SC suggests converting Noida into a metropolitan corporation. What does this mean?
The Court also asked for a probe into the Authority, based on an apex-court constituted SIT which flagged its various flaws and shortcomings. It was hearing the bail pleas of two NOIDA Authority officials accused of allowing excess compensation payouts.
It was created during the Emergency when Sanjay Gandhi, son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, wanted to move industries out of Delhi.
The Authority comes under the purview of the UP Infrastructure & Industrial Development Department. Its day-to-day activities are run by an appointed IAS officer in his role as its Chief Executive Officer.
It covers 81 revenue villages and a total of about 20,316 hectares of land.
How is it different from other cities?
Noida does not have a separate municipal body that performs daily civic functions, like dealing with garbage, street lighting, sewerage and public health, among other issues.
It is an anomaly in that the development authority, which is supposed to be responsible for the acquisition of land, planned development, and infrastructure creation, is also undertaking civic functions here.
For instance, in Delhi, these services are provided by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and in Mumbai by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), whereas Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), respectively, are responsible for planned development in these cities.
What is a metropolitan council?
The Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992, recognised three different types of urban local bodies or municipalities: Nagar Palikas for areas transitioning from rural to urban; municipal councils for smaller urban areas; and municipal corporations for larger urban areas.
A metropolitan area was defined in the Act as an area having a population of above 10 lakh. Noida had breached the 10 lakh-population mark way back in 2010.
Municipalities are supposed to be elected directly by the people and are the third tier of government in urban areas after the Union and state governments.
They are the equivalent of Panchayats, but in urban areas. They are supposed to look after public health, waste management, sanitation, provide urban facilities like parks and playgrounds, as well as amenities like street lighting, parking lots, bus stops and public conveniences, among other functions.
What are the benefits of having a municipality?
Proponents argue that having a self-governing local body leads to more effective, responsive, citizen-friendly, transparent, and accountable governance, in contrast to having an appointed bureaucrat in charge of local governance.
Not having a municipality has a huge negative impact on the area, according to Srikant Vishwanathan, CEO of Janaagraha, an organisation that works on urban governance.
'An elected municipality is the bridge between people's aspirations and the government's priorities and policies, especially for the urban poor,' Vishwanathan says.
In 2017, then District Magistrate BN Singh of Gautam Buddha Nagar (under which Noida falls) had recommended withdrawing municipal functions from the Authority and the formation of a separate municipal corporation.
However, the NOIDA and the Greater NOIDA bodies, later that year, concluded that they did not need municipal bodies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
P Vasu: He fought for freedom, and against Emergency
P Vasu might be 102 but still moves about his house in Cheruvannur in Kerala's Kozhikode district with the help of a walker, reads at least two newspapers a day, and watches television news with great intent, trying to keep himself informed of what's happening in the country. P Vasu: He fought for freedom, and against Emergency Born in January 1923, Vasu got a whiff of nationalistic sentiments early when his father took him to hear Mahatma Gandhi when the latter visited Kozhikode in 1934. He was just 11 then, but by the time he was in his late-teens in 1942, Vasu found himself leading an agitation by the Congress in his native Cheruvannur on the sidelines of the Quit India movement. That year, he was arrested and sentenced by a judge to three-and-a-half months in jail , where he was tortured. In 1943, Vasu had to go underground in erstwhile Madras for over nine months after the police attempted to put him in preventive custody in connection with a case of a bomb threat on Farook bridge. 'I had nothing to do with it but because I was jailed previously, my name was on the police list and I had to go into hiding. It was an extremely tough period,' Vasu told HT over phone. After Independence, Vasu joined the socialist party and was given its membership by stalwart Jayaprakash Narayan in Kozhikode. His strong beliefs in socialist ideals earned him the nickname among locals -- 'Socio Vasu'. In 1951, the then Madras presidency, under which the Malabar region in Kerala fell at the time, offered 10 acres of land in Wayanad and ₹2,000 to several freedom fighters including Vasu. But he refused to accept. 'Jayaprakash Narayan told us that we fought for the country's freedom, not for financial gains. Accepting it would have gone against my socialist ideals,' said Vasu. In 1975 during the Emergency, Vasu was beaten by the police for picketing the local post office. He spent 23 days at the Kozhikode Medical College hospital for treatment. In 1997, on the 50th anniversary of independence, Vasu was felicitated in Delhi by then President KR Narayanan. Is he happy about the present state of the country? 'No,' came the reply. 'It is not the India we envisioned in 1947. We are losing our secular ideals,' he said.
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Archive: A call to forge a sense of national identity
I propose to speak bluntly and sincerely about the state of the nation 50 years after Independence. I would be dishonouring the memory of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and of his mentor, Mahatma Gandhi, if I try to be economical with the truth. Citizens celebrate India's independence from British rule in the streets of erstwhile Calcutta. (Getty Images) Those of us who have lived through the earlier days of free India, when the entire nation was looking forward with zeal and fervour and with a sense of national pride, cannot but look upon the present times with deep anguish and distress. The only achievement of Indian democracy has been that it has survived unfractured for 50 years. The achievement is all the more creditable, since no other democracy has had such diversity in unity, or was such a mosaic of humanity. All the great religions in the world have flourished in India. We have 15 major languages written in different alphabets and derived from different roots and for good measure, our people whom you can never call taciturn express themselves in 250 dialects. In 1950, we started as a Republic with three inestimable advantages. First, we had 5,000 years of civilisation behind us –– a civilisation which had reached 'the summit of human thought' in the words of Ralph Waldo Emerson. We had a superb entrepreneurial spirit, honed over a century of obstacles. Secondly, whereas before 1858, India was never a united political entity, in that year, the accident of British rule welded us into one country, one nation; and when Independence came, we had been in unified nationality for almost a century under one head of state. Thirdly, our founding fathers, after two long years of laborious and painful toil, gave us a Constitution which a former Chief Justice of India rightly described as 'substance'. Unfortunately, over the years we dissipated every advantage we started with, like a compulsive gambler bent upon squandering an invaluable legacy. For the first 40 years, successive governments imposed mindless socialism on the nation, which held in thrall the people's endeavour and enterprise. They respected the shells of socialism state control and state ownership while the kernel, the spirit of social justice, was left with no chance of coming to life. We shut our eyes to the act that socialism is to social justice what ritual is to religion and dogma is to truth. The most persistent tendency in India has been to have too much government and too little administration, too many laws and too little justice, too many public servants and too little public service; too many controls and too little welfare. The picture that emerges is that of a great nation in a state of moral decay, of which corruption and indiscipline are two of the several facets. In the land of Mahatma Gandhi, violence is on the throne today. Mobocracy has too often displaced democracy. The contribution of modern India to sociology has been Bandh –– the closure of an entire city by militant rowdies. If I am asked to name one curse which deserves to be regarded as the greatest curse of India, I would say it is casteism. Unfortunately, divisiveness has become the Indian disease: Communal hatred, linguistic fanaticism, regional fealty, and caste loyalty are gnawing at the vitals of the unity and integrity of the country. To the growing army of terrorists and professional hooligans, caste or clan, creed or tongue, is a sufficient ground to kill their fellow citizens. National integration is born in the hearts of the citizens. When it dies there, no army, no government can save it. Interfaith harmony and consciousness of the essential unity of all religions is the very heart of our national integration. The soul of India aspires to integration and assimilation. The day will come when the 26 states of India will realise that in a profound sense they are culturally akin, ethnically identical, linguistically knit and historically related. The major task before India today is to acquire a keener sense of national identity, to gain the wisdom to cherish its priceless heritage, and to create a cohesive society with the cement of Indian culture. Edited excerpts of an article written by eminent jurist and author Nani A Palkhiwala that appeared on August 15, 1997.
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘Vote theft': Sharmila leads candlelight rally, targets EC, PM
Andhra Pradesh Congress Commitee (APCC) president Y. S. Sharmila on Thursday criticised the BJP-led Central government and the Election Commission of India (ECI), during a candlelight rally organised by the party on Thursday. Speaking during rally organised by party leaders from Andhra Ratna Bhavan, Ms. Sharmila called out the BJP for 'mockery of democracy, with the support of the ECI,' and raised slogans of 'Vote-chor gaddi chod.' She questioned how the EC gave permission to register new voters using false data. 'The Election Commission has no answers to the questions asked by party leader Rahul Gandhi. It is matter of shame,' she added. She added, the EC, is supposed to safeguard democracy and the Constitution, is behaving like an agent of the BJP. 'Like all other institutions in the country, even the EC is playing into the hands of Prime Minister Narendra Modi' she alleged. She added that the Congress demands answers to questions asked by Rahul Gandhi. 'It has come to light that lakhs of votes have been removed from the Bihar electoral rolls,' adding: 'The irregularities are so blatant that Rahul Gandhi went and had tea with seven persons who were supposedly dead. It's a shame for a democracy like India, she said, demanding an enquiry of the highest level and stringent punishment to those found guilty.
