logo
6 reasons why I prefer self hosted apps — and why you should too

6 reasons why I prefer self hosted apps — and why you should too

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
Lately, there's a lot of hype around self-hosting and running your own apps on a home lab or NAS. But you might be wondering what you stand to gain from it? After all, Google, Apple, and many others offer perfectly competent app suites. That's what I thought too. But for the last few years, I've dived deep into the world of open source and self-hosting. And if you're curious why, saddle up — I've got some thoughts to share.
When I first dived into self-hosting, it was less about control and more about finding apps that filled the gaps left by commercial applications, and devs that actually listened to feedback, feature requests, or helped out with issues. That evolved into wanting more control over the apps I was using every day. It started small with a basic notes app, a self-hosted password manager, even a media server. But all too soon, I was running half a dozen services on my own hardware.
Hosting my own tools has helped me build a better relationship with data privacy, my habits, and my tech stack.
While today I might stand behind the open-source ethos, back then I was just tired of depending on apps that kept changing to meet commercial targets, subscriptions that kept stacking. Over time, I came to the obvious realisation — this wasn't just a matter of convenience, I preferred the approach of open-source apps even if it sometimes meant a less-than-polished user experience. Hosting my own tools has helped me build a better relationship with data privacy, my user habits, and even my technology stack. Here's why I'm all in on self-hosted apps and why I think more people should give it a shot.
I want to own my data, not rent access to it
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
There's something incredibly frustrating about using a service for years only to wake up one day and find out your data is locked behind a paywall. Or worse, that the service is shutting down and your stuff is disappearing unless you jump through a dozen hoops. Or how about a service losing the license for your favorite movie, and you not being able to stream it anymore. That's what pushed me to self-host my first app. Media servers tend to be a very popular first foray into open-source apps for a good reason — we've all faced the annoyance of Netflix losing a license for a favorite movie.
We've all faced the annoyance of Netflix losing a license for a favorite movie — that's when self-hosting starts to make sense.
When I self-host, my data lives on my machine or server. I decide when to back it up, move it, or delete it. These goals are defined by my needs, not by an algorithm driven by what a for-profit business decides. Platform updates can't suddenly change how my preferred apps work, or if I'm allowed to watch preferred content. It's mine, and that sense of ownership is something I didn't know I was missing until I had it. Of course, media streaming is just one such example. There are dozens of commercial apps that haven't been updated for the latest operating systems and keep losing functionality till they stop working entirely. With open-source alternatives, there's a good chance the developer will keep maintaining it. And if not, someone else can step in and do the job.
Subscriptions started piling up, and I'd had enough
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
Mockup of Google Play Store's new subscriptions UI
I firmly believe in paying for a quality app to support the developer. I even got on board the subscription train, because let's face it — a one-time $5 fee isn't going to cover the bills in today's economy. If I came across an interesting app that assisted my productivity, I would sign up for it. Five dollars here, ten dollars there, it doesn't seem like much until you start adding it all up. Over time, I was paying more to use software than I was spending on things I actually owned. That's a pretty strong reason I started looking at open-source alternatives.
I was spending more on software I didn't own than on things I did.
Now, let me be clear. Open source, by and large, follows the free as in free speech, not free beer model. There's a good chance that your preferred self-hosted app is available for free. But it doesn't have to be. And when it's not, it's usually just a small one-time donation to unlock a license. I'm down for that. I pay once and run the app as long as I want. I support the developers directly when I can. And best of all, I'm no longer stuck in this loop of monthly charges for tools I barely use. It's safe to say that freedom from subscription fatigue alone was worth the switch for me.
I need things to work even when the internet doesn't
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Here's where things get interesting. I've written enough about the need for backup strategies, and the cloud is certainly a viable element of that. However, I no longer recommend cloud-first backups as the go-to. There are many reasons for that. Be it a lack of control over costs, rising file sizes, or simply having full control over data even without internet. The fact that you might not be able to access notes, documents, photos, or files because a server or your internet line is down is absurd to me. That realisation struck me when I had the bright idea of editing vacation images during a prolonged internet outage. With cloud-first apps, that's simply not an option. It drove me crazy.
Now, when I run something myself, I know it's going to work. My to-do list, my media library, my Google Photos alternative, even my backups — they all live locally or on my own server. If my internet is spotty or a company goes belly up, nothing changes for me. The apps just keep running. I do still maintain cloud copies for critical documents and files. Often, I'll sync them with cloud-first apps to enable easier on-the-go access. But all my self-hosted apps remain accessible on my local network even if the internet goes down, and via a reverse proxy when I'm out and about.
Customization is key
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
One of the things I love most about self-hosting is being able to tweak things until they feel just right. Most commercial apps are built to appeal to as many people as possible, which usually means sacrificing flexibility. But when I host something myself, I have the option to tweak it till it looks, how it works and how it conncets with the rest of my set up.
I don't want to bend to an app's limitations. Open-source, self-hosted apps give me the option to fix those limitations.
If you're a professional or a hobbyist coder like me, the sky is the limit. But even if you're not, many popular apps like Home Assistant, my smart home platform of choice, have a thriving community making themes, plugins, and even forks of the original software. Using open-source apps, I've built dashboards that show the latest news or my favorite Reddit threads directly on my browser's homescreen. This ability to customize tools to behave the way I want is unprecedented and makes everything feel much more personal.
I trust myself more than I trust most platforms
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Security isn't guaranteed, and while you can follow best practices like enabling two-factor authentication and strong passwords, your data's safety is entirely in the hands of third-party corporations. Now, I won't pretend that running your own apps is safer by default. It takes work to secure your own network, and you need to stay on top of updates, configurations, and pay attention to best practices. However, I'll take that over blindly trusting a company that has all the incentives to monetize my data for research and profit.
When I host something myself, I know exactly who has access and where the data is going. I encrypt critical files that need to be encrypted. I manage the backups. I don't have to wonder if some third-party analytics script is quietly harvesting my data in the background because the likelihood of that happening with open-source software is ridiculously low. There's a learning curve, sure, but at least I know what's happening under the hood.
Every app I install teaches me something new
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
There's a learning curve with any new tech. I won't lie, I've struggled with installing many self-hosted apps. I've broken configuration files, misconfigured servers, occasionally lost data, and spent many, many hours reading GitHub issues and community forums to figure out what went wrong. But I've probably learnt more from self-hosting than I did in four years of engineering college. Each time I set something up, I understand the commands and processes better. I've picked up skills in networking, Linux administration, command line use, Docker, reverse proxies, and more. It's helped me go from hobbyist to reasonably adept.
There's something really satisfying about getting it all to work. And along the way, I've learnt about stuff I never thought I'd need, but now I find incredibly useful.
It's all about choice
I'm not here to tell anyone to ditch all their apps and run everything from a Raspberry Pi in their closet. Cloud tools have their place. They can be convenient. Some of them are even great. But what bothers me is the lack of options. The way we're pushed toward services that constantly evolve, not always for the better, or lock us in. Self-hosting offers a viable alternative to many of the best cloud-first solutions. These open-source apps might not be perfect, but they are under my control.
Every mistake I've made while self-hosting has taught me something I now use every day.
My interest in self-hosting started with convenience, turned into curiosity, and is now something I actually rely on. I'm not constantly looking for the next big app to fix my productivity or change my life. I just want simple tools that work for me, don't ask for too much, and let me get on with my day. Self-hosted apps do that. By and large, they accomplish the task I ask of them, no more and no less.
So if you've ever felt frustrated with the tools you use or wondered what it would be like to have more control over your digital life, try self-hosting something small. It could be something as basic as a music server, or well-documented like Home Assistant. See how you feel about it, and what you learn. Even if you break something, you'll definitely fix it and along the way you might just start building a set up that feels completely your own.
Follow
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We Love This Garmin Instinct 2 Solar Smartwatch and It's Now a Massive $136 Off at Walmart
We Love This Garmin Instinct 2 Solar Smartwatch and It's Now a Massive $136 Off at Walmart

CNET

time19 minutes ago

  • CNET

We Love This Garmin Instinct 2 Solar Smartwatch and It's Now a Massive $136 Off at Walmart

It's back-to-school season and for many, this is a great time to reset and refocus on academic and personal goals. If you're into fitness and want to keep better track of your step count, then you know that Apple and Samsung dominate the smartwatch sector. Though these tech companies make great wearable pieces, Garmin is also behind some pretty neat smartwatches. Right now we've spotted the Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch for just $264 at Walmart, which saves you a massive $136. If you prefer Amazon, you an score the same watch for $264 with Amazon Prime. Though there's no set deadline for either of these deals, we suggest acting fast if you're interested. The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch has a 45mm case and its watch band adjusts from 5.3 inches to up to 9.1 inches. The watch features multiple apps that track your step count, VO2 max and other sports activities so you can get an accurate picture of your progress. The Garmin Instinct 2 smartwatch includes a 3-axis compass and navigation programs, such as GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, which offer advanced readings that let you confidently trek in challenging environments. You can also sync this watch with a compatible smartphone and get notifications. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. The Garmin Instinct 2 is renowned for its solar charging capacity and long battery life of up to 54 hours. Keep in mind that you need a clear sky for at least 3 hours for a solar charge, but this is still a great watch for days-long hiking or outdoor adventures. Its power manager helps you track battery life, and your purchase includes a charging cable for when solar charging is unavailable. Looking for more wearable tech but not sure if this deal is for you? Check out our list of the best smartwatch so you can find one that works for you. Why this deal matters The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch offers a battery life of 54 hours, solar charging capacity and loads of apps that will help you track your fitness statistics. It's a massive $136 off at Walmart for a limited time and makes a great alternative to Apple or Samsung smartwatches if you've been looking for one. Now is also a great time to save on this smartwatch and potentially avoid price hikes due to tariffs.

iPhone Fold leaker just spilled the beans on screen sizes — and it's worse than we thought
iPhone Fold leaker just spilled the beans on screen sizes — and it's worse than we thought

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

iPhone Fold leaker just spilled the beans on screen sizes — and it's worse than we thought

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. If rumors are to be believed, Apple will finally dive into the foldable phone market in 2026 with the much-rumored iPhone Fold. Rumors have been all over the place when it comes to the the screen size of this unreleased device, but seemed to have settled on around 7.7 inches for the interior panel. That claim was backed up today (July 25) by regular leaker Digital Chat Station, who posted on Weibo that the iPhone Fold would feature a 7.7-inch unfolded screen and a cover display of 5.49-inches. This isn't the first time Digital Chat Station has made that claim, previously saying it came from an iPhone Fold prototype. "The screen size of the first foldable iPhone has been revealed," DCS said in this most recent machine-translated post. "5.5-inch outer screen + 7.7-inch inner screen." They added that the current prototype has shrunk a bit from the February version. It's an iota smaller than recent rumors that had the device featuring a 7.8-inch internal display, similar to numbers from Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo who reported the same measurements back in March. Kuo also believes the phone will measure between 9 and 9.5mm thick when folded and 4 and 4.5mm when opened. Small screen compared to rivals While thin, the iPhone Fold would be thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 which measures 4.2mm when unfolded and 8.9mm closed. If those numbers are true it would additionally make Apple's device smaller than a number of the best foldable phones available including Samsung's newly released Fold, which features an 8-inch unfolded screen and a 6.5-inch exterior display. The upcoming Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — which we're expecting to see at Google's August 20 event — is supposed to feature a 6.4-inch exterior display while retaining the same 8-inch inner screen as the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The Oppo Find N5 features a huge 8.12-inch inner display alongside a 6.62-inch front screen. iPad-esque The iPhone Fold's smaller screen may not be a deal breaker, as rumors hint that Apple is looking for customized display ratio of 4:3, similar to the iPad. This would make the foldable iPhone more familiar to Apple fans who have used iPads before. Plus, Apple is reportedly developing iOS 27 for foldable phones which takes inspiration from the latest version of iPadOS. Apple is years behind its rivals when it comes to foldable phones, but the company is allegedly obsessed with only releasing one once a creaseless display was possible. Reportedly, that finally became possible thanks to a partnership with Samsung Display. More from Tom's Guide iOS 26 preview — I've been testing Apple's biggest update in over a decade Apple glasses patent reveals a new feature to improve comfort — but it looks bizarre Apple rumored to release 6 new iPhone models starting next year — including iPhone Fold

iPhone Fold could cost less than Galaxy Z Fold 7 — under $2,000
iPhone Fold could cost less than Galaxy Z Fold 7 — under $2,000

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

iPhone Fold could cost less than Galaxy Z Fold 7 — under $2,000

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Buying the rumored iPhone Fold may not set you back as much money as expected, according to new analysis from Swiss investment bank UBS and Jimmy Yoon (seen by Fortune). The core reason for this is the analysis' estimate of the foldable iPhone's bill of materials - the total price a company pays for the parts for its products. Because of Apple's ability to buy memory, chipsets and cameras for cheaper than rivals (likely thanks to the iPhone's prominence and Apple's capacity to bulk buy components), plus the now established supply chain for other parts, UBS estimates the iPhone Fold's bill of materials as $759. For comparison, the Galaxy Z Fold SE, the predecessor to the newly launched Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, cost Samsung $790 per unit. As a result, the UBS analysis predicts Apple will price the iPhone Fold between $1,800 and $2,000, when accounting for manufacturing and Apple's usual profit margin on its phones. That would be at worst the same price as, if not cheaper than, the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which now costs $2,000 in the U.S.. A much more appealing idea than the rumored $2,100 - 2,300 price we've heard before. Limited quantities but a big impact UBS' report also believes Apple will initially produce 10 - 15 million iPhone Folds, less than half of what just the Pro Max version of a given iPhone generation tends to sell. The report goes on to name various companies that will likely supply Apple and build the foldable iPhone, including Samsung Display, which will apparently build the 7-inch main display for the device. Finally, UBS makes a prediction that the launch of the iPhone Fold will increase adoption of foldable devices across the whole market. And that seems like a safe bet. iPhone users make up a huge chunk of the smartphone market, and as tempting as the best foldable phones might be, they all currently run on Android. That benefit may also extend to larger folding tablets and laptops according to UBS, although there are fewer of these devices on the market. While it's been six years since the first generation of foldable phones emerged, Apple's first foldable could cause a renaissance for the category. That big revival may still be some time coming though, as 2026 is the latest estimate for the launch date for the iPhone Fold. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide iPhone 17 Pro Max just leaked in a surprising new color — get ready for orange I just tested the Galaxy Z Fold 7's new selfie camera vs. the Fold 6's under-display camera — and the results are drastically different Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5: Which foldable will win?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store