Durbin retirement tees up competitive Senate primary in Illinois
Sen. Dick Durbin's (D-Ill.) decision not to seek a sixth term in the Senate is expected to tee up a spirited Democratic primary to replace him next year.
Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat who has long served as a member of Senate Democratic leadership and is the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced Wednesday in a video he will retire after his current term in office, saying it was 'time to pass the torch.'
Democrats are now bracing for a crowded field to succeed the 80-year-old senator, with at least four candidates hinting at — or being floated for — possible bids.
'I think Illinois voters have a blessing of riches because there are just so many talented people,' said Martha McKenna, a Democratic strategist who's long worked with the Senate Democrats' campaign arm.
Durbin became the fourth Senate Democrat to announce he will forgo another term in the upper chamber, joining retiring Sens. Gary Peters (Mich.), Tina Smith (Minn.) and Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.).
In recent months, there had been growing speculation over whether Durbin, who entered the Senate in 1997 and has been in Congress since 1983, would vie for a sixth term. Questions around his future became particularly heightened earlier this month, when his campaign reported it had raised roughly $42,000 between January and March of this year — a remarkably small sum for one of the Senate's most influential members.
Durbin put those questions to rest Wednesday, though he vowed in his video he would 'do everything in my power to fight for Illinois and the future of our country every day of my remaining time in the Senate.'
Now, all eyes are turning to handful of Democrats who are likely to mount bids for Durbin's seat: Illinois Reps. Robin Kelly, Raja Krishnamoorthi and Lauren Underwood, in addition to state Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton.
Those Democrats put out statements lauding Durbin, though they did not confirm their next steps. A source in Illinois told The Hill that Krishnamoorthi, who's sitting on a $19.4 million campaign bank account, is 'widely expected to run.'
Democratic strategists say each of them would be a formidable contender for the Senate seat. Chicago-based strategist Kevin Lampe noted Kelly has a long track record in Illinois government and represents a district that's a unique mixture of rural, suburban and urban communities.
Lampe said Krishnamoorthi was a 'great campaigner,' referencing his bid for state comptroller, which he narrowly lost in 2010. The Chicago strategist pointed out Underwood's ability to win Illinois's competitive 14th District, located west of Chicago, while adding that Stratton had two statewide wins under her belt.
Lampe suggested Illinois Treasurer Michael Frerichs (D) could also be a strong candidate, too.
Still, Lampe said he believed the early front-runner might be Kelly.
She's someone 'who I've seen since she ran for state rep who is … definitely a workhorse. She is aggressive in her district about getting out there and meeting people and talking to people,' he said.
'I think it will be a spirited and hard-fought race because, you know, all four of them have a strong record of accomplishment. They each have a vision for the state,' McKenna added of the potential primary field.
Some Republicans may also be hinting at potential interest. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.) said in a statement posted on the social platform X that the senator's retirement 'was long overdue.'
'I will work with Illinoisans from across the state to ensure our next U.S. Senator will work with President Trump to lower inflation, cut taxes, secure our border, and protect our streets and families,' he added.
Still, the climb for Republicans in Illinois will be steep — the last time the Prairie State elected a Senate Republican was in 2010, when former Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) defeated Alexi Giannoulias.
One question looming over the race is whether Gov. JB Pritzker (D) weighs in on the Senate primary. Politico reported last month that Stratton has said she's privately received the backing of the Democratic governor, though a person close to the governor's political team told the news outlet, 'We're not going to engage with hypotheticals for a seat that's not even open.'
'Right now, the governor thanks Sen. Durbin for his service and will wait for candidates who are considering entering the race to make their own announcements,' Jordan Abudayyeh, a member of Pritzker's political team, told The Hill when asked about Pritzker's thinking.
Durbin's retirement comes amid a broader conversation within the party about age and the next generation of Democratic leaders, particularly as a handful of younger candidates have announced primary bids to older incumbents, like Reps. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
While some younger candidates and members of the party are frustrated with current leadership in the House, that same dynamic is not playing out — at least not as publicly — in the Senate with Democratic retirements. McKenna said there's also a notable split screen between how members of the parties are responding to key Senate retirements.
'I am just struck at the difference between how the candidates who are running to replace [Sen. Mitch] McConnell are acting vs. what I think will happen with Durbin,' said McKenna.
'All of these candidates who want to run for Senate will embrace him, embrace his legacy, will shine a bright light, applauding him for his work on behalf of Illinois,' she explained of Durbin.
But she said the same isn't holding true as former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron (R) and Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) look to replace McConnell, a former Senate majority leader.
'It was like an abrupt difference when you look at how McConnell's retirement was received in Kentucky, how the candidates in the primary — Republican primary — are distancing themselves from him, it will be the exact opposite in Illinois, where I think people running and candidates in general will embrace that Durbin legacy,' she said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
8 minutes ago
- Politico
California says Trump's deployment of National Guard violates state sovereignty
California will ask a judge to reverse President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles, arguing that the use of the military to suppress immigration protests is an illegal and unconstitutional intrusion on state authority. The state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, a Democrat, unveiled on Monday the basis for the lawsuit, which he said would be filed imminently. The state will ask a federal judge to 'set aside' Trump's Saturday move to 'federalize' California's National Guard troops, part of an order to defend federal property and personnel carrying out Trump's deportation policies. Gov. Gavin Newsom told POLITICO on Monday that federal law requires Trump to coordinate his call-up of the National Guard with the state. 'There was no communication through our office, period, full stop. So, by definition, it's an illegal act,' Newsom, a Democrat, said, adding that the president failed to meet other key prerequisites for the deployment. Bonta alleged that Trump's action violated federal law and the 10th Amendment, the Constitution's provision that protects state sovereignty and rights. At a press conference Monday, the state attorney general said Trump's order 'skipped over multiple rational, commonsense' steps and wound up escalating the unrest while trampling on California's sovereignty. Trump invoked a provision of federal law that gives the president the ability to deploy National Guard troops in limited circumstances, including to suppress 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion' and to help 'execute' federal laws when 'regular forces' are unable to do so. Bonta argued that the provision requires Newsom's concurrence. 'The governor's agreement and consent needs to be part of any calling in of the National Guard. That didn't happen,' the attorney general said. The statute says that a president's order to deploy the Guard under the provision 'shall be issued through the governors of the States.' It does not expressly mandate consultation with or approval by the governor. Newsom contends that the provision requires at least some communication with the governor's office. Trump indicated over the weekend that he warned Newsom prior to Saturday that he intended to send in troops if he deemed Newsom's response to the protests insufficient. Trump has repeatedly described the L.A. protests as stoked by 'insurrectionists' and has vowed to 'liberate' the city. Bonta and Newsom say the streets had been largely calm when Trump's deployment and inflammatory rhetoric reignited the protests.
Buzz Feed
8 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
5 Ways Republicans Are Defending Kicking People Off Medicaid
WASHINGTON — In their zeal to deliver a big win to President Donald Trump by passing his sweeping tax and spending bill, Republicans have been coming up with ridiculous ways to defend their plan to strip health care from an estimated 11 million low-income people. Experts don't matter. Prove you are worthy of health care. We're all going to die anyway. Somehow, these are actual arguments GOP lawmakers and officials have been making as they try to gloss over the pain their bill would impose on poor people and families while handing big tax breaks to mostly rich people. Here are five of the most absurd ways Republicans have tried to defend their so-called Big Beautiful Bill, which guts federal health and food assistance programs by nearly $1.3 trillion. We're all going to die anyway. It was her first town hall of the year, held at 7:30 in the morning at a rural area two hours away from Des Moines — possibly to keep national attention off the senator as much as possible. Yet Republican Sen. Joni Erst of Iowa last week still managed to step in it with a flippant remark to a woman concerned about Republican plans to cut Medicaid. 'People will die!' the woman shouted at the senator. 'Well, we all are going to die,' Ernst responded with a smirk. 'For heaven's sakes, folks.' The glib comment quickly went viral on social media and Democrats pounced on her words, featuring them on signs at press conferences around the U.S. Capitol this week as they blasted the GOP tax and spending bill. It even spurred Democratic state Rep. JD Scholten to announce his entry into the race to unseat Ernst, who faces reelection next year, and election handicappers to shift the race slightly toward Democrats. Ernst later doubled down by filming a sarcastic apology video from a cemetery. 'I'm very compassionate,' she told a swarm of reporters this week. Losing health care coverage is actually healthy. From the minute Republicans started drafting the legislation this year, they knew two things: They would limit eligibility for the childless adults without disabilities covered under the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, saving hundreds of billions of dollars, and they would deny that the significant loss of coverage resulting from 'work requirements' — which would mostly kick people who have jobs off Medicaid by imposing new paperwork burdens on them — counted as a cut. In fact, as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) explained in February, losing health care coverage would spur people to improve themselves, and they'd be better off for it. 'Work is good for you. You find dignity in work. And the people that are not doing that, we're going to try to get their attention,' Johnson said. 'So everyone needs to take a deep sigh of relief and understand that we're not going to harm any Americans with this. What we're doing is the right thing by the people.' The Congressional Budget Office said this week the proposed work requirements — better understood as a limit on benefits for people who don't prove to their state government they've participated in 80 hours per month of qualifying 'community engagement' activities — would reduce Medicaid enrollment by 5.2 million and save $344 billion over a decade. Ultimately, 4.8 million fewer people would have insurance in 2034. This week, Johnson's office pointed to a new analysis by the conservative American Enterprise Institute finding that unemployed Medicaid recipients who would be affected by the law typically spend 4.2 hours per day watching TV and playing video games, compared with 2.7 hours per day of TV and video games for Medicaid recipients with jobs. For Republicans, unemployed gamers are about as deserving of government assistance as undocumented immigrants, who are also targeted in the legislation. 'The next time a Democrat makes false claims about 'Medicaid cuts,' just remember that what they're really saying is they want illegal aliens and able-bodied adults playing video games at home to continue stealing resources from those who need it,' Johnson's office said in a statement. In a major analysis of work requirements that have been tried in various federal programs, however, the CBO found in 2022 that booting unemployed people off Medicaid didn't boost their employment. The budget office pointed to what happened when the first Trump administration let Arkansas implement a Medicaid work requirement in 2018. 'There, many of the targeted adults lost their health insurance as a result of the work requirement,' the CBO said. 'Employment did not appear to increase, although the evidence is scant. Research indicates that many participants were unaware of the work requirement or found it too onerous to demonstrate compliance.' Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), lead author of the Republicans' Medicaid proposal, has said lawmakers learned from the Arkansas example and that the compliance paperwork in this case would be less onerous. Don't believe the experts. GOP lawmakers have sought to undermine the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan federal agency that analyzes the fiscal effects of legislation, after it estimated that the massive tax cut package will add $2.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years and eliminate health insurance for nearly 11 million people. Republicans have argued that these tax cuts will spur economic growth and eventually pay for themselves, something that studies have shown did not happen after they made similar arguments about their 2017 tax cut bill. They also have a very vocal critic to contend with in billionaire Elon Musk, their one-time ally who has savaged the bill as an 'abomination' for how it will balloon the deficit. Appearing Thursday on CNN, Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) also dismissed the CBO's projections about the nearly 11 million people who stand to lose their health care coverage. 'Can you say for certain no one will lose their health insurance?' CNN anchor Pamela Brown asked Scott. 'You just can't look at those numbers at face value and say they're going to happen,' Scott responded. People will find jobs eventually. Republicans who are willing to at least acknowledge that cutting Medicaid will lead to people losing health insurance argue that they will instead be able to find a job and receive employer-sponsored health care. 'People are screaming and saying, 'Hey, it's kicking people off Medicaid.' It's not kicking people off Medicaid,' Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said in an interview with CNBC. 'It's transitioning from Medicaid to employer-provided health care. So, yes, we've got 10 million people that are not gonna be on Medicaid, but they then are gonna be on employer-provided health care.' That's an extremely optimistic prediction, especially since the GOP bill doesn't explicitly create any jobs itself. Even if those people who lose their Medicaid coverage are able to find a job at some point, not every employer offers health care, particularly for part-time roles. 'Few of those disenrolled from Medicaid because of the policy would have access to and enroll in employment-based coverage and none would be eligible for the premium tax credit,' CBO Director Phillip Swagel said in a letter to members of Congress on Wednesday. Prove you deserve care. Dr. Mehmet Oz, the former TV personality now running the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said people should have to 'prove that you matter' to get Medicaid coverage. During a Wednesday interview on Fox Business, Oz defended the bill's harsh, new work requirements for Medicaid. The bill requires states to deny coverage to people age 19 to 64 applying for Medicaid if they're not already working at least 80 hours a month. It also requires states to kick people off Medicaid if they can't prove they're meeting the work requirements. The Congressional Budget Office estimates these work requirements alone will result in 5.2 million people losing their health coverage. 'We're asking that able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school,' Oz said. 'Do something that shows you have agency over your future.' If people aren't doing those things, he said, they'll have to get a job and get health insurance there because they shouldn't be covered by Medicaid anymore. 'Go out there. Do entry-level jobs. Get into the workforce. Prove that you matter,' Oz said. 'Get agency into your own life.' In fact, under the GOP bill, most people are projected to lose Medicaid coverage due to red tape, with states not automatically exempting certain people from work requirements who should be exempted. At least 2 in 3 enrollees would be kicked off Medicaid despite working or qualifying for an exemption, like having a disability or going to school, per the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Trump accounts' for babies? Why the White House is pushing cash for kids
'Trump accounts' for babies? Why the White House is pushing cash for kids The program for babies born during Trump's second term would involve a one-time $1,000 federal contribution into an index fund tied to the stock market - with some of the money available at age 18. Show Caption Hide Caption Who will benefit from President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? The nations richest Americans will see benefits from the Trump administration's "Big, Beautiful Bill," while the poorest will be left behind. WASHINGTON — In his first term, President Donald Trump made waves when he put his name on stimulus checks the U.S. government sent to millions of Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, the Republican president is celebrating a provision tucked into the GOP tax bill that would create and affix his name onto investment accounts for babies, if the legislation that very narrowly passed the House makes it through the Senate and becomes law. The program for American children born during Trump's current term would involve a one-time contribution from the federal government of $1,000 per toddler into a mutual or index fund that is tied to the performance of the stock market. The legislation also allows for parents to make contributions of up to $5,000 in outside contributions annually during childhood - and the child could then access some of the money when they turn 18 for things like education, training or a first-time home purchase. The full balance would be available at age 30. From gym memberships to gun silencers, Trump's tax bill is full of surprises House Republicans changed the name of the program from "MAGA accounts" to "Trump accounts" before the bill's passage last month, offering the president a tangible benefit for working-class Americans that he can put his stamp on. The program also serves as a counter to Democratic arguments that the legislation that extends the GOP's 2017 tax cuts primarily helps the nation's wealthiest Americans. Trump is set to announce at a June 9 event that a handful of large corporations have further pledged to contribute to their employees' accounts. The term-limited Trump is set to leave office on Jan. 20, 2029, but he and the GOP could benefit politically from the creation of the program in the 2026 campaign. Midterm elections have historically been unkind to the sitting president's political party, and Republicans have been sprinting to get their tax cut bill through quick enough to improve their political fortunes. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the bill would "change the lives of working, middle class families across America" through tax cuts, increasing the child tax credit, "AND by creating this incredible new ''Trump Account' program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path!' White House pushes 'Trump accounts' as Senate debates tax cut bill The House overcame a myriad of obstacles, coming from pockets of lawmakers in the GOP and a unified opposition from Democrat, to pass the lower chamber in late May. It has since run into trouble in the Senate, where conservative Republicans have raised fresh concerns that the bill would balloon the national debt. They are also fighting over provisions dealing with Medicaid and the state and local tax deduction that were critical to the bill's passage in the House. Only three Republicans can defect for the bill to pass. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, has said he's a no, while senators such as Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, have pushed to get the pricetag down. Donald Trump Airport? Trump on the $500 bill? Republicans can't stop honoring ex-president Trump has been putting public and private pressure on lawmakers to vote for the bill. The White House last week touted support from police officers in a bid to bring attention to Trump's fulfillment of a campaign pledge in the legislation to eliminate taxes on overtime. This week, he's turning his attention to the investment fund for newborns in the legislation that would start as a pilot program. The benefit is backdated to begin on January 1, 2024 and end on January 1, 2029, just before the end of Trump's second term, though the White House hopes the program will be so popular that it is permanently extended. CEOs pledge to invest in 'Trump account' program The White House offered to sweeten the pot on June 9, when it said the CEOs of several large corporations would make billons of dollars in additional investments into accounts for the children of their employees. Dell Technologies, Salesforce, Uber and Goldman Sachs were among the companies the White House said would be participating. In a statement provided by the White House ahead of the event, Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, said his company would "match dollar for dollar the government's seed investment into these accounts for all the children born to Dell team members." Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang called Trump's plan "visionary—a seed fund for America's next generation" and said his company would contribute an unspecified amount to the accounts of its employees children.
