logo
How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

CNN29-07-2025
On August 1, hundreds of countries will come to learn their fate with the United States, when President Donald Trump's pause on 'reciprocal' tariffs ends.
Thousands of US businesses will also learn their fates. However, after months of whipsaw trade policy, planning with any sort of certainty has proven near impossible.
'I don't think I'll know that I'm out of the chess pieces until I'm right there, but it's clear that I'm getting closer,' said Sarah Wells, founder of Sarah Wells Bags, designer bags for breast pumps that are imported.
Ninety-seven percent of US businesses that import products are small businesses, according to the Commerce Department. Owners have been trying to navigate the complexities of shifting trade policy all while trying to run their businesses, leaving them confused, financially strapped or worse – forced out of business.
'Not knowing if certain key suppliers will have new trade deals or frameworks at lower or higher tariff rates has made it incredibly difficult for retailers of all sizes to properly plan and forecast what the next buying and selling season will look like,' said Jonathan Gold, the National Retail Federation's vice president of supply shain and customs policy. 'As a result, consumers may be subject to higher costs as well as less product availability.'
Currently, imports from most countries (except China) face a 10% universal tariff. But in the last few weeks, dozens of countries have received warning letters from the Trump administration that they will face higher rates unless they negotiate a deal before August 1. That has run as high as 36% for Cambodia, 40% for Myanmar and 50% for Brazil. To date, seven countries have reached a framework for a trade deal. That includes the US's largest trading partner, the EU, which agreed Sunday to a 15% levy on most imports.
'It feels like it's chasing me,' Wells said of the tariffs.
Wells started to move the production of her bags out of China in February, when Trump kicked off his trade war. Cambodia, with a 10% tariff rate, seemed like a much better deal than the 145%, then later 30%, rate on China.
That is, until the Trump administration threatened Cambodia with a 36% tariff this month. That letter came just days before she placed her first $100,000 order with her new manufacturer in Phnom Penh.
If the higher tariff on Cambodia sticks, she will be paying more than she was in China.
'I've tried to manufacture in the United States, but I can't. China, the policies chased me there. Now I am financially invested in Cambodia with the prospect of an incredibly high insurmountable tariff looming this August,' said Wells.
It's not just small businesses – retailers of all sizes are feeling paralyzed by the on-and-off-again trade war.
According to a survey released this month by global accounting firm KPMG, business leaders are pausing investment for up to a year amid tariff uncertainty.
'Tariffs are forcing companies to rethink their supply chains and investment timelines, but strategic change takes time. Nearly half of businesses reported it takes 7 to 12 months to implement significant supply chain adjustments, and more than half are already working to reconfigure their supply chains in response,' the survey, which polled 300 US-based business leaders at companies with more than $1 billion in revenue, noted.
'Companies are just waiting to see how the new playing field will land in order for them to make important decisions, economically,' said Pedro Casas Alatriste, CEO and executive vice president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico.
The American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico represents 1,500 US-based companies that operate in Mexico, including Apple, Coca-Cola and General Motors. Trump has threatened a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico on August 1.
Large corporations can and do advocate behind the scenes in Washington, DC. Meanwhile, small businesses have less power and influence on trade policy— and are often more vulnerable to the impacts of tariffs.
'Many small and medium-sized companies are literally fighting for their lives. And then there are the other big ones, let's call it the GMs of the world, that are pursuing a more active strategy in DC, calling out different stakeholders that are capable of influencing President Trump, while at the same time being extremely cautious on how to do this,' said Casas Alatriste.
Even when a trade agreement is announced by Trump, for some companies, the uncertainty still remains.
'It is all very uncertain because as we know, he changes his mind or negotiates deals, adds delays. We don't really know what exactly is coming,' said Max Rohn, CEO of Wölffer Estate Vineyard.
Mid-sized winemaker Wölffer Estate Vineyard manufactures wine in the farmlands of Long Island, New York. It also imports blends from Germany, France, and Argentina.
The winery currently pays tariffs on its wine imports from the EU and Argentina, as well as on glassware, labels and barrels. Wölffer cannot move its supply chain, and its Long Island vineyard only has a limited amount of acreage to grow grapes.
'With wine, it's very difficult because champagne is from Champagne, and that's not a product you can substitute,' said Rohn.
But while Sunday's framework raising tariffs on products from the EU to 15% isn't 'as bad' of the previously threatened 30%, the cost still hurts, according to Rohn.
The company is currently rushing in 20,000 cases of wine from Europe to the US before August 1. The vineyard has enough product to sell through the end of the year, but after that, it will have to import next year's vintage.
So far, the vineyard has absorbed the tariff cost and avoided raising prices, which Rohn said would almost certainly deter customers.
'We are going to take a wait and see regarding raising prices on our European imports. We will try as best as we can to hold off,' he said, adding that 'we know it is still fluid. There are more discussions and deals and changes can always happen.'
For Wells, she is running out of options. She's already raised prices and is running low on the inventory she has in the United States. Soon, she'll have no choice but to bring in some of her order from Cambodia at whatever tariff rate is imposed on August 1.
'I've already cut all of those extraneous expenses. I stopped taking any kind of salary in May as the CEO, she said. 'We've cut everywhere we can cut. So do we start laying people off to free up a little bit of cash?'
And in an environment where businesses are competing for every consumer dollar, businesses are turning to one another to try to make sense of how to plan for what comes next.
The answer is not always comforting.
'It's one of those things that it's out of your control. When I ask around, it's just a lot of hands in the air. 'I don't know. There's nothing, what can we do?'' said Rohn.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hey, experts — admit what you got so wrong on Trump's tariffs
Hey, experts — admit what you got so wrong on Trump's tariffs

New York Post

timea minute ago

  • New York Post

Hey, experts — admit what you got so wrong on Trump's tariffs

Economists across the political spectrum predicted that President Donald Trump's trade negotiations would end in disaster. Now that his Aug. 1 deadline has passed without the sky falling — and with multiple advantageous deals completed — it's time to seriously reevaluate the flawed arguments the experts made against his strategy. Many, it turns out, made basic errors in economic reasoning. Advertisement On the left, Nobel laureate and Columbia professor Joseph Stiglitz declared in January that Trump's policy was 'very bad for America and for the world,' while University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers called it 'impressively destructive.' On the right, prominent free-market advocates like George Mason's Donald Boudreaux also voiced strong opposition. Advertisement Yet their arguments against tariffs revealed a fundamental misunderstanding: They decried tariffs as uniquely harmful, while ignoring that the same logic applies to all taxes. Take the common critique that tariffs, as a tax on trade, reduce trade overall. Phil Gramm and Larry Summers — one conservative, one liberal — jointly argued that tariffs 'distort domestic production' by pushing resources toward less efficient uses. They warned tariffs would slow economic growth. Advertisement That's true. But every tax, including sales taxes and income taxes, discourages trade, distorts production and reduces growth. Sales taxes lower consumption. Income taxes discourage work. Corporate taxes deter investment. All taxes distort the economy — tariffs are no exception. Advertisement Another frequent claim is that tariffs hurt consumers. Again, true — just as all taxes do. Logically, opposing tariffs simply because they raise prices and reduce growth means we should oppose all taxes. But unless we abolish government spending — which stands at $7 trillion this year — we need taxes of some kind. That's why economists usually argue for minimizing the total economic damage that all taxes cause across the board. Distortions increase as tax rates do. Before Trump's policies, the average US tariff rate stood at just 2.5% — tiny compared to the 43.4% average top personal income tax rate (including federal and state taxes) or the 27.5% average total corporate tax rate. If we understand a tariff as a tax like any other, higher tariffs could in fact reduce the overall economic burden on American individuals and companies — an outcome that Trump has often touted as his ultimate goal. Advertisement It's unclear whether a 15% tariff is optimal, but it seems apparent now that a 2.5% rate was too low. Economists also missed how negotiation tactics work. Trump began with aggressive tariff threats, horrifying many economists — but the results speak for themselves. The United States has secured deals that dramatically opened foreign markets representing 55% of global GDP. Advertisement Even critics have had to acknowledge the shift. 'To avoid worst of Trump tariffs, [the European Union] accepted a lopsided deal,' The Washington Post conceded, while the London-based Financial Times described how the EU 'succumbed to Trump's tariff steamroller.' 'Under the new deal, US goods into Vietnam will not be taxed while Vietnamese exports will face a 20% US tariff,' the South China Morning Post explained — in coverage that described Hanoi's 'optimism' regarding the agreement. So while the United States is imposing higher tariffs on many imports, other countries lowered or removed their tariffs on American goods, and dropped many of their non-tariff barriers as well. Advertisement These are significant wins that economists failed to anticipate, and that few thought remotely possible even six months ago. Experts also ignored yet another of Trump's reasons for increasing tariffs: as a means of providing for national defense and global freedom of the seas, costs that Americans have borne for a century. Ideally, other countries would help pay for these efforts — how about they just send us a check for the share of benefits they are receiving? Advertisement But since that's not about to happen, tariffs may be the only viable alternative. Trump's trade policies defied economists' dire predictions, delivering substantial gains in opening foreign markets to American exports without tanking the US economy. If tariffs can help lower more damaging taxes while advancing strategic national interests, they deserve a more honest and nuanced evaluation. At the very least, economists should have the guts to admit they were wrong — and take a hard look at their conventional wisdom. John R. Lott Jr., president of the Crime Prevention Research Center, is an economist who has held research or teaching positions at the University of Chicago, Wharton Business School, Stanford, Yale and UCLA.

Trump announces 100% tariff on semiconductors made outside the US in potential blow to domestic businesses
Trump announces 100% tariff on semiconductors made outside the US in potential blow to domestic businesses

New York Post

timea minute ago

  • New York Post

Trump announces 100% tariff on semiconductors made outside the US in potential blow to domestic businesses

WASHINGTON — President Trump announced plans Wednesday for a 100% tariff on 'all chips and semiconductors' — insisting that there would be an orderly economic transition despite potential major impacts on US businesses. 'We'll be putting a tariff, approximately 100%, on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said at an Oval Office event with Apple CEO Tim Cook, who arrived to announce plans for $600 billion in new investments in the US. Trump said he would exempt companies that have plans to transition their manufacturing to the US — a hint that the world's largest chip manufacturer, Taiwan's TSMC, which is building massive manufacturing plants in Arizona, would be spared. Advertisement 3 'We'll be putting a tariff approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said at an Oval Office event with Apple CEO Tim Cook. REUTERS 'If you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge, even though you're building and you're not producing yet in terms of the big numbers of jobs and all of the things that you're building. If you're building there will be no charge,' Trump said. 'So 100% tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States. But if you've made a commitment to build, or if you're in the process of building, as many are, there is no tariff.' Cook did not comment on the tariff plan when given an opportunity to address the press. Advertisement Trump described the duties as a way to hold accountable companies that backtrack on pledges to open US manufacturing plants. 3 Trump also said he would exempt companies that have plans to transition their manufacturing to the US. AFP via Getty Images 3 The president described his tariff plan as a way to hold accountable companies that backtrack on pledges. AFP via Getty Images 'If, for some reason, you say you're building and you don't build, then we go back and get we added up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that's a guarantee,' Trump said. Advertisement 'I think the chip companies are all coming back home. They're all coming back. You know, we started with Intel, and gradually Intel was just taken over the coals, they were taken to the cleaners, frankly, and moved to other places in particular Taiwan, but I think a lot of those companies are coming back, and they're coming back very rapidly.' In additional to large 'reciprocal' tariffs and a new 10% baseline tariff on most countries, Trump previously applied 50% tariffs on foreign steel, aluminum and copper and a 25% tariff on foreign-made cars in an attempt to boost those American industries. The president did not specify a start date for the new computer-chip tariffs, and has previewed similar duties for pharmaceutical drugs and lumber.

Ukraine war: Trump wants trilateral meeting with Putin, Zelensky
Ukraine war: Trump wants trilateral meeting with Putin, Zelensky

UPI

time2 minutes ago

  • UPI

Ukraine war: Trump wants trilateral meeting with Putin, Zelensky

President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he will work to arrange a trilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to end the war in Ukraine. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 6 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump said he will work to schedule a trilateral meeting soon with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to end the war in Ukraine. Trump announced his intent to meet with the leaders of the warring nations as early as next week after special Envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin on Wednesday. "Steve Witkoff just had a highly productive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin," Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Great progress was made." Witkoff and Putin met ahead of Friday's Trump-imposed deadline for a cease-fire in Ukraine. Trump said he apprised some of the nation's allies in Europe of the meeting's content. "Everyone agrees this war must come to a close," he said, "and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." The president also said he would meet with Putin as early as next week and afterward wants to meet with Putin and Zelensky at the same time, The New York Times reported. Trump and Zelensky spoke by phone after the Witkoff-Putin meeting and said "it seems Russia is more inclined toward [a] cease-fire," as reported by CNN. Putin called the meeting "constructive and useful," Russian state media outlet TASS reported. "Putin conveyed some signals to the United States on the Ukrainian issue," the Kremlin told state-controlled RIA Novosti. Witkoff and Putin met for about three hours after Trump threatened to impose 100% tariffs on nations that buy oil from Russia if a cease-fire isn't declared by Friday. He also announced a 25% tariff on India for buying and reselling "massive amounts of Russian oil" and intends to increase the tariff to 50% in three weeks, The Washington Post reported. Trump says such trade with Russia funds its war against Ukraine, which Russia started on Feb. 24, 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store