logo
Democracy under siege: Trump's war comes home to Los Angeles

Democracy under siege: Trump's war comes home to Los Angeles

Time of India16-06-2025
Debashis Chakrabarti is a political columnist, Commonwealth Fellow (UK), and internationally recognized academic whose career bridges journalism, policy, and higher education leadership. A former journalist with The Indian Express, he brings the precision of investigative reporting to his political analysis and scholarly work. He has served as Professor and Dean at leading institutions across the UK, India, Africa, and the Middle East, with expertise in media studies, political communication, and governance. LESS ... MORE
When the bootsteps of US Marines echo through the streets of Los Angeles—not in defence of the nation, but deployed against its own people—history shudders. What we are witnessing is not merely a flashpoint in American politics, but the tremor of a collapsing democratic compact. President Donald Trump has crossed a Rubicon, not in service of security, but in a calculated, authoritarian bid to redefine dissent as insurrection.
This is not a drill. This is not merely political brinkmanship. A constitutional reckoning is underway—and the world is watching.
The tanks are not just rolling—they are redrawing the map of American power
In a stark echo of history's most troubling precedents, US Marines and National Guard troops now patrol not distant battlefields, but the streets of American cities. The pretext: a crackdown on protests following mass immigration raids, executed with mechanical cruelty. But peel back the rhetoric about 'national sovereignty' and 'foreign lawlessness,' and what remains is a naked attempt to militarize policy failure and crush democratic expression.
In Los Angeles, over 2,000 troops, including 700 active-duty Marines, were stationed in proximity to protest sites. Their stated mission: to 'protect federal property.' But their real function was symbolic—the projection of raw power, of martial discipline, of command from above. Curfews were imposed, hundreds arrested, and images of troops 'accompanying' ICE agents into Latino neighborhoods sent a singular message: Dissent will be policed at gunpoint.
Law and constitutional precedent: A republic rewritten
This moment marks a historic constitutional rupture. Trump's move to federalize the California National Guard without the governor's consent defies established precedent and strikes at the core of American federalism. Governor Gavin Newsom's lawsuit, Newsom v. Trump, invokes the Tenth Amendment and the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids the military from enforcing civilian law.
And yet, federal troops roam Los Angeles with semi-automatic precision. What was once unimaginable—federal armed forces embedded in US cities amid peaceful protests—is now fait accompli. Legal experts warn this deployment could set a precedent as dangerous as it is durable, allowing future presidents to invoke vague notions of 'sovereignty' to sidestep governors, mayors, courts—even Congress.
This is not law enforcement. It is executive imperialism.
Political theatre masquerading as public safety
President Trump's apocalyptic tone—accusing protesters of waving 'foreign flags' and bringing 'third-world lawlessness'—is less a diagnosis than a dramaturgical strategy. In invoking militarism while invoking patriotism, Trump is staging a pantomime of leadership for his base, wielding the US military not as a shield of the republic, but as a prop of the presidency.
Let's be clear: the majority of protests were peaceful. Community leaders, clergy, and concerned citizens chanted 'peaceful protest' with their hands raised. But Trump did not seek de-escalation. He sought a show. Marines in flak jackets, helicopters buzzing overhead, police with rubber bullets—it is not governance. It is political theatre, laced with menace and intent.
This is not about public order. It is about performance authoritarianism.
Military strain: Morale collapses under orders
Behind the stoic faces of America's uniformed services lies a brewing crisis. Soldiers have privately expressed alarm at their use against civilians. Reports from Seal Beach and downtown staging areas describe low morale, chaotic logistics, and profound unease about what they are being asked to do.
The mission, ambiguously defined, leaves many service members caught in a legal and ethical limbo. Are they defenders of the nation, or enforcers of a presidency? Are they protecting property, or intimidating political opposition?
We must ask: How long can the military endure being cast in this role before the institution itself begins to fray?
Democratic erosion: The No Kings moment
In a fiery, televised address, governor Newsom declared, 'Democracy is under assault.' It was not rhetoric—it was a tocsin. Across the nation, protests have erupted under the banner 'No Kings Day,' symbolically timed with Trump's birthday and echoing the Founding Fathers' rejection of monarchy.
What we are witnessing is not a partisan rift. It is a populist, cross-ideological resistance to the corrosion of democratic norms. When the military is used to quell dissent, when judges are ignored, when governors are threatened with arrest, when immigrants are hunted and their allies imprisoned—what remains of the democratic edifice?
A republic does not fall in a single day. It erodes—curfew by curfew, raid by raid, arrest by arrest.
A global reckoning
The United States has long cast itself as a global beacon of democratic liberty. But today, images of troops confronting children of immigrants, of curfews enforced by men in camouflage, of governors suing their president to defend basic rights—these are not the hallmarks of democracy.
They are the symptoms of a failing one.
From Paris to Pretoria, New Delhi to New York, global observers must now confront an unthinkable reality: the world's oldest constitutional democracy is no longer immune to authoritarian drift. The contagion of militarized populism has reached home.
The final question
This moment will enter history books—but how it is remembered will depend on what comes next. Will the courts restore balance? Will the military resist politicization? Will the people demand their republic back?
The world must not look away. Because if America forgets itself—if it allows tanks in the streets to become the new normal—then the idea of democracy itself is at stake.
This is not Los Angeles's crisis alone.
This is everyone's fight.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration said to discuss taking 10% in Intel
Trump administration said to discuss taking 10% in Intel

Economic Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump administration said to discuss taking 10% in Intel

Synopsis The Trump administration is reportedly considering acquiring a 10% stake in Intel Corp., potentially making the US government its largest shareholder. This move involves converting some or all of Intel's $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants into equity. Discussions are ongoing, and the exact size of the stake remains subject to change, impacting Intel's stock performance. Reuters The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in Intel Corp., according to a White House official and other people familiar with the matter, in a move that could see the US become the beleaguered chipmaker's largest federal government is considering a potential investment in Intel that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the US Chips and Science Act into equity, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military figure is roughly enough to pay for the targeted holding. At Intel's current market value, a 10% stake in the chipmaker would be worth roughly $10.5 billion. The exact size of the stake, as well as whether the White House chooses to move ahead with the plan, is still in flux, the people shares dropped as much as 5.5% after Bloomberg reported on the talks Monday. They had climbed 23% last week for their best weekly gain since House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, saying only that no deal is official until it's announced by the administration. Intel didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Read More: Trump Administration Eyeing Chips Act Funds for Intel StakeThe White House official also floated the possibility that the administration could convert other Chips Act awards into equity stakes. It's not clear whether that idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with any companies that could be month, in an unprecedented move, the Defense Department said it will take a $400 million preferred equity stake in the little-known US rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp. — a deal that would make the Pentagon the company's largest More: Pentagon Buys Rare Earths Stake to Tackle China's DominanceNews of a potential government investment in Intel kicked off a rally in the company's shares after Bloomberg News first reported the discussions among US officials and company representatives last is the case for all Chips Act winners, Intel's grant money was originally designed to be disbursed over time as the company hits negotiated project milestones. Intel had received $2.2 billion in grant disbursements as of unclear whether that $2.2 billion would be included in the possible equity stake, whether the company has received additional tranches of its award since President Donald Trump took office, and on what timeline Intel would receive money under a possible equity stake.

Trump Zelensky Meeting: Zelensky, Backed by Europe, Confronts Trump at White House
Trump Zelensky Meeting: Zelensky, Backed by Europe, Confronts Trump at White House

News18

time15 minutes ago

  • News18

Trump Zelensky Meeting: Zelensky, Backed by Europe, Confronts Trump at White House

Trump Zelensky Meeting: Zelensky, Backed by Europe, Confronts Trump at White House Last Updated: August 18, 2025, 22:09 IST Breaking News Videos European leaders to join Zelensky in confronting Trump over Ukraine homevideos Trump Zelensky Meeting: Zelensky, Backed by Europe, Confronts Trump at White House CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2024 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. © Copyright Network18 Media and Investments Ltd 2024. All rights reserved.

Taiwan 'issue' is an internal matter, China says in response to Trump
Taiwan 'issue' is an internal matter, China says in response to Trump

The Hindu

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Taiwan 'issue' is an internal matter, China says in response to Trump

Taiwan is an internal matter for China, Beijing's foreign ministry said on Monday, in response to U.S. President Donald Trump saying Chinese President Xi Jinping told him he will not invade the island while Trump is in office. Mr. Trump made the comments in an interview with Fox News, ahead of talks in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Moscow's war with Ukraine. Asked about Mr. Trump's remarks at a daily news briefing in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory. "The Taiwan issue is purely an internal affair of China, and how to resolve the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese people," she said. "We will do our utmost to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification. But we will never allow anyone or any force to separate Taiwan from China in any way." China views Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to "reunify" with the democratic and separately governed island. Taiwan vehemently opposes China's sovereignty claims. On Sunday, in its response to what Mr. Trump had said, Taiwan's foreign ministry said it "always closely monitors interactions between senior officials from the United States and China". Taiwan will continue to work with countries that have "significant interests" in the Indo-Pacific region to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, the ministry added. The United States is Taiwan's most important international backer and arms supplier, despite the absence of formal diplomatic ties. China, which has never renounced the use of force to bring the island under its control, regularly describes Taiwan as the most important and sensitive topic in its relations with the United States.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store