logo
Durbin retirement tees up competitive Senate primary in Illinois

Durbin retirement tees up competitive Senate primary in Illinois

Yahoo23-04-2025

Sen. Dick Durbin's (D-Ill.) decision not to seek a sixth term in the Senate is expected to tee up a spirited Democratic primary to replace him next year.
Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat who has long served as a member of Senate Democratic leadership and is the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced Wednesday in a video he will retire after his current term in office, saying it was 'time to pass the torch.'
Democrats are now bracing for a crowded field to succeed the 80-year-old senator, with at least four candidates hinting at — or being floated for — possible bids.
'I think Illinois voters have a blessing of riches because there are just so many talented people,' said Martha McKenna, a Democratic strategist who's long worked with the Senate Democrats' campaign arm.
Durbin became the fourth Senate Democrat to announce he will forgo another term in the upper chamber, joining retiring Sens. Gary Peters (Mich.), Tina Smith (Minn.) and Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.).
In recent months, there had been growing speculation over whether Durbin, who entered the Senate in 1997 and has been in Congress since 1983, would vie for a sixth term. Questions around his future became particularly heightened earlier this month, when his campaign reported it had raised roughly $42,000 between January and March of this year — a remarkably small sum for one of the Senate's most influential members.
Durbin put those questions to rest Wednesday, though he vowed in his video he would 'do everything in my power to fight for Illinois and the future of our country every day of my remaining time in the Senate.'
Now, all eyes are turning to handful of Democrats who are likely to mount bids for Durbin's seat: Illinois Reps. Robin Kelly, Raja Krishnamoorthi and Lauren Underwood, in addition to state Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton.
Those Democrats put out statements lauding Durbin, though they did not confirm their next steps. A source in Illinois told The Hill that Krishnamoorthi, who's sitting on a $19.4 million campaign bank account, is 'widely expected to run.'
Democratic strategists say each of them would be a formidable contender for the Senate seat. Chicago-based strategist Kevin Lampe noted Kelly has a long track record in Illinois government and represents a district that's a unique mixture of rural, suburban and urban communities.
Lampe said Krishnamoorthi was a 'great campaigner,' referencing his bid for state comptroller, which he narrowly lost in 2010. The Chicago strategist pointed out Underwood's ability to win Illinois's competitive 14th District, located west of Chicago, while adding that Stratton had two statewide wins under her belt.
Lampe suggested Illinois Treasurer Michael Frerichs (D) could also be a strong candidate, too.
Still, Lampe said he believed the early front-runner might be Kelly.
She's someone 'who I've seen since she ran for state rep who is … definitely a workhorse. She is aggressive in her district about getting out there and meeting people and talking to people,' he said.
'I think it will be a spirited and hard-fought race because, you know, all four of them have a strong record of accomplishment. They each have a vision for the state,' McKenna added of the potential primary field.
Some Republicans may also be hinting at potential interest. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.) said in a statement posted on the social platform X that the senator's retirement 'was long overdue.'
'I will work with Illinoisans from across the state to ensure our next U.S. Senator will work with President Trump to lower inflation, cut taxes, secure our border, and protect our streets and families,' he added.
Still, the climb for Republicans in Illinois will be steep — the last time the Prairie State elected a Senate Republican was in 2010, when former Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) defeated Alexi Giannoulias.
One question looming over the race is whether Gov. JB Pritzker (D) weighs in on the Senate primary. Politico reported last month that Stratton has said she's privately received the backing of the Democratic governor, though a person close to the governor's political team told the news outlet, 'We're not going to engage with hypotheticals for a seat that's not even open.'
'Right now, the governor thanks Sen. Durbin for his service and will wait for candidates who are considering entering the race to make their own announcements,' Jordan Abudayyeh, a member of Pritzker's political team, told The Hill when asked about Pritzker's thinking.
Durbin's retirement comes amid a broader conversation within the party about age and the next generation of Democratic leaders, particularly as a handful of younger candidates have announced primary bids to older incumbents, like Reps. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
While some younger candidates and members of the party are frustrated with current leadership in the House, that same dynamic is not playing out — at least not as publicly — in the Senate with Democratic retirements. McKenna said there's also a notable split screen between how members of the parties are responding to key Senate retirements.
'I am just struck at the difference between how the candidates who are running to replace [Sen. Mitch] McConnell are acting vs. what I think will happen with Durbin,' said McKenna.
'All of these candidates who want to run for Senate will embrace him, embrace his legacy, will shine a bright light, applauding him for his work on behalf of Illinois,' she explained of Durbin.
But she said the same isn't holding true as former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron (R) and Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) look to replace McConnell, a former Senate majority leader.
'It was like an abrupt difference when you look at how McConnell's retirement was received in Kentucky, how the candidates in the primary — Republican primary — are distancing themselves from him, it will be the exact opposite in Illinois, where I think people running and candidates in general will embrace that Durbin legacy,' she said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions
Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

All members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced their resignation on Wednesday, releasing a statement accusing President Donald Trump's administration of political interference in the prestigious exchange program. The 12-member board alleged the Trump administration "usurped the authority of the Board" by denying Fulbright awards to "a substantial number of individuals" who were selected for the 2025-2026 academic year. The board also alleged the administration is currently "subjecting" an additional 1,200 international Fulbright recipients to "an unauthorized review process and could reject more." "We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute," the board said in its statement. MORE: State Department delivers crushing news to Fulbright scholar hopefuls in Afghanistan The board oversees the Fulbright Foreign Student Program, which offers international graduate students, young professionals and artists the opportunity to study and conduct research in the United States. The government-funded, non-partisan program -- which was established by Congress in 1942 under then-President Harry Truman's administration -- operates in more than 160 countries worldwide, providing scholarships to approximately 4,000 foreign students annually. In the joint letter on Wednesday, the board said the awards that were overridden by the administration were concentrated in biology, engineering, architecture, agriculture, crop sciences, animal sciences, biochemistry, medical sciences, music and history. MORE: State Dept. suggests Afghan Fulbright hopefuls seek other options as program stalls The board claimed it has raised "legal issues and our strong objections with" senior Trump administration officials "on multiple occasions," including in writing, but says the concerns have not been acknowledged. In a statement to statement to ABC News after the board announced its resignation, a senior State Department official called the decision "a political stunt attempting to undermine President Trump." "It's ridiculous to believe that these members would continue to have final say over the application process, especially when it comes to determining academic suitability and alignment with President Trump's Executive Orders." the official said. The board, however, said in its statement that the decision was not one "we take lightly," woth the board calling on Congress, the courts and future Fulbright Boards to "prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs." "Injecting politics and ideological mandates into the Fulbright program violates the letter and spirit of the law that Congress so wisely established nearly eight decades ago," the board concluded in its statement. Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions originally appeared on

Justice Department calls Newsom National Guard lawsuit a ‘crass political stunt'
Justice Department calls Newsom National Guard lawsuit a ‘crass political stunt'

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Justice Department calls Newsom National Guard lawsuit a ‘crass political stunt'

The Trump administration is urging a federal judge to reject California Gov. Gavin Newsom's bid to block the military from supporting immigration enforcement activities in Los Angeles, calling the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt' and warning that the restraining order Newsom wants would endanger federal personnel. 'That would be unprecedented. It would be constitutionally anathema. And it would be dangerous,' Justice Department lawyers said in a response delivered to San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer Wednesday. In a pointed, 32-page filing replete with political overtones, the administration contended that Trump's decision to deploy the military to help suppress unrest — stemming from ICE raids and arrests taking place across Los Angeles — is entirely within his authority as commander-in-chief, and unreviewable by the court. Breyer, a Clinton appointee, is set to hold a hearing Thursday afternoon on Newsom's request. The governor initially asked the court to block the deployment within two hours, but the judge agreed to a Justice Department request for 24 hours to respond. Trump has authorized the Pentagon to call up nearly 4,000 members of California's National Guard contingent on a mission to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities and personnel. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles. Though federal law generally bars the use of the military to enforce domestic laws, Trump invoked a provision that permits him to call up National Guard troops to protect federal property and personnel when there is a 'rebellion' or 'danger of rebellion.' The Justice Department described the chaotic situation on the ground over the weekend as 'mobs resisting federal authority in a manner that rises to the level of rebellion,' although city and state officials have emphasized that the unrest has impacted only a few relatively small parts of the sprawling metropolis. DOJ lawyers also urged Breyer not to second-guess the president's assessment that military support was needed. Newsom's claim that the law required Trump to consult him before issuing such an order is both wrong and dangerous, DOJ lawyers argued, because it would give state officials an effective veto of the president's military judgment. DOJ attorneys also dismissed as speculative the state's concern that the National Guard or military forces would take part in law enforcement. Images taken on the streets of Los Angeles Tuesday showed Guard forces standing watch as immigration enforcement officers detained and searched potential deportees. The administration argued that those troops were there to protect ICE officials, a distinct mission from carrying out immigration arrests. Justice Department lawyers salted their brief with a series of thinly-veiled political shots at Newsom, speculating that California officials might be 'unwilling' to put a stop to the violence. Two days after Trump suggested Newsom's arrest, the brief also suggests perhaps the governor had broken the law by failing to pass on Trump's order to state Guard officials, although those troops have responded to the president's directive. 'Even if Plaintiffs' interpretation of the statute were correct, the only party acting unlawfully would be Governor Newsom — not President Trump or Secretary Hegseth,' the attorneys wrote. And the Justice Department also quoted Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who recently criticized fellow Democrats over their posture toward the unrest. The DOJ brief also draws an analogy sure to grate on Newsom: comparing him to Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus, who sought to use that state's National Guard to resist court-ordered school desegregation in the 1950s. The federal statute Trump invoked 'affords no veto to Governor Newsom over the President's decision to call forth the guard, just as it afforded no veto to Governor Faubus when President Eisenhower last invoked the predecessor [statute] to ensure that the enforcement of federal law was not obstructed,' DOJ lawyers wrote.

MSNBC host tells Colbert that Trump has started to ‘f— around with the military'
MSNBC host tells Colbert that Trump has started to ‘f— around with the military'

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

MSNBC host tells Colbert that Trump has started to ‘f— around with the military'

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said Tuesday that it felt different to have President Donald Trump 'f— around with the military' in his second term during an interview with late-night host Stephen Colbert. Wallace argued that there were no 'normal Republicans' in Trump's current administration and said 'what's different about Stephen Miller running the ICE raids, and running basically a siege of Los Angeles, is that there is no Mark Esper, Jim Mattis, and that's the big difference, and that is the danger.' Colbert then asked Wallace about the National Guard troops and the Marines that have been sent to Los Angeles to help quell the riots. 'We have seen Trump stretch his presidential powers over the last five months. Is this different?' 'It feels different, it feels different to, can we swear here?' she asked as Colbert said she could. 'To f— around with the military, it feels really different, and he wanted to the first time, but people like Mark Milley, people stopped him. It feels really different to use the military as pawns out loud and as a public tactic. That feels different to me.' A battalion of 700 U.S. Marines are mobilizing in Los Angeles to respond to anti-immigration enforcement riots, just days after Trump deployed the National Guard to the area as well. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson responded to criticism of Trump's actions on Tuesday, telling Fox News Digital that 'violent rioters in Los Angeles, enabled by Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom, have attacked American law enforcement, set cars on fire, and fueled lawless chaos.' On The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said President Donald Trump 'f— around with the military' had a different feeling compared to what he has done throughout his time in office. Scott Kowalchyk/CBS 'President Trump rightfully stepped in to protect federal law enforcement officers. When Democrat leaders refuse to protect American citizens, President Trump will always step in,' she added. Colbert also asked Wallace about the state of the Democratic Party and asked the MSNBC host if they were 'in danger of an autocrat.' 'I don't know, and I think that, in politics, you are one leader away from a comeback, you're one moody character away from this unlikely hero. And so I think the Democratic Party hasn't rotted. I mean the Democratic Party has not corrupted itself, it hasn't turned on itself in the way that the Republican Party has. And I think the Democratic Party is one leader away from being something fresh and appealing to a majority of others again. I think the Republican Party is still heading down, down, down following Trump and his authoritarian ways,' she said. Wallace claims there are no 'normal Republicans' in Trump's current administration and that the difference is that with Stephen Miller running the ICE raids, it is basically running a siege in Los Angeles, California. AP Wallace previously made headlines earlier this year while covering Trump's address to Congress, during which the president made a 13-year-old cancer survivor, DJ Daniel, an honorary Secret Service agent. 'But I think this was a lesson in finding one thing that you let yourself feel,' Wallace said during her coverage of the address. 'And I let myself feel joy about DJ, and I hope he's alive for another, you know, 95 years, and I hope he lives the life he wants to live. He wants to be a cop. He knows what he wants to do, and maybe when you have childhood cancer, that crystallizes for you.' 'I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer,' she continued. 'But I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump's supporters, and if he does, I hope he isn't one of the six who loses his life to suicide, and I hope he isn't one who has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy and then lived to see Donald Trump pardon those people.' The MSNBC host was criticized by Trump and the White House at the time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store