Omagh bombing inquiry: Survivors and families seek representation at closed hearings
Omagh bomb
have asked to be represented by a special advocate in closed hearings at the public inquiry.
Omagh bombing inquiry
chairman Lord Turnbull is hearing arguments around various applications during dedicated hearings this week.
Paul Greaney KC, counsel to the inquiry, which is examining whether the 1998 dissident republican bomb attack could have been prevented, said it will hear some sensitive security evidence in closed hearings.
A total of 31 people, including unborn twins, died and hundreds were injured when a car bomb planted by the dissident republican group the Real IRA exploded in the centre of the
Co Tyrone
town on August 15th, 1998.
READ MORE
Speaking during hearings in
Belfast
on Monday, Mr Greaney said the inquiry's legal team recognises that survivors and the bereaved have spent 25 seeking the truth.
He said some may be 'suspicious or even cynical of the UK state's willingness to engage in a way that is straightforward and wholehearted with this inquiry'.
'We acknowledge too, that the idea of evidence being heard in circumstances in which the families and survivors will be excluded is one that they will find difficult to accept, to say the least, and accordingly, we regard it as entirely understandable that some, although not all, have suggested special advocates should be appointed to represent their interests in any closed hearings, and have made applications for that to occur,' he said.
Mr Greaney last month said the inquiry would not begin examining the atrocity itself until next year due to the 'pace of disclosure'.
He said chapter three of the inquiry, which 'will consider the bombing itself', would commence in March of next year.
The inquiry, which opened last year, was ordered by the UK government in the wake of a court judgment to examine whether the atrocity could reasonably have been prevented by British state authorities.
During a four-week sitting in the Strule Arts Centre in Omagh earlier this year, the inquiry heard emotional testimony from bereaved relatives who delivered pen portraits of their loved ones, as well as from the injured and first responders. – PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Why is Sinn Féin so reluctant to amend climate legislation to improve the A5?
Sinn Féin's loyalty to Stormont's climate change legislation is perplexing self-sabotage. Liz Kimmins, the party's infrastructure minister, has announced an appeal against June's ruling on the A5 dual-carriageway from Aughnacloy to Derry. The Northern Ireland High Court quashed the scheme, the largest single road-building project in the North's history, because it did not comply with emission reduction targets in the 2022 Climate Change Act. These targets can supposedly be met by drawing up carbon offset plans but no serious attempt had been made to do so. Nor does compliance look feasible within the timeframe Stormont has set itself: net zero by 2050, with interim reductions of 48 per cent by 2030 and 77 per cent by 2040. READ MORE The judge in June's case, Mr Justice McAlinden, said it might be possible to make a plan for the A5 consistent with the Act. In theory, perhaps, but experience in Wales suggests otherwise. The Welsh government scrapped all major road-building in 2023, declaring this was the only way to meet its similar net-zero schedule. The Scottish government took a more realistic approach last year when it repealed the interim targets in its climate change legislation, while retaining the aim of net zero by 2045. It did this largely to save a dual-carriageway upgrade from Inverness to Perth. There has been no mention of any of this from Kimmins or her department. All statements on the appeal indicate it will be based on saving lives. The current A5 has a horrendous safety record , averaging one fatality every four months. [ From the archive: 'Everyone who has lost a loved one on that road will be happy' Opens in new window ] This was addressed in June's ruling, however. Mr Justice McAlinden acknowledged lives will continue to be lost but the A5 can still only be built 'in accordance with the law'. His comments reflected the extent to which the Climate Change Act had tied the court's hands. The Court of Appeal will hardly see it differently. Kimmins also referred this week to the A5 as 'regionally significant'. The project is often framed as correcting historic underinvestment in the west of Northern Ireland. If that is being considered as grounds for appeal, it is equally doomed: the Climate Change Act does not care on which side of the Bann carbon dioxide is emitted. Of course, Stormont's hands are not tied by its own laws – it can amend, repeal or replace them. Sinn Féin's refusal to countenance this is bizarre, given how little the party had to do with the 2022 legislation and how important the A5 is to its constituents and supporters. Delivering the project has been a key party promise since the 2006 St Andrews Agreement. Its safety and travel enhancements would be complemented by the symbolism of all-Ireland infrastructure: the Irish government was to have co-funded it to connect Dublin with Donegal. Sinn Féin stepped up these promises last year, when it assumed the first minister's post at a restored Stormont. June's ruling has undermined the credibility of the party and of devolution itself among republican voters. The Climate Change Act has eccentric provenance. It began life as a 2021 private member's bill from Clare Bailey, then leader of the Greens. Sinn Féin supported it, as did the SDLP, Alliance and the UUP, with reservations. The DUP opposed it, arguing Bailey's targets were unachievable. So Edwin Poots, then the DUP environment minister, produced a rival bill. Both bills progressed together amid haggling over targets and several other issues, until Bailey was satisfied enough to let her bill lapse and the DUP's pass, with the support of every party except the TUV. Poots described his final legislation as 'a compromise'. The DUP and TUV both oppose the 2040 deadline, required by the 2022 Act but set by a separate vote last December. Why is Sinn Féin prepared to suffer any political pain to defend a DUP law that even the DUP only begrudgingly supports? If Sinn Féin proposed repealing interim targets, as in Scotland, the DUP would agree. Alliance now holds the environment portfolio but the DUP and Sinn Féin have the numbers to put any change through the assembly. Deborah Erskine, the DUP chair of Stormont's infrastructure committee, responded to June's ruling by saying the Climate Change Act 'will have to be looked at as a matter of priority'. She noted this week that an appeal will take years. Even sluggish Stormont can amend laws quickly, when it wants. Although tactical retreat on climate change would be briefly embarrassing, Sinn Féin has managed far greater reversals in the past. It is managing a trickier U-turn even now on transgender medicine. One possible explanation for the party's behaviour is that it no longer believes the A5 will be built. The estimated cost has quadrupled since the project was proposed, rendering it increasingly implausible. If that is too embarrassing to admit, an appeal kicks the can down the road. But this is speculation on my part, over a genuine mystery. Sinn Féin really needs to explain itself.
Agriland
13 hours ago
- Agriland
Fermanagh farmer convicted over animals in 'poor condition'
A Co. Fermanagh farmer has been convicted in court over the condition of animals on his farm. 78-year-old Wesley Lee of Cleenish Road, Cleenish, Bellanaleck, Enniskillen was today (Wednesday, August 6) convicted at Enniskillen Court on two charges under the Welfare of Animals Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 and one under the Veterinary Medicines Regulations 2013. Lee was convicted on: Two charges of failure to ensure the needs of animals were met; One charge of failure to produce a medicine record when required. The farmer was convicted and fined £600 plus £15 offender levy and £72 summons fee. The case arose following numerous welfare inspections carried out by Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) Veterinary Service officials between April 13, 2023 and September 4, 2023. During these inspections, one sheep was found to be caught on briars and was euthanised by a DAERA veterinary officer as, in their opinion, it was suffering unnecessarily. There were a number of lame animals and animals in poor condition on the premises being kept in dirty conditions without access to clean drinking water. There was no evidence of suitable pens for calving or suitable isolation pens for sick or injured animals and young calves had no access to dry lying areas. During one of the inspections, one of the sick animals died. Lee was asked to provide medicine records to demonstrate treatment of the lame and sick animals seen, but was unable to provide such. DAERA has stated that it gives high priority to the welfare of animals and operates a vigorous enforcement policy to ensure full compliance of regulatory requirements. Any breaches are investigated thoroughly and offenders prosecuted as necessary, it added. The improper use of medicines in animals presents a risk to human health, DAERA has stressed. This is of particular relevance when it comes to observing withdrawal times of medicines administered to animals which are subsequently slaughtered for human consumption. The main areas for concern are: The slaughter for human consumption of an animal before the recommended withdrawal period has been observed for drugs which may themselves have direct side effects in humans; The slaughter of animals entering the food chain containing a drug to which human pathogens are capable of developing a resistance which may reduce the effectiveness with which human diseases can be controlled by a drug. If proper medicine records are not kept, there is a risk of animals which have been treated, but whose withdrawal periods have not been observed, being slaughtered for human consumption, or sold on to another herd from which they will be slaughtered for human consumption without withdrawal times being observed.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
What lessons does the Irish Boundary Commission hold for how borders are made – and unmade – in contested spaces?
In today's episode, Hugh is joined by historian Dr Cormac Moore to discuss one of the most consequential but little-known episodes in modern Irish history: the Irish Boundary Commission. Based on Moore's new book The Root of All Evil, the conversation explores the hopes, fraught negotiations, and ultimate anticlimax that defined the commission's work 100 years ago this year. How did a clause in the Anglo-Irish Treaty come to carry the weight of nationalist aspirations and unionist fears? Why did so many believe that the commission would redraw the map of Ireland in favour of the Free State – and how did those expectations unravel so completely? Was the commission's failure inevitable, or did political miscalculations and miscommunications seal its fate? Moore, historian-in-residence with Dublin City Council, brings a forensic eye to the detail and a deep sense of the human stakes involved. He unpacks the central roles played by figures such as David Lloyd George, James Craig and WT Cosgrave. What lessons does the Boundary Commission hold for how borders are made – and unmade – in contested spaces? And in a world where the political future of Northern Ireland is once again up for debate, is this century-old episode a cautionary tale of how not to manage competing nationalisms? READ MORE What happened in 1925 offers lessons for anyone interested in the deeper roots of partition, the evolution of identity on this island, and how historical decisions continue to cast long shadows. Produced by Declan Conlon with JJ Vernon on sound.
