
Spies and SAS personnel among 100-plus Britons included in Afghan data leak
Defence sources said the highly sensitive document contained names and email addresses belonging to people sponsoring or linked to some individual cases. Personal information about MI6 officers was also included.
The identities of members of the SAS and MI6 are a closely guarded secret, and the possibility that such information could have ended up in the public domain was a source of significant official concern.
SAS and other special forces officers were involved in assessing whether Afghans who said they were members of the elite 333 and 444 units, known as the Triples, were allowed to come to the UK.
Defence sources said the dataset also referred to a 'secret route' that Afghans could use to come to the UK.
This week it emerged that the Ministry of Defence had obtained a superinjunction preventing the disclosure of the leak and that a £2bn-plus scheme had been created to relocate some Afghans affected by the breach to the UK to protect them from the Taliban.
That superinjunction lapsed on Tuesday, when a high court judge, Mr Justice Chamberlain, concluded after a government review that the threat to the 18,700 Afghans was no longer very significant.
Some of the remaining restrictions were relaxed on Thursday after another court hearing. The MoD said it would be possible to publish additional descriptions about contents of the database.
In a statement on Tuesday, after the unprecedented superinjunction was lifted, the defence secretary, John Healey, offered a 'sincere apology' on behalf of the government for the data breach.
He later told the Commons that the spreadsheet contained 'names and contact details of applicants and, in some instances, information relating to applicants' family members, and in a small number of cases the names of members of parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application'.
'This was a serious departmental error,' he added.
Parliament's intelligence and security committee (ISC), which monitors the UK spy agencies, said it would scrutinise the affair, following on from an inquiry announced by the Commons defence select committee.
The ISC asked that all intelligence assessments that had been shared with high court in secret now be shared with the committee. Its chair, Lord Beamish, asked why 'material relating to the data loss' could not be shared with the committee early given that it routinely reviews classified material.
The MoD welcomed the proposed review. 'Defence intelligence and the wider department have been instructed by the defence secretary to give their full support to the ISC and all parliamentary committees,' a spokesperson said.
The decision to seek an injunction preventing the disclosure of the data breach was first taken by Ben Wallace, then the Conservative defence secretary, in August 2023, when the MoD first became aware that the personal information had leaked to a Facebook group.
A judge then ordered that the injunction remain secret, turning it into a rarely used superinjunction. Wallace's immediate successor, Grant Shapps, sought to maintain the gagging order until the general election in July 2024 while developing a secret relocation scheme for about 15,000 Afghans affected.
The day-to-day task for developing the scheme was handed to one of Shapps's deputies, James Heappey, the then minister for the armed forces. On Thursday, in a social media posting, Heappey said the scheme was discussed in the cabinet's domestic an economic affairs committee.
He said the committee 'tried to extend entitlements by smallest number possible', as led by legal advice, with little resistance from other members of the government. 'I don't recall fierce opposition. There was frustrated resignation that it was necessary,' he said.
It can now be reported that the leaked data included the names, email addresses and phone numbers for thousands of Afghans who had applied to come to the UK under an existing relocation scheme designed for those who had helped the British military.
In some instances the data contained further written information about their case and status of their application – focused on whether they had in fact helped the UK or British forces in Afghanistan – but it did not contain addresses or photographs.
This week Afghans affected by the breach received a message addressed from the UK government, sent in English, Pashto and Dari, that warned the recipient's email address had been used to make a resettlement application and that some personal data may have been compromised.
Details of the breach were limited, but recipients of the email – some of whom remain in hiding from the Taliban in Afghanistan – were advised 'not to take phone calls or respond to messages or emails from unknown contacts' and to limit who could see their social media profiles.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
MP says allowing 16-year-olds to vote will distract them from GCSE's
A senior Tory, Claire Coutinho, has warned against lowering the voting age to 16, arguing it would distract teenagers from their exams. Ms Coutinho stated that elections often occur during exam season (May-July), adding unnecessary pressure on 16 and 17-year-olds. The government has announced the voting age will be lowered to 16 for the next election, expected by summer 2029, allowing approximately 1.5 million more teenagers to vote. This change will align UK -wide elections with Scotland and Wales and represents the biggest alteration to the electorate since 1969. Keir Starmer has encouraged 16-year-olds to be politically engaged as they can be in the future of their country.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
18 foreign spies sanctioned by UK government
Britain has imposed sanctions on 18 officers and three units from Russia 's GRU spy agency, accusing them of a sustained campaign of malicious activity against the UK and Europe. The sanctioned individuals and units are implicated in spreading chaos, conducting cyberattacks, and undermining democratic institutions across the continent. Specific actions include targeting the family of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal with malware in 2013, five years before the Novichok poisoning attempt in Salisbury. One GRU unit (26165) conducted online reconnaissance on civilian bomb shelters in Mariupol and Kharkiv in 2022, including the Mariupol theatre which was subsequently bombed, killing approximately 600 people. The sanctions also target the Africa Initiative, which uses Russian intelligence officers for information operations in Africa, and aim to raise awareness and increase the cost for those working for Russian intelligence services.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Who will benefit the most from new rules about voter ID?
The announcement about giving the vote to 16- and 17-year-olds in all UK elections has obviously caused huge excitement, and some controversy. However, the experts say that the number of new voters will in practice be very small, and that it will make only a marginal difference to the result of a general election – because some won't vote, and there's no God-given law about them all voting Labour. Much more significant are the new rules on voter ID. The range of acceptable documents will be widened to include, for example, bank cards. Whatever the advantage it might bestow on any particular party at an election, proponents say it will boost turnout, and engagement with the democratic process... What are the changes? The government says its elections bill will allow people to use UK-issued bank cards as proof of identity, and of course, these do not usually carry an image of the user. In addition, there will be 'more digital options to support voters and polling station staff, including allowing accepted IDs such as the Veteran Card and UK driving licence to be used at polling stations when they become available in digital format'. Why are they doing this? The cynics say it is because it will benefit Labour disproportionately. Others say that, true or not, that's less important than allowing people to vote, and that the threat of electoral fraud has been greatly exaggerated. Historically, according to the Electoral Commission and the academics, there's been little in Great Britain even in local elections, and it is virtually unknown in general elections. Where it has cropped up, such as in Tower Hamlets, it has been dealt with. The counterclaim is that photo ID was brought in by the Conservatives in the last parliament in order to help them and to suppress the Labour vote. A point lost to history is that the 2019 Conservative manifesto did not specify 'photo' ID as the preferred option. (Northern Ireland has needed photo ID for far longer, because of much more voter 'personation'. Hence the local slogan 'Vote early, vote often'.) How many people have been affected by the rules on photo ID? Probably in the hundreds of thousands, and maybe more. The polling company More in Common say that, on the basis of polling after the last election, more than 850,000 would have been turned away at the polling station for lack of ID, and – given that some returned – perhaps 400,000 lost their vote. It affected voters from ethnic minority groups disproportionately: the poll suggested that 6.5 per cent of voters of colour were turned away from a polling booth at least once, compared with 2.5 per cent of white voters. But of course, no one really has any idea how many voters didn't even bother to go to the polls who wished to, because they knew they didn't have the necessary ID – or they did but it had some minor discrepancy, such as a variation in their first name or the precise spelling of their surname. Local council 'greeters' posted outside polling stations may also have stopped people from entering the premises, and thus these would-be voters would have gone unnoticed by the local election officials or the Electoral Commission. What about the millions who aren't registered at all? The government says that an increasingly automated voter registration system will also make it easier for people to register to vote, and will reduce the need for them to fill out their details across different government services on multiple occasions. Who will the reforms help? On balance, Labour, because of its relatively high vote among some ethnic minorities; but also, for that same reason, the Corbynite independents who took seats from Labour in strongly Muslim areas even in a strong year such as 2024. Reform UK might also see some benefit, because their vote is skewed towards more disadvantaged places, where turnouts are traditionally low. Automated registration among disaffected non-voters might give them a bit of a boost. Will it save the Labour Party? No. As with votes at 16, the numbers aren't going to make that much of a difference, and in our present confused four- or five-party system, it's hard to see anyone gaining a decisive advantage. And voting allegiances by age, class and ethnicity, for example, can shift over time anyway. But in a very close contest, who knows? What about postal voting? This seems to be another problem for turnout. The government says of last July: 'Overall, 8 per cent of non-voters mentioned they did not vote because of an issue related to their postal vote (such as missing the deadline to apply, forms arriving late and forgetting to send their postal vote) – with this figure rising to 13 per cent in Scotland and Wales.' The deterioration in the postal system has added fresh challenges to a method of voting many find essential, or more convenient. So the proposal is to change the deadline in Great Britain to apply for a postal vote, moving it from 11 to 14 working days before a poll, thereby providing more time between the application deadline and polling day. What about postal vote fraud? This only became much of an issue in Britain after the contested 2020 US presidential election, and Donald Trump's unfounded allegations that it was rigged. Nigel Farage and Reform UK make a big deal of it, and Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, has raised it again in the Commons this week, stating: 'I have seen people carrying bag-loads of postal votes to a polling station on election day.' The relevant minister, Rushanara Ali, told him to tell the police.