Opinion: Fighting March Madness snub, West Virginia governor looks like a clown
Opinion: Fighting March Madness snub, West Virginia governor looks like a clown Do you know what sports fans hate more than NCAA Tournament injustice? A gasbag governor grandstanding to his political base.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
The Florida Gators lead dominant SEC conference in NCAA tournament
USAT's Jordan Mendoza talks about Florida taking the SEC over the Vols and how the SEC could dominate the March Madness down to the Final Four.
Sports Seriously
Watching West Virginia governor Patrick Morrisey and his attorney general John McCuskey prattle on at a Monday news conference, demanding accountability and threatening legal remedies over — wait for it — the NCAA basketball tournament selection process, you might have wondered if this was all a setup for Kenan Thompson to run out on stage and yell 'Live from New York, it's Saturday Niiiiiiiiight!'
A mere 18 hours after the Mountaineers were controversially snubbed from March Madness in favor of North Carolina, there was really only one thing that could kill the national sympathy being directed toward Morgantown.
And wouldn't you know it, the politicians didn't disappoint.
Do you know what sports fans hate more than an NCAA tournament injustice? A gasbag governor and his obsequious sidekick grandstanding to their political base, sticking their nose into a place it doesn't belong and making a mockery of the real problems in a state that has plenty of them.
Seriously, gentlemen: Do you not have better things to do?
'This was a miscarriage of justice and robbery at the highest levels,' Morrisey said. 'This thing reeks of corruption.'
Is that similar to the smell emanated by a former Washington, D.C. lobbyist for the pharmaceutical industry who ran for office in West Virginia on a platform of fighting the opioid epidemic? Just wondering.
There used to be a time in America when ambitious politicians, and particularly Republicans like Morrisey and McCuskey, would have railed against the idea of running to the courtroom to litigate any perceived minor injustice.
Ah, well, nevertheless.
Instead, we had Morrisey not only refusing to rule out the possibility of seeking an injunction if the NCAA doesn't cooperate immediately with McCuskey's investigation but also suggesting the West Virginia snub might have been retribution for the state suing the NCAA in 2023 over basketball player's RaeQuan Battle's eligibility.
'A lot of people said, 'What are you doing?'' Morrisey said. 'We sent multiple letters they didn't respond adequately to and we fundamentally helped change the transfer eligibility rules. So I think the answer is when you're talking about multi-billion dollar businesses and universities that have a big stake in the outcome, absolutely (it's worthwhile).'
Of course, one big difference: In the Battle lawsuit, West Virginia was challenging whether the NCAA's transfer rules violated antitrust laws on behalf of a citizen fighting for his rights. But this? This is just a whole lot of whining on behalf of a basketball team that lost 13 of its 32 games including to Colorado in the Big 12 tournament.
And it's not even really clear what they hope to gain, other than a mention of 'objective criteria' for the NCAA tournament selection process. Which, if you have followed the selection process for any length of time, is like trying to explain why 'Anora' won Best Picture over 'Conclave.' There is no objective criteria. That's the point.
And West Virginia, like every other Div. 1 school, not only knew that going in but agreed to it.
Now, does that mean the committee got it right? No.
West Virginia's exclusion was stunning, given that every 'bracketologist' who does this either as a job or a hobby had the Mountaineers in the field. And as we addressed Sunday night, the fact that North Carolina athletics director Bubba Cunningham chairs the selection committee isn't a great look when the final decision was literally UNC over West Virginia.
In cases like this, the recusal procedures to ensure Cunningham wasn't part of the discussion or votes involving UNC don't protect the NCAA from accusations of favoritism. That gave Morrisey the opening to pounce, and if it wasn't him, it could just as easily have been the governor of Texas if the Longhorns got left out instead of the Mountaineers.
'UNC had representation in the room,' Morrisey said. 'It's being reported by a number of outlets that Cunningham had a significant bonus incentive, at least $70,000, to get into the tournament, arguably more if they advanced. I want folks to let that sink in for just a minute."
Even if Cunningham did everything by the book, the selection process has long been plagued by suspicions that committee members will do their best to take care of buddies who work at other schools. And even if Cunningham never even hinted at lobbying for the Tar Heels, these committee members are colleagues and often friends who spend a lot of time with each other inside and outside the committee room during this process.
So something like what happened Sunday only turbocharges conspiracy theories, and it's worth looking at whether athletics directors and conference commissioners should be the ones making these tough calls when there's so much on the line financially.
But that's a matter for the leaders of college sports to reckon with — not elected officials who love to use this stuff to make it seem like they're fighting for the common man or woman when we all know it's political theater.
McCuskey, the attorney general, even sounded more like a message board poster than a chief law enforcement officer in repeatedly referring to the Mountaineers as 'we' and making the case that a basketball team with guard Javon Small would have a chance to beat anyone in the country.
In the end, it was deeply embarrassing for the people of West Virginia. Just like it was when some Florida politicians did the same thing after Florida State got left out of the 2023 College Football Playoff. And just like the group of legislators in Georgia, Alabama and Illinois that have recently tried to pass bills giving college athletes an exemption from state income tax on their NIL deals.
In fact, it's probably not a stretch to say that no group of people has consistently done more to turn public opinion back toward the NCAA on a variety of issues than state-level legislators doing ridiculous things on behalf of college sports because they think it will win them more votes in the next election.
Similar to most of those efforts, Monday's news conference was almost as funny as a variety show. Only it happened in real life, in the state of West Virginia, instead of on the SNL set where it belonged.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska needs a nuclear energy strategy
Nebraska Public Power District's Cooper Nuclear Station near Brownville, Nebraska. (Courtesy of NPPD) In February 2021, thousands of Nebraskans found themselves in the dark of rolling blackouts. A brutal polar vortex froze wind turbines, strained natural gas supplies and exposed serious weaknesses in our energy grid. However, even as multiple power sources failed, one remained steadfast — nuclear energy. That moment was a wake-up call. We can no longer afford to treat energy policy as a matter of convenience or short-term cost. To avoid future blackouts and maintain affordable, resilient, firm and reliable power, Nebraska needs nuclear energy. Wind and solar are intermittent. Natural gas is a vital bridge fuel, but it is vulnerable to supply shocks in extreme weather. This is about building a reliable and resilient energy source that can deliver for Nebraska families, farmers and businesses when it counts. Nuclear energy, which currently generates 17% of Nebraska's power, brings unique strengths. It provides carbon-free baseload power that runs around the clock regardless of whether the wind is blowing or the sun is shining. During the 2021 deep freeze, Nebraska's lone nuclear plant kept running at full strength while other sources faltered. The United Nations 2021 report, 'Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options,' shows that nuclear has the lowest overall impacts on human health and the environment by any measure and from any perspective. The cost of new nuclear energy is within a penny per kilowatt-hour of other forms of new energy sources, including natural gas, wind and solar. Is that one cent too much to have a resilient, reliable power source for Nebraska? We've seen what happens when nuclear gets overlooked. Omaha Public Power District's Fort Calhoun plant and Nebraska Public Power District's Cooper Nuclear Station accounted for about a quarter of Nebraska's net generation capabilities before Fort Calhoun was shut down in 2016. The shut down was nearly two decades ahead of schedule, a casualty of market conditions that failed to account for long-term reliability and energy needs. Hundreds of skilled jobs were lost. Our energy safety net shrank. And just a few years later, that decision looked shortsighted as the grid buckled under pressure. To avoid repeating that mistake, policymakers should ensure that energy markets properly value reliability and resilience. As 26 House Republicans made clear in a late April letter to congressional leadership, protecting the federal nuclear production tax credit (PTC) is one way to do so. It has proven a huge help in incentivizing the development of nuclear power at a time when NPPD is exploring options. For Nebraska, the credit helps create and protect hundreds of high-paying, skilled jobs, generating local tax revenue and sustaining a stable source of affordable power. Another step Congress could take is expanding investment incentives for next-generation technologies like small modular reactors (SMRs). These compact, scalable reactors can serve Nebraska's rural areas and industrial parks where large traditional plants aren't practical, offering flexibility and grid stability. Policies like the Advanced Nuclear Production Credit and bipartisan permitting reform proposals can help accelerate local deployment. U.S. Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., has advocated for nuclear's role in America's energy future on the Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee, where it helps Nebraska to have a voice in ensuring that our state's long-term energy interests remain protected. Nebraska's energy future isn't just about keeping the lights on. It's about protecting lives during extreme weather, powering our farms and factories and anchoring high-skilled jobs in our communities. If we want to avoid another round of blackouts, we should encourage policies that keep every reliable tool in the toolbox — including nuclear. Bruce Bostelman, a farmer and veteran from Brainard, served in the Nebraska Legislature from 2017 to 2025, including serving as chair of the Natural Resources Committee. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


Politico
12 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP leaders rush into Musk damage control
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Johnson defends against Musk's attacks— Emmer's megabill confidence— Congress gets its rescissions deadline Hill GOP leaders are in full-on damage control as they scramble to save their megabill — and themselves — from the blast radius of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's breakup. But Musk doesn't seem interested in sparing any part of the GOP trifecta from his wrath on his way out of Washington. The president's new enemy attacked both Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune Thursday over the cost of the party's sweeping domestic policy package. Thune brushed it aside. Johnson, however, is mounting a multi-front rebuttal as he aims to keep Musk from hurting the megabill's prospects, our Meredith Lee Hill reports. He's questioning the tech mogul's motives for opposing the bill and challenging his claims about its impact on the deficit. Johnson already had to reassure hard-liners concerned about the bill's spending in order to squeeze the bill through the House last month. 'I'm the same guy that's always been a deficit hawk, and now I'm the speaker of the House, and I'm working on a multi-step plan to reverse the fiscal insanity that has haunted our country,' Johnson told reporters Thursday. 'We have to get the big, beautiful bill done.' Johnson's leadership team quickly claimed Musk wouldn't rattle their members. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise insisted it hadn't moved any votes. And Whip Tom Emmer, in an exclusive interview with Mia (more on that below), said he's not tracking Musk's onslaught on X. 'Sorry,' Emmer said, 'he's not on my phone.' Some fiscal hard-liners — who share in Musk's concerns about the bill but allowed it to pass the House — avoided immediately picking sides in the feud. Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, bombarded with questions about Musk on Thursday, said only that he's 'right on the deficit.' Sen. Mike Lee posted on X: 'But … I really like both of them.' They may not have to choose. Signs of a détente emerged late Thursday, with Trump brushing off the clash in a phone call with our Dasha Burns and Musk seeming somewhat open to a reconciliation (just not the reconciliation bill). White House aides are working to broker peace. Still, if the Trump-Musk divorce goes through, MAGA will side with the president, our Rachael Bade predicts in her latest Corridors column. There were signs Thursday that Musk was alienating some of Trump's biggest Hill boosters. 'Elon is getting too personal. It's getting out of control,' Rep. Troy Nehls told Mia. 'Some of the most recent comments, I think: Elon, you've lost your mind.' Coming up in today's Playbook: Musk bankrolled the GOP back to power in Washington. Now his financial firepower could break Republicans' trifecta — and imperil their legislative agenda after 2026. TGIF. Follow our live coverage at the Inside Congress blog at and email your Inside Congress scribes at mmccarthy@ lkashinsky@ and bleonard@ THE SKED The House is in session and voting on a bill that requires proof of citizenship to apply for SBA loans at 10:10 a.m. — Financial Services will continue a hearing on digital assets at 9 a.m. — Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries will have his weekly press conference at 10:45 a.m. The Senate is out. Next week: The Senate will continue to take up Trump's nominations. The House is scheduled to take up Trump's rescissions package. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: Emmer projects confidence on Senate's megabill Emmer isn't concerned about the GOP megabill's fate in the Senate, despite the current policy disputes. During an exclusive sitdown with Mia on Thursday, the House majority whip was bullish about getting the bill to Trump's desk by July 4. 'The Senate will do their work. They're going to send the bill back to us,' Emmer told Mia. 'We are going to pass it and send it to the president's desk. The time for talking is over.' ON SALT — One thing Emmer said he hopes the Senate won't touch: the quadrupled state-and-local tax deduction cap carefully negotiated with blue-state Republicans in the House. Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo recently said there's little appetite among his members for keeping the increase fully intact. But Emmer said he believes the Senate understands the House's more difficult math. 'John Thune was quoted somewhere as saying, you know, 'We understand it's 51 over here and it's 218 over there.'' Emmer said. 'That should tell you everything you need to know.' ON MEDICAID — Emmer said he believes senators who have raised concerns on the issue — specifically Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Josh Hawley — are 'going to be pleasantly surprised when they go through' the bill. 'A lot of their concerns that they thought they were going to have are just not there,' Emmer said, adding that 'there might be' tweaks, but no one has flagged any 'major problems' in the bill. Emmer said the only area he thinks there might be unease is about the provider tax. ON CLEAN ENERGY — A key group of senators could hold up the bill over the repeal or scaling back of the Inflation Reduction Act's clean-energy tax provisions, which could disrupt projects in their states. But Emmer said that's something the House was concerned about as well. 'That's one of the reasons why the sunsetting is out at least three years, so that people can continue projects and repurpose them,' Emmer said. 'That was the whole concept. Whatever the Senate does with it, that's their business.' Pros can read the rest of the Q&A with Emmer here. Reconciliation 2.0 ... or 3.0? Johnson has already floated the idea of a second reconciliation package. Now, he's hinting at a third. 'There may be a third one,' the speaker said Thursday, adding that 'we have to do it in the proper sequence.' Emmer didn't wave off the idea of a second or third megabill to Mia on Thursday, but noted they should 'get the first one done.' 'All of it's possible,' Emmer said. 'Is it probable? We'll see.' POLICY RUNDOWN SCOOP: WICKER QUESTIONS ARMY PARADE — Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker told Lisa he 'would have recommended against' the Army's plan to hold a multimillion-dollar parade in D.C. on June 14, which is also Trump's birthday. 'On the other hand, the secretary feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force, that it will be a recruiting tool,' Wicker said. 'So, we'll see.' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll told lawmakers in a budget hearing Thursday that the parade could cost $25 million to $40 million. He was not able to provide an exact cost, he said, because the Army will also need to cover whatever damage its tanks do to Washington's streets. Other GOP senators aren't happy with the price tag. Collins told Lisa she's 'glad that we're honoring the Army' but 'the cost does seem a bit steep.' Sen. Ron Johnson was blunt: 'If it costs money, I won't go.' SCOOP: RESCISSIONS DEADLINE SET — Congress must act by July 18 on Trump's request to claw back $9.4 billion in funding or the White House will be required to spend the money, the Senate parliamentarian said. If the House and Senate follow their current schedules, the 45-day clock on Trump's request will expire at midnight that day, people granted anonymity to discuss private guidance from the Senate's rule-keeper told our Jennifer Scholtes. Before that deadline, the House and Senate can vote to approve or reject Trump's request to nix $8.3 billion for foreign aid and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. TRUMP'S 'EITHER WAY' ON TAX PERMANENCE — Sen. Steve Daines, one of the chamber's tax writers, told our Benjamin Guggenheim Thursday that Trump was noncommittal during their White House meeting on whether his business tax incentives should be extended or made permanent. 'He said: 'I'm open to permanence. I'm open to kind of go either way, even on a five-year provision'' like what the House included in its version of the megabill, Daines said. Daines told Benjamin he believes there's a consensus among Senate Finance Republicans for permanence, calling it a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity' for lasting tax reform. ABOUT THOSE CLEAN ENERGY CREDITS — GOP senators who want to keep clean-energy credits under Democrats' 2022 climate law are expressing confidence that their chamber will ease off the harsh phaseouts in the House-passed megabill. Sen. Thom Tillis told our Josh Siegel that 'every one of them is going to have some sort of an extension' from the sunset dates in the House bill. Murkowski told reporters Thursday she's also looking to ensure 'more reasonable' phaseout timelines. 'You can't have real dominance unless you have all aspects of energy,' Murkowski said. 'And it's not too much to say that 'all of the above' includes things still like wind and solar, and geothermal, and nuclear, and biofuels, and ocean energy.' GOP SENATORS TO REWRITE AI FREEZE — Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz said Thursday his committee would attempt to rewrite the 10-year moratorium on enforcement of state and local artificial intelligence laws that the House tucked into their version of the megabill. Several GOP senators expressed skepticism this week that the current language could clear the Senate's strict rules for what can be included in the filibuster-skirting reconciliation package. Thune sounded supportive of the House measure Thursday, but conceded it was unclear if it could pass the Byrd test. 'The goal is to make sure that we aren't losing the race in AI and making sure that we have a policy that's consistent,' Thune said. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: POLITICO PRO SPACE: Need an insider's guide to the politics behind the new space race? From battles over sending astronauts to Mars to the ways space companies are vying to influence regulators, this weekly newsletter decodes the personalities, policy and power shaping the final frontier. Find out more. TUNNEL TALK SPOTTED — Laura Loomer was on the Hill on Thursday, waiting outside the House Judiciary room. She was trying to meet with Reps. Eric Swalwell and Jared Moskowitz, among other Democrats, to talk about designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, according to our John Sakellariadis. THE BEST OF THE REST Exclusive: New video shows tussle between Rep. Nadler staffer and federal officers, by Arya Sundaram at the Gothamist Democrats Say Trump's New Travel Ban Won't Be as Central to Messaging as Last Time, by Torrence Banks at NOTUS JOB BOARD Melissa Burnison is now clerk for the Senate Appropriations Energy-Water Subcommittee. She previously was VP for federal legislative affairs at Berkshire Hathaway Energy, and is an Energy Department alum. Christiana Nulty (née Reasor) has joined Thune's office as health policy adviser. She previously was director of federal affairs at Genentech and is a Jerry Moran and Lynn Jenkins alum. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Sen. Marsha Blackburn ... Reps. Madeleine Dean and Eugene Vindman (5-0) … Alexander Vindman (5-0) … former Reps. Eric Cantor, David Bonior (8-0) and Allen Boyd (8-0) … Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth … ABC's Katherine Faulders … Fabiana Corsi Mendez of Rep. Eugene Vindman's office … Ward Baker … Margaret White of No Labels ... Max Docksey ... POLITICO's Gabby Miller ... CQ's Caroline Simon Coudriet … Allie Freedman … Sarah Gadsden … Julia Masterman of Angerholzer Broz Consulting TRIVIA THURSDAY'S ANSWER: SP correctly answered that China was the first country to sign a Fulbright agreement. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Mia: What current member of Congress was formerly a scuba instructor in Thailand? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@