
How the atomic bombing of Nagasaki tore apart Japan's understanding of motherhood
When Kikuyo Nakamura's adult son discovered bumps on his back, she assumed it was just a rash.
Still, she urged him to go to the hospital — better safe than sorry.
Hiroshi, her second son, was born in 1948, three years after the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki. As a survivor of the bombing, Nakamura had long feared she might pass on health problems to her children.
In 2003, at age 55, Hiroshi went to the hospital. Two days passed without any word from him. Then three. Then a week.
Eventually Nakamura went to the hospital, where her son told her: ''They're going to do more tests,' she told CNN.
The results showed he had stage 4 leukemia –– an advanced stage of blood cancer that had spread to other parts of his body. According to Nakamura, the doctor told her that she had given her son cancer –– suggesting the radiation that caused it was passed on through breastfeeding when he was a baby.
When Hiroshi died, six months later, his mother was left to believe she had essentially killed him; a thought that still haunts her more than two decades on.
'I was overwhelmed with guilt and suffering… Even now, I still believe what the doctor said, that I caused it. That guilt still lives in me,' said Nakamura, who is now 101-years old.
Those who are exposed to nuclear radiation are generally urged to stop breastfeeding in the immediate aftermath of an atomic blast. But experts say there's no concrete evidence that first generation 'hibakusha' –– atomic bomb survivors of World War II –– can pass cancer-causing material to their children, years after exposure.
As the 80th anniversary of the US bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki approaches, aging survivors — some, like Nakamura, more than 100-years old — are sharing their stories of suffering and resilience, while they still can.
Many of them were young women, either pregnant or of childbearing age, when the bombs fell and have lived much of their lives under a heavy shadow of fear and stigma.
They were told by medical practitioners, neighbors, even friends and family that their exposure to nuclear radiation could cause them to have children with illnesses or disabilities –– if they conceived at all.
Even when infertility or a child's disability had nothing to do with radiation exposure, hibakusha women often felt blamed and shunned.
Those with visible scars from the blasts faced barriers to marriage. Physical wounds were harder to hide — and clearer proof of exposure.
And at a time in society when a woman's worth was closely tied to marriage and motherhood, this stigma was particularly damaging.
It caused a large number of women survivors –– many of whom had PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) –– to 'hide the fact that they were hibakusha,' according to Masahiro Nakashima, a professor of radiation studies at Nagasaki University.
'In a society like Japan — where gender discrimination and male dominance have been deeply rooted — women were especially affected by radiation,' Nakashima told CNN.
Radiation exposure did affect some second-generation survivors, depending on the timing of pregnancy.
The embryonic period — generally ranging from weeks 5 up to 15 — is especially sensitive for brain and organ development. Women exposed to radiation during this window had a higher risk of giving birth to children with intellectual disabilities, neurological issues, and microcephaly, a condition marked by a small head and impaired brain function, according to studies from the joint Japan-US Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) –– a successor to the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission formed just after World War II.
Other studies showed that women hibakusha faced long-term health risks themselves.
A 2012 RERF study found that radiation exposure from an atomic bomb raised cancer risk for the rest of a person's life. Solid cancer rates for women at age 70 increased by 58 percent for every gray of radiation their bodies absorbed at age 30. A gray is a unit that measures how much radiation energy a body or object takes in. For men, solid cancer rates increased by 35 percent.
Nakamura was 21-years old and was hanging laundry outside around 11am when the bomb fell on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. She says she was 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) from the epicenter –– a little beyond what experts call the area of 'total destruction.'
The young mother saw a bright light, followed by a loud boom and a powerful gust of wind that flung her into the air. When she regained consciousness, her house was wrecked — furniture was strewn everywhere and glass shards covered the floor. She called out to her own mother, who had been helping Nakamura care for her eldest son.
Relieved they weren't physically wounded, the family fled to an air raid shelter. It wasn't until the next day that Nakamura grasped the scale of destruction. Relatives living near Nagasaki University, closer to the blast, all died.
Nakamura says she didn't suffer any effects of radiation exposure. She had her uterus removed four years later, and at age 70, doctors found a tumor in her abdomen, but her physicians told her neither issue was linked to the bombing, she said.
The psychological trauma, however, has stayed with her ever since.
Ashamed of her own exposure, she feared the stigma would also pass to her grandchildren.
'If people knew that my son died of leukemia, especially before they (my grandchildren) got married, others might not want to marry them. I made sure my children understood that. We kept it within the family and didn't tell anyone else about how he died,' Nakamura said.
But encouraged by other survivors, she finally spoke publicly about her son's cancer in 2006, three years after his death.
'I received phone calls and even letters from people who heard my story. It made me realize how serious the issue of inherited health effects is in Hiroshima and Nagasaki,' she said.
Even though she now knows it's unlikely she could have caused her son's cancer, she says as a mother, the feeling of guilt is a burden she'll forever carry.
'I still feel so sorry. I keep apologizing to him. I say, 'Forgive me,'' she said.
The unique burden of hibakusha motherhood is something Mitsuko Yoshimura, now 102-years old, never got to carry.
Separated from her parents and sister at a young age, she always longed for a family. She moved to Nagasaki for a good job in Mitsubishi's payroll department — just months before the US dropped the bomb, turning the city into hell on earth.
'When I got out to the road, there were people with blood gushing from their heads, people with the skin peeled off their backs,' she recalled.
Being just a kilometer (0.6 miles) away from the epicenter of the blast, her survival was nothing short of a miracle. In the months that followed, she stayed behind to help the injured. But her body suffered too.
'My hair fell out. Whenever I tried to comb it with my hands, strands would come out little by little,' Yoshimura said. She also regularly vomited blood for months after the blast.
Still, she endured. She got married a year after the war ended. Her husband was an atomic bomb survivor, like herself, and their marriage marked a fresh start for the couple.
But the child they longed for never followed. She had two miscarriages and a stillbirth.
Yoshimura lives alone now; her husband having died years ago. In her home in Nagasaki, where photos of children and grandchildren might be, there are dolls — a quiet substitute for what was lost, she said.
At their remarkable age, Nakamura and Yoshimura both know they don't have much longer to live. But that gives them greater urgency to educate younger generations about the toll of nuclear war.
'People really need to think carefully. What does winning or losing even bring? Wanting to expand a country's territory, wanting a country to gain more power, what exactly are people seeking from that?' Nakamura asked.
'I don't understand it. But what I do feel deeply is the utter foolishness of war,' she said.
Reporter
Hanako Montgomery
Editors
Sheena McKenzie, Todd Symons
Producer
Junko Ogura
Senior Video Producer
Ladan Anoushfar
Visual Editor
Carlotta Dotto
Video Editor
Estefania Rodriguez, Daishi Kusunoki
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Fish Bone or Cancer? 80-Year-Old's Perforation Case
Key Takeaways An 80-year-old man presented with progressive lower left-quadrant abdominal pain. Imaging studies identified a mass adjacent to the sigmoid colon, with features suggestive of an abscess, although no definitive foreign body was detected preoperatively. Surgical exploration revealed a sigmoid colon perforation associated with a sharp foreign object, which was later confirmed to be a fish bone. Histopathological examination revealed an inflammatory response without evidence of malignancy. The case reported by Daniel Herrera Hernández, MD, and colleagues from the Hospital General Regional No. 1 Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Tijuana, Mexico, highlighted a rare cause of intestinal perforation. The Patient and His History The patient had a medical history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension. There was no prior surgical history or screening colonoscopy. He reported a 12-day history of lower left-quadrant abdominal pain, progressively worsening to become intolerable, prompting emergency admission. Findings and Diagnosis On presentation, the patient was stable but exhibited abdominal distension and tenderness on palpation of the left hemiabdomen, without signs of peritoneal irritation. Laboratory tests showed leucocytosis of 20,800/μL (4000-11,000), neutrophils at 65.1% (40%-70%) of total leukocytes, and a serum creatinine of 1.0 mg/dL (0.6-1.2). Abdominal and pelvic CT scans revealed a mass adjacent to the descending colon with peripheral enhancement dependent on the colonic wall, extending into the muscular layer, suggestive of an abscess, as well as a small radio-opaque object in the middle of the phlegmon, supportive of a foreign body. Adjacent fat stranding and free fluid were observed in the left iliac fossa. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, revealing a colonic perforation at the sigmoid colon with firm adhesions to the abdominal wall. A sharpened foreign body, approximately 2 cm in length, was found at the adhesion site, which was the cause of the perforation. No diverticula were identified in the colon. Left hemicolectomy with transverse colon terminal colostomy was performed. Postoperative recovery was uneventful under antibiotic therapy with meropenem and metabolic management. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 with clinical improvement. The histopathology report indicated chronic inflammation with no evidence of malignancy. Discussion 'Intestinal perforation by a fish bone in the colon is a rare complication that poses diagnostic challenges. It requires a high index of suspicion from surgeons or emergency physicians. In patients with risk factors, such perforations can resemble tumours with abscess formation or perforation secondary to malignancy,' the authors wrote. This story was translated from Univadis Germany.


Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Anesthetic Gas Emissions Show Global Regional Disparities
TOPLINE: An analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from volatile anesthetic agents across 41 countries showed that Western nations have achieved significant reductions, but Asian countries continue to increase their use of the agents. South Korea and Japan reported the highest global per capita emissions. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a multicounty analysis to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from volatile anesthetics using sales data obtained from IQVIA MIDAS and national medicines agencies. They calculated kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) equivalents per capita as an indicator of greenhouse gas emissions focusing on sales of desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in 41 countries, representing approximately 35% of the global population. ) equivalents per capita as an indicator of greenhouse gas emissions focusing on sales of desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in 41 countries, representing approximately 35% of the global population. The analysis compared emissions among 27 nations in the European Union with those among other Western countries like Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the US. Emissions among Asian countries such as China, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand were also analyzed. Time trends and percentage changes in greenhouse gas emissions related to the procurement of volatile anesthetics from 2018 to 2023 were presented for all the groups. TAKEAWAY: Canada, New Zealand, and the UK showed a 65%-95% reduction in CO 2 equivalent emissions, achieving levels below 0.5 kg of CO 2 equivalents per inhabitant by 2023. Australia and the United States, despite reductions, still had higher levels of emissions. equivalent emissions, achieving levels below 0.5 kg of CO equivalents per inhabitant by 2023. Australia and the United States, despite reductions, still had higher levels of emissions. Asian countries saw substantial increases in emissions related to volatile anesthetics, with South Korea and Japan having approximately 2.5 kg of CO 2 equivalents per inhabitant in 2023 and China experiencing a 130% rise in emissions from 2018 to 2023. equivalents per inhabitant in 2023 and China experiencing a 130% rise in emissions from 2018 to 2023. Emissions also increased from 2018 to 2023 in some countries, including Malta, Serbia, the Czech Republic, and the Russian Federation. Trends in emissions varied across Europe; Northern countries like Finland, Norway, and the UK showed a reduction in emissions from 1-2 kg to less than 0.5 kg of CO 2 equivalents per inhabitant, whereas Denmark and Estonia maintained low levels of emissions. Italy, Portugal, and Spain saw minimal reductions. IN PRACTICE: 'The experience of nations that were receptive to awareness campaigns and phased out desflurane use show that reducing emissions below 0.5 kg of CO 2 e [equivalents] per inhabitant is attainable. This success should serve as a model for all the other countries, prompting them to implement educational initiatives for anaesthetists and adopt specific policies to mitigate emissions from inhalational anaesthetics,' the researchers reported. SOURCE: The study was led by Marta Caviglia, of the Centre for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, at the Università del Piemonte Orientale in Novara, Italy. It was published online on August 6, 2025, in Anaesthesia. LIMITATIONS: The study considered only greenhouse gas emissions from atmospheric release of volatile anesthetic agents, not accounting for emissions during production, packaging, transport, storage, and disposal phases. While data were available for 41 countries, there was clear overrepresentation of high-income nations, with incomplete or unavailable data from South America, Africa, and some Asian countries, including India. The analysis did not account for nitrous oxide emissions. DISCLOSURES: No external funding or competing interests were declared by the authors. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
First Kpod criminal: Singapore man convicted for making drug-laced vape pods that trigger muscle spasms
SINGAPORE, Aug 13 — A 41-year-old man from Yishun has admitted to producing vaporiser pods laced with etomidate, marking the first conviction linked to Kpods. According to The Straits Times, in December 2024, Mohammed Akil Abdul Rahim was caught at his flat with enough white powder etomidate to make over 70 Kpods. Currently in remand, Akil is scheduled for sentencing on August 26. During the investigation, it emerged that Akil tried to travel to Malaysia to visit his girlfriend despite having his passport impounded. In January 2025, he falsely told the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority that he had left his bag containing his identity card and passport at a coffee shop. Only his identity card was later returned. He was issued a new passport and travelled abroad several times before authorities uncovered the deception. Etomidate, a substance regulated under the Poisons Act, is medically used as an anaesthetic but only in clinical settings under strict controls. Experts said that etomidate can cause muscle spasms known as myoclonus, with overdose symptoms including unsteadiness, sluggishness, and mental confusion. On July 30, Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam announced that officers from the Ministry of Home Affairs will be seconded to assist the Health Sciences Authority in cracking down on etomidate-related offences. The Ministry of Health is studying further legal measures, but MHA plans to list etomidate as a Class C drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act in the coming weeks as an interim step. If classified as a Class C drug, users caught with etomidate could face supervision, mandatory rehabilitation programmes, or be sent to drug rehabilitation centres, similar to other drug offenders. Repeat offenders or those committing serious crimes may face jail terms of at least one year.