UK launched secret scheme to relocate Afghans after data leak
LONDON: Britain set up a secret scheme to relocate thousands of Afghans to the UK after people's personal details were disclosed in a data leak, risking reprisals from the Taleban after their return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, court documents showed on Tuesday. Concerns that individuals named could be targeted by the Taleban led the previous Conservative government to set up the relocation scheme, involving thousands of people and estimated to cost the government 2 billion pounds ($2.7 billion).
British defense minister John Healey apologized for the data leak, which included details about members of parliament and senior military officers who supported applications to help soldiers who worked with the British military and their families relocate to the UK from Afghanistan. 'This serious data incident should never have happened,' Healey told lawmakers in the House of Commons.? 'It may have occurred three years ago under the previous government, but to all whose data was compromised I offer a sincere apology.'
Healey said that around 4,500 affected people 'are in Britain or in transit ... at a cost of around 400 million pounds'. But he added that no-one else from Afghanistan will be offered asylum because of the data leak. News of the leak comes as Britain's public finances are tight and the right-wing, anti-immigration Reform UK political party leads in the opinion polls.
British forces were first deployed to Afghanistan in 2001 following the September 11 attacks on the United States, and they played a major role in combat operations there until 2014. The government is facing lawsuits from those affected by the breach, further adding to the ultimate cost of the incident.
A Ministry of Defense-commissioned review of the data breach, a summary of which was also published on Tuesday, said more than 16,000 people affected by it had been relocated to the UK as of May this year. The details emerged on Tuesday after a legal ruling known as a superinjunction was lifted. The injunction had been granted in 2023 after the MoD argued that a public disclosure of the breach could put people at risk of extra-judicial killing or serious violence by the Taleban.
The dataset contained personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to be relocated to Britain and their families. A High Court said in a summary of its ruling to lift the injunction that the data 'contained personal information about more than 33,000 applicants'.
It was released in error in early 2022, before the MoD spotted the breach in August 2023, when part of the dataset was published on Facebook. The former Conservative government obtained the injunction the following month. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's centre-left government, which was elected last July, launched a review into the injunction, the breach and the relocation scheme, which found that although Afghanistan remains dangerous, there was little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
4 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Why is Britain recognizing a Palestinian state
LONDON: Britain has said it will formally recognize a Palestinian state in September unless the Zionist government takes substantive steps to end suffering in Gaza and meets other conditions. What did Starmer say? He said Britain would make the move at the United Nations General Assembly unless Zionist entity agreed to certain conditions. Those were: •a ceasefire between Zionist entity and Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza •substantive steps to allow more aid to enter the Gaza Strip •a clear declaration there will be no annexation of the Zionist-occupied West Bank •a commitment to a long-term peace process that delivers a 'two-state solution' - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Zionist entity Starmer said there was 'no equivalence between Zionist entity and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm'. Why did Starmer do this? Successive British governments have said they will formally recognize a Palestinian state when the time is right and when it will be most effective to support a two-state solution. Until Tuesday, the government had said it was more focused on improving the situation on the ground for civilians stricken by the conflict than recognition. But Starmer has become increasingly vocal over the starvation and devastation in Gaza, and has been under pressure to act from lawmakers in his Labour Party. Britain hopes its move will have a practical impact on Zionist entity's behavior, initially by increasing the flow of aid, but also by reviving the diplomatic push for a two-state solution. What will this mean in practice? The move carries great diplomatic and moral weight, even if it is mostly symbolic, according to Julie Norman, an associate professor at University College London specializing in Middle Eastern politics. The most immediate impact may be an upgrading of diplomatic relations with the Palestinians, according to one British government official. Britain currently hosts a 'Palestinian mission' of officials in London, but the recognition of a Palestinian state means it may be allowed open a fully fledged embassy. The official said Britain could eventually open an embassy in the West Bank, where the Western-backed Palestinian Authority exercises limited self-government under Zionist military occupation. The PA seeks the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem for a future state. Hamas has refused to recognize Zionist entity and the group's 1988 founding charter calls for its destruction. Vincent Fean, a former British consul general to Jerusalem, said recognition of Palestine as a state would result in the government having to review its relations with Zionist entity. This, he said, could result in Britain banning products from Zionist settlements in occupied Palestinian territories. 'That would only be symbolic in that sense that those goods are a pinprick in the overall size of the Zionist economy,' he said. What is currently unclear is the impact recognition would have on the close intelligence and security ties between Britain and Zionist entity, including defense-related supply chains. — Reuters
Kuwait Times
4 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
22 killed in Angola fuel hike unrest
LUANDA: Two days of unrest and looting in Angola during a protest against a fuel price hike claimed the lives of 22 people, the government said Wednesday, as a tense calm returned to the capital. Violence erupted on Monday, the first day of a strike called by taxi drivers to protest the July 1 increase in fuel costs in the oil-rich nation where millions live in poverty. It was some of the worst unrest in several years in the Portuguese-speaking southern African country, which has been governed by the MPLA party since 1975. Sporadic gunfire was heard across Luanda and several other cities on Monday and Tuesday as people looted shops and clashed with police. 'We regret 22 deaths, including one police officer,' Interior Minister Manuel Homem told reporters on the sidelines of a Council of Ministers meeting chaired by President Joao Lourenco. Nearly 200 people were injured in the violence, he said, and more than 1,200 people had been arrested. The unrest was marked by massive looting in which people raided supermarkets and warehouses, making off with food and other supplies. Sixty-six shops were damaged, Homem said. The streets of Luanda were tense and largely empty Wednesday, although there were some queues outside petrol stations and shops, AFP reporters said. There was a heavy presence of security forces. Many shops remained closed, but public transport had slowly resumed in some areas after a two-day standstill. With the protests having spread outside the capital, a statement after the ministers' meeting said vandalism and rioting had 'triggered a climate of widespread insecurity'. It said 'elements with criminal intentions' had turned the demonstration into a 'threat to security'. Police in the southern city of Lubango confirmed separately that a police officer had shot and killed a 16-year-old on Tuesday. The teenager was part of a group attempting to invade the headquarters of the ruling MPLA party, a statement said. The strike was the latest in a series of protests this month after the price of fuel was hiked from 300 to 400 kwanzas ($0.33 to $0.43) a liter on July 1. The government's move to lower its heavy fuel subsidies reportedly followed International Monetary Fund calls for more public money for health and education. But it has angered many in the country of 36 million people, already under pressure from inflation of around 20 percent while nearly 30 percent are unemployed. High inflation and limited growth 'are likely to keep poverty rates high, around 36 percent by 2026, underscoring the need for a stronger social safety net and more development spending', according to the World Bank. At a demonstration of around 2,000 people in Luanda on Saturday, protesters condemned the fuel price hike but also brandished signs denouncing MPLA 'corruption' or discontent with the rule of Lourenco, who was re-elected for a second five-year term in 2022. There had been similar protests the two previous weekends. In a joint statement Wednesday, the opposition UNITA and Bloco Democratico parties said Angola was in a 'severe economic and social crisis' that was a result of government policies 'disconnected from the country's reality'. Amnesty International and other rights groups have accused the police of using excessive force against protesters in Angola, which suffered through a 1975-2002 civil war and almost four decades of repression under former president Jose Eduardo dos Santos. - AFP
Kuwait Times
11 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Thailand and Cambodia trade allegations of truce breaking
Thailand and Cambodia trade allegations of truce breaking Troops still massed at both sides of border amid accusations BANGKOK: Thailand and Cambodia exchanged allegations on Wednesday of breaching a ceasefire deal which has largely halted the open combat that engulfed their frontier. The nations agreed a truce starting Tuesday after five days of clashes killed at least 43 on both sides, as a long-standing dispute over contested border temples boiled over into fighting on their 800-kilometre (500-mile) boundary. But Thailand's foreign ministry said its troops in Sisaket province 'came under attack by small arms fire and grenade assaults launched by Cambodian forces' in an offensive which continued until Wednesday morning. 'This represents a flagrant violation of the ceasefire agreement,' said a foreign ministry statement. Thai government spokesman Jirayu Huangsab also reported overnight clashes but said in a statement 'the Thai side maintained control of the situation' and 'general conditions along the border are reported to be normal' from 8 am (0100 GMT). On Wednesday a Cambodian defense ministry official accused Thailand of twice the previous day breaching the ceasefire, intended to end fighting which has seen the two countries evacuate a total of more than 300,000 people from the border region. At a temple in Thailand's Surin city serving as a shelter and field kitchen 50 kilometers away from the frontier, volunteer Thanin Kittiworranun said evacuees remain in limbo. 'We don't believe Cambodia will hold the ceasefire,' the 65-year-old told AFP. But an AFP journalist on the Cambodian side who heard a steady drumbeat of artillery fire since fighting began last Thursday reported hearing no blasts between the start of the truce and Wednesday morning. And Beijing said deputy foreign minister Sun Weidong hosted a Shanghai meeting with Thai and Cambodian officials where both 'reaffirmed to China their commitment to abide by the ceasefire consensus'. The armistice got off to a shaky start in the early hours of Tuesday, with Thailand accusing Cambodia of continuing attacks in 'a clear attempt to undermine mutual trust'—before peace generally prevailed. Meetings between rival commanders along the border—scheduled as part of the pact—went ahead, with Thailand's army saying de-escalation steps were agreed including 'a halt on troop reinforcements or movements that could lead to misunderstandings'. But later in the day a foreign affairs spokeswoman for Bangkok's border crisis center, Maratee Nalita Andamo, warned: 'In this moment, in the early days of the ceasefire, the situation is still fragile'. Jets, rockets and artillery have killed at least 15 Thai troops and 15 Thai civilians, while Cambodia has confirmed only eight civilian and five military deaths. The flare-up has surpassed the death toll of 28 in violence that raged sporadically from 2008 to 2011 over the territory, claimed by both nations because of a vague demarcation made by Cambodia's French colonial administrators in 1907. The peace pact was sealed in Malaysia after intervention from US President Donald Trump—who both Thailand and Cambodia are courting for a trade deal to avert his threat of eye-watering tariffs. – AFP
