
What Really Happened With the DDoS Attacks That Took Down X
Mar 11, 2025 9:42 AM Elon Musk said a 'massive cyberattack' disrupted X on Monday and pointed to 'IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area' as the source of the attack. Security experts say that's not how it works. White House Senior Advisor to the President and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk departs the U.S. Capitol Building on March 5, 2025 in Washington, DC. Photograph:The social network X suffered intermittent outages on Monday, a situation owner Elon Musk attributed to a 'massive cyberattack.' Musk said in an initial X post that the attack was perpetrated by 'either a large, coordinated group and/or a country.' In a post on Telegram, a pro-Palestinian group known as 'Dark Storm Team' took credit for the attacks within a few hours. Later on Monday, though, Musk claimed in an interview on Fox Business Network that the attacks had come from Ukrainian IP addresses.
Web traffic analysis experts who tracked the incident on Monday were quick to emphasize that the type of attacks X seemed to face—distributed denial of service, or DDoS, attacks—are launched by a coordinated army of computers, or a 'botnet,' pummeling a target with junk traffic in an attempt to overwhelm and take down its systems. Botnets are typically dispersed around the world, generating traffic with geographically diverse IP addresses, and they can also include mechanisms that make it harder to determine where they are controlled from.
'It's important to recognize that IP attribution alone is not conclusive. Attackers frequently use compromised devices, VPNs, or proxy networks to obfuscate their true origin," says Shawn Edwards, chief security officer of the network connectivity firm Zayo.
X did not return WIRED's requests for comment about the attacks.
Multiple researchers tell WIRED that they observed five distinct attacks of varying length against X's infrastructure, the first beginning early Monday morning with the final burst on Monday afternoon.
The internet intelligence team at Cisco's ThousandEyes tells WIRED in a statement that,'During the disruptions, ThousandEyes observed network conditions that are characteristic of a DDoS attack, including significant traffic loss conditions which would have hindered users from reaching the application.'
DDoS attacks are common and virtually all modern internet services experience them regularly and must proactively defend themselves. As Musk himself put it on Monday, 'We get attacked every day.' Why, then, did these DDoS attacks cause outages for X? Musk said it was because 'this was done with a lot of resources,' but independent security researcher Kevin Beaumont and other analysts see evidence that some X origin servers, which respond to web requests, weren't properly secured behind the company's Cloudflare DDoS protection and were publicly visible. As a result, attackers could target them directly. X has since secured the servers.
'The botnet was directly attacking the IP and a bunch more on that X subnet yesterday, it's a botnet of cameras and DVRs,' Beaumont says.
A few hours after the final attack concluded, Musk told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow in an interview that, 'We're not sure exactly what happened, but there was a massive cyberattack to try to bring down the X system with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area.'
Musk has mocked Ukraine and its president Volodymyr Zelensky repeatedly since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022. A major campaign donor to President Donald Trump, Musk now heads the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, which has razed the US federal government and its workforce in the weeks since Trump's inauguration. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has recently warmed relations with Russia and moved the US away from its longtime support of Ukraine. Musk has already been involved in these geopolitics in the context of a different company he owns, SpaceX, which operates the satellite internet service Starlink that many Ukrainians rely on.
DDoS traffic analysis can break down the firehose of junk traffic in different ways, including by listing the countries that had the most IP addresses involved in an attack. But one researcher from a prominent firm, who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak about X, noted that they did not even see Ukraine in the breakdown of the top 20 IP address origins involved in the X attacks.
If Ukrainian IP addresses did contribute to the attacks, though, numerous researchers say that the fact alone is not noteworthy.
'What we can conclude from the IP data is the geographic distribution of traffic sources, which may provide insights into botnet composition or infrastructure used,' Zayo's Edwards says. 'What we can't conclude with certainty is the actual perpetrator's identity or intent.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
29 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Tesla's (TSLA) Full Self-Driving Could Expand in China Due to New Data Export Rules
China has released draft guidelines that could help EV maker Tesla (TSLA) expand its advanced driver-assistance features in the country, according to a Bloomberg report on Friday. For the first time, Beijing has provided clear rules on how data generated in China, including from driver-assistance systems and product development, can be accessed, used, and exported. This is an important step for companies like Tesla, which need to send data abroad in order to improve their systems. Confident Investing Starts Here: The proposed guidelines were published by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, along with seven other government agencies, and are now open for public comment. The framework covers key types of information, such as autonomous driving algorithms, training images, operational data, and vehicle-to-road perception data. These are all critical for developing and improving advanced driver-assistance technologies like Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system. Being able to export this data is especially valuable for Tesla because the core team working on FSD is based in the U.S., and having access to real-world data from Chinese roads would help optimize the system's performance in China, the world's largest car market. It's worth noting that, until now, strict data controls have been a barrier for foreign automakers. However, the new guidelines could provide Tesla with a clearer path to making its most advanced driver-assistance features more competitive in China. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? Overall, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on TSLA stock based on 14 Buys, 12 Holds, and nine Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average TSLA price target of $285.97 per share implies 12.1% downside risk.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Think Lucid Group Stock Is Expensive? This 1 Chart Might Change Your Mind.
Lucid Group stock looks expensive. Tesla's history shows Lucid's true potential. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Everyone wants to invest in the next Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), and an examination of analyst predictions suggests Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) has the potential to be it. Sales are expected to grow by 73% this year, with another 96% growth expected in 2026. There's just one problem with buying the stock at the moment: Lucid shares trade at 6.7 times sales, a pricey valuation for a business that might be unprofitable for at least the next several years. If you dig deeper, however, Lucid shares might be wildly undervalued despite the high price-to-sales ratio (P/S). Despite generating less than 1% of Tesla's revenue, Lucid Group still trades at roughly half the valuation of Tesla on a price-to-sales basis. That could all change when the company releases its "mass market" vehicles. Management has previously teased three new vehicle models that will all sell for less than $50,000 a piece. While these vehicles are still a year or two away from production, they should eventually put Lucid's growth in overdrive. Tesla released its Model 3 in 2017, with the Model Y following in 2020. These two affordable vehicles now account for more than 90% of Tesla's sales -- the primary reason that Tesla's sales have gone from a few billion dollars to more than $95 billion today. Lucid has a very long way to go before matching Tesla's revenue numbers. But releasing more affordable models is the key to closing the gap. If management is to be believed, the first of several mass market models will arrive sometime in 2026, with more on the way in 2027 and beyond. It should be stressed that Lucid's financial position isn't incredibly strong right now. It has less than $1.9 billion in cash on the balance sheet, yet it lost nearly $2.4 billion over the last 12 months. More cash will need to be raised to get these new models to market. However, Tesla's success shows Lucid's true potential. Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Think Lucid Group Stock Is Expensive? This 1 Chart Might Change Your Mind. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Neuralink device helps Monkey see something that's not there
Elon Musk's Neuralink Corp. used a brain implant to enable a monkey to see something that wasn't physically there, according to an engineer, as it moves toward its goal of helping blind people see. The device, called Blindsight, stimulated areas of a monkey's brain associated with vision, Neuralink engineer Joseph O'Doherty said Friday at a conference. At least two-thirds of the time, the monkey moved its eyes toward something researchers were trying to trick the brain into visualizing. The results were the first Neuralink has publicized about tests of Blindsight, a brain chip that mimics the function of an eye. This is a closely watched frontier for brain device development, a scientific field that's testing the boundaries of how technology can be used to potentially treat intractable conditions. As with all animal studies, it's an open question how the results would apply to humans. The device isn't approved for human use in the US. The short-term goal of Blindsight is to help people see, and the long-term goal is to facilitate superhuman vision — like in infrared — Musk has said. The company has been testing Blindsight in monkeys for the past few years and is hoping to test it in a human this year, the billionaire said in March. On the sidelines of the conference, O'Doherty declined to comment further about Neuralink's work. Neuralink is also implanting devices in people who are paralyzed that allow them to communicate directly with computers, one of several companies in the growing technological field. Five people have received Neuralink implants so far, Musk has said. Three were implanted in 2024 and two in 2025, according to O'Doherty's presentation at the Neural Interfaces conference. In some cases, patients are using their Neuralink device for about 60 hours a week. In the future, brain devices using similar technology could allow paralyzed people to move or walk, Musk has said. O'Doherty co-authored a poster with academic researchers, which was presented at the conference, describing an experiment that used the Neuralink implant to stimulate the spinal cord of a monkey, causing its muscles to move. Other researchers have been working on spinal cord stimulation to restore muscle movement for several years. Musk's medical aspirations are a stepping stone toward the goal of increasing the speed of human communication for everyone, allowing people to 'mitigate the risk of digital super-intelligence,' Musk said in 2024. He's also building artificial intelligence through his company xAI Corp. Eventually, the company wants the Blindsight system to include a pair of glasses to help make the chip work, O'Doherty said in his talk. Testing in monkeys has advantages. The visual cortex in a monkey is closer to the surface of the brain than in a human, making it easier to access, O'Doherty said in the presentation. Neuralink could use its surgical robot to insert its implant into the deeper regions in a person's brain, he added. Swetlitz writes for Bloomberg