
How a teenage kiss at a funfair led to Jack Woodley being kicked and stabbed by a pack of bloodthirsty yobs... and the 'chilling' detail that stunned the court
Punched, kicked, stamped upon and fatally wounded with a Rambo knife, the 5ft 7in, 10st 8lb victim was completely defenceless as the vicious gang murdered him 'like zombies attacking an animal' in front of horrified onlookers on October 16 2021.
Jack's grieving mother, Zoey McGill, previously released a heartbreaking video of herself cradling her dying son and singing to him in his final moments while he was on life support. He tragically died in hospital a day after the attack.
The unarmed 18-year-old, from Newton Aycliffe in County Durham, had done nothing to provoke the killers, only coming to the group's attention by chance when a random row broke out over a girl kissing a boy at the funfair.
For four years, most of the teenagers, aged between 14 and 17 at the time of the sickening attack, have been protected by a reporting restriction banning their identity from being revealed until their 18th birthdays.
But on Wednesday, Lewis Rose, the youngest of the ten murderers, became an adult, paving the way for the twisted mob to finally be unmasked as one. Their mugshots were finally released, allowing the public to see the faces of evil.
Rose, Calum Maddison, Sonny Smith, Leighton Mayo, Blaine Sewell, Grant Wheatley, Clayton Owen, Joe Lathan, Tyler Brewis and Rhys Wear, were the boys handed life sentences with a combined minimum term of more than 124 years.
Tragically, it was these 10 animals against one. Jack was hunted down and stabbed in the back during an 80-second attack while making his way home from the Houghton Feast funfair, in Houghton-le-Spring near Sunderland.
The 10 boys who murdered Jack Woodley
All of the killers, who can now be named after turning 18, were handed life sentences with the following minimum terms:
Calum Maddison, 17 years
Blaine Sewell, 13 years and five months
Sonny Smith, 15 years
Grant Wheatley, 15 years
Lewis Rose, eight years
Tyler Brewis, 13 years
Rhys Wear, 10 years
Leighton Mayo, 11 years
Joe Lathan, 11 years
Clayton Owen, 11 years
It was Maddison, who had recently turned 15, who delivered the fatal stab wound, but all ten were convicted of Jack's murder under the principle of joint enterprise as they were deemed to be equally responsible.
Most of the boys lied to police in a desperate bid to deflect their involvement. Yet none of them even attempted to suggest Jack had provoked the savage assault that has plunged his family into unimaginable grief.
As one of the boys' lawyers suggested, it would have been easy for the 10-strong group to pin the blame on Jack as being the aggressor. But the truth was, he simply did nothing wrong that night.
He had simply gone to the Houghton Feast funfair with friends when the atmosphere became hostile.
Jack was challenged to a fight by a stranger, but sensibly walked away thinking better of it.
But as he neared the crowded Britannia Inn, then 16-year-old Sewell ran up and punched him and seized him in a headlock, triggering a terrifying ten on one melee before Maddison plunged his 9in (25cm) knife into Jack's back.
He was left to die in an alleyway and tragically died in hospital the following day - his life cut short by a random 'mob attack'.
The 11-week trial at Newcastle Crown Court heard he was targeted for a 'trivial reason' - something not one of the 10 defendants ever explained.
Jack's family were forced to sit through weeks of evidence and recounting their son's brutal death - but have been left no nearer to understanding why he was targeted.
During one moment in the trial, the 16-year-old who attacked Jack from behind, triggering scenes of anarchy, was asked by prosecutors: 'Why did you attack Jack?'
'I can't remember', he replied in a final insult to his victim and Jack's family.
Had he seen Jack 'do anything wrong?' 'No,' he replied.
The teenager said he did not know if there was a reason Jack was attacked but that there probably was one that he couldn't remember.
When asked if he was angry, the boy said: 'A little bit yeah. I must have been to actually hit him.'
Pressed why he was angry, he reverted to being unable to remember. So asked again why he attacked Jack, he said: 'I just can't remember.'
Quizzed by prosecutors how it could have been forgotten after just a few months, he said: 'Dunno. It just went out my head, I can't remember it.'
The boy's lack of memory was described as 'particularly chilling' by prosecutor Mark McKone QC.
Jack had only come to the group's attention by chance. The trial heard how when a girl kissed a boy, the boy's ex-girlfriend kicked off and a minor scuffle broke out between the pair.
Jack witnesses the girls fighting and asked another boy - one of his would-be killers - what it was about. They joked about it and went their separate ways.
Less than an hour later, that boy would be part of the gang who so brutally set upon Jack.
Rumours spread that Jack had threatened to 'punch the head in' of one of the boys - lie that had been completely fabricated.
This, in the eyes of the prosecutors, was their plot to 'create a conflict with Jack so they could attack him'.
When challenged to a one-on-one fight, Jack sensibly decided to walk off.
But he was followed and set upon by the bloodthirsty gang. Mobile phone footage of the attack showed there were shouts of 'get the chopper out' - referring to the knife - heard.
One of the mob was 'armed with a very dangerous knife', while another admitted taking a knuckle duster out that night.
One witness said the youths were like a 'herd of lions' when they attacked.
Another witness who saw the violence said: 'Jack got down on the floor so he could curl up in a ball.
'He was so scared. There were so many punches raining down on him. They were brutal.
'Everyone in the group was just kicking the life out of Jack, stamping on his head
'The lads were savagely kicking Jack, like zombies attacking an animal.
'I remember the terrified look on Jack's face as he was being kicked, punched and stamped on.'
For all the brutality that led to the death of an 18-year-old boy, none of the 10 killers could say why they did what they did that night.
Most said they could not remember or said it happened too fast. The incident lasted around 80 seconds and there was only a small amount of CCTV and mobile footage.
Questions were asked over why so many of the boys had their hoods up. One claimed it was because he felt anxious about his hair.
But the main element to dissect was why the teenage knifeman - who admitted the stabbing but denied intent - was armed.
Jurors were told he had bought it six months prior out of fear of living in a city plagued with knife crime. He wanted it to be a deterrent.
But on that night, he hadn't taken it out with him. In fact, he went home to get the knife just 20 minutes before launching a fatal attack on Jack.
He claimed he'd gone home to get his coat because it was cold - and decided at the last minute to take the knife back out due to the supposed trouble brewing.
Ultimately, he would go on to use it to murder Jack Woodley. He would stand trial alongside nine others - despite claiming they were not responsible for Jack's death.
While Jack suffered multiple injuries as he lay helpless on the floor, he was killed by the single knife wound.
The nine others were charged as the prosecution argued the fatal blow would not have been delivered if the other members hadn't launched the frenzied attack.
By targeting Jack outside the Britannia Inn, each of them contributed to the killing even if their involvement was less than the other.
'The prosecution say all ten defendants participated in this joint attack, using violence themselves or intentionally encouraging others to use violence,' Mr McKone QC said.
The reason, argued by the prosecution, for Jack's death was that this was simply a gang of boys wanting to inflict harm on an individual.
In a heartbreaking tribute, Jack's mother, Zoey McGill, said: 'Jack was my reason to live and succeed in life. From the moment Jack was born he brought light and love to us all.
'The devastation of losing Jack is immense and far reaching. The trauma of reliving this whole incident over a long trial has had a devastating effect on us all. We cannot see a way of recovering from this.
'We feel imprisoned by our grief and trauma. No parent, loved one or friend should suffer someone going to a fair and losing them forever. We will never be able to share treasured family moments with our cheeky chappy blue-eyed boy ever again.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Peterborough woman who attacked neighbour with a spade is jailed
A 44-year-old woman has been jailed for 10 months after she attacked her neighbour with a spade, hitting him on the Lloyd of George Street, Peterborough, set about her victim outside his home in the Woodston area of the city on 14 May, following a dispute that had been going on for three man, who was in his 20s, was left with a cut to his head that needed hospital was sentenced by a judge at Peterborough Crown Court after admitting causing grievous bodily harm without intent. 'Move on' Cambridgeshire Police said the neighbours had been in dispute about "various issues".Det Con Lloyd Davis said: "Catherine Lloyd's behaviour in this case was completely unacceptable."Irrespective of any ongoing dispute, violence like this is not the answer."I'm pleased the victim can now move on." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fencing boss speaks on theft of Kaleb Cooper kit
The owner of a fencing firm has described how thieves stole farm equipment belonging to Clarkson's Farm star Kaleb Cooper from a field.A post knocker, owned by Mr Cooper, was stolen along with a tractor, which he does not own, from a field near Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, between 15:30 and 16:30 BST last hired items were being used by Aylesbury firm Home and Country Fencing, whose owner, who asked to be identified only as Lewis, said he believed the thieves had been keeping watch,Mr Cooper declined to comment, but posted to Instagram, on which he has 2.9 million followers, writing: "Can we please make this as hot as possible! What is going on with England at the moment." The equipment was being used in a field off Hawkswood told the BBC: "They broke into the field and cut a chain off. "They had probably been watching us as it was parked out of sight behind a barn."We had another post knocker stolen 11 months ago in Chalgrove as well."A social media post from the company, shared by Mr Cooper, suggested a "burnt out" silver 4x4 vehicle found nearby was "possibly related".The post knocker is a Protech P200S with the serial number 10698. It belongs to Mr Cooper, who lives near Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, and has risen to fame in Jeremy Clarkson's farming show on Amazon Prime in recent green John Deere tractor 6630 had the number plate OU11 Valley Police said both were seen being driven past the BP filling station in Gerrards Cross, on the A40 Oxford Road, at 15:52 on the same force is appealing for anyone with further information to contact Mutual, the insurance arm of the National Farmers' Union, estimates that rural crime in the UK cost £44.1m last year – although that was down 16.5% on the previous year. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Prison system was days from collapse three times under Sunak, review finds
The criminal justice system was within days of collapse on three occasions before being bailed out by 'last-minute emergency measures', an independent review by a former prisons watchdog has found. Dame Anne Owers said the prison system, under pressure from overcrowding, was 'in crisis' between autumn 2023 and the summer of 2024, but No 10 under Rishi Sunak refused to cut the numbers in jail until 'the next predictable cliff edge'. Former ministers and officials interviewed by Owers 'expressed frustration and sometimes anger' at the failure to endorse a plan to avert crises and suspected that this was a deliberate move by Downing Street, she said. 'Many believed that the default position was to do as little as possible as late as possible, with the consequence that the system repeatedly reached the brink of collapse,' she said. The 25-page report into the teetering Prison Service, which remains at nearly 97.5% capacity, comes as the criminal justice system is expected to come under renewed pressure this weekend. Police have warned that they could arrest hundreds of people who plan to express support for Palestine Action on Saturday. Forces fear more incidents among people protesting outside hotels housing asylum seekers across Greater London, the north-east of England and East Anglia. The review, commissioned by the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, in February, detailed claims that Sunak's office waited until prisons were days from collapsing before acting – to the dismay of some ministers. 'Although departmental ministers were convinced by mid-2023 that some form of early release was both necessary and urgent, this required prime ministerial agreement, which was not forthcoming until the system was within three days of potential collapse, and only in incremental stages,' she wrote. She said Alex Chalk, the then justice secretary, called for an early release scheme from mid-2023 for prisoners who had received standard determinate sentences, but received no backing. Chalk had made clear, she said, that he 'was advocating, without success, a version of the SDS early release scheme in order to get ahead of the crisis, rather than the minimal salami-slicing approach that was eventually taken'. 'Without exception, all those the review spoke to expressed frustration and sometimes anger at the reluctance to accept and then act on the well-documented and imminent crisis, or to agree any coherent plan to avert it,' she wrote. After the general election was called in May 2024, Sunak called emergency Cobra meetings to discuss 'invoking emergency powers' to release prisoners early if the criminal justice system collapsed. 'This might be necessary to avert the risk of public disorder if the criminal justice system collapsed during the election campaign,' the report disclosed. On three occasions, the Sunak government used early release schemes, employing powers designed to allow release on compassionate grounds, the report said. Civil servants were concerned that there would be an investigation into the mismanagement of prisons, the report said. 'Senior officials were so concerned about a potential breakdown in the criminal justice system that an audit was kept of all decision-making and documents, in case there was a public or parliamentary inquiry,' the report found. In October 2023, Chalk announced plans to free prisoners 18 days early under the end of custody supervised licence, which was later extended to 35 days and then 70 days. More than 13,000 were released under the scheme. One of Labour's first acts after forming a government last year was to announce a plan to release offenders with standard determinate sentences after they had served 40% of their term. Recommendations from David Gauke's sentencing review, which proposed less jail time for thousands of offenders, including some violent criminals and domestic abusers, are in the process of being implemented. Commenting on the Owers report, Mahmood said it 'lays bare the disgraceful way the last Conservative government ran our prisons. They added less than 500 cells to the prison estate over 14 years, released over 10,000 prisoners early under a veil of secrecy, and brought our jails close to total collapse on countless occasions.' The Conservatives and Sunak have been approached for comment. Andrew Neilson, the director of campaigns at the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: 'This review into prison capacity spells out in forensic detail how the government has found itself facing the prospect of running out of cells. It is a crisis, or more accurately a series of crises, that has been brewing over several decades and across successive governments.'