logo
Review: Daisy & Woolf by Michelle Cahill

Review: Daisy & Woolf by Michelle Cahill

Hindustan Times16 hours ago

Dalloway Day, an annual event, was celebrated on June 11, marking the 100th anniversary, this year, of Virginia Woolf's novel, Mrs Dalloway. Published by Hogarth Press, that the author set up with her husband Leonard in their basement at Hogarth House in Richmond, London, the novel challenged the Victorian idea of a plot. A luminary text, that has been adapted to films and plays, it is set to soon have its own biography published by Manchester University Press. But as everyone holds forth about the centenary – the book was published on May 14, 1925 though Dalloway Day celebrations are held in mid-June, when the central event of the novel, Mrs Dalloway's party, takes place – few question Woolf's colonial gaze. Indeed, the Eurasian character left in the margins has rarely been addressed. Far away from the colonial metropole, Daisy, Peter Walsh's Anglo-Indian lover awaits news from him in India. When Woolf mentions her in passing, it is with an air of racial superiority even as her protagonist, Clarissa, suffers from low self esteem.
'Oh if she [Mrs. Dalloway] could have had her life over again!...She would have been, in the first place, dark like Lady Bexborough, with a skin like crumpled leather and beautiful eyes… slow and stately; rather large; interested in politics like a man; with a country house; very dignified, very sincere… She [Mrs Dalloway] had the oddest sense of being herself invisible; unseen; unknown; there being no more marrying, no more having children now, but only this astonishing and rather solemn progress with the rest of them… this being Mrs Dalloway; not even Clarissa anymore; this being Mrs Richard Dalloway.'
The passage establishes Woolf's protagonist as someone without an inherent sense of self. In her fifties, when she is no longer pressed by the duties of being a wife and a mother, Clarissa Dalloway finds herself wanting to be more than her social identity as wife of a conservative MP with her silks and scissors preparing to throw a party on a fine evening in 1923. As she walks across London, she has opinions on everyone but it's not the same as participating in luncheons hosted by Mrs Bruton where they discuss politics. From Hugh Whitbread and Peter Walsh to Sally Seton and Miss Killman, everyone is scrutinised, even Septimus Smith's wife, Lucrezia, 'a little woman, with large eyes in sallow pointed face; an Italian girl.' Everyone, but not 53-year-old Peter Walsh's 24-year-old Anglo-Indian lover, Daisy, wife of a major, mother of two in India. She describes Indian women at large as 'silly, pretty, flimsy, nincompoops.'
The stream of consciousness narrative, whose film parallel would ideally comprise one long single shot somehow narrated from the perspective of different characters, makes the reader wonder: Was Daisy merely a tool to explore the complex relationship that Peter and Clarissa shared in their youth? For Peter looks at Daisy as someone who'd boost his ego, '…of course, she would give him everything…everything he wanted!' which Clarissa had bruised. He describes, in his insecurity, the women he loved over the years as 'vulgar, trivial, commonplace' and has thought before that 'Daisy would look ordinary beside Clarissa.' Clarissa's presence in his life is further underlined by the impactful lines at the end of the text: 'It is Clarissa, he said. For there she was.'
The contemporary reader is bound to ask: With Clarissa's overbearing presence, what was Daisy doing in Peter's life? Compensating for the void left behind by Clarissa? When Woolf dug her characters from within, showcasing their perception of each other, why was Daisy left voiceless far away in India? Her mixed race mentioned but not explored.
A century later, enter Michelle Cahill with Daisy & Woolf. An Australian of Anglo-Indian heritage, the author provides a glimpse of Daisy's life along with the difficulties and blockages that come with it by introducing a mixed-race immigrant protagonist, Mina, who is writing Daisy's story. Woolf is evoked in the novel's epigraph with a quote from A Room of One's Own: 'A woman writing thinks back through her mothers.' While the book revolves around motherhood quite a bit, the epigraph works like a double-edged sword: it showcases gratitude for the feminist writers who have paved the way for the telling of Daisy's story while also challenging their silence that has rendered voiceless this character at the margins.
In this metafiction set in 2017, Cahill presents the dilemmas of race and migration through Mina's reimagination, in the novel that she is writing, of Daisy journeying to London to meet Peter Walsh. Mina writes, 'Muslims and refugees were being restricted by Trump's immigration ban; Theresa May was advocating an early Brexit deal, with Scotland calling for talks on a second referendum. All over the world people of colour felt vulnerable while crossing borders.' As the storyteller of Daisy's life, she narrates harrowing experiences of being Anglo-Indians from East Africa and of her brother's mental illness, a result of being bullied at school for being brown skinned. It's as if Mina, and Cahill herself, is attempting to fill an intersectional gap in the canon.
Instead of writing a straight postcolonial response like Jean Rhys does for Bertha Mason in Wide Sargasso Sea, Cahill makes her work partly epistolary. Between Mina's meditation on racism and writing and her travels across India, China, London, and New York to find the nuances of Woolf's life, Daisy tells her story through letters and diary entries. Alongside, Mina writes, 'Mrs Woolf had kept Daisy stunted, and on purpose it seems. Her intent was always to centre Clarissa Dalloway, setting her in flight. Drifting and timeless, she is a hallmark achievement: Clarissa, the stream of Virginia Woolf's consciousness.' Daisy too addresses the absorbing nature of Clarissa's presence, which makes you wonder if she will ever see herself as Clarissa's equal or if she will succumb to class and racial hierarchies. She writes, '…although you [Walsh] hint at… an air of disappointment about Clarissa, it is impossible for me to imagine a woman more absorbing?'
Cahill's Daisy has the decisive power to leave her husband and son behind to board a ship for London with her daughter and Radhika, a servant girl from Bihar. She reflects on her experiences as an Anglo-Indian in India by chronicling her life story and through the course of a journey lasting months from Calcutta to London, she comes face-to-face with the plague, loses her child to death, which changes her romantic obsession into something much stronger, a determination to chart out her life irrespective of Peter Walsh. She engages with the suffragettes, befriends Lucrezia — the other peripheral character in Mrs Dalloway — and makes a living in Italy, which can be interpreted as tragic for the former wife of an officer in the Indian army or as empowering for an immigrant woman in an alien land.
Interestingly, Cahill leaves Daisy's servant girl behind. Radhika disappears, quite literally, from Daisy's life implying that not all stories can be accommodated when the writer chooses to focus on one character. However, this absence is observed and mourned by Daisy, who was held together by her support in the lowest times — a treatment that's better than Woolf's treatment of Daisy.
Throughout the novel, Cahill keeps fictional characters and real-life figures in conversation with each other. Daisy & Woolf is meta not only for its story-within-a-story structure but also for the many references to Woolf's diaries and letters to interpret her psychology at the time. Daisy is also travelling to London at a time when Woolf is writing Mrs Dalloway. Characters from Woolf's story and suffragette figures such as Sylvia Pankhurst are masterfully incorporated into Daisy's narrative. All of it creates a dialogue between the worlds of Mina, Virginia and Daisy while also exploring grief, death, motherhood, alienation, sexuality and mental illness.
The prose of both these novels is distinctive. But while Mrs Dalloway glides, Daisy & Woolf startles by intentionally hitting the brakes on multiple occasions. In the end, this novel, that breathes life into an incidental character, encourages readers to examine the colonial gaze of a celebrated 20th century high Modernist, while also realising that race, identity and migration are as fraught today as they ever were.
Akankshya Abismruta is an independent writer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ed Sheeran's Sapphire in Arijit Singh's voice: Recreated AI version goes viral; is it legal?
Ed Sheeran's Sapphire in Arijit Singh's voice: Recreated AI version goes viral; is it legal?

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Ed Sheeran's Sapphire in Arijit Singh's voice: Recreated AI version goes viral; is it legal?

On June 6, Ed Sheeran released the video for Sapphire, a song he'd been teasing for a while. The three-minute video was shot in a guerrilla style during his visit to India and includes clips of him riding auto rickshaws and meeting fans. What has excited Indian fans is the fact that the video, as well as the song, also features Arijit Singh. The Bollywood singer is seen driving Ed on his scooter around his hometown, Jiaganj, a small town in West Bengal's Murshidabad district. Ed Sheeran called Arijit 'the final jigsaw piece' of the song. He teased that a full Punjabi version with Arijit is also coming soon. Meanwhile, a recreated version of the song was released on YouTube. Apparently done with AI, this version of Sapphire is sung completely by Arijit Singh. The video, uploaded by YouTube user Sing Rajveera on June 7, has gained more than 1 million views so far even though it's not actually a video. An AI-created photo of Arijit Singh and Ed Sheeran floats on the screen while the audio plays. LiveMint has decided not to share/embed the AI version. Here's the original song: Social media users had mixed reactions. 'I just realized how good Ed Sheeran is, they almost sound identical,' posted one user. Another user wrote, 'Both versions are best but I like this one most ...I'm eagerly waiting for this version' 'Arjit the voice of India…' came from a fan while another wrote, 'No one can beat Arijit Singh…' 'This version is very special because it's Arijit Magical voice,' wrote another. Comments dropped even from outside India, 'Arijit Singh's voice. Love from Bangladesh.' Some users were not impressed with the AI use. 'Ai can't create the magic Arijit does,' came from one user. Another user wrote, 'AI just stole our feelings slowly.' 'This is good but the original is masterpiece because AI doesn't create art with feeling and emotions. This is why AI will never beat human art,' wrote one user. The YouTuber may not be aware that, in 2024, Arijit Singh filed a case against the use of AI to mimic his voice. And, he won the case. The Bombay High Court, while calling it 'technological exploitation', gave interim relief to Singh in his copyright case against AI platforms for misusing his voice and image. According to the court, using someone's voice or face without permission breaks their personality rights. It 'also undermines their ability to prevent commercial and deceptive uses of their identity," the court said in its ruling.

Dharmendra claims Amitabh Bachchan was not first choice for 'Sholay', another iconic action-hero was slated to play Jai
Dharmendra claims Amitabh Bachchan was not first choice for 'Sholay', another iconic action-hero was slated to play Jai

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Dharmendra claims Amitabh Bachchan was not first choice for 'Sholay', another iconic action-hero was slated to play Jai

Agencies Dharmendra says Big B was not the first choice for the role of Jai in Sholay One of Indian cinema's most revered classics, Sholay, may have featured a completely different cast if things had gone as initially planned. In a recent interaction with ANI , veteran actor Dharmendra disclosed that the legendary Amitabh Bachchan, who immortalized the role of Jai, was not the first choice for the part. Instead, the role had originally been offered to actor Shatrughan Sinha. Back in a 2023 interview with Aaj Tak, Shatrughan Sinha spoke candidly about turning down not just Sholay but also another iconic film, Deewaar—both of which later went to Bachchan and significantly boosted his stardom. Sinha shared that he had been handed the script for Deewaar and held onto it for nearly six months. Despite the depth and potential of the storyline, unresolved creative differences led him to step away from the project. Likewise, he was approached for Sholay, particularly for the role of Jai, but he faced issues with scheduling and the director's lack of clarity about shoot timelines. At the time, Sinha was managing several film commitments and had no space in his calendar to travel to Bangalore on uncertain terms. Sinha further reflected that he was deliberately avoiding roles that portrayed him as a villain, which also influenced his decision to turn down the film. His packed shooting schedule meant that even close colleagues like Manoj Kumar—whom he considered a brotherly figure—had to face rejections from him for important roles, including one in the film Shor. Looking back, Sinha acknowledged these decisions as part of human fallibility. While he expressed some regret, he also took solace in the fact that his decisions paved the way for Amitabh Bachchan, whom he considered a friend and an exceptional talent. According to him, by stepping away from those roles, he unknowingly contributed to Bachchan's ascent to final push that led to Amitabh Bachchan being cast in Sholay came from Dharmendra himself. Speaking to ANI, the seasoned actor shared that he had personally suggested Bachchan's name to director Ramesh Sippy. Bachchan would often visit Dharmendra on set, and the latter noticed something unique about him—his voice, presence, and inner drive. Convinced of Bachchan's potential, Dharmendra urged Sippy to consider this fresh face for the role of Jai. This recommendation played a vital role in Bachchan's inclusion in what would become a defining film in his in 1975, Sholay was a daring cinematic experiment. Directed by Ramesh Sippy and written by Salim–Javed, the story revolved around two ex-criminals, Jai and Veeru, hired by a retired police officer to take down a menacing bandit, Gabbar Singh. Featuring an ensemble cast that included Hema Malini, Jaya Bhaduri, and Sanjeev Kumar, the film didn't initially enjoy critical acclaim or box-office success. However, through strong word-of-mouth, it eventually broke all previous records, especially with a five-year continuous run at Mumbai's Minerva its rough start, Sholay transformed into a cultural phenomenon, becoming the highest-grossing Indian film at the time and even enjoying success overseas, especially in the Soviet Union. Over the years, it has secured its place as one of the most iconic Indian films ever made, topping British Film Institute's list of the best Indian films in 2002.

Zoya Akhtar reveals how 'Made in Heaven' led to powerful docuseries 'In Transit': 'We got so much love from the LGBTQ+ community'
Zoya Akhtar reveals how 'Made in Heaven' led to powerful docuseries 'In Transit': 'We got so much love from the LGBTQ+ community'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Zoya Akhtar reveals how 'Made in Heaven' led to powerful docuseries 'In Transit': 'We got so much love from the LGBTQ+ community'

Be it a school educator from Tripura or a classical musician from Bengaluru, the four-part documentary series 'In Transit' gives a sneak peek into the lives of nine individuals who live beyond the gender binary and are ready to go through hardships to fulfill their dreams. Each character is at a distinct level in their journey, confronting and challenging societal norms. Produced by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kagti under the banner of Tiger Baby, the four-part docuseries is directed by Ayesha Sood . The project explores the lives of trans and non-binary individuals navigating love, identity, and the boundaries of gender in a uniquely Indian way. In a conversation with ANI, producer Zoya Akhtar and director Ayesha Sood got candid about the series and shared the challenges of making 'In Transit' Zoya shared that the genesis of the series traces back to the positive response to 'Made in Heaven': "The idea came, actually, after when we started doing Made in Heaven, the first season of Made in Heaven, we got a lot of support from the LGBT community and a lot of love from them. And then the next season, we had a character called Meher, which was played by Trinetra Haldar Gummaraju . And that was a trans woman character. While we were writing it, we realised we knew very little. So we did extensive interviews with about six women. And just their candour, the way they were so candid, the way they shared, and we realised how little we knew of these experiences. And they were from all over India. I just felt that this needs to be explored more. Lucky for us, our partners were Amazon Prime. And when I pitched this to them, they just went for it. So then we got Ayesha on who curated, she wanted to cover in this docuseries. And that's how it started." 'In Transit' is an unfiltered insight into the lives of nine people who live beyond the gender binary. The series features real-life stories of courage, vulnerability, and resistance from people around the country, including a young educator living in a reserve forest, a classical musician from Bangalore, and a corporate hotshot in Mumbai. Talking about the research work and bringing all the stories together, director Ayesha shared, "We did very deep research for about a year and a half. And through that time, we went through, like, from history to mythology to politics to understanding all the concerns of what it means to be trans in this country. And through that process, we made a long list and sort of filtered down ideas and thoughts of the story, and then came down to a final nine. So, you know, different stories and different perspectives and but also, you know, make them universal in that we are talking about, you know, identity and love and family. So these are also universal themes. So that's kind of broadly how we came to our characters." About the challenges of bringing them on camera to share their stories, Sood added, "Through the time that we were doing our research with the team, we started to sort of have conversations and build a relationship with these characters. We spoke with them, we did online interviews, we sent people and went and met them like one-on-one, no cameras. So I think the key thing here was to build this over time. And by the time they came to the camera, they knew us. So they were comfortable with us, and they trusted us. I think it was tough for a lot of them. These are not easy stories. They come from a lot of battles and struggles with people close to them and people in their lives. So I don't think it's easy for them at all." Referring to the story of a school educator in Tripura, Ayesha said, "Sid, who comes from Tripura, actually has a very complicated and tough story and runs away from home and had to be rescued with this conversation, this story that happened with his partner because there was another abduction involved. And we actually found Sid through a local sort of help NGO, an NGO in Kolkata. And they had rescued Sid and his partner from this traumatic night and evening. Our research team had somebody who knew of this, of this NGO and through them, we found this story. So it was like, I mean, I think it was like amazing that we were able to make these links with networks across India, like people who worked in the field, worked with trans individuals who could help us find these characters." Transgenders face different challenges including social exclusion, discrimination, unemployment, lack of educational facilities and others. The director talked about their acceptance in society and how, through the series, she hopes to bring a change. "I think people change and societies change when they experience things that move them and you'll see through the series also, there are some people who are accepting and there are some people who are not accepting and some families that do and some families that don't. So, I don't think it's, you look at the society as one block, you know, has society changed or it hasn't changed but things like 'In Transit' are what is going to help people change. You see it in your living room with family, with other people that you know and hopefully that sparks a conversation and a dialogue within that living room, you know, and changes something there." On talking about the challenges of making the project, Zoya shared, "For me, it was not challenging at all. Reema and me wanted a director that would actually not be manipulative, would actually not want to do something that would be,.. shocking or trying to attract attention in a way that we didn't want and Ayesha was the first name that came to both of us because there's a certain empathy, there's a certain understanding, there's a certain compassion, there's a certain analytical brain, there's a certain she just ticked all the boxes. Then Ayesha came on, honestly, we, for us, it was jam. We really didn't have any struggle." Ayesha agreed and said, "Filmmaking is chaotic and complicated and has many moving parts, but this wasn't a struggle for any of us. The struggle was for our characters, you know, them coming out, telling us their stories. They had to be involved in our process from beginning to end, you know, like give up parts of their life to us, whether it's photographs or introduce us to their worlds. So I think the struggles lay with them, you know, like for us, it wasn't a struggle."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store