Ex-LG staff plead guilty to obstructing investigation
The historic case has just come to light after name suppression lapsed for two of the trio.
The three were discharged without conviction after assessments of their individual circumstances.
The case dated back to a 2020 investigation into possible anti-competitive conduct in the supply and pricing of televisions, which might have restricted the ability of retailers to set their own prices.
LG's then- country manager, Dowan Kim, admitted telling a key account manager, Nicholas Clarke, and another staff member, who has permanent name suppression, to delete any messages with customers that might possibly be an "issue" in the investigation.
Kim said it was done at the instruction of an overseas manager, which LG denied.
The Commerce Commission queried why it had not been given all the information required, including instant messages, after being tipped off by a whistleblower about the message deletions.
Commission Chairperson John Small said it was a blatant attempt to obstruct the investigation.
"We will take action against parties who attempt to obstruct our investigations," Small said.
"In this particular case, given the conduct occurred after a direction from the most senior New Zealand manager of a large global electronics supplier, we considered the conduct to be sufficiently serious for the charges to be filed under the Crimes Act."
The Commission recovered some of the deleted messages, which did not reveal any breaches of the Commerce Act.
The result of the investigation was a compliance letter to LG about potential wrong conduct, and a warning to Panasonic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Who Pays When A Supermarket Price Tag Is Wrong?
, Money Correspondent When a Whanganui SuperValue displayed some dodgy maths recently, shopper David Bradbury argued he should have been able to choose to pay the lower of the prices on offer. He spotted bacon that was advertised as selling for a different price per 100g than the main display price. Shoulder bacon was 200g for $4.69 but then 94c per 100g, and middle bacon was 200g for $5.79 but $1.16 per 100g. "I pointed out to the closest person in a shop uniform the poor arithmetic ... He said the big number was the right one. I said I should be able to choose. He said no." A SuperValue spokesperson said the unit price was incorrect. "On our pricing tickets customers will find the price of the item and a unit price which enables them to make an informed decision of value based on the unit of measure. "In this instance, the unit price was incorrect on the 200gm Grandpas Shoulder Bacon and Middle Bacon products. The price was however the correct price the customer would have paid at the apologise for the error and any confusion caused. "We know how important it is that all of our tickets are accurate and we have now corrected the pricing tickets to reflect the correct unit price." Vanessa Horne, Commerce Commission general manager, competition, fair trading and credit said she encouraged him to report the concern so the commission could assess whether the shop was complying with the laws it enforced. "The trader could be prosecuted where there is serious non-compliance with the Unit Pricing Regulations. "The Unit Pricing Regulations are there to help consumers easily compare products based on the price-per-unit and make informed choices about which product offers them the best value." She said the Commerce Commission had ongoing investigations into supermarket operators. "We have recently filed criminal charges against Woolworths NZ, Pak'nSave Silverdale, and Pak'nSave Mill Street for what the Commission alleges was inaccurate pricing and misleading specials that may have breached the Fair Trading Act. "Supermarkets have long been on notice about the importance of accurate and clear pricing and specials, and we're not satisfied with the continuing issues we're seeing across the industry. "The major supermarkets are large, well-resourced businesses that should invest the time and effort to get pricing and promotions right." Consumer NZ spokesperson Sahar Lone said a supermarket that displayed incorrect unit pricing could be breaching the Fair Trading Act. "If you notice an incorrect unit price, point this out to a supervisor in store. The store has the right to correct its pricing mistakes. If it doesn't sort the issue, or it's widespread, you can lodge a complaint with the Commerce Commission."
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Commerce Commission warning for Kmart over greenwashing
Photo: RNZ The Commerce Commission has warned national retailer Kmart NZ over an environmentally friendly claim likely to mislead consumers. The commission said the national retailer might have breached the Fair Trading Act in making unsubstantiated claims in its "100% sustainably sourced cotton" advertising. Commission general manager Vanessa Horne said greenwashing was a real concern, as well-intentioned consumers were led to believe products were more environmentally friendly than they actually were. "Consumers have a right to clear and accurate information, and greenwashing makes it virtually impossible for a consumer to identify if a product is genuinely sustainable," Horne said. "Kmart's absolute claim of '100 percent sustainably sourced cotton' implies a high level of certainty that we believe Kmart did not have." The commission said Kmart admitted its "Better Cotton" was mixed with conventional cotton in the supply chain. "Kmart could therefore not say with certainty whether 100 percent of the cotton in its clothing was supplied by Better Cotton farmers or was sustainably sourced." Horne said consumers increasingly considered the environment when buying goods or services. "Unsubstantiated claims are unfair for businesses who put in the time and resource to make sure their environmental claims are legitimate," she said. "We are very supportive of businesses getting involved in sustainability initiatives, but as with any advertising, claims made must be accurate and be able to be backed up to avoid breaching the Fair Trading Act. "Our message to businesses is simple: if you can't back it up, don't say it." The commission was inviting consumers to pass on their concerns about potentially misleading claims on its website. The 100 percent sustainable cotton claims were made from August 4, 2023 and removed on October 4, 2024. The commission said legal action remained available to the commission if the conduct was repeated. Kmart has been asked for comment.
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Cautious optimism over changes to human trafficking law
Anti human trafficking advocates are welcoming news that trafficking and people smuggling laws will soon be strengthened - with the hope it will result in more prosecutions. Since 2009, over 50 victims of trafficking have been identified in New Zealand, but only four prosecutions have been undertaken and just two of these prosecutions have led to a conviction. The Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith confirmed the changes would form part of the current reforms being made to the Crimes Act. Rebekah Armstrong is a member of the Human Trafficking Research Coalition and Head of Advocacy and Justice at World Vision New Zealand. Photo: - vimeo - Nancy Kelley
