logo
Report ranks Florida as top state for long summer power outages

Report ranks Florida as top state for long summer power outages

Yahoo02-06-2025

TAMPA, Fla. (BLOOM) — As hurricane season kicks into gear across Florida, a new report sheds light on just how vulnerable the state is to long summer power outages, even when storms aren't in play.
A national study conducted by Wolf River Electric analyzed five years of data from the Event Correlated Outage Dataset to determine where Americans are most likely to lose electricity during the hottest months of the year. Florida ranks fourth in the country for major summer outages, with an average of more than 18,000 hours without power each year from May through August.
While Florida didn't log as many large-scale outages as states like Michigan or Texas, the duration of its blackouts paints a troubling picture. Each recorded event affected at least 5,000 utility customers, including homes, schools, and businesses, and often stretched for hours or even days.
'These aren't just flickers,' the study's authors noted. 'In Florida, when the power goes out in summer, it tends to stay out.'
National leaders in summer outages
The state with the most frequent and prolonged outages is Michigan, which topped the list with over 12,000 major events and more than 34,000 annual outage hours. Texas ranked second, reporting fewer outages but a higher average duration — 35,440 hours without electricity each year — making the Lone Star State's blackouts especially punishing during triple-digit heatwaves.
California came in third, with more than 6,000 major outages, but significantly faster recovery times, averaging 9,500 hours per year. That's roughly half the duration of Florida's.
Comparing states: Short vs. long outages
Florida's outage profile differs sharply from other East Coast states like Maryland, which reported nearly 1,900 outages but just 335 hours without power annually — suggesting short, manageable disruptions.
By contrast, Alabama and Louisiana, southern neighbors to Florida, had fewer outages than the Sunshine State but still saw long-lasting ones: Alabama averaged 8,159 hours per year without power, while Louisiana logged 3,610 hours.
Other notable figures include:
New York: 873 outages; ~4,000 annual hours
North Carolina: 554 outages; ~2,985 annual hours
Georgia: 242 outages; ~1,362 annual hours
Even West Coast states like Washington (609 outages; 1,969 hours) and Oregon (206 outages; 1,201 hours) saw less disruption overall.
Midwest and South hit hardest
The report concluded that the Midwest and Southern U.S. face the greatest risk, both in terms of outage frequency and duration. The Northeast and much of the West Coast fare better, with fewer and shorter disruptions.
Florida's high-stakes summer
For Floridians, the timing of this data is especially relevant. Hurricane season began June 1 and continues through November. Although not all outages in the report were storm-related, the trend of long-duration outages raises serious concerns for public health, food safety, and disaster readiness.
In a state where summer temperatures regularly push into the 90s with high humidity, the absence of air conditioning, refrigeration, or even working traffic lights can quickly become more than just inconvenient — it can be dangerous.
Top 5 states with the longest summer outages (by duration):
Texas – 35,440 hours/year
Michigan – 34,068 hours/year
Florida – 18,038 hours/year
California – 9,553 hours/year
Alabama – 8,159 hours/year
Experts recommend that residents in high-risk states like Florida keep emergency kits, backup power options, and evacuation plans ready, especially as the season heats up.
TAMPA, Fla. (BLOOM) — As hurricane season kicks into gear across Florida, a new report sheds light on just how vulnerable the state is to long summer power outages, even when storms aren't in play.
A national study conducted by Wolf River Electric analyzed five years of data from the Event Correlated Outage Dataset to determine where Americans are most likely to lose electricity during the hottest months of the year. Florida ranks fourth in the country for major summer outages, with an average of more than 18,000 hours without power each year from May through August.
While Florida didn't log as many large-scale outages as states like Michigan or Texas, the duration of its blackouts paints a troubling picture. Each recorded event affected at least 5,000 utility customers, including homes, schools, and businesses, and often stretched for hours or even days.
'These aren't just flickers,' the study's authors noted. 'In Florida, when the power goes out in summer, it tends to stay out.'
National leaders in summer outages
The state with the most frequent and prolonged outages is Michigan, which topped the list with over 12,000 major events and more than 34,000 annual outage hours. Texas ranked second, reporting fewer outages but a higher average duration — 35,440 hours without electricity each year — making the Lone Star State's blackouts especially punishing during triple-digit heatwaves.
California came in third, with more than 6,000 major outages, but significantly faster recovery times, averaging 9,500 hours per year. That's roughly half the duration of Florida's.
Comparing states: Short vs. long outages
Florida's outage profile differs sharply from other East Coast states like Maryland, which reported nearly 1,900 outages but just 335 hours without power annually — suggesting short, manageable disruptions.
By contrast, Alabama and Louisiana, southern neighbors to Florida, had fewer outages than the Sunshine State but still saw long-lasting ones: Alabama averaged 8,159 hours per year without power, while Louisiana logged 3,610 hours.
Other notable figures include:
New York: 873 outages; ~4,000 annual hours
North Carolina: 554 outages; ~2,985 annual hours
Georgia: 242 outages; ~1,362 annual hours
Even West Coast states like Washington (609 outages; 1,969 hours) and Oregon (206 outages; 1,201 hours) saw less disruption overall.
Midwest and South hit hardest
The report concluded that the Midwest and Southern U.S. face the greatest risk, both in terms of outage frequency and duration. The Northeast and much of the West Coast fare better, with fewer and shorter disruptions.
Florida's high-stakes summer
For Floridians, the timing of this data is especially relevant. Hurricane season began June 1 and continues through November. Although not all outages in the report were storm-related, the trend of long-duration outages raises serious concerns for public health, food safety, and disaster readiness.
In a state where summer temperatures regularly push into the 90s with high humidity, the absence of air conditioning, refrigeration, or even working traffic lights can quickly become more than just inconvenient — it can be dangerous.
Top 5 states with the longest summer outages (by duration):
Texas – 35,440 hours/year
Michigan – 34,068 hours/year
Florida – 18,038 hours/year
California – 9,553 hours/year
Alabama – 8,159 hours/year
Experts recommend that residents in high-risk states like Florida keep emergency kits, backup power options, and evacuation plans ready — especially as the season heats up.
Source: Wolf River Electric; U.S. Event Correlated Outage Dataset (2019–2023)
Source: Wolf River Electric; U.S. Event Correlated Outage Dataset (2019–2023)For more on hurricane prep and local safety resources, visit wfla.com/bloom-tampa-bay.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk: I apologise for some of my Trump posts
Musk: I apologise for some of my Trump posts

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk: I apologise for some of my Trump posts

Elon Musk has made a public apology to Donald Trump for posting incendiary comments on social media that imploded their relationship. The billionaire Tesla founder, who had been one of Mr Trump's closest advisers, called for the US president to be impeached and claimed he was named in the Epstein files. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Mr Musk wrote on Wednesday morning. He did not specify which ones, although he has since deleted the claim about Mr Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Trump said that Mr Musk had 'lost his mind' in the meltdown, which started with a disagreement over the Republican's so-called 'big, beautiful' spending bill. Mr Musk had been hired as a 'special government employee' to head up the new Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), controversially tasked with downsizing the federal workforce and slashing spending. While he enjoyed some success in his mission, he was upset with Mr Trump's decision to open the spending taps in his bill, saying it was undoing his team's work. Mr Musk exited the White House at the end of May, ending a turbulent 130-day stint in Mr Trump's team, just days after he said he was 'disappointed' with the new budget. A acordial public farewell to the man who appointed himself as Trump's 'first buddy', both said Mr Musk would stay on as an adviser. He was handed a gold key to the White House. But the simmering dissent went public last week when the pair began trading insults online, with Mr Musk denouncing the president's budget as 'a disgusting abomination' that will bankrupt the US. The Tesla billionaire called on Americans to help 'kill the bill', which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax breaks and a boost to defence spending. Mr Trump was quick to hit back, claiming that the Tesla billionaire had been irked by the legislation ending tax credit worth billions of dollars to his electric vehicle company. Credit: Reuters Their spat rapidly intensified when Musk called for the president's impeachment and claimed the Republican was 'in the Epstein files' – the dossier of US government information held on the late paedophile financier. In response, Mr Trump threatened to cancel US government contracts with Mr Musk's companies, which include SpaceX. By Saturday, Musk had deleted the worst of his tweets, in an apparent sign he was hoping to repair the rift between them. Yet, the damage was done. Mr Trump declared his relationship with the South African-born tech tycoon was over and that he had 'no desire' to mend it, accusing Mr Musk of being 'disrespectful to the office of the President'. Mr Trump also warned that there would be 'serious consequences' if Mr Musk switched his allegiance to the Democrats and funded rival candidates who would vote against the bill. JD Vance, the US vice-president, said Mr Musk had made a 'huge mistake' in picking a fight with Mr Trump. Over the weekend, he said he hoped he would 'come back into the fold', but acknowledged that might be difficult after he went 'nuclear' during the row. Credit: YouTube/ Theo Von Mr Musk bankrolled Mr Trump's election run to the eye-watering tune of $250 million (£185 million) and was rewarded with his 'special government employee' role. For months after Mr Trump's inauguration, Mr Musk rarely left his side, travelling on Air Force One, moving into Mar-a-Lago and having the president babysit his four-year-old son in the Oval Office. The night of the election, Mr Trump declared of Musk 'a star is born'. Weeks later, Mr Musk confessed he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man'. The messy breakdown of their bromance, however, had been heavily predicted. Mr Trump, who has now refocused attention elsewhere including to the deployment of troops to the LA riots, recently told reporters he wasn't even thinking of Mr Musk. According to reports, he is considering giving away the red Tesla he bought from Musk earlier this year. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

The days around Trump's trade war announcements saw spikes in lawmaker stock market transactions
The days around Trump's trade war announcements saw spikes in lawmaker stock market transactions

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The days around Trump's trade war announcements saw spikes in lawmaker stock market transactions

In the days before President Donald Trump suddenly paused most of the punishing tariffs on foreign countries he had revealed in early April, more than a dozen congressional lawmakers were tied to thousands of dollars' worth of stock transactions, including significant purchases as the US stock market tumbled, a CNN analysis of financial filings shows. Seven Democrats and three Republicans reported stock transactions made on April 7, two days before Trump instituted the pause, according to a CNN review of a database of congressional financial filings compiled by Capitol Trades, a platform by the financial data research firm 2iQ which tracks lawmakers' financial activity. That day, a post on X erroneously suggested a pause was already underway, tumbling stocks and sending the markets into a state of turbulence. The next day, on the eve of Trump's tariff reprieve, seven Republicans and four Democrats were tied to transactions, filings show. The White House that day announced it would impose hefty tariffs on China and the S&P 500 closed at its lowest level so far this year. Then came April 9. 'BE COOL!' and 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that day, hours before his White House announced a 90-day pause on tariffs against a number of countries save for China. The announcement set the S&P 500 on track to post its biggest single-day gain since October 2008. House and Senate lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have long traded stocks, and their reported transactions so far this Congress have largely mirrored Americans' high volume of trading activity amid the frenetic market shifts fueled by the president's whipsaw economic policy. While lawmakers who spoke with CNN denied having advance briefings, some who bought ahead of the president's tariff reprieve stood to make significant gains after it spurred a market rebound. Lawmakers told CNN the trades were made largely by third-party financial advisors with unilateral control over their portfolios. But experts and some on Capitol Hill say questions around the timing of the transactions strikes at the heart of an ethical and optical question that has long dogged Congress: Can lawmakers play the market without generating suspicion their access to information gives them an unfair advantage, or should they ban the practice altogether? 'At a time where there was significant or important non-public information swirling around Washington, the public can't help but fear that members of Congress are using their access to information to personally profit,' Indiana University Maurer School of Law Professor Donna Nagy, who has testified before Congress on the issue, told CNN after viewing the trading data. 'And whether that perception is true or not, it is destructive. It fuels a corrosive belief that lawmakers are using their positions for purposes of profit and not for the public interest.' Lawmakers, their spouses, and children are permitted to make trades but they are mandated to report any activity done on their behalf within 45 days. They are only required to disclose a monetary value range for trades. From March 31 — just before the president's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement of tariffs of at least 10% across all countries — through the April 9 pause, a total of 35 lawmakers (19 Republicans and 16 Democrats) reported purchases between about $8.6 million and $27.9 million and sales between about $5.9 million and $22.4 million across 1,265 transactions. Not all of the trades were individual stocks; some involved were mutual funds or public bonds. From March 31 through April 9, Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna reported the most transactions at 438, while GOP Rep. Kevin Hern reported the single highest-value transaction of up to $5 million on April 4. Eleven lawmakers reported one transaction. Fourteen lawmakers reported two transactions or fewer. The transactions Khanna reported, his communications director Sarah Drory told CNN, were not stock trades but part of a trust managed by an independent third party that stems from money his wife had before they were married. Hern spokeswoman Miranda Dabney, meanwhile, told CNN: 'Rep. Hern does not have day-to-day management or control over his stock portfolio or his businesses.' In statements provided to CNN, representatives for the lawmakers who reported trades during that period pointed to various agreements with third-party financial advisors and noted that some purchases were bonds and not individual stocks. The offices told CNN the lawmakers are not directly involved in the purchases. 'President Trump was telling the entire world for months, and even decades, about the benefits of tariffs. It was even a central component of his 2024 presidential campaign. Suggesting any behind-the-scenes coordination is ridiculous,' a spokesperson for Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said, pushing back on concerns around the timing of the trades. The Georgia Republican – whose 11 reported purchases on April 8 included between $1,000 and $15,000 worth of stock each, according to the filings – does not direct her own trades but instead has a fiduciary agreement with her portfolio manager, the spokesperson said. Around Trump's trade war, a number of Republicans publicly pledged support for Trump's economic policy while protecting their own financial interests. Sen. Markwayne Mullin sold between $290,000 and $700,000 in stocks across industries from a joint account on April 8 through 'an independent, third-party operator firm that manages all stock portfolio investments on his behalf,' according to his spokesperson. At the same time, the Oklahoma Republican was publicly supporting the president's escalating trade war, despite the financial decisions that appeared to mirror broader consumer concerns. Hern, the fourth-highest ranking Republican in the House said on February 13, shortly after Trump announced 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from all countries: 'These reciprocal tariffs will incentivize other nations to level the playing field and remove long-standing, exorbitant tariffs.' On March 31 — two days before Trump announced expansive tariffs on April 2 — a trust affiliated with Hern sold between $500,000 and $1 million worth of structured investments. For Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, one of the Republicans behind the push to ban lawmaker stock trading, having an intermediary conduct the trades does little to assuage concern. 'Members of Congress should come here to advance the interests of their constituents, not to enrich themselves using stock trading,' Roy said. Rhode Island Rep. Seth Magaziner, one of the leading negotiators on the Democratic side of the effort to ban congressional stock trading who participates in regular meetings on the issue, similarly told CNN: 'We should eliminate the opportunity for members of Congress to engage in any sort of insider trading because the opportunity clearly exists.' The director of government affairs at the Project on Government Oversight Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette told CNN, 'You occasionally have these moments where it really clarifies and distills down just how bad this is. And I think the tariff announcements and subsequent trades and transactions are a prime example of that.' March 3 — the day before Trump levied an additional 10% tariff on China and a 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian imports with some exceptions — saw the highest number of lawmakers reporting stock trading in a single day through mid-April, according to CNN's analysis. Sixteen lawmakers, evenly split among Democrats and Republicans, reported hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of transactions that day — most of them purchases. The president had confirmed at an afternoon White House event on March 3 that the tariffs would take effect the next day, leading to a sharp selloff in stocks. At that point, March 3 had so far been the worst day for the market. Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Dave McCormick, who reported purchases between $50,000 and $100,000, was the only lawmaker to report having personally traded on March 3. McCormick did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Lawmakers reached by CNN sought to distance themselves from the transactions filed during those key dates around Trump's tariffs announcements. CNN reached out to the 16 lawmakers who reported transactions on March 3, and the 35 lawmakers, some of whom overlapped, who reported having transactions between March 31 and April 9. Those who responded to CNN said they were unaware of trades being made through various agreements with financial advisors. They said the filings did not reflect traditional stock trades and that they had no interactions with the administration around key announcements. Some told CNN the filings reflected trades or reinvestments through a joint account or by a spouse. Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer is waiting on congressional approval for a blind trust, a spokesman told CNN. GOP Rep. Bruce Westerman, meanwhile, has instructed his investment advisor to not invest in individual stocks and is in the process of putting his assets back into a fund, after receiving heat for recent investments, spokesperson Kinsey Featherston shared. Democratic Rep. Julie Johnson has begun the process of divesting her stocks, managed by an independent third party, into ETFs and mutual funds upon becoming a member of Congress, her spokesperson told CNN. Some said they supported efforts to ban lawmaker trading of individual stocks, even those with active portfolios, including Khanna and GOP Rep. Rob Bresnahan. The STOCK Act passed with overwhelming support in 2012 to increase transparency about lawmaker stock trading and made it illegal for lawmakers to use inside information for financial benefit. But lawmakers and experts argue problems persist with existing reporting structures and enforcement mechanisms. Along with only being required to report a monetary range of transactions, lawmakers also don't report the timing of a trade on a given day, which could be useful context for those determining whether seemingly well-timed trades could be based on non-public information. There is also currently no designated oversight body to determine whether lawmakers hold a conflict of interest in their trading practices. Legal experts say that even lawmakers who use financial advisors to trade on their behalf are not necessarily insulated from scrutiny, and it depends on the details of the agreement. The $200 fine for late filings is hardly a deterrent, experts argue. 'That doesn't pass the sniff test even a little bit because there is no guarantee that they're not talking to those people because there is no prohibition against them from talking to those financial advisors,' Hedtler-Gaudette said of the arrangements most lawmakers have with their financial advisors. As efforts to ban congressional stock trading have fallen short, scholars and ethics experts have argued that members of Congress are privy to more information than the average American and are often faced with legislative decisions that overlap with their investment portfolios. 'It is essentially completely legal for a congressman, congresswoman or senator to go to Goldman Sachs, Blackrock or Vanguard and be like, 'Hey I'm proposing this regulation, what do you think will be the impact on the market?' There is nothing to stop you from that,' said Dr. Jan Hanousek Jr., an assistant professor at the University of Memphis who has studied the patterns of lawmaker stock trading. 'This is an insane problem.' Beyond ethics concerns, a 2022 Fox News poll found that 70% of respondents supported banning members of Congress and their families from trading stock, while a January UC San Diego study found that even when lawmakers make their trading practices public, it 'erodes' the legitimacy of Congress. The push to ban lawmaker stock trading last peaked when dozens of federal officials and some lawmakers made lucrative stock and mutual fund trades as the government was preparing for the financial onslaught of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020. The Department of Justice has since closed investigations into the moves. But in a sign this Congress' bipartisan group of lawmakers may be closer to finding the political will to ban the practice, House Speaker Mike Johnson, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the president himself have publicly supported the effort, following news of lawmaker stock trading activity around the tariff announcements. 'I have been working on this issue for years,' Roy told CNN. 'We can and should fix the problem during this term now that President Trump and the Speaker have signaled their support for the measure. We have the will and the mandate of the American people to do this. Let's deliver.' CNN's John Towfighi contributed to this report.

Who's listening to Negative Nelly? Not these investors. Survey shows they're optimistic.
Who's listening to Negative Nelly? Not these investors. Survey shows they're optimistic.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Who's listening to Negative Nelly? Not these investors. Survey shows they're optimistic.

Who's listening to Negative Nelly? Not these investors. Survey shows they're optimistic. Show Caption Hide Caption The trade war hits stock markets — how can you protect your finances? The global trade war has hit the stock markets — this is how you can protect your finances. Americans may have gotten pretty good at tuning out negative news and predictions, at least when it comes to investing, a Wealthfront survey suggests. Individuals surveyed by investment platform Wealthfront continued investing through the April U.S. stock market volatility stemming from President Donald Trump's tariff back-and-forth, and nearly 30% say they plan to invest more in U.S. stocks in the future. That may seem counterintuitive considering the many dire forecasts for the economy and the stock market from tariff wars, but 'it's also possible that investors are getting better at handling the constant flow of headlines and uncertainties that have shaped the market lately,' said Alex Michalka, head of investment strategy at Wealthfront. Optimism rises In May, 55% of respondents said they were somewhat or very optimistic about the U.S. stock market over the next six months. That's significantly higher than the 42% in April who felt upbeat. The improved vibes are 'likely fueled by the postponement of tariffs and the growing perception that future trade policies could be more moderate than initially anticipated,' Michalka said. Since Trump first announced his aggressive tariff plan on April 2, some of the highest tariffs have been iced as the administration tries to strike trade deals. The latest, and arguably the most significant, talks are occurring this week in London with Chinese officials. Is the worst over? Market volatility isn't necessarily over, and it can be uncomfortable for investors, but it's a fact of life, Michalka said. Once people understand and accept that, it's easier to stay the course and remain optimistic. 'During Covid, stocks went down really fast, but they also came back really fast,' said Nick Bour, founder and chief executive of Inspire Wealth in Brighton, Michigan. 'If you get out, you could miss the big bounce back.' Stocks ended May up 6% and are up again on the year. Additionally, if you took advantage of tax-loss harvesting and dollar-cost averaging during the volatility earlier this year, you may have even done better. Tax-loss harvesting means selling stocks that are losing money, recognizing the loss, and using it to offset capital gains, or profits made from other holdings, even if they are different types of investments or are being held in different accounts. Dollar-cost averaging is buying stock at regular intervals, regardless of whether prices are falling or rising. 'Not only did you buy investments 'at a discount,' you should have potentially valuable losses to use to lower your tax bill come tax time next year,' Michalka said. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store