family retreated into their own private grief.
Harriet Salarno: I didn't even care if I even lived. I wanted to join Catina.
Regina Salarno Novello: I didn't know what to do anymore. My whole plan, my whole world, my whole bubble blew up.
Nina Salarno: I mean I never felt that kind of hurt. … I lost my entire family because they fell apart … It was painful enough that my sister had been murdered, but the person that I viewed as a brother and loved, betrayed me by taking her life.
The Salarnos would learn that the young man they had trusted had stolen a gun from Mike's store weeks before Catina's murder.
Erin Moriarty: You believe he planned that murder?
Harriet Salarno: Yes.
Nina Salarno: Oh, absolutely. … the fact that he stole the gun prior. There was no reason for the stealing of the gun, otherwise.
They came to believe Burns may have been planning to use that gun to kill Catina even before she left for college.
Regina Salarno-Novello: The night before we took her to UOP, I heard this noise outside … and it was Steve Burns … pacing in front of the bedroom window. …he had a big, white towel wrapped around his left hand.
Regina says Burns tried to climb up the side of their house and enter through the window of the bedroom the girls shared, but Catina told him to leave.
Regina Salarno-Novello: She said, "No, I'm not opening the window, go to bed, Steve. Go — you're — I'm going to school tomorrow." You know, "stop, just stop, just stop."
Nina Salarno: Then there was a sound like he fell, and it was a very distinct sound of metal hitting metal.
Erin Moriarty: What do you think now, when you look back on that, that sound of metal against metal?
Nina Salarno: I think if I had opened the window and he got in, there'd be three dead girls.
Erin Moriarty: You think he had a gun with him then?
Nina Salarno: Absolutely.
Six months after Catina's death, 19-year-old Steven Burns went on trial for her murder. It was a bitter awakening for the Salarnos, who say there was more concern for the defendant and his rights than there was for his victim. Neither of Catina's parents were allowed in the courtroom — not even while Nina, who was only 14 years old at the time – took the stand. She had to testify at the trial on her own without a victim's advocate to support her.
Erin Moriarty: What was that like on the stand?
Nina Salarno: Ugh. … I think the best word was just awful. I was in a courtroom. The only person I knew in the courtroom was the guy that had murdered my sister.
The prosecution argued that Burns met Catina that night carrying the stolen gun with the intention of killing her if she wouldn't continue their relationship. Still, the jury did not convict him of premeditated first-degree murder. He was found guilty of second-degree murder and was sentenced to 17 years to life with the possibility of parole.
Nina Salarno: We all thought 17 years to life meant life – that they would never let him out.
They would learn they were wrong. Just 10 years into his sentence, Steven Burns came up for parole. The Salarnos were outraged. In 1990, they talked to then-"48 Hours" correspondent Bernard Goldberg the night before the first parole hearing:
MIKE SALARNO: He should be in prison the rest of his life…
HARRIET SALARNO: I had no idea the parole system was so rotten.
BERNARD GOLDBERG: OK, Steven Burns was handed down a 17-to-life sentence.
HARRIET SALARNO: That's right.
BERNARD GOLDBERG: And — and here we are 10 years later —
HARRIET SALARNO: That's right.
BERNARD GOLDBERG: But you — you don't want him out after 17 years, after 20 years, after 25, you — is that fair?
HARRIET SALARNO: Oh, that's a very fair question. Absolutely, I don't want him out, but I don't even wanna go up there before 17 years because that's what I was told!
Going into this hearing, they know there's a chance he could get out.
On March 28, 1990, the Salarnos and a bus full of supporters headed to Steven Burns' parole hearing.
MIKE SALARNO (to Goldberg): That bus ride was the longest ride in my life. The first hardest thing was when she died, this is the second.
For the first time since Catina's murder, the Salarnos confronted the man they had once considered part of the family.
MIKE SALARNO (parole hearing): Steve sentenced my daughter to death forever. I ask for a fair trade. I ask you to sentence Steve to life in prison.
Then it was Burns' turn to speak.
STEVEN BURNS (parole hearing): It's hard to say the words how difficult it is to live day to day about the feelings I have inside about what I did. Regardless of what I do, I can't bring Catina back. … But I know this that I am deeply sorry for what I did. And I will work each day of my life, whether it be in prison or out — outside to make up.
He apologized, but the Salarnos noticed he never looked at them while he did it.
NINA SALARNO: If you can't look at someone in the face and say you're sorry, then you know damn well you're not sorry.
After an excruciating wait, the parole board came back with a decision. Steven Burns was found unsuitable for release, but he would get another chance at freedom in just two years.
HARRIET SALARNO (1990): Two years, we got two years. And I feel very, very drained, and I know my family's so worn out.
BERNARD GOLDBERG: And in two years, what about the Salarno family?
NINA SALARNO: We'll be here.
HARRIET SALARNO: We'll be back.
MIKE SALARNO: We'll be back. We'll be back.
And back they would come over and over again for the next 35 years.
FIGHTING FOR VICTIMS' RIGHTS
There is one thing you can count on with the Salarnos. Every week for almost 46 years, they have gone to the cemetery where Catina now rests.
These days there's another grave to tend. Mike Salarno died in 2013 of cancer.
There's something else you can be sure of. Every time Steven Burns comes up for parole, they will be there.
Nina Salarno: We all said we would be back and we've continued to be back 12 times, not just because he murdered Catina, but because he is a dangerous murderer that will kill or harm again. And that's just the bottom line.
In January 2025, they were about to go to their 13th parole hearing.
NINA SALARNO (praying at gravesite): Give this family the strength to continue to fight.
That fight for victim's rights has shaped all their lives.
Regina Salarno-Novello: Was I gonna be a nurse 40 years ago? No. And now I am … the reason why I did it is because I swore nobody would die alone.
Nina says she was so traumatized by the trial, she vowed she would become a prosecutor. And so she did. She became a specialist in domestic violence cases.
Nina Salarno: I believed like my sister, so many victims are either not heard, afraid to be heard, or just don't understand the magnitude of what's happening to them.
She became the DA in Modoc County – cowboy country – about as far north in California as you can get.
Nina Salarno: Being able to be out in the mountains and/or, um, work on a cattle ranch or ride my horses and have that time is just — it's who I am.
Harriet went on to start Crime Victims United, an organization that has changed hundreds of laws. Before Harriet Salarno, victims in California weren't allowed to give impact statements at sentencing. Now they are. Parents – even if witnesses – can now attend the trial. And children, unlike Nina, must now be accompanied by a support person when testifying.
Nina Salarno: She's my hero. … my absolute hero. … it's just so significant to see … how she supports people and just really fights for what's right.
Harriet Salarno: I have a passion.
For Harriet that has meant fighting to keep Steven Burns behind bars.
Harriet Salarno: I've been doing it for 45 years and I will continue to do it. … As long as I'm alive and as long as he's in prison.
Burns has been in prison for 45 years. But the Salarnos are convinced he hasn't changed.
Nina Salarno: He still has yet to admit to … the facts of the crime.
Burns' story, says Deputy District Attorney Robert Himelblau, has changed at least 12 times over the years.
Robert Himelblau: He had said repeatedly that Catina pulled the gun, that Catina was the one who had the revolver, ignoring the fact that we knew that he had stolen Catina's father's revolver. … sometimes she shot him, sometimes they struggled over the gun and it accidentally went off.
In 2016 – 37 years after the murder – Burns finally stopped lying about Catina's actions, says Nina. He told the commissioners, "I became very, very angry … and I pulled out a gun and shot Catina." But Burns continued to deny that he stalked her to UOP to kill her if she didn't get back together with him.
Nina Salarno: The shooting of the gun murdered my sister, but the behaviors and the need for his power and control, and the obsessiveness is what makes him dangerous.
And according to a complaint brought up at the last parole hearing, he has shown those same obsessive behaviors inside prison. A professor who taught incarcerated students reported that Burns' behavior towards her was quote disturbing and manipulating.
Nina Salarno: He was relentless towards her because she would … not allow him into a class. He focused on her and was not going to stop till he got what he wanted.
Erin Moriarty: Do you think that if Steven Burns is released, he could hurt someone?
Robert Himelblau: Yes. The next woman he goes out with who says no.
But there are some who believe that Burns deserves a second chance.
Kevin Anderson, once a respected pediatrician, got to know Burns when he was incarcerated — also for murder. After 24 years in prison, Anderson was released on parole in 2023. He started working as a counselor.
"48 Hours" first spoke to him the day before Burns' 2025 parole hearing.
Erin Moriarty: Do you think that Steven Burns is a danger to society?
Kevin Anderson: I can't say 100 percent … But I do think that Steven Burns has done a lot of the work … to get to that point where you're no longer a danger to society.
Burns has earned a college degree and has worked with hospice patients. He has participated in numerous anger management and rehabilitation programs, some alongside Anderson.
Kevin Anderson: I think that … he has the tools now that he didn't have before.
Anderson worked with Burns in mock hearing sessions to help him prepare for the upcoming parole hearing.
Kevin Anderson: We had to push him. And once we got him to get off of the denial on certain issues where the real honesty had to come out, now he's able to talk about it in the honest terms that maybe he wasn't able to do 10 years ago, 15 years ago.
Anderson says Steven told him he snapped when Catina rejected him.
Kevin Anderson: She said, I want you to stay away from me and my family. … and he said, at that point I just lost it. … And as he was describing this, he was crying. … 'cause now he realizes where he was going with this, and what this was leading to.
And Catina saw it too, says Anderson.
Kevin Anderson: He described to me her body language, what her eyes were doing, how they had just grown really big. I said, what else? And he said … her voice was shaking. … And I said, and what did that mean to you? And he would say, it meant she was scared to death.
But it didn't stop him. Steven Burns shot the woman he claimed to love in the back of the head and walked away, leaving her to slowly bleed to death.
Erin Moriarty: Did he say why he left and didn't get help for her?
Kevin Anderson: He did say that what he did afterwards was a very cowardly act.
Steven Burns is about to get another chance to convince commissioners that the same man who left Catina to die that night, is a changed man. And this time, the Salarnos fear the odds are in his favor.
Regina Salarno-Novello: It scares the living daylights outta me, having him come out.
STEVEN BURNS' 13th PAROLE HEARING
As Harriet Salarno counts down the days to the 2025 hearing, she does what she has done for the past four decades; she goes to work.
At 92, Harriet still goes to the office at Crime Victims United every day.
Harriet and Nina are picking out photos to show the commissioners at the parole hearing.
Nina Salarno: It's important that they understand that she was a beautiful human being … and her life was taken for no reason
Nina has been preparing for this hearing for month.s.
Nina Salarno (showing file cabinet): And in here, I keep everything from the trial, everything from the trial to all those subsequent parole hearings.
Nina, the prosecutor, is leaving nothing to chance.
Nina Salarno (holding binder): Here's transcripts from the 2010 hearing.
But Nina, the protector, is calling on Catina and her dad to help the things she can't control.
As a DA, Nina knows Burns' chances of getting out are better than ever.
Keith Wattley is founder of UnCommon Law, an organization that helps incarcerated people navigate the parole process.
Keith Wattley: From what I've seen so far on paper, in terms of the time he's done, the program … that he's put together for himself and how well he's performed there, he does seem like somebody who, under the law, should be granted parole.
Wattley, who has never met Burns, but has reviewed his last two parole transcripts, says Steven has two other important things going for him: his age — he was only 18 — when he committed the crime.
Keith Wattley: California … has passed laws to say that we have to consider someone's youth at the time of the crime … none of us are fully developed in the brain by — before we're age 25.
And his age at the time of the hearing — 63. Wattley says Burns is eligible for special consideration under the elderly parole program. He says people simply age out of crime, especially violent crime.
Erin Moriarty: But in Steven Burns' case, isn't there a possibility that … if he gets out, he gets involved with someone and they leave him, he'll do the same thing?
Keith Wattley: It's a great question. It's an important question. The science and the statistics say no. ... They say that people who come home from a life sentence are among the least likely to recidivate. That's just true.
But sometimes statistics are no match for the human spirit.
Erin Moriarty: When the family comes consistently to these parole hearings, especially a family like the Salarnos, doesn't that make it much more difficult for someone like Steven Burns to get a chance at parole?
Keith Wattley: I would say yes. Yes, it does … have an impact on the process.
The Salarnos are praying they'll make an impact again this time. Harriet, Nine, her daughter Lexy, and a group of loyal friends head to the DA's office in Stockton, California, where they will attend the parole hearing via video — the post-COVID new normal.
Erin Moriarty: Won't hearing all this today make you relive everything?
Harriet Salarno: It does. It really does. I am shaky, very shaky.
Erin Moriarty: You are right now?
Harriet Salarno: Yeah. Sad thing. But I'm — I'm afraid of him being released, Erin. … I — just afraid that he'll come after us.
Harriet braces herself as she heads into the conference room knowing she will have to again see the man who put her daughter in a grave.
Harriet Salarno: Looking at Steve Burns when he walked in … he just looks dangerous. He acts dangerous. And what he says is dangerous.
"48 Hours" was not allowed to record video or audio during the hearing, but I was able to sit with the family and friends to observe.
Steven Burns — his affect flat, his voice monotone — once again denied he planned to kill Catina that night. Audio was recorded by the parole board:
COMMISSIONER: You didn't plan to kill her?
STEVEN BURNS: No.
COMMISSIONER: And you deny that you've threatened to kill her at — previously, correct?
STEVEN BURNS: Yes.
COMMISSIONER: Do you understand why previous panels ... have found that you minimize what you did and — and your intentions?
STEVEN BURNS: Based on that, yes.
After almost four hours, the commissioners retreated to make their decision.
Erin Moriarty: Is this the hardest part? Just waiting — to see?
Harriet Salarno: Waiting. This is the most difficult part.
Twenty minutes later, the family was called back into the conference room. The decision was in.
COMMISSIONER: Even after 45 years in prison … we see very little change on those issues that led you to murder Catina, that led you to do things in prison that offended others … We see very little change.
Steven Burns was found unsuitable for parole.
Harriet Salarno: We can go home and really sleep tonight!
Erin Moriarty: This is the first real smile I've really seen on your face.
Nina Salarno (to her mother): I'm very proud of you.
When Kevin Anderson, Burns' friend from prison, read the transcript of the hearing, he was stunned. He sent "48 Hours" an email, some of which I read to him when we spoke again after the hearing.
Erin Moriarty (reading email): "Reading this transcript is hurting my head, heart and soul. This man is absolutely not ready to be released."
Kevin Anderson: No. The way he came across in that hearing, he was absolutely not ready … All the work he has done, I didn't see it showing up there at all.
Four days after the hearing, Nina and Harriet went to the gravesite to deliver the news.
Nina Salarno: We got a five-year-denial, dad. So I'm still holding strong to my promise to you.
It was Catina's 64th birthday.
Nina Salarno: Catina, I think that's the best birthday present we could give you was that denial. So thank you for watching over mom and watching over everyone
Harriet Salarno: Happy birthday Catina … I love you both so much and miss you.
Steven Burns is expected to go before the parole board again in 2030.
Produced by Liza Finley and Gabriella Demirdjian. Cindy Cesare and Greg Fisher are the development producers. Lauren Turner Dunn is the associate producer. Doreen Schechter, Gregory F. McLaughlin, Chris Crater and Michael Vele are the editors. Patti Aronofsky is the senior producer. Nancy Kramer is the executive story editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer.
Daughter reflects on iconic photo that shows reunion with her father, a Vietnam prisoner of war
Kentucky distillery defies historic flooding and reopens for "Derby Week"
Trump's AI photo of him as pope sparks worldwide outrage

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Lawmakers push efforts to ban ICE from wearing masks at Boston legislative summit
ICE officials say agents have been wearing masks to avoid publicly exposing their identities and personal information. Advertisement In a statement to the Globe, a senior official with the Department of Homeland Security said that ICE officers are facing an 830 percent increase in the number of assaults against them, and condemned efforts to prohibit officers from wearing masks. 'These are repulsive messaging bills that stoke dangerous anti-ICE rhetoric for cheap political points and fundraising emails,' the official said. 'Sanctuary politicians are trying to outlaw officers wearing masks to protect themselves from being doxxed and targeted.' In early July, Advertisement 'With transparency, identification, and reason there should be no need for disguises when performing their duties to the communities they serve,' Hawkins said on Tuesday. Lawmakers said such legislation is meant to promote accountability for all law enforcement, and would also reduce the chances of law enforcement officers being impersonated. New York State Senator Patricia Fahy, a Democrat who is sponsoring a similar legislation in New York, said the practice of federal immigration agents arresting and detaining people while wearing masks, plainclothes, and using unmarked cars 'should shock the collective conscience.' 'A dangerous line is being crossed here,' Fahy said. 'Immigration enforcement is really turning into more of a paramilitary type secret police.' A number of Republican lawmakers 'It's meant for the intimidation of the officer and their families,' said Representative Scott Sharp, a Kentucky Republican and retired law enforcement officer. 'I can't see any other reason to do it.' Representative Bob Lewis, a Kansas Republican, echoed the sentiment. '[ICE agents] are acting in an official capacity, not personal,' Lewis said. 'They are doing their jobs.' Amy Carnevale, the chair of the Massachusetts Republican Party said in a statement that the Massachusetts bill put immigration officers' lives at risk. Advertisement 'Far-left activists have doxxed and assaulted ICE officials and agents in the field,' she said. In Massachusetts, mask-wearing ICE officers provoked public outcry earlier this year, when agents wearing face coverings whisked Tufts student Rümeysa Öztürk off a Somerville street in broad daylight in March — 'I didn't think that they were the police because I had never seen police approach and take someone away like this,' Öztürk wrote. Federal officials have said in various public statements that immigration agents When DHS officers conduct operations, they 'clearly identify themselves as law enforcement, while wearing masks to protect themselves' from gangs like Tren de Aragua and MS-13, the DHS official said, as well as from others who have committed crimes. 'The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line every day to arrest violent criminal illegal aliens to protect and defend the lives of American citizens,' the statement said. ICE's acting director, Todd Lyons, has strongly 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line and their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' Lyons said during a June press conference in Boston, where the agency announced that federal officials Advertisement During a trial last month in Boston federal court regarding a lawsuit brought by higher education organizations over the Trump administration's policies of arresting and detaining noncitizen students and pro-Palestinian activists, Patrick Cunningham, an assistant special agent in charge at the Homeland Security Investigations office in Boston, which is part of ICE, told the court there was no specific policy on masking that he was aware of within the agency. He said it was up to the 'personal choice' of each agents as to whether or not they want to wear face coverings. 'They might wear them because they want to protect their identity,' Cunningham said, particularly in the 'age of camera phones, and the ability of people to identify those agents.' Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio can be reached at


Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Rwanda agrees to take deportees from the US
The State Department said the US 'works with Rwanda on a range of mutual priorities' but wouldn't comment on details of the deportation deal and what it called diplomatic conversations with other governments. Advertisement The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back. The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, Panama, and El Salvador under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally. In March, using an 18th-century wartime law, the US deported more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, which was built to hold alleged gang members. Human rights groups have documented hundreds of deaths as well as cases of torture inside its walls. Advertisement Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum. Under that proposed deal, their claims would have been processed in Rwanda and, if successful, they would have stayed there. The contentious agreement was criticized by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over. Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants. The Trump administration has come under scrutiny for the African countries it has entered into secretive deals with to take deportees. It sent eight men from South Sudan, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, and Vietnam to South Sudan in early July after a US Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for their deportations. They were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at an American military base in Djibouti as the legal battle over their deportations played out. South Sudan, which is tipping toward civil war, has declined to say where the men are being held or what their fate is. The US also deported five men who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen, and Laos to the southern African kingdom of Eswatini, where the government said they will be held in solitary confinement in prison for an undetermined period. A human rights lawyer in Eswatini said the men are being denied access to legal representation there and has taken the authorities to court. Eswatini is Africa's last absolute monarchy, and the king rules over the government, and political parties are effectively banned. Advertisement Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US. Rwanda, a relatively small country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed over 800,000 people in 1994. It has promoted itself under longtime President Paul Kagame as an example of stability and development, but human rights groups allege there are also deadly crackdowns on any perceived dissent against Kagame, who has been president for 25 years. Government spokesperson Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because 'our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation.' 'Those approved [for resettlement in Rwanda] will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade,' she said. There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees. Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said, 'appeasing President Trump pays.'


Atlantic
6 hours ago
- Atlantic
What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?
Trump's use of pardons may have induced some of his confederates—including Stone and Manafort—to not cooperate with prosecutors, or to only partly cooperate, thus depriving the public of a chance at receiving a full accounting. This was a kind of legalized obstruction of justice. Plenty of authorities have pointed out that Trump's claim of a hoax is nonsense. In 2017, PolitiFact named that its lie of the year. In 2018, The Washington Post reported: 'Trump's Russia 'Hoax' Turns Out to Be Real.' In 2019, a report by the Justice Department's inspector general concluded that, as my colleague Adam Serwer put it, 'the 'Russia hoax' defense is itself a hoax, and a highly successful one, aimed at reassuring Trump supporters who might otherwise be troubled by the president's behavior.' Still, the idea that the whole thing was a chimera has taken hold even within some precincts of the mainstream press, where the whole thing is treated as a weird passing obsession. The journalist Ben Smith, who made the decision to publish the Steele dossier, now contends, vaguely and in passive voice, that ' Trump was in retrospect treated unfairly.' Meanwhile, Trump world continues to cook up new iterations of the hoax claim. The most recent ones are driven by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who has a history of weaponizing intelligence, to use a term he's a fan of, and Gabbard, who has for years repeated Kremlin talking points. Last month, Ratcliffe alleged that in 2016, three of the nation's top intelligence officials 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals—all to get Trump,' but as my colleague Shane Harris reported, he didn't have evidence to back that up. Gabbard has released a dribble of documents intended to bolster it, but still nothing that matches the claims. In recent days, MAGA allies have pushed a new and shocking allegation: that emails show Clinton actually approved a plan to smear Trump by claiming he was colluding with Russia. The problem is that, once again, investigations have debunked it. A special counsel appointed by Barr during Trump's first term, with the goal of ferreting out political skulduggery in the Russia investigation, found that messages about Clinton being treated as a smoking gun were, in fact, likely concocted by the Russians. As The New York Times reported, 'The special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.' Durham's finding of a Russian forgery is ironic: Someone has finally turned up a real Russia hoax. Rather than working to fight it, however, Trump's aides are once more colluding with Russia to mislead the American people and further Trump's political fortunes.